Peripheral and Central Blood Pressure Responses of Combination Aliskiren/Hydrochlorothiazide and Amlodipine Monotherapy in African American Patients With Stage 2 Hypertension: The ATLAAST Trial
Article first published online: 18 JAN 2011
© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
The Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Volume 13, Issue 5, pages 366–375, May 2011
How to Cite
Ferdinand, K. C., Pool, J., Weitzman, R., Purkayastha, D. and Townsend, R. (2011), Peripheral and Central Blood Pressure Responses of Combination Aliskiren/Hydrochlorothiazide and Amlodipine Monotherapy in African American Patients With Stage 2 Hypertension: The ATLAAST Trial. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension, 13: 366–375. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2010.00416.x
- Issue published online: 4 MAY 2011
- Article first published online: 18 JAN 2011
- Manuscript received: June 17, 2010; Revised: November 10, 2010; Accepted: November 16, 2010
Efficacy of antihypertensive agents on central blood pressure (BP) in African Americans is not well studied. The authors report on an 8-week double-blind, randomized study of African American patients with stage 2 hypertension that compared brachial and central BP responses (substudy of 53 patients) to combination aliskiren/hydrochlorthiazide (HCTZ) and amlodipine monotherapy. Following a 1- to 4-week washout, initial therapy was aliskiren/HCTZ 150/12.5 mg (n=166) or amlodipine 5 mg (n=166) for 1 week, forced-titrated to aliskiren/HCTZ 300/25 mg or amlodipine 10 mg for 7 weeks. Mean seated systolic BP reductions from baseline was similar with both treatments (−28.6 mm Hg with aliskiren/HCTZ vs −28.2 mm Hg with amlodipine). In the substudy, significantly greater reductions in central systolic BP was observed with aliskiren/HCTZ vs amlodipine (−30.1 mm Hg vs −21.2; P=.031), although 24-hour mean ambulatory BP reductions between the two groups were similar. Central pressure is considered an important risk factor in African Americans, and these findings may suggest a new treatment option for these patients. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011;13:366–375. ©2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.