Current Controversies in the Study of Personality across Cultures
Article first published online: 24 JUL 2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00132.x
© 2008 The Author. Journal Compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Additional Information
How to Cite
Church, A. T. (2008), Current Controversies in the Study of Personality across Cultures. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2: 1930–1951. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00132.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 20 SEP 2008
- Article first published online: 24 JUL 2008
- Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2/5 (2008): 1930–1951, 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00132.x
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
Research on culture and personality is thriving. In this article, I address several prominent controversies, including: (a) alternative perspectives on the relationship between culture and personality; (b) the cross-cultural universality versus specificity of personality structure; (c) whether comparisons of mean inventory profiles reveal valid cultural differences in trait levels; and (d) the importance and role of the trait concept across cultures. Greater consensus regarding the relationship between culture and personality will likely be achieved if researchers clarify which aspects of personality they are addressing (e.g., basic tendencies vs. characteristic adaptations). Recent lexical and indigenous studies have weakened consensus regarding the universality and comprehensiveness of the Five-Factor Model. The validity of cultural mean profiles remains unresolved. Research on the importance of traits across cultures provides support for both trait and cultural psychology perspectives, although more culture-comparative studies of consistency and predictive validity are needed. Suggestions for research are offered.

1751-9004/asset/olbannerleft.jpg?v=1&s=15f71b05e9b0dee1b831f0f416216fc04d1cae6a)
1751-9004/asset/olbannerright.jpg?v=1&s=0a787d954ae5beaa077753a089ee866592a81436)
