You have free access to this content

Women, Men, and Leadership: Exploring the Gender Gap at the Top

  1. Crystal L. Hoyt†

Article first published online: 2 JUL 2010

DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00274.x

Issue

Social and Personality Psychology Compass

Social and Personality Psychology Compass

Volume 4, Issue 7, pages 484–498, July 2010

Additional Information

How to Cite

Hoyt, C. L. (2010), Women, Men, and Leadership: Exploring the Gender Gap at the Top. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4: 484–498. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00274.x

Author Information

  1. University of Richmond

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 2 JUL 2010
  2. Article first published online: 2 JUL 2010

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (107K)

References

  • Allport, F. (1924). Social Psychology. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Andrews, P. H. (1992). Sex and gender differences in group communication: Impact on the facilitation process. Small Group Research, 23(1), 74–94.
  • Aven, F. F., Parker, B., & McEvoy, G. M. (1993). Gender and attitudinal commitment to organizations: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 26, 63–73.
  • Ayman, R., Korabik, K., & Morris, S. (2009). Is transformational leadership always perceived as effective? Male subordinates’ devaluation of female transformational leaders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 852–879.
    Direct Link:
  • Babcock, L., & Laschever, S. (2003). Women Don’t Ask: Negotiation and the Gender Divide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Bartol, K. M., & Butterfield, D. A. (1976). Sex effects in evaluating leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 446–454.
  • Bass, B. M. (1981). Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership: A Survey of Theory and Research (Revised edn). New York: Free Press.
  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership: Good, better, best. Organizational Dynamics, 13, 26–40.
  • Berger, J., Rosenholtz, S. J., & Zelditch, M. (1980). Status organizing processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 479–508.
  • Bergeron, D. M., Block, C. J., & Echtenkamp, B. A. (2006). Disabling the able: Stereotype threat and women’s work performance. Human Performance, 19(2), 133–158.
  • Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191–228.
  • Book, E. W. (2000). Why the Best Man for the Job is a Woman. New York: HarperCollins.
  • Bowles, H. R., Babcock, L., & Lai, L. (2007). Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 84–103.
  • Bowles, H. R., & McGinn, K. L. (2005). Claiming authority: Negotiating challenges for women leaders. In D. M.Messick & R. M.Kramer (Eds.), The Psychology of Leadership: New Perspectives and Research (pp. 191–208). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Bravo, E. (2007). Taking on the Big Boys: Or Why Feminism is Good for Families, Business, and the Nation. New York, NY: The Feminist Press.
  • Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current reappraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59–78.
    Direct Link:
  • Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Plenum.
  • Buss, D. M., & Kenrick, D. T. (1998). Evolutionary social psychology. In D. T.Gilbert, S. T.Fiske & G.Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (4th edn, Vol. 2, pp. 982–1026). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  • Carli, L. L. (2001). Gender and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 725–741.
    Direct Link:
  • Carroll, S. J. (2009). Reflections on gender and Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign: The good, the bad, and the misogynic. Politics and Gender, 5, 1–20.
  • Catalyst (2004). Women and Men in U.S. Corporate Leadership: Same Workplace, Different Realities? Retrieved October 10, 2009 from: http://www.catalyst.org/publication/145/women-and-men-in-us-corporate-leadership-same-workplace-different-realities
  • Catalyst. (2006). 2005 Catalyst Census of Women Board Directors of the Fortune 500. New York: Author.
  • Catalyst. (2009). Statistical Overview of Women in the Workplace. Retrieved May 27, 2009 from http://www.catalyst.org/file/172/qt_statistical_overview_of_women_in_the_workplace.pdf.
  • Center for American Women and Politics. (2009). Women in Elective Office 2009. Retrieved May 28, 2009 from http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/fast_facts/levels_of_office/documents/elective.pdf.
  • Chemers, M. M. (1997). An integrative Theory of Leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Corporate Woman. (1986). The corporate woman: A special report. Wall Street Journal, 32-page supplement.
  • Couric and Co. (2008). Katie Couric’s Notebook: Sexism and Politics. Retrieved May 29, 2009 from http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/06/11/couricandco/entry4174429.shtml
  • Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 276–287.
  • Davison, H. K., & Burke, M. J. (2000). A meta-analysis of sex discrimination in simulated selection contexts. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 225–248.
