SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Literature cited

  • Ackerly, D. D., S. A. Dudley, S. E. Sultan, J. Schmitt, J. S. Coleman, C. R. Linder, D. R. Sandquist et al. 2000. The evolution of plant ecophysiological traits: recent advances and future directions. BioScience 50:979995.
  • Alonso-Blanco, C., B. Mendez-Vigo, and M. Koornneef. 2005. From phenotypic to molecular polymorphisms involved in naturally occurring variation of plant development. International Journal of Developmental Biology 49:717732.
  • Alonso-Blanco, C., M. G. M. Aarts, L. Bentsink, J. J. B. Keurentjes, M. Reymond, D. Vreugdenhil, and M. Koornneef. 2009. What has natural variation taught us about plant development, physiology, and adaptation? Plant Cell 21:18771896.
  • Alvarez-Ponce, D., M. Aguade, and J. Rozas. 2009. Network-level molecular evolutionary analysis of the insulin/TOR signal transduction pathway across 12 Drosophila genomes. Genome Research 19:234242.
  • Araus, J. L., G. A. Slafer, M. P. Reynolds, and C. Royo. 2002. Plant breeding and drought in C-3 cereals: What should we breed for? Annals of Botany 89:925940.
  • Arntz, A. M., and L. F. Delph. 2001. Pattern and process: evidence for the evolution of photosynthetic traits in natural populations. Oecologia 127:455467.
  • Atherton, J. G., and J. Rudich. 1986. The tomato crop: a scientific basis for improvement, pages 661. London, Chapman & Hall.
  • Bai, Y. L., and P. Lindhout. 2007. Domestication and breeding of tomatoes: What have we gained and what can we gain in the future? Annals of Botany 100:10851094.
  • Barone, A., A. Di Matteo, D. Carputo, and L. Frusciante. 2009. High-throughput genomics enhances tomato breeding efficiency. Current Genomics 10:19.
  • Bartels, D., and R. Sunkar. 2005. Drought and salt tolerance in plants. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 24:2358.
  • Begun, D. J., A. K. Holloway, K. Stevens, L. W. Hillier, Y. P. Poh, M. W. Hahn, P. M. Nista et al. 2007. Population genomics: whole-genome analysis of polymorphism and divergence in Drosophila simulans. PLoS Biology 5:25342559.
  • Bloom, A. J., M. A. Zwieniecki, J. B. Passioura, L. B. Randall, N. M. Holbrook, and D. A. St Clair. 2004. Water relations under root chilling in a sensitive and tolerant tomato species. Plant, Cell and Environment 27:971979.
  • Bohnert, H. J., D. E. Nelson, and R. G. Jensen. 1995. Adaptations to environmental stresses. Plant Cell 7:10991111.
  • Boyer, J. S. 1982. Plant productivity and environment. Science 218:443448.
  • Bray, E. A. 1997. Plant responses to water deficit. Trends in Plant Science 2:4854.
  • Brown, J. H. 1999. Macroecology: progress and prospect. Oikos 87:314.
  • Caicedo, A. L., and B. A. Schaal. 2004. Heterogeneous evolutionary processes affect R gene diversity in natural populations of Solanum pimpinellifolium. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101:1744417449.
  • Chan, Y. F., M. E. Marks, F. C. Jones, G. Villarreal, M. D. Shapiro, S. D. Brady, A. M. Southwick et al. 2010. Adaptive evolution of pelvic reduction in sticklebacks by recurrent deletion of a Pitx1 enhancer. Science 327:302305.
  • Chapin, F. S., K. Autumn, and F. Pugnaire. 1993. Evolution of suites of traits in response to environmental stress. American Naturalist 142:S78S92.
  • Chaves, M. M., and M. M. Oliveira. 2004. Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture. Journal of Experimental Botany 55:23652384.
  • Chen, K. Y., B. Cong, R. Wing, J. Vrebalov, and S. D. Tanksley. 2007. Changes in regulation of a transcription factor lead to autogamy in cultivated tomatoes. Science 318:643645.
  • Chen, G. X., T. Krugman, T. Fahima, K. G. Chen, Y. G. Hu, M. Roder, E. Nevo, et al. 2010. Chromosomal regions controlling seedling drought resistance in Israeli wild barley, Hordeum spontaneum C. Koch. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 57:8599.
  • Chetelat, R. T., and Y. Ji. 2007. Cytogenetics and evolution. In M. K.Razdan, and A. K.Mattoo, eds. Genetic Improvement of Solanaceous Crops, pp. 77112. Science Publishers, Enfield, NH.
  • Clark, R. M., T. N. Wagler, P. Quijada, and J. Doebley. 2006. A distant upstream enhancer at the maize domestication gene tb1 has pleiotropic effects on plant and inflorescent architecture. Nature Genetics 38:594597.
  • Collins, N. C., F. Tardieu, and R. Tuberosa. 2008. Quantitative trait loci and crop performance under abiotic stress: Where do we stand? Plant Physiology 147:469486.
