Notice: Wiley Online Library will be unavailable on Saturday 30th July 2016 from 08:00-11:00 BST / 03:00-06:00 EST / 15:00-18:00 SGT for essential maintenance. Apologies for the inconvenience.
The substrate specificity of the two polymerases (PhaC1 and PhaC2) involved in the biosynthesis of medium-chain-length poly-hydroxyalkanoates (mcl PHAs) in Pseudomonas putida U has been studied in vivo. For these kind of experiments, two recombinant strains derived from a genetically engineered mutant in which the whole pha locus had been deleted (P. putida U Δpha) were employed. These bacteria, which expresses only phaC1 (P. putida U Δpha pMC-phaC1) or only phaC2 (P. putida U Δpha pMC-phaC2), accumulated different PHAs in function of the precursor supplemented to the culture broth. Thus, the P. putida U Δpha pMC-phaC1 strain was able to synthesize several aliphatic and aromatic PHAs when hexanoic, heptanoic, octanoic decanoic, 5-phenylvaleric, 6-phenylhexanoic, 7-phenylheptanoic, 8-phenyloctanoic or 9-phenylnonanoic acid were used as precursors; the highest accumulation of polymers was observed when the precursor used were decanoic acid (aliphatic PHAs) or 6-phenylhexanoic acid (aromatic PHAs). However, although it synthesizes similar aliphatic PHAs (the highest accumulation was observed when hexanoic acid was the precursor) the other recombinant strain (P. putida U Δpha pMC-phaC2) only accumulated aromatic PHAs when the monomer to be polymerized was 3-hydroxy-5-phenylvaleryl-CoA. The possible influence of the putative three-dimensional structures on the different catalytic behaviour of PhaC1 and PhaC2 is discussed.
If you can't find a tool you're looking for, please click the link at the top of the page to "Go to old article view". Alternatively, view our Knowledge Base articles for additional help. Your feedback is important to us, so please let us know if you have comments or ideas for improvement.
Analysis of the substrate specificity of PhaC1 and PhaC2 from P. putida U were performed in a mutant in which the whole pha cluster had been deleted (P. putida U ΔphaC1ZC2DFI, henceforth abbreviated as PpΔpha). The pha locus was deleted by using the methodology described by other authors, which involves a double-recombination event and selection of the required mutant by expression of the lethal sacB gene (Donnenberg and Kaper, 1991; Quandt and Hynes, 1993; Sandoval et al., 2007). To confirm the position and extent of the deletion, the mutants were analysed by PCR using a Perkin Elmer DNA Thermal Cycler 2400 and the conditions described elsewhere (Miñambres et al., 2000). When required, degenerated oligonucleotides were designed in order to introduce restriction sites (usually BamHI and XbaI) that would facilitate the cloning of the PCR-amplified fragment into pBBR1MCS-3 (see below).
To address the study of the polymerases, the phaC1 or phaC2 genes were PCR-amplified, cloned into the plasmid pBBR1MCS-3 (Tcr), a broad-host-range cloning and expression vector (Kovach et al., 1995; Sandoval et al., 2007), and used to analyse the expression of these genes in the deletion mutant PpΔpha (see above). Henceforth, these two recombinant strains (P. putida U Δpha pBBR1MCS-3-phaC1 and P. putida U Δpha pBBR1MCS-3-phaC2) will be referred to as PpΔpha pMC-phaC1 and PpΔpha pMC-phaC2 respectively.
