SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abrams, D., Frings, D., & Randsley de Moura, G. (2005). Group identity and self-definition. In S. A.Wheelan (Ed.), Handbook of Group Research and Practice (pp. 329350). London, UK: Sage Publications.
  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequality in social exchange. In L.Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267299). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Alicke, M. D., & Govorun, O. (2005). The better-than-average effect. In M. D.Alicke, D. A.Dunning, & J. I.Krueger (Eds.), The Self in Social Judgment (pp. 85106). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
  • Andersen, S. M., Chen, S., & Miranda, R. (2002). Significant others and the self. Self and Identity, 1, 159168.
  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497529.
  • Beaman, A. L., Klentz, B., Diener, E., & Svanum, S. (1979). Self-awareness and transgression in children: Two field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 18351846.
  • Bies, R. J. (2001). Interaction (in)justice: The sacred and the profane. In J.Greenberg & R.Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in Organizational Justice (pp. 89118). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threats. In N.Ellemers, R.Spears, & B.Doosje (Eds.), Social Identity: Context, commitment, Content (pp. 3558). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Brebels, L., De Cremer, D., & Sedikides, C. (forthcoming). Retaliation as a response to procedural unfairness: A self-regulatory approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
  • Brockner, J., Heuer, L. B., Siegel, P. A., Wiesenfeld, B., Martin, C., Grover, S., et al. (1998). The moderating effect of self-esteem in reaction to voice: Converging evidence from five studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 394407.
  • Campbell, J. D., Trapnell, P. D., Heine, S. J., Katz, I. M., Lavallee, L. F., & Lehman, D. R. (1996). Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 141156.
  • Carmichael, C. L., Tsai, F.-F., Smith, S. M., Caprariello, P. A., & Reis, H. T. (2007). The self and intimate relationships. In C.Sedikides & S. J.Spencer (Eds.), The Self: Frontiers in Social Psychology (pp. 285310). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Chen, S., Boucher, H. C., & Tapias, M. P. (2006). The relational self revealed: Integrative conceptualization and implications for interpersonal life. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 151179.
  • Clayton, S., & Opotow, S. (2003). Justice and identity: Changing perspectives on what is fair. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 298310.
  • Cropanzano, R., Rupp, D. E., Mohler, C. J., & Schminke, M. (2001). Three roads to organizational justice. In J.Ferris (Ed.), Review of Personnel and Human Resources Management (Vol. 20, pp. 1113). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • De Cremer, D. (2003). Why inconsistent leadership is regarded as procedurally unfair: The importance of social self-esteem concerns. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 535550.
  • De Cremer, D. (2006). Unfair treatment and revenge taking: The roles of collective identification and feelings of disappointment. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 10, 220232.
  • De Cremer, D., & Blader, S. (2006). Why do people care about procedural fairness?: The importance of belongingness in responding and attending to procedures. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 211228.
  • De Cremer, D., & Sedikides, C. (2005). Self-uncertainty and responsiveness to procedural justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 157173.
  • De Cremer, D., & Sedikides, C. (2008). Reputational implications of procedural fairness for personal and relational self-esteem. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30, 6675.
  • De Cremer, D., & Tyler, T. R. (2005a). Managing group behavior: The interplay between procedural justice, sense of self, and cooperation. In M.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 151218). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • De Cremer, D., & Tyler, T. R. (2005b). Am I respected or not?: Inclusion and reputation as issues in group membership. Social Justice Research, 18, 121152.
  • Deutsch, M. (1979). Education and distributive justice: Some reflections on grading systems. American Psychologist, 34, 391401.
  • Diekmann, K. A., Sondak, H., & Barsness, Z. I. (2007). Does fairness matter more to some than to others? The moderating role of workplace status on the relationship between procedural fairness perceptions and job satisfaction. Social Justice Research, 20, 161180.
  • Emler, N., & Hopkins, N. (1990). Reputation, social identity, and the self. In D.Abrams & M. A.Hogg (Eds.), Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
  • Ferris, G. R., Blass, F. R., Douglas, C., Kolodinsky, R. W., & Treadway, D. C. (2003). Personal reputation in organizations. In J.Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational Behavior (pp. 211246). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2008). Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Folger, R. (1997). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of ‘voice’ and improvement of experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108119.
