SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Literature cited

  • Allendorf, F. W. 1986. Delay of adaptation to captive breeding by equalizing family size. Zoo Biology 5:181190.
  • Allendorf, F. W. 1993. Delay of adaptation to captive breeding by equalizing family size. Conservation Biology 7:416419.
  • Allendorf, F. W., and G. Luikart. 2007. Conservation and the Genetics of Populations. Blackwell Publishing, UK.
  • Allendorf, F. W., and N. Ryman. 1987. Genetic management of hatchery stocks. In N.Ryman, and F.Utter, eds. Population Genetics and Fishery Management, pp. 141159. University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA.
  • Allendorf, F. W., and R. S. Waples. 1996. Conservation and genetics of salmonid fishes. In J. C.Avise, and J. L.Hamrick, eds. Conservation Genetics: Case Histories From Nature, pp. 238280. Chapman and Hall, New York.
  • Allendorf, F. W., D. Bayles, D. L. Bottom, K. P. Currens, C. A. Frissell, D. Hankin, J. A. Lichatowich et al. 1997. Prioritizing Pacific salmon stocks for conservation. Conservation Biology 11:140152.
  • Alvarez, D., and A. G. Nicieza. 2003. Predator avoidance behaviour in wild and hatchery-reared brown trout: the role of experience and domestication Journal of Fish Biology 63:15651577.
  • Araki, H., R. S. Waples, W. R. Ardren, B. Cooper, and M. S. Blouin. 2007a. Effective population size of steelhead trout: influence of variance in reproductive success, hatchery programs, and genetic compensation between life-history forms. Molecular Ecology 16:953966.
  • Araki, H., W. R. Ardren, E. Olsen, B. Cooper, and M. S. Blouin. 2007b. Reproductive success of captive-bred steelhead trout in the wild: evaluation of three stocking programs in the Hood River. Conservation Biology 21:181190.
  • Araki, H., B. Cooper, and M. S. Blouin. 2007c. Genetic effects of captive breeding cause a rapid, cumulative fitness decline in the wild. Science 318:100103.
  • Araki, H., B. A. Berejikian, M. J. Ford, and M. S. Blouin. 2008. Fitness of hatchery-reared salmonids in the wild. Evolutionary Applications 1:342355.
  • Ardren, W. R., and A. R. Kapuscinski. 2003. Demographic and genetic estimates of effective population size (Ne) reveals genetic compensation in steelhead trout. Molecular Ecology 12:3549.
  • Armstrong, D. P., and P. J. Seddon. 2008. Directions in reintroduction biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23:2025.
  • Ballou, J., and R. C. Lacy. 1995. Identifying genetically important individuals for management of genetic diversity in pedigreed populations. In J.Ballou, M.Gilpin, and L.Foose, eds. Population Management for Survival and Recovery: Analytical Methods and Strategies for Small Population Conservation, pp. 76111. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Bams, R. A. 1976. Survival and propensity for homing as affected by presence or absence of locally adapted paternal genes in two transplanted populations of pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha). Journal of the Fisheries Board of Canada 33:27162725.
  • Bartley, D., M. Bagley, G. Gall, and B. Bartley. 1992. Use of linkage disequilibrium data to estimate effective size of hatchery and natural fish populations. Conservation Biology 6:365375.
  • Baum, E. 1997. Maine Atlantic Salmon: A National Treasure. Atlantic Salmon Unlimited, Hermon, Maine.
  • Beacham, T. D. 2003. Comment on “Rapid evolution of egg size in captive salmon”. Science 302:59d.
  • Beck, B. B., L. G. Rapaport, M. R. Stanley Price, and A. C. Wilson. 1994. Reintroduction of captive-born animals. In P. J. S.Olney, G. M.Mace, and A. T. C.Feistner, eds. Creative Conservation: Interactive Management of Wild and Captive Animals, pp. 265286. . Chapman and Hall, London.
  • Berejikian, B. A. 1995. The effects of hatchery and wild ancestry and experience on the relative ability of steelhead trout fry (Oncorhynchus mykiss) to avoid a benthic predator. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52:24762482.
  • Berejikian, B. A., S. B. Mathews, and T. P. Quinn. 1996. Effects of hatchery and wild ancestry and rearing environments on the development of agonistic behavior in steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fry. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53:20042014.
  • Berejikian, B. A., T. Flagg, and P. Kline. 2004. Release of captively reared adult anadromous salmonids for population maintenance and recovery: biological trade-offs and management considerations. American Fisheries Society Symposium 44:233245.
  • Berejikian, B. A., T. Johnson, R. Endicott, and J. Lee 2008. Increases in steelhead red abundance resulting from two conservation hatchery strategies in the Hamma Hamma River, WA. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 65:754764.
  • Bernatchez, L. 1995. A role for molecular systematics in defining evolutionary significant units. American Fisheries Society Symposium 17:114132.
  • Bijlsma, R., J. Bundgaard, and A. C. Boerema. 2000. Does inbreeding affect the extinction risk of small populations? Predictions from Drosophila. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13:502514.
  • Bohlin, T., L. F. Sundstrom, J. I. Johnsson, I. Hojesjo, and J. Pettersson. 2002. Density-dependent growth in brown trout: effects of introducing wild and hatchery fish Journal of Animal Ecology 71:683692.
  • Booth, R. E., and J. P. Grime. 2003. Effects of genetic impoverishment on plant community diversity. Journal of Ecology 91:721730.
  • Borlase, S. C., D. A. Loebel, R. Frankham, R. K. Nurthen, D. A. Briscoe and G. E. Daggard 1993. Modeling problems in conservation genetics using captive Drosophila populations: consequences of equalization of family sizes. Conservation Biology 7:122131.
  • Bosch, W. J., T. H. Newsome, J. L. Dunnigan, J. D. Hubble, and D. Neeley. 2007. Evaluating the feasibility of reestablishing a Coho Salmon population in the Yakima River, Washington. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 27:198214.
  • Bowen, B. W. 1999. Preserving genes, species, or ecosystems? Healing the fractured foundations of conservation policy. Molecular Ecology 8:S5S10.
  • Braithwaite, V. A., and A. G. V. Salvanes. 2005. Environmental variability in the early rearing environment generates behaviourally flexible cod: implications for rehabilitating wild populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B – Biological Sciences 272:11071113.
  • Brannon, E. L., D. F. Amend, M. A. Cronin, J. E. Lannon, S. LaPatra, W. J. McNeil, R. E. Noble et al. 2004. The controversy about salmon hatcheries. Fisheries 29:1230.
  • Bronte, C. R., M. E. Holey, C. P. Madenjian, J. L. Jonas, R. M. Claramunt, P. C. McKee, M. L. Toneys et al. 2007. Relative abundance, site fidelity, and survival of adult lake trout in Lake Michigan from 1999 to 2001: implications for future restoration strategies. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 27:137155.
  • Brown, L. R., and D. Michniuk. 2007. Littoral zone assemblages of the alien-dominated Sacremento-San Joaquin Delta, California 1980–1983 and 2001–2003. Estuaries and Coasts 30:186200.
  • Bryant, E. H., and D. H. Reed. 1999. Fitness decline under relaxed selection in captive populations. Conservation Biology 7:122131.
  • Burger, C. V., K. T. Scribner, W. J. Spearman, and D. O. Campton. 2000. Genetic contribution of three introduced life history forms of sockeye salmon to colonization of Frazer Lake, Alaska. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57:20962111.
  • Caballero, A., and M. A. Toro. 2000. Interrelations between effective population size and other pedigree tools for the management of conserved populations. Genetical Research 75:331343.
  • Caballero, A., and M. A. Toro. 2002. Analysis of genetic diversity for the management of conserved subdivided populations. Conservation Genetics 3:289299.
  • Campton, D. E. 1995. Genetic effects of hatchery fish on wild populations of Pacific salmon and steelhead: what do we really know? American Fisheries Society Symposium 15:7180.
