SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Allport, F. (1924). Social Psychology. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Andrews, P. H. (1992). Sex and gender differences in group communication: Impact on the facilitation process. Small Group Research, 23(1), 7494.
  • Aven, F. F., Parker, B., & McEvoy, G. M. (1993). Gender and attitudinal commitment to organizations: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 26, 6373.
  • Ayman, R., Korabik, K., & Morris, S. (2009). Is transformational leadership always perceived as effective? Male subordinates’ devaluation of female transformational leaders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 852879.
  • Babcock, L., & Laschever, S. (2003). Women Don’t Ask: Negotiation and the Gender Divide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Bartol, K. M., & Butterfield, D. A. (1976). Sex effects in evaluating leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 446454.
  • Bass, B. M. (1981). Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership: A Survey of Theory and Research (Revised edn). New York: Free Press.
  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership: Good, better, best. Organizational Dynamics, 13, 2640.
  • Berger, J., Rosenholtz, S. J., & Zelditch, M. (1980). Status organizing processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 479508.
  • Bergeron, D. M., Block, C. J., & Echtenkamp, B. A. (2006). Disabling the able: Stereotype threat and women’s work performance. Human Performance, 19(2), 133158.
  • Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191228.
  • Book, E. W. (2000). Why the Best Man for the Job is a Woman. New York: HarperCollins.
  • Bowles, H. R., Babcock, L., & Lai, L. (2007). Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 84103.
  • Bowles, H. R., & McGinn, K. L. (2005). Claiming authority: Negotiating challenges for women leaders. In D. M.Messick & R. M.Kramer (Eds.), The Psychology of Leadership: New Perspectives and Research (pp. 191208). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Bravo, E. (2007). Taking on the Big Boys: Or Why Feminism is Good for Families, Business, and the Nation. New York, NY: The Feminist Press.
  • Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current reappraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 5978.
  • Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Plenum.
  • Buss, D. M., & Kenrick, D. T. (1998). Evolutionary social psychology. In D. T.Gilbert, S. T.Fiske & G.Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (4th edn, Vol. 2, pp. 9821026). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  • Carli, L. L. (2001). Gender and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 725741.
  • Carroll, S. J. (2009). Reflections on gender and Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign: The good, the bad, and the misogynic. Politics and Gender, 5, 120.
  • Catalyst (2004). Women and Men in U.S. Corporate Leadership: Same Workplace, Different Realities? Retrieved October 10, 2009 from: http://www.catalyst.org/publication/145/women-and-men-in-us-corporate-leadership-same-workplace-different-realities
  • Catalyst. (2006). 2005 Catalyst Census of Women Board Directors of the Fortune 500. New York: Author.
  • Catalyst. (2009). Statistical Overview of Women in the Workplace. Retrieved May 27, 2009 from http://www.catalyst.org/file/172/qt_statistical_overview_of_women_in_the_workplace.pdf.
  • Center for American Women and Politics. (2009). Women in Elective Office 2009. Retrieved May 28, 2009 from http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/fast_facts/levels_of_office/documents/elective.pdf.
  • Chemers, M. M. (1997). An integrative Theory of Leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Corporate Woman. (1986). The corporate woman: A special report. Wall Street Journal, 32-page supplement.
  • Couric and Co. (2008). Katie Couric’s Notebook: Sexism and Politics. Retrieved May 29, 2009 from http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/06/11/couricandco/entry4174429.shtml
  • Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 276287.
  • Davison, H. K., & Burke, M. J. (2000). A meta-analysis of sex discrimination in simulated selection contexts. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 225248.
  • Deaux, K., & Emswiller, T. (1974). Explanations for successful performance on sex-linked tasks: What is skill for the male is luck for the female. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 8085.
  • Deaux, K., & Kite, M. (1993). Gender stereotypes. In F. L.Denmark & M. A.Paludi (Eds.), Psychology of Women: A Handbook of Issues and Theories (pp. 739). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
  • Dodge, K. A., Gilroy, F. D., & Fenzel, L. M. (1995). Requisite management characteristics revisited: Two decades later. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 10, 253264.