  • Deaux, K., & Emswiller, T. (1974). Explanations for successful performance on sex-linked tasks: What is skill for the male is luck for the female. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 80–85.
  • Deaux, K., & Kite, M. (1993). Gender stereotypes. In F. L.Denmark & M. A.Paludi (Eds.), Psychology of Women: A Handbook of Issues and Theories (pp. 7–39). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
  • Dodge, K. A., Gilroy, F. D., & Fenzel, L. M. (1995). Requisite management characteristics revisited: Two decades later. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 10, 253–264.
  • Dunning, D., & Sherman, D. A. (1997). Stereotypes and tacit inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 459–471.
  • Eagly, A. H. (1995). The science and politics of comparing women and men. American Psychologist, 50, 145–158.
  • Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the Labyrinth: The Truth about How Women become Leaders. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Van Engen, M. (2003). Transfor­mational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 569–591.
  • Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 233–256.
  • Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 685–710.
  • Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598.
  • Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 125–145.
  • Eagly, A., Makhijani, M., & Klonsky, B. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3–22.
  • Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T.Eckes & H. M.Trautner (Eds.), The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Eden, D. (1992). Leadership and expectations: Pygmalion effects and other self-fulfilling prophecies in organizations. Leadership Quarterly, 3, 271–305.
  • Van Engen, M. L., & Willemsen, T. M. (2004). Sex and leadership styles: A meta-analysis of research published in the 1990s. Psychological Reports, 94, 3–18.
  • Ensher, E. A., & Murphy, S. E. (2005). Power Mentoring: How Successful Mentors and Protégés Get the Most out of their Relationships. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429–456.
  • Fiske, S., Bersoff, D. N., Borgida, E., Deaux, K., & Heilman, M. E. (1991). Social science research on trial: Use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins. American Psychologist, 46(10), 1049–1060.
  • Fletcher, J. K. (2001). Disappearing Acts: Gender, Power, and Relational Practice at Work. Boston: MIT Press.
  • Foels, R., Driskell, J. E., Mullen, B., & Salas, E. (2000). The effects of democratic leadership on group member satisfaction: An integration. Small Group research, 31, 676–701.
  • Forsyth, D. R., Heiney, M. M., & Wright, S. S. (1997). Biases in appraisals of women leaders. Group Dynamics, 1, 98–103.
  • Forsyth, D. R., & Nye, J. L. (2008). Seeing and being a leader: The perceptual, cognitive, and interpersonal roots of conferred influence. In C.Hoyt, G.Goethals & D. R.Forsyth (Eds.), Leadership at the Crossroads: Psychology and Leadership (Vol. 1, pp. 116–131). Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Franke, G. R., Crown, D. F., & Spake, D. F. (1997). Gender differences in ethical perceptions of business practices: A social role theory perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 920–934.
  • Gastil, J. (1994). A meta-analytic review of the productivity and satisfaction of democratic and autocratic leadership. Small Group Research, 25, 384–410.
  • Geary, D. C. (1998). Male, Female: The Evolution of Human Sex Differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Goldberg, P. (1968). Are women prejudiced against women? Transaction, 5, 316–322.
  • Goldin, C., & Rouse, C. (2000). Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. The American Economic Review, 90(4), 715–741.
  • Hamilton, D. L., Stroessner, S. J., & Driscoll, D. M. (1994). Social cognition and the study of stereotyping. In P. G.Devine, D. L.Hamilton & T. M.Ostrom (Eds.), Social Cognition: Impact on Social Psychology (pp. 291–321). New York: Academic Press.
  • Haslam, S. A., & Ryan, M. K. (2008). The road to the glass cliff: Differences in the perceived suitability of men and women for leadership positions in succeeding and failing organizations. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 530–546.
  • Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657–674.
    Direct Link:
  • Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., Martell, R. F., & Simon, M. C. (1989). Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women, and managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 935–942.
  • Heilman, M. E., & Haynes, M. C. (2005). Attributional rationalization of women’s success in mixed-sex teams: No credit where credit is due. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 905–916.
  • Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 81–92.
  • Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalities for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 416–427.
  • Hennig, M., & Jardin, A. (1977). The Managerial Woman. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
  • Hewlett, S. A. (2002). Creating a Life: Professional Women and the Quest for Children. New York: Talk Miramax.
  • Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184–200.
  • Hogg, M. A., Fielding, K. S., Johnson, D., Masser, B., Russell, E., & Svensson, A. (2006). Demographic category membership and leadership in small groups: A social identity analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 335–350.
  • Hoyt, C. L. (2005). The role of leadership efficacy and stereotype activation in women's identification with leadership. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 11 (4), 2–14.
  • Hoyt, C. L. (2010). Women and leadership. In P.Northouse’s (Ed.), Leadership: Theory and Practice (5th edn, pp. 301–333). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hoyt, C. L., & Blascovich, J. (2007). Leadership efficacy and women leaders’ responses to stereotype activation. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 10, 595–616.
  • Hoyt, C. L., & Blascovich, J. (2010). The role of self-efficacy and stereotype activation on cardiovascular, behavioral and self-report responses in the leadership domain. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 89–103.
  • Hoyt, C. L., & Chemers, M. M. (2008). Social stigma and leadership: A long climb up a slippery ladder. In C. L.Hoyt, G. R.Goethals & D. R.Forsyth (Eds.) Leadership at the Crossroads: Leadership and Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 165–180). Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Hoyt, C. L., Goethals, G. R., & Forsyth, D. R. (2008a). A contemporary social psychology of leadership. In C. L.Hoyt, G. R.Goethals & D. R.Forsyth (Eds.) Leadership at the Crossroads: Leadership and Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1–10). Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Hoyt, C. L., Goethals, G. R., & Forsyth, D. R. (Eds., 2008b). Leadership and psychology (Vol. 1) In J.Ciulla’s (Series Ed.), Leadership at the Crossroads. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Hoyt, C. L., Johnson, S., Murphy, S., & Skinnell, K. (2010). The impact of blatant stereotype activation and group sex-composition on female leaders. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 89–103.
  • Hymowitz, C., Schellhardt, T. D. (1986, March 24). The glass ceiling: Why women can?t break the invisible barrier that blocks them from top jobs. Special Report on the Corporate Woman. Wall Street Journal, Vol. 1 No.4.
  • Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2010). Women in National Parliaments. Retrieved March 26, 2010, from http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/classif.htm
  • Johnson, S. K., Murphy, S. E., Zewdie, S., & Reichard, R. J. (2008). The strong, sensitive type: Effects of gender stereotypes and leadership prototypes on the evaluation of male and female leaders. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106, 39–60.
  • Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 765–780.
  • Kaufman, G., & Uhlenberg, P. (2000). The influence of parenthood on work effort of married men and women. Social Forces, 78(3), 931–947.
  • Kay, F. M., & Hagan, J. (1998). Raising the bar: The gender stratification of law-firm capital. American Sociological Review, 63, 728–743.
  • Kay, F. M., & Hagan, J. (1999). Cultivating clients in the competition for partnership: Gender and the organizational restructuring of law firms in the 1990s. Law & Society Review, 33, 517–555.
  • Kellerman, B. (2003). You’ve come a long way baby – And you’ve got miles to go. In D.Rhode’s (Ed.) The Difference Difference Makes: Women and Leadership (pp. 53–58). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Kenney, R. A., Schwartz-Kenney, B. M., & Blascovich, J. (1996). Implicit leadership theories: Defining leaders described as worthy of influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1128–1143.
  • Knight, P. A., & Saal, F. E. (1984). Effects of gender differences and selection agent expertise on leader influence and performance evaluations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 225–243.
  • Knoke, D., & Ishio, Y. (1998). The gender gap in company job training. Work and Occupations, 25(2), 141–167.
  • Kray, L., Reb, J., Galinsky, A., & Thompson, L. (2004). Stereotype reactance at the bargaining table: The effect of stereotype activation and power on claiming and creating value. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 399–411.
  • Kray, L. J., Thompson, L., & Galinsky, A. (2001). Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 80, 942–958.
  • Leary, M. R. (1995). Impression Management and Interpersonal Behavior. Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark.
  • Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created ‘social climates. Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271–299.
  • Livingston, R. W., & Pearce, N. A. (2009). The teddy-bear effect: Does having a baby face benefit Black Chief Executive Officers? Psychological Science, 20, 1229–1236.
    Direct Link:
  • Lord, R. G., & Maher, K. J. (1991). Leadership and Information Processing: Linking Perceptions and Performance. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
  • Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. G., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 385–425.