  • Campton, D. E. 2004. Sperm competition in salmon hatcheries: the need to establish genetically-benign spawning protocols. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 133:12771289.
  • Carofinno, D. C., L. M. Miller, A. R. Kapuscinski, and J. J. Ostazecki. 2008. Stocking success of local-origin fry and impact of hatchery ancestry: monitoring a new steelhead stocking program in a Minnesota tributary to Lake Superior. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 65:309318.
  • Carr, J. W., F. Whoriskey, and P. O’Reilly. 2004. Efficacy of releasing captive reared broodstock into an imperilled wild Atlantic salmon population as a recovery strategy. Journal of Fish Biology 65(Suppl A):3854.
  • Chebanov, N. A., and B. E. Riddell. 1998. The spawning behavior, selection of mates, and reproductive success of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawyscha) spawners of natural and hatchery origins under conditions of joint spawning. Journal of Ichthyology 38:517526.
  • Chilcote, M. W. 2003. Relationship between natural productivity and the frequency of wild fish in mixed spawning populations of wild and hatchery steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60:10571067.
  • Chilcote, M. W., S. A. Leider, and J. J. Loch. 1986. Differential reproductive success of hatchery and wild summer-run steelhead under natural conditions. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 115:727735.
  • Claytor, R., P. Boudreau, T. Currie, J. Gibson, T. Goff, R. Jones, C. Katopodis et al. 2006. Conceptual Facility to BYPASS ATLANTIC SALMON SMOLTS at the Tobique Narrows Dam. Expert opinion 2002/02. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Ottawa, Canada.
  • COSEWIC. 2000. COSEWIC Assessment and Update Status Report on Aurora Trout (Salvelinus Fontinalis Timagamiensis) in Canada. Committee of the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, Ottawa.
  • COSEWIC. 2003a. COSEWIC Assessment and Update Status Report on Sockeye Salmon (Oncorhynchus Nerka) Sakinaw Population in Canada. Committee of the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, Ottawa.
  • COSEWIC. 2003b. COSEWIC Assessment and Update Status Report on Sockeye Salmon (Oncorhynchus Nerka) Cultus Population in Canada. Committee of the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, Ottawa.
  • COSEWIC. 2006a. COSEWIC Assessment and Update Status Report on Atlantic Salmon (Salmo Salar) of Lake Ontario. Committee of the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, Ottawa.
  • COSEWIC. 2006b. COSEWIC Assessment and Update Status Report on Atlantic Salmon (Salmo Salar) Inner Bay of Fundy Populations. Committee of the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, Ottawa.
  • COSEWIC. 2006c. COSEWIC Emergency Assessment of the Sakinaw Lake Population of Sockeye Salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Committee of the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, Ottawa.
  • Crandall, K. A., O. R. P. Bininda-Emonds, G. M. Mace, and R. K. Wayne. 2000. Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15:290295.
  • Crawford, S. S. 2001. Salmonine Introductions to the Laurentian Great Lakes: An Historical Review and Evaluation of Ecological Effects. Canadian Special Publications in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 132. National Research Council Canada Monograph Series, NRC Research Press, Ottawa, 205 pp.
  • Crawford, S. S., and A. M. Muir. 2008. Global Introductions of Salmon and Trout of the Genus Oncorhynchus: 1870–2007. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries In press.
  • Crow, J. F., and M. Kimura. 1970. An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Harper and Row, New York, NY. 591 pp.
  • Currens, K. P., and C. A. Busack. 1995. A framework for assessing genetic vulnerability. Fisheries 20:2431.
  • Currens, K. P., F. W. Allendorf, D. Bayles, D. L. Bottom, C. A. Frissell, D. Hankin, J. A. Lichatowich et al. 1998. Conservation of Pacific salmon: response to Wainright and Waples. Conservation Biology 12:11481149.
  • Dahl, J., E. Pettersson, J. Dannewitz, T. Jarvi, and A. C. Lof. 2006. No difference in survival, growth and morphology between offspring of wild-born, hatchery and hybrid brown trout (Salmo trutta). Ecology of Freshwater Fish 15:388397.
  • Dannewitz, J., E. Petersson, T. Prestegaard, and T. Jarvi. 2003. Effects of sea-ranching and family background on fitness traits in brown trout Salmo trutta reared under near-natural conditions. Journal of Applied Ecology 40:241250.
  • Dellefors, C., and J. I. Johnsson. 1995. Foraging under risk of predation in wild and hatchery-reared juvenile sea trout (Salmo trutta L.). Nordic Journal of Freshwater Research 70:3137.
  • D.F.O. 2006. Recovery Strategy for the Atlantic Whitefish (Coregonus Huntsmani) in Canada. Species At Risk Act Recovery strategy series, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Ottawa, Canada.
  • Dickhoff, W. W., B. R. Beckman, D. A. Larsen, C. V. W. Mahnken, C. B. Schreck, C. Sharp, and W. S. Zaugg. 1995. Quality assessment of hatchery-reared spring chinook smolts in the Columbia River basin. American Fisheries Society Symposium 15:292302.
  • Dodson, J. J., R. J. Gibson, R. A. Cunjak, K. D. Friedland, C. Garcia de Leaniz, M. R. Gross, R. Newbury et al. 1998. Elements in the development of conservation plans for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55(Suppl 1):312323.
  • Doyle, R. W., R. Perez-Enriquez, M. Takagi, and M. Taniguchi. 2001. Selective recovery of founder diversity in aquaculture broodstocks and captive, endangered fish populations. Genetica 111:291304.
  • Duchesne, P., and L. Bernatchez. 2002. An analytical investigation of the dynamics of inbreeding in multi-generation supportive breeding. Conservation Genetics 3:4760.
  • Ebanhard, T. 1995. Conservation breeding as a tool for saving animal species from extinction. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11:438443.
  • Edge, T. A., and J. Gilhen. 2001. Updated status report on the endangered Atlantic Whitefish, Coregonus huntsmani. Canadian Field Naturalist 115:635652.
  • Edmands, S. 2007. Between a rock and a hard place: evaluating the relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for conservation and management. Molecular Ecology 16:463475.
  • Einum, S., and I. A. Fleming. 1997. Genetic divergence and interactions in the wild among native, farmed and hybrid Atlantic salmon. Journal of Fish Biology 50:634651.
  • Einum, S., and I. A. Fleming. 1999. Maternal effects of egg size in brown trout (Salmo trutta): norms of reaction to environmental quality. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Biological Sciences 266:20952100.
  • Einum, S., and I. A. Fleming. 2000. Selection against late emergence and small offspring in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Evolution 54:628639.
  • Eknath, A. E., and R. W. Doyle. 1990. Effective population size and the rate of inbreeding in aquaculture of Indian major carps. Aquaculture 85:293305.
  • Eldridge, W. H., and K. Killebrew. 2007. Genetic diversity over multiple generations of supplementation: an example from Chinook salmon using microsatellite and demographic data. Conservation Genetics 9:1328.
  • Federenko, A. Y., and B. G. Shepherd. 1986. Review of Salmon Transplant Procedures and Suggested Transplant Guidelines. Canadian Technical Reports for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 1479, Vancouver, BC, 144 pp.
  • Felsenstein, J. 1971. Inbreeding and variance effective numbers in populations with overlapping generations. Genetics 68:581597.
  • Fernandez, J., and A. Caballero. 2001. A comparison of management strategies for conservation with regard to population fitness. Conservation Genetics 2:121131.
  • Fernandez, J., M. A. Toro, and A. Caballero. 2003. Fixed contribution designs vs. minimization of global coanscestry to control inbreeding in small populations. Genetics 165:885894.
  • Fernandez, J., M. A. Toro, and A. Caballero. 2004. Managing individuals’ contributions to maximize the allelic diversity maintained in small, conserved populations. Conservation Biology 18:358367.
  • Ferno, A., and T. Jarvi. 1998. Domestication genetically alters the anitpredator behaviour of anadromous brown trout (Salmo trutta) – dummy predator experiment. Nordic Journal of Freshwater Research 74:95100.