  • Dunning, D., & Sherman, D. A. (1997). Stereotypes and tacit inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 459471.
  • Eagly, A. H. (1995). The science and politics of comparing women and men. American Psychologist, 50, 145158.
  • Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the Labyrinth: The Truth about How Women become Leaders. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Van Engen, M. (2003). Transfor­mational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 569591.
  • Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 233256.
  • Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 685710.
  • Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573598.
  • Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 125145.
  • Eagly, A., Makhijani, M., & Klonsky, B. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 322.
  • Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T.Eckes & H. M.Trautner (Eds.), The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender (pp. 123174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Eden, D. (1992). Leadership and expectations: Pygmalion effects and other self-fulfilling prophecies in organizations. Leadership Quarterly, 3, 271305.
  • Van Engen, M. L., & Willemsen, T. M. (2004). Sex and leadership styles: A meta-analysis of research published in the 1990s. Psychological Reports, 94, 318.
  • Ensher, E. A., & Murphy, S. E. (2005). Power Mentoring: How Successful Mentors and Protégés Get the Most out of their Relationships. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429456.
  • Fiske, S., Bersoff, D. N., Borgida, E., Deaux, K., & Heilman, M. E. (1991). Social science research on trial: Use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins. American Psychologist, 46(10), 10491060.
  • Fletcher, J. K. (2001). Disappearing Acts: Gender, Power, and Relational Practice at Work. Boston: MIT Press.
  • Foels, R., Driskell, J. E., Mullen, B., & Salas, E. (2000). The effects of democratic leadership on group member satisfaction: An integration. Small Group research, 31, 676701.
  • Forsyth, D. R., Heiney, M. M., & Wright, S. S. (1997). Biases in appraisals of women leaders. Group Dynamics, 1, 98103.
  • Forsyth, D. R., & Nye, J. L. (2008). Seeing and being a leader: The perceptual, cognitive, and interpersonal roots of conferred influence. In C.Hoyt, G.Goethals & D. R.Forsyth (Eds.), Leadership at the Crossroads: Psychology and Leadership (Vol. 1, pp. 116131). Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Franke, G. R., Crown, D. F., & Spake, D. F. (1997). Gender differences in ethical perceptions of business practices: A social role theory perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 920934.
  • Gastil, J. (1994). A meta-analytic review of the productivity and satisfaction of democratic and autocratic leadership. Small Group Research, 25, 384410.
  • Geary, D. C. (1998). Male, Female: The Evolution of Human Sex Differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Goldberg, P. (1968). Are women prejudiced against women? Transaction, 5, 316322.
  • Goldin, C., & Rouse, C. (2000). Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. The American Economic Review, 90(4), 715741.
  • Hamilton, D. L., Stroessner, S. J., & Driscoll, D. M. (1994). Social cognition and the study of stereotyping. In P. G.Devine, D. L.Hamilton & T. M.Ostrom (Eds.), Social Cognition: Impact on Social Psychology (pp. 291321). New York: Academic Press.
  • Haslam, S. A., & Ryan, M. K. (2008). The road to the glass cliff: Differences in the perceived suitability of men and women for leadership positions in succeeding and failing organizations. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 530546.
  • Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657674.
  • Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., Martell, R. F., & Simon, M. C. (1989). Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women, and managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 935942.
  • Heilman, M. E., & Haynes, M. C. (2005). Attributional rationalization of women’s success in mixed-sex teams: No credit where credit is due. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 905916.
  • Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 8192.
  • Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalities for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 416427.
  • Hennig, M., & Jardin, A. (1977). The Managerial Woman. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
  • Hewlett, S. A. (2002). Creating a Life: Professional Women and the Quest for Children. New York: Talk Miramax.
  • Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184200.
