The Sociology of Expertise: The Distribution of Social Fluency
Article first published online: 14 JAN 2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00062.x
© 2008 The Author
Additional Information
How to Cite
Evans, R. (2008), The Sociology of Expertise: The Distribution of Social Fluency. Sociology Compass, 2: 281–298. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00062.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 14 JAN 2008
- Article first published online: 14 JAN 2008
- Sociology Compass 2/1 (2008): 281–298, 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00062.x
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Cited in:
- CrossRef
This article has been cited by:
- 1, Assumptions of the Deficit Model Type of Thinking: Ignorance, Attitudes, and Science Communication in the Debate on Genetic Engineering in Agriculture, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 2012, 25, 3, 295
- 2, Communicating Expertise: Knowledge Performances in Professional-Service Firms, Communication Monographs, 2012, 79, 1, 23
- 3, , , , , , , Eliciting Expert Knowledge in Conservation Science, Obtención de Conocimiento de Expertos en Ciencia de la Conservación, Conservation Biology, 2012, 26, 1Direct Link:
- 4, , , From consilium to advice: A review of the evaluation and related literature on advisory structures and processes, New Directions for Evaluation, 2012, 2012, 136Direct Link:
- 5, , Knowledge management technology as a stage for strategic self-presentation: Implications for knowledge sharing in organizations, Information and Organization, 2012, 22, 1, 37
- 6, The Rise of Transnational Environmental Law and the Expertise of Environmental Lawyers, Transnational Environmental Law, 2012, 1, 01, 43
- You have free access to this content7, , , , , , , Redefining expertise and improving ecological judgment, Conservation Letters, 2011, 4, 2Direct Link:
- 8, Public and User Participation in Public Service Delivery: Tensions in Policy and Practice, Sociology Compass, 2009, 3, 2Direct Link:
- 9, Who's Credible? Expressions of Consensus and Conflict in Focus Groups about DNA Patenting, BioSocieties, 2009, 4, 1, 25

1751-9020/asset/olbannerleft.jpg?v=1&s=3f0bd1a3e9a9c770e13d4bfcddf00d7789ec52bc)
1751-9020/asset/olbannerright.jpg?v=1&s=5d264195c4498041cf4d6a9aaee08d5b1016e5ae)