  • Fischer, J., and D. B. Lindenmayer. 2000. An assessment of the published results of 22 animal relocations. Biological Conservation 96:111.
  • Flagg, T. A., C. V. W. Mahnken, and K. A. Johnson. 1995. Captive broodstocks for recovery of Snake River sockeye salmon. In H. L.Schramm, and R. G.Piper, eds. Uses and Effects of Cultured Fishes in Aquatic Ecosystems, pp. 8190. American Fisheries Society Symposium, Bethesda, MD.
  • Flagg, T. A., M. C. McAuley, and W. T. Fairgrieve. 1999. Status of Redfish Lake Sockeye Salmon Broodstocks at NMFS January Through December 1999. Resource enhancement and utilization technologies division, National Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association, Seattle.
  • Flagg, T. A., M. C. McAuley, P. A. Kline, M. S. Powell, D. Taki, and J. C. Gislason. 2004a. Application of captive broodstocks to preservation of ESA-listed stocks of Pacific salmon: Redfish Lake Sockeye Salmon Case example. American Fisheries Society Symposium 44:387400.
  • Flagg, T. A., C. V. W. Mahnken, and R. N. Iwamoto. 2004b. Conservation hatchery protocols for Pacific salmon. American Fisheries Society Symposium 44:603619.
  • Fleming, I. A. 1994. Captive breeding and the conservation of wild salmon populations. Conservation Biology 8:886888.
  • Fleming, I. A., and S. Einum. 1997. Experimental tests of genetic divergence of farmed from wild Atlantic salmon due to domestication. ICES Journal of Marine Science 54:10511063.
  • Fleming, I. A., and M. R. Gross. 1993. Breeding success of hatchery and wild coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in competition. Ecological Applications 3:230245.
  • Fleming, I. A., and E. Petersson. 2001. The ability of released, hatchery salmonids to breed and contribute to the natural productivity of wild populations. Nordic Journal of Freshwater Research 75:7198.
  • Fleming, I. A., B. Jonsson, and M. R. Gross. 1994. Phenotypic divergence of sea-ranched, farmed and wild salmon. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51:28082824.
  • Fleming, I. A., K. Hindar, I. B. Mjolnerod, B. Jonsson, T. Balstad, and A. Lamberg. 2000. Lifetime success and interactions of farm salmon invading a native population. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B – Biological Sciences 267:15171524.
  • Fleming, I. A., S. Einum, B. Jonsson, and N. Jonsson. 2003. Comment on “Rapid evolution of egg size in captive salmon”. Science 302:59d.
  • Ford, M. J. 2002. Selection in captivity during supportive breeding may reduce fitness in the wild. Conservation Biology 16:815825.
  • Ford, M. J., H. Fuss, B. Boelts, E. LaHood, J. Hard, and J. B. Miller. 2006. Changes in run timing and natural smolt production in a naturally spawning coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) population after 60 years of intensive hatchery supplementation. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63:23432355.
  • Foresberg, L. A., J. Dannewitz, E. Petersson, and M. Grahm. 2007. Influence of genetic similarity in the reproductive success and mate choice of brown trout – females fishing for optimal MHC dissimilarity. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20:18591869.
  • Frankel, O. H., and M. E. Soulé. 1981. Conservation and Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. 327 pp.
  • Frankham, R. 1995. Effective population size – adult population sizes in wildlife: a review. Genetical Research 66:95107.
  • Frankham, R. 2005. Genetics and extinction. Biological Conservation 126:131140.
  • Frankham, R. 2008. Genetic adaptation to captivity. Molecular Ecology 17:325333.
  • Frankham, R., H. Manning, S. A. Margan, and D. A. Briscoe. 2000. Does equalization of family size reduce genetic adaptation to captivity? Animal Conservation 3:357363.
  • Frankham, R., J. D. Ballou, and D. A. Briscoe. 2002. Introduction to Conservation Genetics. Cambridge University Press, UK.
  • Franklin, I. A. 1980. Evolutionary changes in small populations. In M. E.Soule, and B. A.Wilcox, eds. Conservation Biology, and Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective, pp. 135150. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
  • Fraser, D. J., and L. Bernatchez. 2001. Adaptive evolutionary conservation: towards a unified concept for defining conservation units. Molecular Ecology 10:27412752.
  • Fraser, D. J., and L. Bernatchez. 2005. Adaptive migratory divergence among sympatric brook charr populations. Evolution 59:611624.
  • Fraser, D. J., and L. Bernatchez. 2008. Ecology, evolution and the conservation of lake-migratory brook trout: a perspective from pristine populations. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society in press.
  • Fraser, D. J., P. Duchesne, and L. Bernatchez. 2005. Migratory charr schools exhibit population and kin associations beyond juvenile stages. Molecular Ecology 14:31333146.
  • Fraser, D. J., T. Coon, R. Dion, M. R. Prince, and L. Bernatchez. 2006. Integrating traditional and evolutionary knowledge in biodiversity conservation: a population level case study. Ecology and Society 11:4.
  • Fraser, D. J., M. M. Hansen, N. Tessier, S. Ostergaard, M. Legault, and L. Bernatchez. 2007a. Comparative estimation of effective population sizes and temporal gene flow in two contrasting population systems. Molecular Ecology 16:38663889.
  • Fraser, D. J., M. W. Jones, T. L. McParland, and J. A. Hutchings. 2007b. Loss of historical immigration and the unsuccessful rehabilitation of extirpated salmon populations. Conservation Genetics 8:527546.
  • Frazer, N. 1992. Sea turtle conservation and halfway technology. Conservation Biology 6:179184.
  • Fritts, A. L., J. L. Scott, and T. N. Pearsons. 2007. The effects of domestication on the relative vulnerability of hatchery and wild spring chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) to predation. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 64:813818.
  • Garcia de Leaniz, C., I. A. Fleming, S. Einum, E. Verspoor, W. C. Jordan, S. Consuegra, N. Aubin-Horth et al. 2007. A critical review of adaptive genetic variation in Atlantic salmon: implications for conservation. Biological Reviews 82:173211.
  • Gausen, D. 1993. The Norwegian Gene Bank Programme for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). In J.G.Cloud, and G.H.Thorgaard, eds. Genetic Conservation of Salmonid Fishes, pp. 181187. Plenum Press, New York.
  • Gautschi, B., G. Jabob, and J. J. Negro. 2003. Analysis of relatedness and determination of the source of founders in the captive bearded vulture, Gypaetus barbatus, population. Conservation Genetics 4:479490.
  • Gerlier, M., and P. Roche. 1998. A radiotelemetry study of the migration of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) and sea trout (Salmo trutta L.) in the upper Rhine. Hydrobiologia 371/372:283293.
  • Gomulkiewicz, R., and R. D. Holt. 1995. When does evolution by natural selection prevent extinction? Evolution 49:201207.
  • Goodman, D. 2005. Selection equilibrium for hatchery and wild spawning fitness in integrated breeding programs. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 62:374389.
  • Griffith, B., J. M. Scott, J. W. Carpenter, and C. Reed. 1989. Translocations as a species conservation tool: status and strategy. Science 245:477480.
  • Guerrero-Bosagna, C., P. Sabat, and L. Valladares. 2005. Environmental signaling and evolutionary change: can exposure of pregnant mammals to environmental estrogens lead to epigentically-induced changes in embryos? Evolution and Development 7:341350.
  • Hansen, M. M. 2002. Estimating the long-term effects of stocking domesticated trout into wild brown trout (Salmo trutta) populations: an approach using microsatellite DNA analysis of historical and contemporary samples. Molecular Ecology 11:10031015.
  • Hansen, M. M., and L. F. Jensen. 2005. Sibship within samples of brown trout (Salmo trutta) and implications for supportive breeding. Conservation Genetics 6:297305.
  • Hansen, M. M., E. E. Nielsen, and K.-L. D. Mensberg. 1997. The problem of sampling families rather than populations: relatedness among individuals in samples of juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta, L.). Molecular Ecology 6:469474.