  • Hogg, M. A., Fielding, K. S., Johnson, D., Masser, B., Russell, E., & Svensson, A. (2006). Demographic category membership and leadership in small groups: A social identity analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 335350.
  • Hoyt, C. L. (2005). The role of leadership efficacy and stereotype activation in women's identification with leadership. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 11 (4), 214.
  • Hoyt, C. L. (2010). Women and leadership. In P.Northouse’s (Ed.), Leadership: Theory and Practice (5th edn, pp. 301333). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hoyt, C. L., & Blascovich, J. (2007). Leadership efficacy and women leaders’ responses to stereotype activation. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 10, 595616.
  • Hoyt, C. L., & Blascovich, J. (2010). The role of self-efficacy and stereotype activation on cardiovascular, behavioral and self-report responses in the leadership domain. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 89103.
  • Hoyt, C. L., & Chemers, M. M. (2008). Social stigma and leadership: A long climb up a slippery ladder. In C. L.Hoyt, G. R.Goethals & D. R.Forsyth (Eds.) Leadership at the Crossroads: Leadership and Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 165180). Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Hoyt, C. L., Goethals, G. R., & Forsyth, D. R. (2008a). A contemporary social psychology of leadership. In C. L.Hoyt, G. R.Goethals & D. R.Forsyth (Eds.) Leadership at the Crossroads: Leadership and Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 110). Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Hoyt, C. L., Goethals, G. R., & Forsyth, D. R. (Eds., 2008b). Leadership and psychology (Vol. 1) In J.Ciulla’s (Series Ed.), Leadership at the Crossroads. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Hoyt, C. L., Johnson, S., Murphy, S., & Skinnell, K. (2010). The impact of blatant stereotype activation and group sex-composition on female leaders. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 89103.
  • Hymowitz, C., Schellhardt, T. D. (1986, March 24). The glass ceiling: Why women can?t break the invisible barrier that blocks them from top jobs. Special Report on the Corporate Woman. Wall Street Journal, Vol. 1 No.4.
  • Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2010). Women in National Parliaments. Retrieved March 26, 2010, from http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/classif.htm
  • Johnson, S. K., Murphy, S. E., Zewdie, S., & Reichard, R. J. (2008). The strong, sensitive type: Effects of gender stereotypes and leadership prototypes on the evaluation of male and female leaders. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106, 3960.
  • Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 765780.
  • Kaufman, G., & Uhlenberg, P. (2000). The influence of parenthood on work effort of married men and women. Social Forces, 78(3), 931947.
  • Kay, F. M., & Hagan, J. (1998). Raising the bar: The gender stratification of law-firm capital. American Sociological Review, 63, 728743.
  • Kay, F. M., & Hagan, J. (1999). Cultivating clients in the competition for partnership: Gender and the organizational restructuring of law firms in the 1990s. Law & Society Review, 33, 517555.
  • Kellerman, B. (2003). You’ve come a long way baby – And you’ve got miles to go. In D.Rhode’s (Ed.) The Difference Difference Makes: Women and Leadership (pp. 5358). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Kenney, R. A., Schwartz-Kenney, B. M., & Blascovich, J. (1996). Implicit leadership theories: Defining leaders described as worthy of influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 11281143.
  • Knight, P. A., & Saal, F. E. (1984). Effects of gender differences and selection agent expertise on leader influence and performance evaluations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 225243.
  • Knoke, D., & Ishio, Y. (1998). The gender gap in company job training. Work and Occupations, 25(2), 141167.
  • Kray, L., Reb, J., Galinsky, A., & Thompson, L. (2004). Stereotype reactance at the bargaining table: The effect of stereotype activation and power on claiming and creating value. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 399411.
  • Kray, L. J., Thompson, L., & Galinsky, A. (2001). Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 80, 942958.
  • Leary, M. R. (1995). Impression Management and Interpersonal Behavior. Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark.
  • Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created ‘social climates. Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271299.