  • Forgas, J. P., Williams, K. D., & Wheeler, L. (Eds.). (2001). The Social Mind: Cognitive and Motivational Aspects of Interpersonal Behavior. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Frei, J. R., & Shaver, P. R. (2002). Respect in close relationships: Prototype definition, self-report assessment, and initial correlates. Personal Relationships, 9, 121139.
  • Gaertner, L., Iuzzini, J., Witt, M. G., & Orina, M. M. (2006). Us without them: Evidence for an intragroup origin of positive in-group regard. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 426439.
  • Gonsalkorale, K., & Williams, K. D. (2007). The KKK won't let me play: Ostracism even by a despised outgroup hurts. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 11761186.
  • Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16, 399432.
  • Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 367388.
  • Ham, J., & Van Den Bos, K. (2008). Not fair for me!: The influence of personal relevance on social justice inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 699705.
  • Hart, C. M., Sedikides, C., & De Cremer, D. (2007). Procedural Fairness as a Buffer against Undesirable Information. Talk given at the 54th Meeting of the British Psychological Association: Social Psychology Section. Canterbury, England, UK.
  • Hill, T. E. Jr. (2000). Respect, Pluralism, and Justice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Hoelter, J. W. (1984). Relative effects of significant others on self-evaluation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 255262.
  • Hogg, M. A. (2001). Social identity and the sovereignty of the group: A psychology of belonging. In C.Sedikides & M. F.Brewer (Eds.), Individual Self, Relational Self, Collective Self (pp. 125146). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
  • Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social Identifications. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Koper, G., Van Knippenberg, D., Bouhuijs, F., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. (1993). Procedural fairness and self-esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 313325.
  • Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger, D. M., & Sapienza, H. J. (1995). Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 6084.
  • Leary, M. R. (2006). Sociometer theory and the pursuit of relational value: Getting to the root of self-esteem. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 75111.
  • Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In K. J.Gergen, M. S.Greenberg, & R. H.Willis (Eds.), Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research (pp. 2755). New York, NY: Plenum.
  • Libby, L. K., & Eibach, R. P. (2007). How the self affects and reflects the content and subjective experience of autobiographical memory. In C.Sedikides & S. J.Spencer (Eds.), The Self: Frontiers in Social Psychology (pp. 7591). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Fairness. New York, NY: Plenum.
  • Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one's social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302318.
  • McGregor, I. (2003). Defensive zeal: Compensatory conviction about attitudes, values, goals, groups, and self-definitions in the face of personal uncertainty. In S. J.Spencer, S.Fein, M. P.Zanna, & J. M.Olson (Eds.), Motivated Social Perception: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 9, pp. 7392). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Miller, D. T. (2001). Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 527553.
  • Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845855.
  • Neuman, J. H., & Baron, R. H. (2005). Aggression in the workplace. A social-psychological perspective. In S.Fox & P.Spector (Eds.), Counterproductive Work Behavior: Investigations of Actors and Targets (pp. 1340). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Reis, H. T., & Burns, L. B. (1982). The salience of the self in responses to inequity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 464475.
  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Schmitt, M., & Dörfel, M. (1999). Procedural injustice at work, justice sensitivity, job satisfaction and psychosomatic well-being. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 443453.
  • Sedikides, C., & Brewer, M. B. (2001). Individual Self, Relational Self, Collective Self. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
  • Sedikides, C., & Gaertner, L. (2001). A homecoming to the individual self: Emotional and motivational primacy. In C.Sedikides & M. F.Brewer (Eds.), Individual Self, Relational Self, Collective Self (pp. 723). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
  • Sedikides, C., & Gregg, A. P. (2003). Portraits of the self. In M. A.Hogg & J.Cooper (Eds.), Sage Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 110138). London, UK: Sage Publications.
  • Sedikides, C., & Gregg, A. P. (2008). Self-enhancement: Food for thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 102116.