  • Hanski, I., and I. Saccheri. 2006. Molecular-level variation affects population growth in a butterfly metapopulation. PLOS Biology 4:719726.
  • Hard, J. J. 1995. Genetic monitoring of life-history characters in salmon supplementation: problems and opportunities. American Fisheries Society Symposium 15:212225.
  • Hard, J. J. 2004. Evolution of Chinook salmon life history under size-selective harvest. In A. P.Hendry, and S. C.Stearns, eds. Evolution Illuminated: Salmon and Their Relatives, pp. 316337. University Press, New York.
  • Hartl, D. L., and A. G. Clark. 1989. Principles of Population Genetics. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA.
  • Harvey, B. 1993. Cryopreservation of fish spermatozoa. In J. G.Cloud, and G. H.Thorgaard, eds. Genetic Conservation of Salmonid Fishes, pp. 175178. Plenum Press, New York.
  • Haugen, T. O., and L. A. Vollestad. 2000. Population differences in early-life history traits in grayling. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13:897905.
  • Heath, D. D., C. W. Fox, and J. W. Heath. 1999. Maternal effects of offspring size: variation through early development of chinook salmon. Evolution 53:16051611.
  • Heath, D. D., J. W. Heath, C. A. Bryden, R. M. Johnson, and C. W. Fox. 2003. Rapid evolution of egg size in captive salmon. Science 299:17381740.
  • Hebdon, J. L., P. Kline, D. Taki, and T. A. Flagg. 2004. Evaluating reintroduction strategies for Redfish Lake sockeye salmon captive broodstock progeny. American Fisheries Society Symposium 44:401413.
  • Hedrick, P. W., and D. Hedgecock. 1994. Effective population size in winter-run chinook salmon. Conservation Biology 8:890902.
  • Hedrick, P. W., D. Hedgecock, and S. Hamelberg. 1995. Effective population size in winter-run chinook salmon. Conservation Biology 9:615624.
  • Hedrick, P. W., D. Hedgecock, S. Hamelberg, and S. J. Croci. 2000a. The impact of supplementation in winter-run Chinook salmon on effective population size. Journal of Heredity 91:112116.
  • Hedrick, P. W., V. K. Rashbrook, and D. Hedgecock. 2000b. Effective population size in winter-run chinook salmon based on microsatellite analysis of returning spawners. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57:23682373.
  • Hedrick, P. W., T. E. Dowling, W. L. Minckley, C. A. Tibbets, B. D. Demarais, and P. C. Marsh. 2000c. Establishing a captive broodstock for the endangered Bonytail chub (Gila elegans). Journal of Heredity 91:3539.
  • Hendry, A. P. 2001. Adaptive divergence and the evolution of reproductive isolation in the wild: an empirical demonstration using introduced sockeye salmon. Genetica 112:515534.
  • Hendry, A. P., J. K. Wenburg, P. Bentzen, E. C. Volk, and T. P. Quinn. 2000. Rapid evolution of reproductive isolation in the wild: evidence from introduced salmon. Science 290:516518.
  • Herbinger, C. M., P. T. O’Reilly, and E. Verspoor. 2006. Unravelling first-generation pedigrees in wild endangered salmon populations using molecular genetic markers. Molecular Ecology 15:22612275.
  • Hesthagen, T., and B. M. Larsen. 2003. Recovery and establishment of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, in limed Norwegian rivers. Fisheries Management and Ecology 10:8795.
  • Hill, W. G. 1972. Effective size of populations with overlapping generations. Theoretical Population Biology 3:278289.
  • Hindar, K., N. Ryman, and F. Utter. 1991. Genetic effects of cultured fish on natural fish populations. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48:945957.
  • Holt, R. D. 1993. Ecology at the mesoscale: the influence of regional processes on communities. In R.Ricklefs, and D.Schluter, eds. Species Diversity in Ecological Communities: Historical and Biogeographical Perspectives, pp. 7788. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Hood Canal Coordinating Council. 2005. Hood Canal and Eastern Strait of Juan de Fuca Summer Chum Salmon Recovery Plan. Executive summary, Hood Canal Coordinating Council, Belfair, Washington, 15 pp.
  • Incerpi, A. 1996. Hatchery-bashing: a useless pastime. Fisheries 21:28.
  • Independent Scientific Review Panel. 2003. Review of Idaho Supplementation Studies. Document no. 2003-8.Independent Scientific Review Panel, Portland, Oregon.
  • Innes, B. H., and N. G. Elliott. 2006. Genetic diversity in a Tasmanian hatchery population of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) compared with its Canadian progenitor population. Aquaculture Research 37:563569.
  • Irvine, J. R., M. R. Gross, C. C. Wood, L. B. Holtby, N. D. Schubert, and P. G. Amiro. 2005. Canada’s Species at Risk Act: An opportunity to protect “endangered” salmon. Fisheries 30:1119.
  • IUCN. 1998. Guidelines for reintroductions. http://www.iucn.org/themes/ssc/publications/policy/reinte/ (accessed 15 May 2008).
  • IUCN. 2006. IUCN red list of threatened species. http://www.iucnredlist.org/ (accessed 15 May 2008).
  • Jirtle, R. L., and M. K. Skinner. 2007. Environmental epigenomics and disease susceptibility. Nature Reviews Genetics 8:253262.
  • Johnsson, J. I., and M. V. Abrahams. 1991. Interbreeding with domestic strain increases foraging under threat of predation in juvenile steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) – an experimental study. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48:243247.
  • Johnsson, J. I., E. Petersson, E. Jönsson, B. T. Björnsson, and T. Järvi. 1996. Domestication and growth hormone alter antipredator behaviour and growth patterns in juvenile brown trout, Salmo trutta. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53:15461554.
  • Johnsson, J. I., J. Hojesjo, and I. A. Fleming. 2001. Behavioural and heart rate responses to predation risk in wild and domesticated Atlantic salmon. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58:788794.
  • Jonsson, B., N. Jonsson, and I. A. Fleming. 1996. Does early growth cause a phenotypically plastic response in egg production of Atlantic salmon? Functional Ecology 10:8996.
  • Kallio-Nyberg, I., and M. L. Koljonen. 1997. The genetic consequence of hatchery rearing on life-history traits of the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.): a comparative analysis of sea-ranched salmon with wild and reared parents. Aquaculture 153:207224.
  • Keller, L. F., and D. M. Waller. 2002. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:230241.
  • Kimura, M., and J. F. Crow. 1963. The measurement of effective population number. Evolution 17:279288.
  • King, J. L. 1965. The effects of litter culling-or family planning-on the rate of natural selection. Genetics 51:425429.
  • Kinnison, M. T., and N. G. Hairston. 2007. Eco-evolutionary conservation biology: contemporary evolution and the dynamics of persistence. Functional Ecology 21:444454.
  • Kinnison, M. T., M. J. Unwin, and T. P. Quinn. 2008. Eco-evolutionary versus habitat contribution to invasion: experimental evaluation in the wild. Molecular Ecology 17:405414.
  • Knudsen, C. M., S. L. Schroder, C. A. Busack, M. V. Johnston, T. N. Pearsons, W. J. Bosch, and D. E. Fast. 2006. Comparison of life history traits between first-generation hatchery and wild Upper Yakima River Spring Chinook salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 135:11301144.
  • Koljonen, M. L., J. Tahtinen, M. Saisa, and J. Koskiniemi. 2002. Maintenance of genetic diversity of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) by captive breeding programmes and the geographic distribution of microsatellite variation. Aquaculture 212:6992.
  • Koskinen, M. T., T. O. Haugen, and C. R. Primmer. 2002. Contemporary fisherian life-history evolution in small salmonid populations. Nature 419:826830.
  • Kostow, K. E. 2004. Differences in juvenile phenotypes and survival between hatchery stocks and a natural population provide evidence for modified selection due to captive breeding. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61:577589.
