SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aubin-Horth, N., J.-F. Bourque, G. Daigle, R. Hedger, and J. J. Dodson. 2006. Longitudinal gradients in threshold size for alternative male life history tactics in a population of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63:20672075.
  • Beckman, B. R., and W. W. Dickhoff. 1998. Plasticity of smolting in spring chinook salmon: relation to growth and insulin-like growth factor-I. Journal of Fish Biology 53:808826.
  • Bjornn, T. C. 1960. The salmon and steelhead stocks of Idaho. Report to Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise, Idaho.
  • Brannon, E. L., M. S. Powell, T. P. Quinn, and A. Talbot. 2004. Population structure of Columbia River Basin chinook salmon and steelhead trout. Reviews in Fisheries Science 12:99232.
  • Bugert, R. M., C. W. Hopley, C. A. Busack, and G. W. Mendel. 1995. Maintenance of stock integrity in Snake River fall Chinook salmon. In H. L.SchrammJr, and R. G.Piper, eds. Uses and Effects of Cultured Fishes in Aquatic Ecosystems, pp. 267276. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
  • Carlson, S. M., and T. R. Seamons. 2008. A review of quantitative genetic components of fitness in salmonids: implications for adaptation to future in change. Evolutionary Applications 1:222238.
  • Chapman, D. W. 1986. Salmon and steelhead abundance in the Columbia River in the nineteenth century. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 115:662670.
  • Clarke, W. C., R. E. Withler, and J. E. Shelbourn. 1992. Genetic control of juvenile life history pattern in Chinook salmon. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49:23002306.
  • Coltman, D. W. 2008. Molecular ecological approaches to studying the evolutionary impact of selective harvesting in wildlife. Molecular Ecology 17:221235.
  • Connor, W. P., and H. L. Burge. 2003. Growth of wild subyearling fall chinook salmon in the Snake River. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 23:594599.
  • Connor, W. P., T. C. Bjornn, H. L. Burge, A. R. Marshall, H. L. Blankenship, R. K. Steinhorst, and K. F. Tiffan. 2001. Early life history attributes and run composition of PIT-tagged wild subyearling Chinook salmon recaptured after migrating downstream past lower granite dam. Northwest Science 75:254261.
  • Connor, W. P., H. L. Burge, R. Waitt, and T. C. Bjornn. 2002. Juvenile life history of wild fall chinook salmon in the Snake and Clearwater rivers. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22:703712.
  • Connor, W. P., J. G. Sneva, K. F. Tiffan, R. K. Steinhorst, and D. Ross. 2005. Two alternative juvenile life history types for fall Chinook salmon in the Snake River basin. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 134:291304.
  • Cormack, R. M. 1964. Estimates of survival from the sightings of marked animals. Biometrika 51:429438.
  • Craig, J. A., and R. L. Hacker. 1940. The history and development of the fisheries of the Columbia River. Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries 32:133216.
  • Diamond, J. M.. 1989. Overview of recent extinctions. In D.Western, and M. C.Pearl, eds. Conservation for the Twenty-first Century, pp 3741. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Dickhoff, W. W., B. R. Beckman, D. A. Larsen, C. Duan, and S. Moriyama. 1997. The role of growth in endocrine regulation of salmon smoltification. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry 17:231236.
  • Ebel, W. J., and C. H. Koski. 1968. Physical and chemical limnology of Brownlee Reservoir, 1962–1964. Fishery Bulletin 67:295335.
  • Etterson, J. R., and R. G. Shaw. 2001. Constraint to adaptive evolution in response to global warming. Science 294:151154.
  • Evermann, B. W. 1896. A preliminary report on salmon investigations in Idaho in 1894. Bulletin of the United States Fish Commission 15:253284.
  • Faulkner, J. R., S. G. Smith, W. D. Muir, D. M. Marsh, and J. G. Williams. 2007. Survival estimates for passage of spring-migrating juvenile salmonids through Snake and Columbia River Dams and Reservoirs, 2006. Report of Research by Fish Ecology Division, 112 p. Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, OR, Project No. 1993-02900. Available online at: http://pisces.bpa.gov/release/documents/documentviewer.aspx?doc=P103914.
  • Foley, J. A., R. DeFries, G. P. Asner, C. Barford, G. Bonan, S. R. Carpenter, F. S. Chapin et al. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570574.
  • Fulton, L. A. 1968. Spawning areas and abundance of Chinook Salmon (Oncorhychus tshawytscha) in the Columbia River Basin – past and present. United States Fish and Wildlife Service Special Scientific Report-Fisheries No. 571, 26 p. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington DC, USA.