  • Comstock, J. P., S. R. McCouch, B. C. Martin, C. G. Tauer, T. J. Vision, Y. B. Xu, and R. C. Pausch. 2005. The effects of resource availability and environmental conditions on genetic rankings for carbon isotope discrimination during growth in tomato and rice. Functional Plant Biology 32:10891105.
  • Condon, A. G., R. A. Richards, G. J. Rebetzke, and G. D. Farquhar. 2004. Breeding for high water-use efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany 55:24472460.
  • Cutler, A. J. 2009. Abscisic Acid (ABA) Encyclopedia of Life Sciences (ELS). John Wiey & Sons, Chichester.
  • Dalziel, A. C., S. M. Rogers, and P. M. Schulte. 2009. Linking genotypes to phenotypes and fitness: how mechanistic biology can inform molecular ecology. Molecular Ecology 18:49975017.
  • D’Arcy, W. G. 1979. The classification of the Solanaceae. In J. G.Hawkes, R. N.Lester, and A. D.Skelding, eds. The Biology and Taxonomy of the Solanaceae, pp. 347. Academic Press, London.
  • Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. John Murray, London.
  • Dudley, S. A. 1996a. Differing selection on plant physiological traits in response to environmental water availability: a test of adaptive hypotheses. Evolution 50:92102.
  • Dudley, S. A. 1996b. The response to differing selection on plant physiological traits: evidence for local adaptation. Evolution 50:103110.
  • Eanes, W. F. 1999. Analysis of selection on enzyme polymorphisms. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30:301326.
  • Easlon, H. M., and J. H. Richards. 2009. Drought response in self-compatible species of tomato (Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany 96:605611.
  • Ehleringer, J. R., and R. K. Monson. 1993. Evolutionary and ecological aspects of photosynthetic pathway variation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24:411439.
  • Ehrenreich, I. M., and M. D. Purugganan. 2006. The molecular genetic basis of plant adaptation. American Journal of Botany 93:953962.
  • Feder, M. E., and T. Mitchell-Olds. 2003. Evolutionary and ecological functional genomics. Nature Reviews Genetics 4:651657.
  • Fernandez, A. I., N. Viron, M. Alhagdow, M. Karimi, M. Jones, Z. Amsellem, A. Sicard et al. 2009. Flexible tools for gene expression and silencing in Tomato. Plant Physiology 151:17291740.
  • Fernie, A. R., Y. Tadmor, and D. Zamir. 2006. Natural genetic variation for improving crop quality. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 9:196202.
  • Fisher, R. A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  • Flowers, J. M., E. Sezgin, S. Kumagai, D. D. Duvernell, L. M. Matzkin, P. S. Schmidt, and W. F. Eanes. 2007. Adaptive evolution of metabolic pathways in Drosophila. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24:13471354.
  • Flowers, J. M., Y. Hanzawa, M. C. Hall, R. C. Moore, and M. D. Purugganan. 2009. Population genomics of the Arabidopsis thaliana flowering time gene network. Molecular Biology and Evolution 26:24752486.
  • Foolad, M. R. 2007. Genome mapping and molecular breeding of tomato. International Journal of Plant Genomics 2007:64358.
  • Foolad, M. R., L. P. Zhang, and P. Subbiah. 2003. Genetics of drought tolerance during seed germination in tomato: inheritance and QTL mapping. Genome 46:536545.
  • Frankel, N., E. Hasson, N. D. Iusem, and M. S. Rossi. 2003. Adaptive evolution of the water stress-induced gene Asr2 in Lycopersicon species dwelling in arid habitats. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20:19551962.
  • Frary, A., Y. M. Xu, J. P. Liu, S. Mitchell, E. Tedeschi, and S. Tanksley. 2005. Development of a set of PCR-based anchor markers encompassing the tomato genome and evaluation of their usefulness for genetics and breeding experiments. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 111:291312.
  • Gay, A. P., and R. G. Hurd. 1975. Influence of light on stomatal density in tomato. New Phytologist 75:3746.
  • Geber, M. A., and L. R. Griffen. 2003. Inheritance and natural selection on functional traits. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164:S21S42.
  • Giombini, M. I., N. Frankel, N. D. Iusem, and E. Hasson. 2008. Nucleotide polymorphism in the drought responsive gene Asr2 in wild populations of tomato. Genetica 136:1325.
  • Gur, A., and D. Zamir. 2004. Unused natural variation can lift yield barriers in plant breeding. PLoS Biology 2:16101615.
  • Hahn, M. W. 2009. Distinguishing among evolutionary models for the maintenance of gene duplicates. Journal of Heredity 100:605617.
  • Hancock, J. F. 2005. Contributions of domesticated plant studies to our understanding of plant evolution. Annals of Botany 96:953963.
  • Harvey, P. H., and M. D. Pagel. 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology: Oxford Series in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Hereford, J. 2009. A quantitative survey of local adaptation and fitness trade-offs. American Naturalist 173:579588.