  • Kostow, K. E., A. R. Marshall, and S. R. Phelps. 2003. Naturally spawning hatchery steelhead contribute to smolt production but experience low reproductive success. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 132:780790.
  • Kozfkay, C. C., M. R. Campbell, J. A. Heindel, D. J. Baker, P. Kline, M. S. Powell, and T. A. Flagg. 2008. A genetic evaluation of relatedness for broodstock management of captive, endangered Snake River sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Conservation Genetics In press.
  • Kraaijeveld-Smit, F. J. L., R. A. Griffiths, R. D. Moore, and T. J. C. Beebee. 2006. Captive breeding and the fitness of reintroduced species: a test of the responses to predators in a threatened amphibian. Journal of Applied Ecology 43:360365.
  • Krueger, C. C., and P. E. Ihssen. 1995. Review of genetics of lake trout in the great lakes: History, molecular genetics, physiology, strain comparisons, and restoration management. Journal of Great Lakes Research 21(Suppl 1):348363.
  • Krueger, C. C., A. J. Gharrett, T. R. Dehring, and F. W. Allendorf. 1991. Genetic aspects of fisheries rehabilitation programs. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38:18771881.
  • Kusuda, S., N. Koide, and H. Kawamula. 2005. Cryopreservation diluents for spermatozoa of Sakhalin taimen Hucho perryi. Fisheries Science 71:293298.
  • Lahnsteiner, F. 2000. Semen cryopreservation in the salmonidae and in the Northern pike. Aquaculture Research 31:245258.
  • Lahnsteiner, F., T. Weismann, and R. Patzner. 1996. Cryopreservation of semen of the grayling (Thymallus thymallus) and the Danube salmon (Hucho hucho). Aquaculture 144:265274.
  • Lambrinos, J. G. 2004. How interactions between ecology and evolution influence invasion dynamics. Ecology 85:20612070.
  • Lande, R. 1995. Breeding plans for small populations based on the dynamics of quantitative genetic variance. In J. D.Ballou, M.Gilpin, and T. J.Foose, eds. Population Management for Survival and Recovery: Analytical Methods and Strategies in Small Population Conservation, pp. 318340. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Landry, C., D. Garant, P. Duchesne, and L. Bernatchez. 2001. ‘Good genes as heterozygosity’– the major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Biological Sciences 268:12791285.
  • Larsen, D. A., B. R. Beckman, K. A. Cooper, D. Barrett, M. Johnson, P. Swanson, and W. W. Dickhoff. 2004. Assessments of high rates of precocial male maturation in a spring Chinook salmon supplementation hatchery programme. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 133:98120.
  • Lassuy, D. R. 1995. Introduced species as a factor in extinction and endangerment of native fish species. In H. L.Schramm, and R. G.Piper, eds. Uses and Effects of Cultured Fishes in Aquatic Ecosystems, pp. 391396. American Fisheries Society Symposium 15, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
  • Leberg, P. L. 1992. Effects of population bottlenecks on genetic diversity as measured my allozyme electrophoresis. Evolution 46:477494.
  • Leberg, P. L., and B. D. Firmin. 2008. Role of inbreeding depression and purging in captive breeding and restoration programmes. Molecular Ecology 17:334343.
  • Leider, S. A., P. L. Hulett, J. J. Loch, and M. W. Chilcote. 1990. Electrophoretic comparison of the reproductive success of naturally spawning transplanted and wild steelhead trout through the returning adult stage. Aquaculture 88:239252.
  • Luikart, G., F. W. Allendorf, J. M. Cornuet, and W. B. Sherwin. 1998. Distortion of allele frequency distributions provides a test for recent population bottlenecks. Journal of Heredity 89:238247.
  • Lynch, M., and M. O’Hely. 2001. Captive breeding and the genetic fitness of natural populations. Conservation Genetics 2:363378.
  • Machado-Schiaffino, G., E. Dopico, and E. Garcia-Vazquez. 2007. Genetic variation losses in Atlantic salmon stocks created for supportive breeding. Aquaculture 264:5965.
  • Mahnken, C., E. Prentic, W. Waknitz, N. G. Sims, and J. Williams. 1982. The application of recent smoltifcation research to public hatchery releases: an assessment of size/time requirements for Columbia River hatchery coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Aquaculture 28:251268.
  • Margan, S. H., R. K. Nurthen, M. E. Montgomery et al. 1998. Single large or several small? Population fragmentation in the captive management of endangered species. Zoo Biology 17:467480.
  • Maynard, D. J., T. A. Flagg, C. V. W. Mahnken, and S. L. Schroder. 1996. Natural rearing technologies for increased postrelease survival of hatchery-reared salmon. Bulletin of National Research Institute of Aquaculture 2:7177.
  • Maynard, D. J., T. A. Flagg, R. N. Iwamoto, and C. V. W. Mahnken. 2004. A review of recent studies investigating seminatural release strategies as a tool for increasing Pacific salmon postrelease survival. American Fisheries Society Symposium 44:573584.
  • McGinnity, P., P. Prodohl, A. Ferguson, R. Hynes, N. O’Maoileidigh, N. Baker, D. Cotter et al. 2003. Fitness reduction and potential extinction of wild populations of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, as a result of interactions with escaped farm salmon. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B – Biological Sciences 270:24432450.
  • McGinnity, P., P. Prodohl, N. O’Maoileidigh, R. Hynes, S. Cotter, N. Baker, B. O’Hea, and A. Ferguson. 2004. Differential lifetime success and performance of native and non-native Atlantic salmon examined under common environmental conditions. Journal of Fish Biology 65(Suppl A):175187.
  • McKay, J. K., and R. G. Latta. 2002. Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:285291.
  • McKenna, J. E., and J. H. Johnson. 2005. Juvenile rainbow trout production in New York tributaries of Lake Ontario: implications for Atlantic salmon restoration. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 25:391403.
  • McKinlay, D. D., S. Lehmann, J. Bateman, and R. Cook. 2004. Pacific salmon hatcheries in British Columbia. American Fisheries Society Symposium 44:5775.
  • McLean, J. E., P. Bentzen, and T. P. Quinn. 2004. Differential reproductive success of sympatric, naturally spawning hatchery and wild steelhead, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Environmental Biology of Fishes 69:359369.
  • McLean, J. E., P. Bentzen, and T. P. Quinn. 2005. Nonrandom, size- and timing-biased breeding in a hatchery population of steelhead trout. Conservation Biology 19:446454.
  • McLean, J. E., T. R. Seamons, M. B. Dauer, P. Bentzen, and T. P. Quinn. 2007. Variation in reproductive success and effective number of breeders in a hatchery population of steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): examination by microsatellite-based parentage analysis. Conservation Genetics 9:295304.
  • Meffe, G. K. 1992. Techno-arrogance and halfway technologies: salmon hatcheries on the Pacific coast of North America. Conservation Biology 5:320324.
  • Miller, L. M., and A. R. Kapuscinski. 2003. Genetic guidelines for hatchery supplementation programmes. In E. M.Hallerman, ed. Population Genetics: Principles and Applications for Fisheries Scientists, pp. 329355. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
  • Miller, L. M., T. Close, and A. R. Kapuscinski. 2004. Lower fitness of hatchery and hybrid rainbow trout compared to naturalized populations in Lake Superior tributaries. Molecular Ecology 13:33793388.
  • Mobrand, L. E., J. Barr, L. Blankenship, D. E. Campton, T. T. P. Evelyn, T. A. Flagg, C. V. Mahnken et al. 2005. Hatchery reform in Washington State: principles and emerging issues. Fisheries 30:1122.
  • Montgomery, M. E., J. D. Ballou, R. K. Nurthen, P. R. England, D. A. Briscoe, and R. Frankham. 1997. Minimizing kinship in captive breeding programs. Zoo Biology 16:377389.
  • Moritz, C. 2002. Strategies to protect biological diversity and the evolutionary processes that sustain it. Systematic Biology 51:238254.