  • Galbreath, J. L., and R. L. Ridenour. 1964. Fecundity of Columbia River Chinook salmon. Research Briefs, Fish Commission of Oregon 10:1627.
  • Grant, P. R., and B. R. Grant. 2006. Evolution of character displacement in Darwin’s finches. Science 313:224226.
  • Gross, M. R. 1996. Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: diversity within sexes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11:9296.
  • Hazel, W. N., R. Smock, and M. D. Johnson. 1990. A polygenic model for the evolution and maintenance of conditional strategies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 242:181187.
  • Healey, M. C. 1991. Life history of chinook salmon. In C.Groot, and L.Margolis, eds. Pacific Salmon Life Histories, pp. 311393. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, BC.
  • Hendry, A. P., J. K. Wenburg, P. Bentzen, E. C. Volk, and T. P. Quinn. 2000. Rapid evolution of reproductive isolation in the wild: evidence from introduced salmon. Science 290:516518.
  • Hutchings, J. A., and D. J. Fraser. 2008. The nature of fisheries- and farming-induced evolution. Molecular Ecology 17:294313.
  • Hutchings, J. A., and R. A. Myers. 1994. The evolution of alternative mating strategies in variable environments. Evolutionary Ecology 8:256268.
  • Jolly, G. M.. 1965. Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration – stochastic model. Biometrika 52:225247.
  • Kareiva, P., M. Marvier, and M. McClure. 2000. Recovery and management options for spring/summer chinook salmon in the Columbia River Basin. Science 290:977979.
  • Kinnison, M. T., and A. P. Hendry. 2001. The pace of modern life II: from rates of contemporary microevolution to pattern and process. Genetica 112 113:145164.
  • Krcma, R. F., and R. F. Raleigh. 1970. Migration of juvenile salmon and trout into Brownlee Reservoir, 1962–65. Fishery Bulletin 68:203217.
  • Law, W., and J. Salick. 2005. Human-induced dwarfing of Himalayan snow lotus, Saussurea laniceps (Asteraceae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102:1021810220.
  • Leonardsson, K., and P. Lundberg. 1986. The choice of reproductive tactics as mixed evolutionarily stable strategy: the case of male Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Report of the Institute for Freshwater Research, Vol. 63, pp. 6976. Drottningholm.
  • Loder, N. 2005. Point of no return. Conservation in Practice 6:124129.
  • Lotka, A. J. 1959. Principles of Mathematical Biology. Dover, New York.
  • Mains, E. M., and J. M. Smith. 1964. The distribution, size, time, and current preferences of seaward migrant chinook salmon in the Columbia and Snake Rivers. Fisheries research papers. Washington Department of Fisheries, 2:543.
  • Marine, K. R., and J. J. Cech Jr. 2004. Effects of high water temperature on growth, smoltification, and predator avoidance in juvenile Sacramento River Chinook salmon. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 24:198210.
  • Merilä, J., B. C. Sheldon, and L. E. B. Kruuk. 2001. Explaining stasis: microevolutionary studies in natural populations. Genetica 112-113:199222.
  • Mesa, M. G., L. K. Weiland, and P. Wagner. 2002. Effects of acute thermal stress on survival, predator avoidance, and physiology of juvenile fall Chinook salmon. Northwest Science 76:118128.
  • Miller, R. J., and E. L. Brannon. 1982. The origin and development of life history patterns in Pacific salmonids. In E. L.Brannon, and E. O.Salo, eds. Proceedings of the Salmon and Trout Migratory Behavioral Symposium, pp. 296309. University of Washington, Seattle.
  • Myers, R. A., and J. A. Hutchings. 1986. Selection against parr maturation in Atlantic salmon. Aquaculture 53:313320.
  • Palumbi, S. R. 2001. Evolution – Humans as the world’s greatest evolutionary force. Science 293:17861790.
  • Parkhurst, Z. E. 1950. Survey of the Columbia River and Its Tributaries: Part 8. Area VII. Snake River, above Payette River to upper Salmon Falls, 19 p. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Special Scientific Report-Fisheries, No. 57, Washington DC, USA.
  • Prentice, E. F., T. A. Flagg, and C. S. McCutcheon. 1990. Feasibility of using implantable passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags in salmonids. American Fisheries Society Symposium 7:317322.
  • Quinn, T. P., M. J. Unwin, and M. T. Kinnison. 2000. Evolution of temporal isolation in the wild: Genetic divergence in timing of migration and breeding by introduced chinook salmon populations. Evolution 54:13721385.
