Single-Pill vs Free-Equivalent Combination Therapies for Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of Health Care Costs and Adherence

Authors


Beth Sherrill, MS, 3040 Cornwallis Road, PO Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194
E-mail: bsherrill@rti.org

Abstract

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011;13:898–909. ©2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

This meta-analysis compares health care resource use costs, adherence, and persistence between groups of patients taking antihypertensives as single-pill combinations (SPCs) vs free-equivalent components (FEC) based on a structured review of published studies. The search yielded 12 retrospective database studies included in analyses. The mean difference in combined total annual all-cause and hypertension-related health care costs was $1357 (95% confidence interval [CI], $778–$1935) lower in favor of SPC than FEC groups. Adherence, measured as the mean difference in medication possession ratio, was estimated to be 8% higher for patients naive to prior antihypertensives and 14% higher for nonnaive SPC patients compared with corresponding FEC patients. Persistence in the SPC groups was twice as likely as the FEC groups (pooled risk ratio, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1–4.1). Improved adherence and persistence may have contributed to the lower costs in the SPC groups via improved clinical outcomes.

Ancillary