  • Moyer, G. R., M. S. Blouin, and M. A. Banks. 2007. The influence of family-correlated survival on Nb/N for progeny from integrated multi- and single-generation hatchery stocks of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 64:12581265.
  • Moyle, P. B. 1969. Comparative behaviour of young brook trout of domestic and wild origin. Progressive Fish Culturist 31:5156.
  • Mullins, C. C., C. E. Bourgeois, and T. R. Porter. 2003. Opening up new habitat: Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) enhancement in Newfoundland. In D.Mills, ed. Salmon at the Edge, pp. 200221. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford.
  • Myers, J. M., P. O. Heggelund, G. Hudson, and R. N. Iwamoto. 2001. Genetics and broodstock management of coho salmon. Aquaculture 197:4362.
  • Myers, R. A., S. A. Levin, R. Lande, F. C. James, W. W. Murdoch, and R. T. Paine. 2004. Hatcheries and endangered salmon Science 303:19801980.
  • Naish, K. A., J. E. Taylor, P. S. Levin, T. P. Quinn, J. R. Winton, J. Huppert, and R. Hilborn. 2008. An evaluation of the effects of conservation and fishery enhancement hatcheries on wild populations of salmon. Advances in Marine Biology 53:61194.
  • Nei, M., and N. Takahata. 1993. Effective population size, genetic diversity, and coalescence time in subdivided populations. Journal of Molecular Evolution 37:240244.
  • Newman, D., and D. Pilson. 1997. Increased probability of extinction due to decreased genetic effective population size: Experimental populations of Clarkia pulchella. Evolution 51:354362.
  • Nickelson, T. E., M. F. Solazzi, and S. L. Johnson. 1986. Use of hatchery coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) presmolts to rebuild wild populations in Oregon coastal streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 43:24432449.
  • Norman, L. 1987. Stream Aquarium Observations of Territorial Behavior in Young Salmon (Salmo Salar) of Wild and Hatchery Origin, Vol. 2. Salmon Research Institute Report, Salmon Research Institute, Sweden, 7 pp.
  • N.R.C. (National Research Council). 1996. Upstream: Salmon and Society in the Pacific Northwest. National Academy Press, Washington DC.
  • O’Reilly, P., and R. W. Doyle. 2007. Live gene banking of endangered populations of Atlantic salmon. In E.Verspoor, L.Stradmeyer, and J. L.Nielsen, eds. The Atlantic Salmon: Genetics, Conservation and Management, pp. 346380. Springer, The Netherlands.
  • Okutsu, T., S. Shikina, M. Kanno, Y. Takeuchi, and G. Yoshizaki. 2007. Production of trout offspring from triploid salmon parents. Science 317:1517.
  • Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) and US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1996. Integrated Hatchery Operations Team – Operation Plans for Anadromous Fish Production Facilities in the Columbia River Basin. Vol. II. Oregon. BPA Project No. 92-043, Bonneville Power Association, Portland Oregon.
  • Page, K. S., K. T. Scribner, D. Bast, M. E. Holey, and M. K. Burnham-Curtis. 2005. Genetic evaluation of a Great Lakes lake trout hatchery program. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 134:872891.
  • Palm, S., J. Dannewitz, T. Jarvi, E. Petersson, T. Prestegaard, and N. Ryman. 2003. Lack of molecular genetic divergence between sea-ranched and wild sea trout (Salmo trutta). Molecular Ecology 12:20572071.
  • Pante, M. J. R., B. Gjerde, and I. McMillan. 2001. Effect of inbreeding on body weight at harvest in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Aquaculture 192:201211.
  • Parrish, D. L., R. J. Behnke, S. R. Gephard, S. D. McCormick, and G. H. Reeves. 1998. Why aren’t there more Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55(Suppl 1):281287.
  • Pascual, M. A., and J. E. Ciancio. 2007. Introduced salmonids in Patagonia: risks, uses and a conservation paradox. In T. M.Bert, ed. Ecological and Genetic Implications of Aquaculture Activities, pp 333353. Springer, The Netherlands.
  • Pascual, M. A., P. Bentzen, C. Riva Rossi, G. Mackey, M. Kinnison, and R. Walker. 2001. First documented case of anadromy in a population of introduced rainbow trout in Patagonia, Argentina. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 130:5367.
  • Pearsons, T. N., A. L. Fritts, and J. L. Scott. 2007. The effects of domestication on competitive dominance of juvenile spring chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 64:803812.
  • Pelletier, F., T. Clutton-Brock, J. Pemberton, S. Tuljapurkar, and T. Coulson. 2007. The evolutionary demography of ecological change: Linking trait variation and population growth. Science 315:15711574.
  • Perez-Enriquez, R., M. Takagi, and N. Taniguchi. 1999. Genetic variability and pedigree tracing of a hatchery-reared stock of red sea bream (Pagrus major) used for stock enhancement, based on microsatellite DNA markers Aquaculture 173:413423.
  • Perry, G. M. L., C. Audet, and L. Bernatchez. 2005. Maternal genetic effects on adaptive divergence between anadromous and resident brook charr during early life-history. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18:13481361.
  • Philippart, J. C. 1995. Is captive breeding an effective solution for the preservation of endemic species? Biological Conservation 72:281295.
  • Piironen, J. 1993. Cryopreservation of sperm from brown trout (Salmo trutta m-lacustris L) and Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus L). Aquaculture 116:275285.
  • Pitcher, T. E., and B. D. Neff. 2007. Genetic quality and offspring performance in Chinook salmon: implications for supportive breeding. Conservation Genetics 8:607616.
  • Pollard, H. A., and T. A. Flagg. 2004. Guidelines for use of captive broodstocks in recovery efforts for Pacific salmon. American Fisheries Society Symposium 44:333345.
  • Prignon, C., J. C. Micha, G. Rimbaud, and J. C. Phillipart. 1999. Rehabilitation efforts for Atlantic salmon in the Meuse River Basin area. Hydrobiologia 410:6977.
  • Quinn, T. P. 2005. The Behavior and Ecology of Pacific Salmon and Trout. University of Washington Press, Seattle WA.
  • Quinn, T. P., M. T. Kinnison, and M. J. Unwin. 2001. Evolution of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) population in New Zealand: patterns, rates and process. Genetica 112:493513.
  • Ramirez, O., L. Altet, C. Ensenat, C. Vila, A. Sanchez, and A. Ruiz. 2006. Genetic assessment of the Iberian wolf Canis lupus signatus captive breeding program. Conservation Genetics 7:861878.
  • Reed, D. H., and R. Frankham. 2001. How closely correlated are molecular and quantitative measures of genetic variation? A meta-analysis. Evolution 55:10951103.
  • Reik, W. 2007. Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene regulation in mammalian development. Nature 447:425432.
  • Reisenbichler, R. R. 2004. Uncertainty and research needs for supplementing wild populations of anadromous Pacific salmon. American Fisheries Society Symposium 44:263275.
  • Reisenbichler, R. R., and J. D. McIntyre. 1977. Genetic differences in growth and survival of juvenile hatchery and wild steelhead trout, Salmo gairdneri. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 34:123128.
  • Reisenbichler, R. R., and S. P. Rubin. 1999. Genetic changes from artificial propagation of Pacific salmon affect the productivity and viability of supplemented populations. ICES Journal of Marine Science 56:459466.
  • Reisenbichler, R. R., F. M. Utter, and C. C. Krueger. 2003. Genetic concepts and uncertainties in restoring fish populations and species. In R. C.Wissmar, and P. A.Bisson, eds. Strategies for Restoring River Ecosystems, pp 149183. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
  • Reisenbichler, R. R., S. Rubin, L. Wetzel, and S. Phelps. 2004. Natural selection after release from a hatchery stock leads to domestication in steelhead, Oncorhynchus mykiss. In M.Leber, S.Kitada, H. L.Blankenship, and T.Svasand, eds. Stock Enhancement and sea Ranching, pp 371384. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK.
  • Rensel, J. 1997. Comment on March 1997 North Pacific International Chapter of the American Fisheries Society plenary session: incorporating hatcheries in ecosystem management. North Pacific International Chapter AFS Newsletter 19:1415.