  • Livingston, R. W., & Pearce, N. A. (2009). The teddy-bear effect: Does having a baby face benefit Black Chief Executive Officers? Psychological Science, 20, 12291236.
    Direct Link:
  • Lord, R. G., & Maher, K. J. (1991). Leadership and Information Processing: Linking Perceptions and Performance. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
  • Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. G., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 385425.
  • Lyness, K. S., & Heilman, M. E. (2006). When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 777785.
  • Lyness, K. S., & Thompson, D. E. (2000). Climbing the corporate ladder: Do female and male executives follow the same route? Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 86101.
  • Major, B., & O’Brien, L. (2005). The social psychology of stigma. In S. T.Fiske (Ed.), Annual Review of Psychology (Vol. 56, pp. 393421). Chippewa Falls, WI: Annual Reviews.
  • Marx, D. (2009). On the role of group membership in stereotype-based performance effects. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 7793.
  • Maume, D. J. Jr (1999). Glass ceilings and glass escalators. Work and Occupations, 26(4), 483.
  • Morrison, A., & Von Glinow, M. A. (1990). Women and minorities in management. American Psychologist, 45, 200208.
  • Nieva, V. E., & Gutek, B. A. (1981). Women and Work: A Psychological Perspective. New York: Praeger.
  • Ohlott, P. J., Ruderman, M. N., & McCauley, C. D. (1994). Gender differences in managers’ developmental job experiences. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 4667.
  • Powell, G. N., & Graves, L. M. (2003). Women and Men in Management (3rd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Ridgeway, C. L. (2001). Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 637655.
  • Rosener, J. (1995). America’s Competitive Secret: Utilizing Women as a Management Strategy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counter-stereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 629645.
  • Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743762.
  • Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., Hersby, M. D., Kulich, C., & Atkins, C. (2008). Opting out or pushed off the edge? The glass cliff and the precariousness of women’s leadership positions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 266279.
  • Schein, V. E. (1973). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 95100.
  • Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. (2001). A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 219237.
  • Simon, S., & Hoyt, C. (2008). Understanding the gender gap in support for a woman for president. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy (ASAP), 8, 157181.
  • Small, D. A., Gelfand, M., Babcock, L., & Gettman, H. (2007). Who goes to the bargaining table? The influence of gender and framing on the initiation of negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 600613.
  • Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797811.
  • Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype threat and social identity threat. In M. P.Zanna (Ed), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol 34, pp. 379440). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Swim, J. K., & Sanna, L. J. (1996). He’s skilled, she’s lucky: A meta-analysis of observer’s attributions for women’s and men’s successes and failures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 507519.
  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2008). Married Parents Use of Time, 2003–06. Retrieved June 8, 2009, from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/atus2.pdf.
  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2009a). Current Population Survey, Annual Averages: Household Data. (Characteristics of the employed, Table 9: Employed persons by occupation, sex and age). Retrieved March 26, 2010, from http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat9.pdf
  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2009b). Current population survey, annual averages: Household data. (Table 11: Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity). Retrieved March 22, 2010, from http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.pdf.
  • U.S. Census. (2007). Facts for Features. Women’s History Month: March 2009. Retrieved April 30, from http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/013129.html
  • Vecchio, R. P. (2002). Leadership and gender advantage. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 643671.
  • Vecchio, R. P. (2003). In search of gender advantage. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 835850.
  • Williams, C. L. (1992). The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the “female” professions. Social Problems, 39, 253267.
  • Williams, C. L. (1995). Still a Man’s World: Men Who Do “Women’s Work.” Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Williams, J. (2000). Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to do About It. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Sex and Psyche: Gender and Self Viewed Cross-Culturally. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699727.
  • Zaccaro, S. J., Gulick, L. M. V., & Khare, V. P. (2008). Personality and leadership. In C. L.Hoyt, G. R.Goethals & D. R.Forsyth (Eds.) Leadership at the Crossroads: Leadership and Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 110). Westport, CT: Praeger.