Margaret K. Keiley, EdD, Human Development and Family Studies, Auburn University.
MULTIPLE-FAMILY GROUP INTERVENTION FOR INCARCERATED ADOLESCENTS AND THEIR FAMILIES: A PILOT PROJECT
Article first published online: 24 JAN 2007
Journal of Marital and Family Therapy
Volume 33, Issue 1, pages 106–124, January 2007
How to Cite
Keiley, M. K. (2007), MULTIPLE-FAMILY GROUP INTERVENTION FOR INCARCERATED ADOLESCENTS AND THEIR FAMILIES: A PILOT PROJECT. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33: 106–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00009.x
The author would like to thank all the student members of the Conduct Disorder Research Group in the Marriage and Family Therapy Program of Purdue University for their help with the implementation of this project over the seven years she was at Purdue. Without their help this clinical and research project would not have been conducted. In addition, the author would like to thank all the adolescents and caregivers who engaged in this treatment; without them this project would not have reached fruition.
This project was supported in part by Grant #02-JF-040 awarded by the Indiana Criminal Justice Institute and made possible by Award No. 2002-JF-FX-0018 awarded by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
- Issue published online: 24 JAN 2007
- Article first published online: 24 JAN 2007
The Multiple-Family Group Intervention (MFGI) was developed to address the need for an effective and yet affordable treatment for reducing recidivism for incarcerated adolescents and altering the families’ coercive interactional patterns from an affect regulation and attachment perspective. The 8-week MFGI program was conducted in two Indiana juvenile correctional institutions. The research study utilized pre- and postintervention assessments and a 6-month follow-up assessment. Data from both male (n = 43) and female (n = 30) adolescents were combined, yielding a total sample of 140 respondents (73 adolescents, 67 caretakers). The 6-month follow-up assessment indicated a recidivism rate of only 44% compared to the national norm of 65–85%. Linear growth models were fit to determine the nature of the changes in adolescent behavior over the three assessments. Adolescents and caregivers reported that adolescents’ externalizing behaviors significantly declined over time. Adolescent-reported internalizing symptoms as well as their alcohol and drug use significantly declined over the follow-up period, while caregiver reports of these behaviors showed no change over time. Adolescent-reported attachment to their parents, particularly mothers, increased significantly as did both adolescent and caregiver-reported functional affect regulation.