Pseudomonas putida U PpΔpha, and the recombinant strains PpΔpha pMC-phaC1 and PpΔpha pMC-phaC2 were maintained on Trypticase Soy Agar (Difco) and growth slants (12 h at 30°C) were used to inoculate liquid media. Erlenmeyer flasks (500 ml) containing 100 ml of a chemically defined medium (MM, Martínez-Blanco et al., 1990) were inoculated with 2 ml each of a bacterial suspension (A540 = 0.5). Incubations were carried out in a rotary shaker (250 r.p.m.) at 30°C for the time required in each set of experiments. The carbon source used to culture all these strains was 4-hydroxy-phenylacetic acid (4-OH-PhAc) (10 mM), a compound that is efficiently assimilated by P. putida U but that cannot be used as PHA precursor (García et al., 1999). For study of the synthesis of plastic polymers, bacteria were cultured in MM + 4-OH-PhAc (10 mM) + different n-alkanoic (As) or n-phenylalkanoic acids (PhAs) (10 mM). In cases in which two PHA precursors were added to the same culture, the concentration of each was 5 mM. When required different antibiotics (Rf, Tc, or both) were supplied to the cultures. In all experiments in which solid media were employed, 25 g l−1 Difco agar was added. The nature of the PHA accumulated by the different strains was established as reported elsewhere (Lageveen et al., 1988; García et al., 1999). The contents and composition of the different PHA accumulated were determined by gas chromatography and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance as previously reported (García et al., 1999; Olivera et al., 2001b).
To analyse the PHAs accumulated by PpΔpha, PpΔpha pMC-phaC1 and PpΔpha pMC-phaC2, in an initial approach these strains were cultured on plates of solid MM containing 4-OH-PhAc and different aliphatic (acetic, propionic, butyric, valeric, hexanoic, heptanoic, octanoic, nonanoic and decanoic acids) or aromatic (phenylacetic, phenylpropionic, phenylbutyric, phenylvaleric, phenylhexanoic, phenylnonanoic or phenyldecanoic acids) PHA precursors as carbon sources (García et al., 1999). We observed that whereas PpΔpha was unable to accumulate PHA in any media tested, PpΔpha pMC-phaC1 and PpΔpha pMC-phaC2 synthesize them in some media. We also found that the accumulation of PHAs in these two strains differs as a function of the precursor supplied to the media. Thus, when cultured in liquid MM supplemented with alkanoic acids, PpΔpha pMC-phaC1 accumulated PHAs in all the media that contained precursors with a carbon chains longer than five carbon atoms (from hexanoic to decanoic being acid) and the highest quantity of polymer accumulated when decanoic acid was added. In this case, the PHA content (evaluated as percentage of bacterial dry weight, w/w) was 30% (w/w), and the polymer synthesized contains a 65% of 3-OH-decanoic acid and 35% of 3-OH-octanoic acid. When nonanoic, octanoic, heptanoic or hexanoic acids were used as PHA precursors, the amount of PHA accumulated (w/w) decreased as the carbon length of the alkanoic acids (As) decreased (23%, 20%, 15% and 9% respectively), their relative composition being 60% of 3-OH-nonanoic acid and 40% of 3-OH-heptanoic acid; 97% of 3-OH-octanoic acid and 3% of 3-OH hexanoic acid; 100% of heptanoic acid and 100% of hexanoic acid respectively. These results suggest that PhaC1 does not polymerize 3-HA-CoA (3-OH-acyl-CoA) derivatives whose acyl chain contains fewer than six carbon atoms and that this enzyme recognizes 3-OH-n-acyl-CoA derivatives (3-OH-n-alkanoyl-CoA) containing eight or more carbon atoms in the acyl chain faster.
When the same experiments were performed with PpΔpha pMC-phaC2, we observed that unlike what was found for PhaC1, the quantity of PHA synthesized (w/w) decreased (19%, 17%, 11%, 8% and 6%) when the carbon length of the As used as precursor increased (hexanoic, heptanoic, octanoic, nonanoic and decanoic acid), being maximal with hexanoic acid and heptanoic acid (19% and 17% respectively). The relative composition of the polymers accumulated were as follows: with hexanoic acid (100% of 3-OH-hexanoic acid); with heptanoic acid (100% of heptanoic acid); with octanoic acid (75% of 3-OH-hexanoic acid and 25% of 3-OH-octanoic acid); with nonanoic acid (80% of 3-OH-heptanoic acid and 20% of 3-OH-nonanoic acid); and with decanoic acid (54% of 3-OH-hexanoic acid, 37% of 3-OH-octanoic acid and 9% of 3-OH-decanoic acid).
These data revealed that although both enzymes are able to polymerize monomers with an acyl carbon length of more than five carbon atoms, PhaC2 preferentially uses 3-OH-hexanoyl-CoA, whereas the best substrate of PhaC1 is 3-OH-decanoyl-CoA.
