You have free access to this content

Resistance to Group Criticism and Recommendations for Change: Lessons from the Intergroup Sensitivity Effect

  1. Matthew J. Hornsey†,
  2. Sarah Esposo

Article first published online: 12 MAY 2009

DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00178.x

Issue

Social and Personality Psychology Compass

Social and Personality Psychology Compass

Volume 3, Issue 3, pages 275–291, May 2009

Additional Information

How to Cite

Hornsey, M. J. and Esposo, S. (2009), Resistance to Group Criticism and Recommendations for Change: Lessons from the Intergroup Sensitivity Effect. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3: 275–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00178.x

Author Information

  1. University of Queensland

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 27 MAY 2009
  2. Article first published online: 12 MAY 2009
  3. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 3/3 (2009): 275–291, 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00178.x

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (466K)

References

  • Abrams, D., Marques, J. M., Bown, N., & Henson, M. (2000). Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 906–912.
  • Abrams, D., Hogg, M. A., & Marques, J. (Eds.) (2005). The Social Psychology of Inclusion and Exclusion. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Amiot, C. E., & Hornsey, M. J. (forthcoming). Collective self-esteem contingency and its role in predicting intergroup bias. Self and Identity. Paper accepted October 2008.
  • Ariyanto, A., Hornsey, M. J., & Gallois, C. (2006). Group-directed criticism in Indonesia: Role of message source and audience. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 96–102.
    Direct Link:
  • Ariyanto, A., Hornsey, M. J., & Gallois, C. (forthcoming). United we stand: Intergroup conflict moderates the intergroup sensitivity effect. European Journal of Social Psychology. Paper accepted February 2009.
  • Baron, R. A. (1988). Negative effects of destructive criticism: Impact on conflict, self-efficacy, and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 199–207.
  • Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370.
  • Bourhis, R., Giles, H., Leyens, J. P., & Tajfel, H. (1979). Psycholinguistic distinctiveness: Language divergence in Belgium. In H.Giles & R. St.Claire (Eds.), Language and Social Psychology (pp. 158–185). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Brander, T., & Hornsey, M. J. (2006). Intergroup sensitivity effect and the war in Iraq: A case of attitudes and intentions diverging. Australian Journal of Psychology, 58, 166–172.
    Direct Link:
  • Branscombe, N., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N.Ellemers, R.Spears, & B.Doosje (Eds.), Social Identity: Context, Commitment, Content (pp. 35–58). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Branscombe, N., Wann, D., Noel, J., & Coleman, J. (1993). In-group or out-group extremity: Importance of the threatened social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 381–388.
  • Brewer, M. B. (1981). Ethnocentrism and its role in interpersonal trust. In M. B.Brewer & B. E.Collins (Eds.), Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences (pp. 345–360). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1961). The mirror-image in Soviet-American relations. Journal of Social Issues, 3, 45–56.
  • Cupach, W. R., & Metts, S. (1994). Facework. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Elder, T. J., Sutton, R. M., & Douglas, K. M. (2005). Keeping it to ourselves: Effects of audience size and composition on reactions to criticism of the ingroup. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8, 231–244.
  • Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271–282.
  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.
  • Fiske, S. T. (1980). Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 889–906.
  • Hornsey, M. J., & Imani, A. (2004). Criticizing groups from the inside and the outside: An identity perspective on the intergroup sensitivity effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 365–383.
  • Hornsey, M. J., De Bruijn, P., Creed, J., Allen, J., Ariyanto, A., & Svensson, A. (2005). Keeping it in-house: How audience affects responses to group criticism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 291–312.
    Direct Link:
  • Hornsey, M. J., Frederiks, E., Smith, J. R., & Ford, L. (2007a). Strategic defensiveness: Public and private responses to group criticism. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 697–716.
    Direct Link:
  • Hornsey, M. J., Grice, T., Jetten, J., Paulsen, N., & Callan, V. (2007b). Group directed criticisms and recommendations for change: Why newcomers arouse more resistance than old-timers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1036–1048.
  • Hornsey, M. J., Oppes, T., & Svensson, A. (2002). ‘It's ok if we say it, but you can't’: Responses to intergroup and intragroup criticism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 293–307.
    Direct Link:
  • Hornsey, M. J., Robson, E., Smith, J., Esposo, S., & Sutton, R. (2008). Sugaring the pill: Assessing rhetorical strategies designed to minimize defensive reactions to group criticism. Human Communication Research, 34, 70–98.
    Direct Link:
  • Hornsey, M. J., Trembath, M., & Gunthorpe, S. (2004). ‘You can criticize because you care’: Identity attachment, constructiveness, and the intergroup sensitivity effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 499–518.
    Direct Link:
  • Hornsey, M. J. (2006). Ingroup critics and their influence on groups. In T.Postmes & J.Jetten (Eds.), Individuality and the Group: Advances in Social Identity (pp. 74–91). London, UK: Sage.
  • Insko, C. A., Schopler, J., Hoyle, R. H., Dardis, G. J., & Graetz, K. A. (1990). Individual-group discontinuity as a function of fear and greed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 68–79.
  • Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Meale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44 (4), 741–763.
  • Jetten, J., Duck, J., Terry, D. J., & O’Brien, A. (2002). Being attuned to intergroup differences in mergers: The role of aligned leaders and low-status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1194–1201.
  • Kelman, H. C. (1995). Decision making and public discourse in the Gulf War: An assessment of underlying psychological and moral assumptions. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 1, 117–130.
  • Khan, S., & Lambert, A. (1998). Ingroup favoritism versus black sheep effects in observations of informal conversations. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20, 263–269.
  • Maoz, I., Ward, A., Katz, M., & Ross, L. (2002). Reactive devaluation of an ‘Israeli’ vs. ‘Palestinian’ peace proposal. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46, 515–546.
  • Marques, J., & Yzerbyt, V. (1988). The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members in inter- and intra-group situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 287–292.
    Direct Link:
  • Marques, J., Yzerbyt, V., & Leyens, J. (1988). The ‘black sheep effect’: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1–16.
    Direct Link:
  • Miller, C. T. & Felicio, D. M. (1990). Person-positivity bias: Are individuals liked better than groups? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 408–420.
  • Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 25, 706–725.
  • Nemeth, C. J. (1985). Dissent, group process and creativity: The contribution of minority influence. In J. E.Lawler (Ed.), Advances in Group Processes (pp. 57–75). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Nemeth, C. J. (1995). Dissent as driving cognition, attitudes, and judgments. Social Cognition, 13, 273–291.
  • O'Dwyer, A., Berkowitz, N. H., & Alfeld-Johnson, D. (2002). Group and person attributions in response to criticism of the in-group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 563–588.
    Direct Link:
  • Packer, D. J. (2008). On being with us and against us: A normative conflict model of dissent in social groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 50–72.
  • Platow, M. J., Hoar, S., Reid, S., Harley, K., & Morrison, D. (1997). Endorsement of distributively fair and unfair leaders in interpersonal and intergroup situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 465–494.
    Direct Link:
  • Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Cihangir, S. (2001). Quality of decision making and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 918–930.
  • Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 296–320.
  • Sears, D. O. (1983). The person-positivity bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 233–250.
  • See, Y. H. M., & Petty, R.E. (2006). Effects of mortality salience on evaluation of ingroup and outgroup sources: The impact of pro-versus counter-attitudinal positions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 405–416.
  • Sutton, R. M., Elder, T. J., & Douglas, K. M. (2006). Reactions to internal and external criticism of outgroups: Social convention in the intergroup sensitivity effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 563–575.
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An intergrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G.Austin & S.Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Tanis, M., & Postmes, T. (2005). A social identity approach to trust: Interpersonal perception, group membership and trusting behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 413–424.
    Direct Link:
  • Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. New York, NY: Blackwell.
  • Vivian, J. E., & Berkowitz, N. H. (1992). Anticipated bias from an outgroup: An attributional analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 415–424.
    Direct Link:
  • Worchel, S. (1979). Trust and distrust. In W. G.Austin & S.Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 174–187). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Yamagishi, T., & Kiyonari, T. (2000). The group as the container of generalized reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 116–132.
View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (466K)