  • Reusch, T. B. H., A. Ehlers, A. Hammerli, and B. Worm. 2005. Ecosystem recovery after climatic extremes enhanced by genotypic diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of United States of America 102:28262831.
  • Rhodes, J. S., and T. P. Quinn. 1998. Factors affecting the outcome of territorial contests between hatchery and naturally reared coho salmon parr in the laboratory. Journal of Fish Biology 53:12201230.
  • Rhodes, J. S., and T. P. Quinn. 1999. Comparative performance of genetically similar hatchery and naturally reared juvenile coho salmon in streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 19:670677.
  • Riddell, B. E.. 1993. Spatial organization of Pacific salmon: what to conserve?. In J. G.Cloud, and G. H.Thorgaard, eds. Genetic Conservation of Salmonid Fishes, pp. 2337. Plenum Press, New York.
  • Roberts, P. D., G. B. Stewart, and A. S. Pullin. 2006. Are review articles a reliable source of evidence to support conservation and environmental management? A comparison with medicine. Biological Conservation 132:409423.
  • Robertson, A. 1960. A theory of limits in artificial selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B – Biological Sciences 153:234249.
  • Rodriguez-Ramilo, S. T., P. Moran, and A. Caballero. 2006. Relaxtion of selection with equalization of parental contributions in conservation programs: an experimental test with Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 172:10431054.
  • Roman, J., and J. A. Darling. 2007. Paradox lost: genetic diversity and the success of species invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22:454464.
  • Rowan, G. D. 1997. Umatilla Hatchery Satellite Facilities Operation and Maintenance: Annual Report 1996. Bonneville Power Administration, Public Information Center. CKPS-1, Portland, OR.
  • Rudnick, J. A., and R. C. Lacy. 2008. The impact of assumptions about founder relationships on the effectiveness of captive breeding strategies. Conservation Genetics In press.
  • Russello, A., and G. Amato. 2004. Ex situ population management in the absence of pedigree information. Molecular Ecology 13:28292840.
  • Ryder, O. A. 1986. Species conservation and systematics – the dilemma of subspecies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 1:910.
  • Ryman, N., and L. Laikre. 1991. Effects of supportive breeding on the genetically effective population size. Conservation Biology 5:325329.
  • Ryman, N., and G. Stahl. 1981. Genetic perspectives of the identification and conservation of Scandinavian stocks of fish. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38:15621575.
  • Ryman, N., F. Utter, and L. Laikre. 1995. Protection of intraspecific biodiversity of exploited fishes. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 5:417446.
  • Saccheri, I., M. Kuussaari, M. Kankare, P. Vikman, W. Fortelius, and I. Hanski. 1998. Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392:491494.
  • Saisa, M., M.L. Koljonen, and J. Tahtinen. 2003. Genetic changes in Atlantic salmon stocks since historical times and the effective population size of a long-term captive breeding programme. Conservation Genetics 4:613627.
  • Salvanes, A. G. V., and V. A. Braithwaite. 2005. Exposure to variable spatial information in the early rearing environment generates asymmetries in social interactions in cod (Gadus morhua). Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 59:250257.
  • Sarrazin, F., and B. Barbault. 1996. Reintroduction: challenges and lessons for basic ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11:474478.
  • Scott, R. J., R. Kosick, M. Clement, and D. L. G. Noakes. 2005a. Nest site selection and spawning by captive bred Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, in a natural stream. Environmental Biology of Fishes 74:309321.
  • Scott, R. J., K. A. Judge, K. Ramster, and D. L. G. Noakes. 2005b. Interactions between naturalised exotic salmonids and reintroduced Atlantic salmon in a Lake Ontario tributary. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 14:402405.
  • Seddon, P. J. 1999. Persistence without intervention: assessing success in wildlife reintroductions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14:503.
  • Seddon, P. J., D. P. Armstrong, and R. F. Maloney. 2007. Developing the science of reintroduction biology. Conservation Biology 21:303312.
  • Sharma, R., G. Morishima, S. Wang, A. Talbot, and L. Gilbertson. 2006. An evaluation of the Clearwater River supplementation program in western Washington. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63:423437.
  • Snyder, N. F. R., S. R. Derrickson, S. R. Beissinger et al. 1996. Limitations of captive breeding in endangered species recovery. Conservation Biology 10:338348.
  • Sonesson, A. K., M. E. Goddard, and T. H. Meuwissen. 2002. The use of frozen semen to minimize inbreeding in small populations. Genetical Research 80:2730.
  • Soto, D., I. Arismendi, C. Di Prinzio, and F. Jara. 2007. Establishment of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in Pacific basins of southern South America and its potential ecosystem implications. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 80:8198.
  • Soulé, M. E. 1987. Viable Populations for Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
  • Soulé, M. E., W. Gilpin, W. Conway, and T. Foose. 1986. The millennium ark: how long a voyage, how many staterooms, how many passengers? Zoo Biology 5:101113.
  • Spidle, A. P., T. L. King, and B. H. Letcher. 2004. Comparison of genetic diversity in the recently founded Connecticut River Atlantic salmon population to that of its primary donor stock, Maine’s Penobscot River. Aquaculture 236:253265.
  • Spielman, D., W. B. Brook, and R. Frankham. 2004. Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact them. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of United States of America 101:1526115264.
  • Stoss, J., and T. Refstie. 1983. Short-term storage and cryopreservation of milt from Atlantic salmon and sea trout. Aquaculture 30:229236.
  • Su, G. S., L. E. Liljedahl, and G. A. E. Gall. 1996. Effects of inbreeding on growth and reproductive traits in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture 142:139148.
  • Swain, D. P., and B. E. Riddell. 1990. Variation in agonistic behavior between newly emerged juveniles from hatchery and wild populations of coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47:566571.
  • Swain, D. P., B. E. Riddell, and C. B. Murray. 1991. Morphological differences between hatchery and wild populations of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch)- environmental versus genetic origin. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48:17831791.
  • Tallmon, D. A., G. Luikart, and R. S. Waples. 2004. The alluring simplicity and complex reality of genetic rescue. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19:489496.
  • Tave, D. 1984. Effective breeding efficiency: and index to quantify the effects that different breeding programs and sex ratios have on inbreeding and genetic drift. Progressive Fish Culturist 46:262268.
  • Taylor, E. B. 1991. A review of local adaptation in Salmonidae, with particular reference to Pacific and Atlantic salmon. Aquaculture 98:185207.
  • Taylor, E. B. 1999. Species pairs of north temperate freshwater fishes: taxonomy, evolution, and conservation. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 9:299324.
  • Theodorou, K., and D. Couvet. 2004. Introduction of captive breeders to the wild: harmful or beneficial? Conservation Genetics 5:112.
  • Thorgaard, G. H., and J. G. Cloud. 1993. Reconstitution of genetic strains of salmonids using biotechnical approaches. In J. G.Cloud, and G. H.Thorgaard, eds. Genetic Conservation of Salmonid Fishes, pp. 189196. Plenum Press, New York.
  • Thrower, F., C. Guthrie, J. Nielsen, and J. Joyce. 2004. A comparison of genetic variation between an anadromous steelhead, Oncorhynchus mykiss, population and seven derived populations sequestered in freshwater for 70 years. Environmental Biology of Fishes 69:111125.
  • Toro, M. A., and A. Caballero. 2005. Characterization and conservation of genetic diversity in subdivided populations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 360:13671378.
  • Toro, M., L. Silio, J. Rodriganez, C. Rodriguez, and J. Fernandez. 1999. Optimal use of genetic markers in conservation programmes. Genetics, Selection and Evolution 31:255261.
  • Tufto, J. 2001. Effects of releasing maladapted individuals: a demographic evolutionary model. American Naturalist 158:331340.
  • U.K. Environment Agency. 2006a. History of Salmon in the Thames. U.K. Environment Agency, Rotherham, U.K.. 3 pp.