  • Lyness, K. S., & Heilman, M. E. (2006). When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 777–785.
  • Lyness, K. S., & Thompson, D. E. (2000). Climbing the corporate ladder: Do female and male executives follow the same route? Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 86–101.
  • Major, B., & O’Brien, L. (2005). The social psychology of stigma. In S. T.Fiske (Ed.), Annual Review of Psychology (Vol. 56, pp. 393–421). Chippewa Falls, WI: Annual Reviews.
  • Marx, D. (2009). On the role of group membership in stereotype-based performance effects. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 77–93.
    Direct Link:
  • Maume, D. J. Jr (1999). Glass ceilings and glass escalators. Work and Occupations, 26(4), 483.
  • Morrison, A., & Von Glinow, M. A. (1990). Women and minorities in management. American Psychologist, 45, 200–208.
  • Nieva, V. E., & Gutek, B. A. (1981). Women and Work: A Psychological Perspective. New York: Praeger.
  • Ohlott, P. J., Ruderman, M. N., & McCauley, C. D. (1994). Gender differences in managers’ developmental job experiences. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 46–67.
  • Powell, G. N., & Graves, L. M. (2003). Women and Men in Management (3rd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Ridgeway, C. L. (2001). Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 637–655.
    Direct Link:
  • Rosener, J. (1995). America’s Competitive Secret: Utilizing Women as a Management Strategy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counter-stereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 629–645.
  • Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743–762.
    Direct Link:
  • Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., Hersby, M. D., Kulich, C., & Atkins, C. (2008). Opting out or pushed off the edge? The glass cliff and the precariousness of women’s leadership positions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 266–279.
  • Schein, V. E. (1973). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 95–100.
  • Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. (2001). A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 219–237.
  • Simon, S., & Hoyt, C. (2008). Understanding the gender gap in support for a woman for president. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy (ASAP), 8, 157–181.
    Direct Link:
  • Small, D. A., Gelfand, M., Babcock, L., & Gettman, H. (2007). Who goes to the bargaining table? The influence of gender and framing on the initiation of negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 600–613.
  • Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.
  • Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype threat and social identity threat. In M. P.Zanna (Ed), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol 34, pp. 379–440). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Swim, J. K., & Sanna, L. J. (1996). He’s skilled, she’s lucky: A meta-analysis of observer’s attributions for women’s and men’s successes and failures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 507–519.
  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2008). Married Parents Use of Time, 2003–06. Retrieved June 8, 2009, from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/atus2.pdf.
  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2009a). Current Population Survey, Annual Averages: Household Data. (Characteristics of the employed, Table 9: Employed persons by occupation, sex and age). Retrieved March 26, 2010, from http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat9.pdf
  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2009b). Current population survey, annual averages: Household data. (Table 11: Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity). Retrieved March 22, 2010, from http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.pdf.
  • U.S. Census. (2007). Facts for Features. Women’s History Month: March 2009. Retrieved April 30, from http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/013129.html
  • Vecchio, R. P. (2002). Leadership and gender advantage. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 643–671.
  • Vecchio, R. P. (2003). In search of gender advantage. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 835–850.
  • Williams, C. L. (1992). The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the “female” professions. Social Problems, 39, 253–267.
  • Williams, C. L. (1995). Still a Man’s World: Men Who Do “Women’s Work.” Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Williams, J. (2000). Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to do About It. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Sex and Psyche: Gender and Self Viewed Cross-Culturally. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699–727.
  • Zaccaro, S. J., Gulick, L. M. V., & Khare, V. P. (2008). Personality and leadership. In C. L.Hoyt, G. R.Goethals & D. R.Forsyth (Eds.) Leadership at the Crossroads: Leadership and Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1–10). Westport, CT: Praeger.
View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (107K)