When aromatic precursors were used, the differences in substrate specificity between PhaC1 and PhaC2 became much more evident. Thus, when PpΔpha pMC-phaC1 and PpΔpha pMC-phaC2 were cultured in MM + 4-OH-PhAc + different PhAs (from phenylacetic to 10-phenyldecanoic acids) it was observed that both strains failed to accumulate PHA unless the carbon length of the supplemented PhA was higher than that of 4-phenylbutyric acid (see Fig. 1).
Moreover, PpΔpha pMC-phaC1 accumulates different PHA when cultured in media containing 5-phenylvaleric acid (PhV) (100% of 3-OH-phenylvaleric acid); 6-phenylhexanoic acid (PhH) (100% of 3-OH-phenylhexanoic acid); 7-phenylheptanoic acid (Phh) (80% of 3-OH-phenylvaleric acid and 20% of 3-OH-phenylheptanoic acid); 8-phenyloctanoic acid (PhO) (65% of 3-OH-phenylhexanoic acid and 35% of 3-OH-phenyloctanoic acid); 9-phenylnonanoic acid (PhN) (60% of 3-OH-phenylhexanoic acid, 35% of 3-OH-phenylheptanoic acid and 5% of 3-OH-phenylnonanoic acid); and 10-phenyldecanoic acid (PhD) (50% of 3-OH-phenylhexanoic acid, 33% of 3-OH-phenyloctanoic acid and 17% of 3-OH-phenyldecanoic acid).
Conversely, PpΔpha pMC-phaC2 only accumulated PHAs when cultured in media supplemented with PhAs containing an odd number of carbon atoms (5-phenylvaleric acid, 7-phenylheptanoic acid and 9-phenylnonanoic acid), and was unable to synthesize PHAs when cultured in media supplemented with 6-phenylhexanoic, 8-phenyloctanoic acid or 10-phenyldecanoic acids (see Figs 1 and 2). Furthermore, analysis of the PHA accumulated revealed that in all three cases the only polymer accumulated was poly-3-OH-phenylvalerate, suggesting that 3-OH-phenylvaleryl-CoA is the only monomer that can be polymerized by PhaC2.
Although PhaC2 does not polymerize 3-OH-phenylalkanoyl-CoAs other than 3-OH-5-phenylvaleryl-CoA (3-OH-PhV-CoA), it could be argued that in the presence of a mixture of PhV and other PhA, and once the polymerization process has started, this enzyme might be able to incorporate monomers other than 3-OH-PhV to the nascent polymer chains, thus synthesizing copolymers. To test this hypothesis PpΔpha pMC-phaC2 was cultured in MM supplemented with 4-OH-PhAc (10 mM), PhV (5 mM) and 6-phenylhexanoic acid (PhH, 5 mM). Analysis of the polymer accumulated revealed that it was a pure homopolymer of poly-3-OH-phenylvalerate, indicating that PhaC2 is unable to polymerize 3-OH-phenylalkanoates other than 3-OH-PhV-CoA. Notwithstanding, when PpΔpha pMC-phaC1 was cultured under the same conditions the PHA accumulated was a copolymer comprising 65% 3-OH-PhV and 35% 3-OH-PhH.
Ultrastructural studies: structure predictions for phaC1 and phaC2
Secondary structure predictions for PhaC1 and PhaC2 were carried out using the PROFsec program on the PredictProtein server (http://www.predictprotein.org) (Rost et al., 2004). Structure assignments were performed on those residues with a predicted accuracy higher than 82% (see Fig. S1).
PhaC1 and PhaC2 do not display a strong sequence similarity with any of the proteins of known structure contained in the PDB database (http://www.rcsb.org). However, the PHYRE server is able to find remote homologues with a similar predicted global fold. Using these utilities, we found that the residues 190–480 of both polymerases share fold similarity with several hydrolases, such as human and dog gastric lipases and the carboxylesterase from Bacillus stearothermophilus (SCOP encodes d1k8qa, d1hlga and d1tqha) (Murzin et al., 1995). That part of the protein might be modelled within a core domain of the α/β-hydrolase type covered by a ‘lid’ (residues c. 330–425) (Fig. 3A), which suggests an interfacial activation mechanism that has already been described for several lipases (Desnuelle et al., 1960). However, although the presence of the ‘lid’ was predicted in all cases, its detailed structure was found to be strongly dependent on the template used. Accordingly, we focused our analysis only on the α/β-hydrolase core.