    Direct Link:
  • Sedikides, C., De Cremer, D., Hart, C. M., & Brebels, L. (forthcoming). Procedural fairness responses in the context of self-uncertainty. In R. M.Arkin, K. C.Oleson, & P. J.Carroll (Eds.), The Uncertain Self: A Handbook of Perspectives from Social and Personality Psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Sedikides, C., Gregg, A. P., & Hart, C. M. (2007a). The importance of being modest. In C.Sedikides & S.Spencer (Eds.), The Self: Frontiers in Social Psychology (pp. 163184). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Sedikides, C., Hart, C. M., & De Cremer, D. (2007b). Procedural Fairness as Self-affirmation. University of Southampton: Unpublished manuscript.
  • Sherman, D. K., & Cohen, G. L. (2006). The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory. In M. P.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 183242). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Shroth, H. A., & Shah, P. P. (2000). Procedures: Do we really want to know them?: An examination of the effects of procedural justice on self-esteem. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 462471.
  • Simon, B., & Stuermer, S. (2005). In search of the active ingredient of respect: A closer look at the role of acceptance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 809818.
  • Skitka, L. J. (2003). Of different minds: An accessible identity model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 286297.
  • Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L.Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261302). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Tabibnia, G., Satpute, A. B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2008). The sunny side of fairness: Preferences for fairness activates reward circuitry (and disregarding unfairness activates self-control circuitry). Psychological Science, 19, 339347.
    Direct Link:
  • Thau, S., Aquino, K., & Poortvliet, P. M. (2007). Self-defeating behaviors in organizations: The relationship between thwarted belonging and interpersonal work behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 840847.
  • The New Oxford Dictionary of English (1998). J.Pearsall (Ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2001). The primacy of the interpersonal self. In C.Sedikides & M. F.Brewer (Eds.), Individual Self, Relational Self, Collective Self (pp. 7188). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
  • Tyler, T. R. (1984). The role of perceived injustice in defendants’ evaluations of their courtroom experience. Law & Society Review, 18, 5174.
  • Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 830838.
  • Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2000). Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
  • Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2002). Autonomous vs. comparative status: Must we be better than others to feel good about ourselves? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 813838.
  • Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349361.
  • Tyler, T. R., & Caine, A. (1981). The role of distributional and procedural fairness in the endorsement of formal leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 642655.
  • Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the Law. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115191). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Vallacher, R. R., & Solodky, M. (1979). Objective self-awareness, standards of evaluation, and moral behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 254262.
  • Van den Bos, K. (1999). What are we talking about when we talk about no-voice procedures? On the psychology of the fair outcome effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 560577.
  • Van den Bos, K. (2001). Reactions to perceived fairness: The influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 931941.
  • Van den Bos, K. (2007). Hot cognition and social justice judgments. In D.De Cremer (Ed.), Advances in the Psychology of Justice and Affect (pp. 5982). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publising.
  • Van den Bos, K., Ham, J., Lind, E. A., Simonis, M., Van Essen, W. J., & Rijpkema, M. (2008). Justice and the human alarm system: The impact of exclamation points and flashing lights on the justice judgment process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 201219.
  • Van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2002). Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. In M. P.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 160). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Van den Bos, K., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1997). Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 95104.
  • Van Prooijen, J.-W., Van den Bos, K., & Wilke, H. A. M. (2002). Procedural justice and status: Status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 13531361.
  • Van Prooijen, J.-W., Van den Bos, K., & Wilke, H. A. M. (2005). Procedural justice and intragroup status: Knowing where we stand in a group enhances reactions to procedures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 664676.
  • Vermunt, R., Van Knippenberg, D., Van Knippenberg, B., & Blaauw, E. (2001). Self-esteem and outcome fairness: Differential importance of procedural and outcome considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 621628.
  • Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and Research. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Wiesenfeld, B. M., Swann, W. B. Jr., Brockner, J., & Bartel, C. (2007). Is more fairness always preferred? Self-esteem moderates reactions to procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 12351253.
  • Williams, K. D., Forgas, J. P., & Von Hippel, W. (Eds.) (2005). The Social Outcast: Ostracism, Social Exclusion, Rejection, and Bullying. New York, NY: Psychology Press.