  • Quinn, T. P., M. T. Kinnison, and M. J. Unwin. 2001. Evolution of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) populations in New Zealand: pattern, rate, and process. Genetica 112:493513.
  • Raymond, H. L. 1979. Effects of dams and impoundments on migrations of juvenile chinook salmon and steelhead from the Snake River. 1966 to 1975. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 108:505529.
  • Raymond, H. L. 1988. Effects of hydroelectric development and fisheries enhancement on spring and summer chinook salmon and steelhead in the Columbia River Basin. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 8:124.
  • Seber, G. A. F. 1965. A note on the multiple recapture census. Biometrika 52:249259.
  • Smith, T. B., and L. Bernatchez. 2008. Evolutionary change in human-altered environments. Molecular Ecology 17:18.
  • Smith, S. G., W. D. Muir, E. E. Hockersmith, R. W. Zabel, R. J. Graves, C. V. Ross, W. P. Connor et al. 2003. Influence of river conditions on survival and travel time of Snake River subyearling fall Chinook salmon. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 23:939961.
  • Sterns, S. C. 1992. The Evolution of Life Histories. New York, Oxford University Press.
  • Stockwell, C. A., A. P. Hendry, and M. T. Kinnison. 2003. Contemporary evolution meets conservation biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18:94101.
  • Taylor, E. B. 1988. Adaptive variation in rheotactic and agnostic behavior in newly emerged fry of chinook salmon. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 45:237243.
  • Taylor, E. B. 1990. Phenotypic correlates of life-history variation in juvenile chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Journal of Animal Ecology 59:455468.
  • Thomkins, J. L., and W. Hazel. 2007. The status of the conditional evolutionarily stable strategy. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22:522528.
  • Thorpe, J. E. 1986. Age at first maturity in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, freshwater period influences and conflicts with smolting. In D.Meerburg, ed. Salmonid Age at Maturity, pp. 714. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 89, Canadian Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Ottawa.
  • Thorpe, J. E., M. Mangel, N. B. Metcalfe, and F. A. Huntingford. 1998. Modelling the proximate basis of salmonid life-history variation, with application to Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. Evolutionary Ecology 12:581599.
  • Unwin, M. J., T. P. Quinn, M. T. Kinnison, and N. C. Boustead. 2000. Divergence in juvenile growth and life history in two recently colonized and partially isolated chinook salmon populations. Journal of Fish Biology 57:943960.
  • Vigg, S., and C. C. Burley. 1991. Temperature-dependent maximum daily consumption of juvenile salmonids by northern squawfish (Ptychocheilus oregonensis) from the Columbia River. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48:24912498.
  • Vitousek, P. M., H. A. Mooney, J. Lubchenco, and J. M. Melillo. 1997. Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science 277:494499.
  • Vucetich, J. A., M. P. Nelson, and M. K. Phillips. 2006. The normative dimension and legal meaning of Endangered and Recovery in the US Endangered Species Act. Conservation Biology 20:13831390.
  • Waples, R. S. 2002. The effective size of fluctuating salmon populations. Genetics 161:783791.
  • Waples, R. S., D. J. Teel, K. W. Myers, and A. R. Marshall. 2004. Life-history divergence in Chinook salmon: historic contingencey and parallel evolution. Evolution 58:386403.
  • Waples, R. S., R. S. Zabel, M. D. Scheuerell, and B. L. Sanderson. 2007. Evolutionary responses by native species to major anthropogenic changes to their ecosystems: Pacific salmon in the Columbia River hydropower system. Molecular Ecology 17:8496.
  • Williams, J. G., S. G. Smith, R. W. Zabel, W. D. Muir, M. D. Scheuerell, B. P. Sandford, and D. M. Marsh et al. 2005. Effects of the Federal Columbia River Power System on Salmon Populations, 150 p. US Deparment of Commerce, NOAA Tech. Memo., Seattle, NMFS-NWFSC-63. Available online at: http://www.nwfsc.noaa.gov/publications.
  • World Commission on Dams (WCD). 2000. Dams and Development: a New Framework for Decision-Making. Earthscan Publications, London.
  • Young, F. R., and W. L. Robinson. 1974. Age, size, and sex of Columbia River chinook, 1960-69. Fish Commission of Oregon, Data Report Series, Report Number 4, Clackamas, OR.
  • Zabel, R. W., M. D. Scheuerell, M. M. McClure, and J. G. Williams. 2006. The interplay between climate variability and density dependence in the population viability of Chinook salmon. Conservation Biology 20:190200.