Funding Information Funding of this study was provided by the Ministry of Science and Technology (Grant Nos: 2011AA10A204 and 2009CB118904) and the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos: 30930018 and 31021003).
Recognition of a core fragment ofBeauveria bassiana hydrophobin gene promoter (Phyd1) and its special use in improving fungal biocontrol potential
Version of Record online: 28 MAY 2012
© 2012 The Authors. Microbial Biotechnology published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd and Society for Applied Microbiology
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Volume 6, Issue 1, pages 27–35, January 2013
How to Cite
Wang, Z.-L., Ying, S.-H. and Feng, M.-G. (2013), Recognition of a core fragment ofBeauveria bassiana hydrophobin gene promoter (Phyd1) and its special use in improving fungal biocontrol potential. Microbial Biotechnology, 6: 27–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2012.00351.x
- Issue online: 18 DEC 2012
- Version of Record online: 28 MAY 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 20 APR 2012
- Manuscript Revised: 13 APR 2012
- Manuscript Received: 20 MAR 2012
- Ministry of Science and Technology. Grant Numbers: 2011AA10A204, 2009CB118904
- Natural Science Foundation of China. Grant Numbers: 30930018, 31021003
Total views by type:
Publication date: 28 May 2012. Cumulative views from 28 May 2012 - 1 Apr 2016.
- Total views: 1447
- Total PDF views: 542
- Total HTML views: 905
- * Although we update our data on a daily basis (not in real time), there may be a 48-hour delay before the most recent numbers are available.
About this data
Usage data should be viewed in relation to:
- the publication date (older articles will generally have higher usage).
- the relevance of the article to a broad community (some articles will be extremely important but to smaller sections of the research community), and
- the availability and usage of the article through other sources
Article usage data is not a precise measure of an individual article's importance and should only be considered alongside other measures of visibility/importance.