The most revealing feature in this model is the presence in both polymerases of a putative catalytic triad at the active site (Fig. 3B and C). At one corner of the α/β-hydrolase core, facing the ‘lid’ and close to the hinge between both domains, amino acids Cys296-His479-Asp451 (PhaC1) or Cys296-His480-Asp452 (PhaC2) are in close proximity and are suggestive of the arrangement reported for many hydrolases (see Holmquist, 2000, for a review). Thus, Cys296 could act as a nucleophile, attacking the activated carboxyl group of the 3-OH-acyl-CoA, thereby displacing the coenzyme A and creating an intermediate acyl-enzyme that would subsequently react with the free hydroxyl group of another 3-hydroxyalkanoyl-CoA molecule. As shown in Fig. 3D, Cys296 lies at the bottom of an elongated crevice that could accommodate the growing polymer.
α/β-Hydrolases usually contain a serine residue as the nucleophile of the catalytic triad (Holmquist, 2000). Additionally, Cys296, Ser325 (PhaC1) and Ser326 (PhaC2) are located close to the catalytic histidine-479 residue (Fig. 3B). However, the psi-blast alignment used by the PHYRE server to create the models reveal that while Cys296 is absolutely conserved in all PHA synthetases (supporting its importance), the 325/326 serine is frequently substituted by non-reactive amino acids such as alanine. Further site-directed mutagenesis experiments will be crucial to assess the exact role of these residues in the catalytic mechanism of these polymerases.
Despite exhaustive analysis, we did not find significant differences between the models for the PhaC1 and PhaC2 polymerases (at least in the active site or in the rest of α/β-hydrolase core) able to account for their differences in substrate specificity. Non-conservative sequence changes were distributed more or less evenly throughout the whole structure (data not shown). Perhaps the accumulation of subtle, sparse conservative changes might be of importance for ‘lid’ movement or substrate accommodation. However, it should be noted that our models only spanned residues 190–480, while the remaining 260 additional residues must certainly have some important, as yet unknown, function. In order to check the whole protein sequence, in a secondary structure prediction for both proteins (see Fig. S1) we observed some differences around amino acids 115–123 (coil prediction for PhaC1, helix prediction for PhaC2) and 316–324 (beta prediction for PhaC1, coil prediction for PhaC2), the latter residues located near the ‘lid’.
In sum, the above data allow us to conclude that the PHA polymerases (PhaC1 and PhaC2) from P. putida U show quite different substrate specificity. Thus, whereas PhaC1 is able to polymerize several aliphatic and aromatic monomers (the best substrate being 3-OH-decanoyl-CoA), PhaC2 only polymerizes an aromatic compound (3-OH-5-phenylvaleryl-CoA) and certain aliphatic ones, the best substrate being 3-OH-hexanoyl-CoA. These differences may contribute to expanding the number and characteristic of the PHAs accumulated by genetically manipulated strains (i.e. PpΔfadBA– a β-oxidation mutant – or PpΔpha pMCphaF) when transformed with plasmids containing the genes encoding PhaC1 or PhaC2.
Our ultrastructural studies revealed that although there were not significant differences between PhaC1 and PhaC2 polymerases, some changes were distributed throughout the whole structure. Thus, it could be speculated that the variations found in amino acids located near the ‘lid’ (see above) might be responsible of their different substrate specificity. However, more experimental work would be required to confirm whether such changes are indeed true determinants of specificity.
This work was supported by Grants from the Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología (CICYT), Madrid, España (Grants BIO2003-05309-C04-01, BIO2003-05309-C04-04 and BFU2006-15214-C03-03/BMC), Excma. Diputación Provincial de León (2005) and Junta de Castilla y León (LE40A06, 2006). S.A. and M.A. are recipients of fellowships from the Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología.
All experiments reported in this paper comply with current Spanish legislation.