  • U.K. Environment Agency. 2006b. Thames Salmon Rehabilitation Scheme: 2005 Work Activities. U.K. Environment Agency, Rotherham, U.K.. 3 pp.
  • U.K. Environment Agency. 2007. Thames Salmon Rehabilitation Scheme: 2006 Work Activities. U.K. Environment Agency, Rotherham, U.K.. 2 pp.
  • Unwin, M. J. 1997. Fry-to-adult survival of natural and hatchery-produced chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) from a common origin. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54:12461254.
  • U.S. Atlantic Salmon Assessment Committee. 2005. Annual Report of the U.S. Atlantic Salmon Assessment Committee, Report 17-2004 Activities, U.S. Atlantic Salmon Assessment Committee, Woods Hole, MA.
  • Utter, F. M. 1981. Biological criteria for definition of species and distinct intraspecific populations of anadromous salmonids under the U.S. Endangered Species Act of 1973. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38:16261635.
  • Utter, F. M. 1998. Genetic problems of hatchery-reared progeny released into the wild and how to deal with them. Bulletin of Marine Science 62:623640.
  • Utter, F. M.. 2000. Patterns of subspecific anthropogenic introgression in two salmonid genera. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 10:265279.
  • Utter, F. M., and J. Epifanio. 2002. Marine aquaculture: genetic potentialities and pitfalls. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 10:265279.
  • Vales-Alonso, J., J. Fernandez, F. J. Gonzalez-Castano, and A. Caballero. 2003. A parallel optimization approach for controlling allele diversity in conservation schemes. Mathematical Biosciences 183:161173.
  • Vincent, R. E. 1960. Some influences of domestication upon three stocks of brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchill). Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 89:3552.
  • Volkman, E. T., K. L. Pangle, D. A. Rajchel, T. M. Sutton, and D. R. Bast. 2004. Comparison of hatchery performance attributes among three strains of age-0 coaster brook trout. North American Journal of Aquaculture 66:278284.
  • Wainwright, T. C., and R. S. Waples. 1998. Prioritizing Pacific salmon stocks for conservation: a response to Allendorf et al.. Conservation Biology 12:11441147.
  • Wang, J. 1997. More efficient breeding systems for controlling inbreeding and effective size in animal populations. Heredity 79:191199.
  • Wang, J. 2001a. Optimal marker-assisted selection to increase the effective size of small populations. Genetics 154:475479.
  • Wang, J. 2001b. A pseudo-likelihood method for estimating effective population size from temporally placed samples. Genetical Research 78:243257.
  • Wang, J. 2004. Monitoring and managing genetic variation in group breeding populations without individual pedigrees. Conservation Genetics 5:813825.
  • Wang, J., and N. Ryman. 2001. Genetic effects of multiple generations of supportive breeding. Conservation Biology 15:16191631.
  • Wang, S., J. J. Hard, and F. M. Utter. 2002. Salmon inbreeding: a review. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 11:301319.
  • Waples, R. S. 1990. Conservation genetics of Pacific salmon. II. Effective population size and the rate of loss of genetic variability. Journal of Heredity 81:267276.
  • Waples, R. S. 1991a. Pacific salmon and the definition of “species” under the Endangered Species Act. Marine Fisheries Review 53:1122.
  • Waples, R. S. 1991b. Genetic interactions between hatchery and wild salmonids: lessons from the Pacific Northwest. Canadian Journal Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48:124133.
  • Waples, R. S. 1995. Evolutionarily significant units and the conservation of biological diversity under the Endangered Species Act. In J. L.Nielsen, ed. Evolution and the Aquatic Ecosystem: Defining Unique Units in Population Conservation. American Fisheries Society Symposium 17, pp. 827. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
  • Waples, R. S. 1999. Dispelling some myths about hatcheries. Fisheries 24:1221.
  • Waples, R. S. 2002a. Effective size of fluctuating salmon populations. Genetics 161:783791.
  • Waples, R. S. 2002b. Definition and estimation of effective population size in the conservation of endangered species. In S. R.Beissinger, and D. R.McCullough, eds. Population Viability Analysis, pp. 147168. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  • Waples, R. S., and C. Do. 1994. Genetic risk associated with supplementation of Pacific salmonids – captive broodstock programmes. Canadian Journal Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51:310329.
  • Waples, R. S., and J. Drake. 2004. Risk/benefit considerations for marine stock enhancement: a Pacific salmon perspective. In K. M.Lber, S.Kitada, H.Blankenship, and T.Svasand, eds. Stock Enhancement and Sea Ranching: Developments, Pitfalls and Opportunities, pp. 260306. Blackwell, Oxford.
  • Waples, R. S., and D. J. Teel. 1990. Conservation genetics of Pacific salmon. I. Temporal changes in allele frequency. Conservation Biology 4:144156.
  • Waples, R. S., M. J. Ford, and D. Schmitt. 2007. Empirical results of salmon supplementation in the Northeast Pacific: A preliminary assessment. In T. M.Bert, ed. Ecological and Genetic Implications of Aquaculture Activities, pp. 383403. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
  • Ward, D. M., K. H. Nislow, and L. K. Holt. 2008. Do native species limit survival of reintroduced Atlantic salmon to historic rearing streams? Biological Conservation 141:146152.
  • Waugh, G. D. 1980. Salmon in New Zealand. In J. E.Thorpe, ed. Salmon Ranching, pp. 277303. Academic Press, London, England.
  • Weber, K. E., and L. T. Diggins. 1990. Increased selection response in larger populations II.Selection for ethanol vapor resistance in Drosophila melanogaster, at two population sizes. Genetics 125:585597.
  • Wedekind, C. 2002. Sexual selection and life-history decisions: implications for supportive breeding and the management of captive populations. Conservation Biology 16:12041211.
  • Wedekind, C., G. Rudolfsen, A. Jacob, D. Urbach, and R. Muller. 2007. The genetic consequences of hatchery-induced sperm competition in a salmonid. Biological Conservation 137:180188.
  • Willi, Y., J. Van Buskirk, and A. A. Hoffmann. 2006. Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Annual Review in Ecology and Systematics 37:433458.
  • Withler, F. C. 1982. Transplanting Pacific Salmon. Canadian Technical Reports in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1079, Nanaimo, BC, 27 pp.
  • Withler, R. E. 1988. Genetic consequences of fertilizing Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytshca) eggs with pooled milt. Aquaculture 68:1525.
  • Withler, R. E., K. D. Le, R. J. Nelson, K. M. Miller, and T. D. Beacham. 2000. Intact genetic structure and high levels of genetic diversity in bottlenecked sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) populations of the Fraser River, British Columbia, Canada. Canadian Journal Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57:19851998.
  • Wolf, C. M., B. Griffith, C. Reed, and S. A. Temple. 1996. Avian and mammalian translocations: Update and reanalysis of 1987 survey data. Conservation Biology 10:11421154.
  • Wolf, C. M., T. Garland, and B. Griffith. 1998. Predictors of avian and mammalian translocation success: reanalysis with phylogenetically independent contrasts. Biological Conservation 86:243255.
  • Wood, C. C., and M. R. Gross. 2008. Elemental conservation units: communicating extinction risk without dictating targets for protection. Conservation Biology 22:3647.
  • Wright, S. 1938. Size of population and breeding structure in relation to evolution. Science 87:430431.
  • Yamamoto, T., and U. G. Reinhardt. 2003. Dominance and predator avoidance in domesticated and wild masu salmon, Oncorhynchus masu. Fisheries Science 69:8894.
  • Yoshiyama, R. M., E. R. Gerstung, F. W. Fisher, and P. B. Moyle. 2000. Chinook salmon in the California Central Valley: an assessment. Fisheries 25:620.
  • Young, M. K., A. L. Harig, B. Rosenlund, and C. Kennedy. 2002. Recovery History of Greenback Cutthroat Trout: Population Characteristics, Hatchery Involvement, and Bibliography. General Technical Report. RMRS-GTR-88WWW. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Fort Collins, CO.