  • Heschel, M. S., K. Donohue, N. Hausmann, and J. Schmitt. 2002. Population differentiation and natural selection for water-use efficiency in Impatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 163:907912.
  • Hoekstra, H. E., and J. A. Coyne. 2007. The locus of evolution: Evo devo and the genetics of adaptation. Evolution 61:9951016.
  • Hsiao, T. C. 1973. Plant responses to water stress. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 24:519570.
  • Jimenez-Gomez, J. M., and J. N. Maloof. 2009. Sequence diversity in three tomato species: SNPs, markers, and molecular evolution. BMC Plant Biology 9:85.
  • Johal, G. S., P. Balint-Kurti, and C. F. Well. 2008. Mining and harnessing natural variation: a little MAGIC. Crop Science 48:20662073.
  • Kacser, H., and J. A. Burns. 1973. The control of flux. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology 27:65104.
  • Kahn, T. L., S. E. Fender, E. A. Bray, and M. A. Oconnell. 1993. Characterization of expression of drought and abscisic acid-regulated tomato genes in the drought-resistant species Lycopersicon pennellii. Plant Physiology 103:597605.
  • Kamenetzky, L., R. Asis, S. Bassi, F. De Godoy, L. Bermudez, A. R. Fernie, M. A. Van Sluys et al. 2010. Genomic analysis of wild tomato (Solanum pennellii) introgression determining metabolic- and yield-associated traits. Plant Physiology 152:17721786.
  • Karrenberg, S., and A. Widmer. 2008. Ecologically relevant genetic variation from a non-Arabidopsis perspective. Current Opinion In Plant Biology 11:156162.
  • Kebede, H., B. Martin, J. Nienhuis, and G. King. 1994. Leaf anatomy of 2 Lycopersicon species with contrasting gas-exchange properties. Crop Science 34:108113.
  • Kopp, A. 2009. Metamodels and phylogenetic replication: a systematic approach to the evolution of developmental pathways. Evolution 63:27712789.
  • Kozak, K. H., C. H. Graham, and J. J. Wiens. 2008. Integrating GIS-based environmental data into evolutionary biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23:141148.
  • Lambers, H., F. S. Chapin, and T. L. Pons. 2008. Plant Physiological Ecology. Springer, New York.
  • Latta, R. G. 2009. Testing for local adaptation in Avena barbata: a classic example of ecotypic divergence. Molecular Ecology 18:37813791.
  • Lippman, Z. B., Y. Semel, and D. Zamir. 2007. An integrated view of quantitative trait variation using tomato interspecific introgression lines. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 17:545552.
  • Lister, R., B. D. Gregory, and J. R. Ecker. 2009. Next is now: new technologies for sequencing of genomes, transcriptomes, and beyond. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 12:107118.
  • Ludlow, M. M. 1989. Strategies of response to water stress. In K. H.Kreeb, H.Richter, and T. M.Hinckley, eds. Structural and Functional Responses to Environmental Stresses, pp. 269281. SPB Academic, The Hague.
  • Maldonado, C., F. A. Squeo, and E. Ibacache. 2003. Phenotypic response of Lycopersicon chilense to water deficit. Revista Chilena De Historia Natural 76:129137.
  • Martin, B., and Y. R. Thorstenson. 1988. Stable carbon isotope composition (delta-C-13), water-use efficiency, and biomass productivity of Lycopersicon esculentum, Lycopersicon pennellii, and the F1 hybrid. Plant Physiology 88:213217.
  • Martin, B., J. Nienhuis, G. King, and A. Schaefer. 1989. Restriction fragment length polymorphisms associated with water-use efficiency in tomato. Science 243:17251728.
  • Martin, B., C. G. Tauer, and R. K. Lin. 1999. Carbon isotope discrimination as a tool to improve water-use efficiency in tomato. Crop Science 39:17751783.
  • McKay, J. K., and J. R. Stinchcombe. 2008. Ecological genomics of model eukaryotes. Evolution 62:29532957.
  • McKay, J. K., J. H. Richards, and T. Mitchell-Olds. 2003. Genetics of drought adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana: I. Pleiotropy contributes to genetic correlations among ecological traits. Molecular Ecology 12:11371151.
  • McKay, J. K., J. H. Richards, K. S. Nemali, S. Sen, T. Mitchell-Olds, S. Boles, E. A. Stahl, et al. 2008. Genetics of drought adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana II. QTL analysis of a new mapping population, KAS-1 x TSU–1. Evolution 62:30143026.
  • Mitchell, J. P., C. Shennan, S. R. Grattan, and D. M. May. 1991. Tomato fruit yields and quality under water deficit and salinity. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 116:215221.
  • Moyle, L. C. 2008. Ecological and evolutionary genomics in the wild tomatoes (Solanum Sect. Lycopersicon). Evolution 62:29953013.
  • Mueller, L. A., T. H. Solow, N. Taylor, B. Skwarecki, R. Buels, J. Binns, C. W. Lin et al. 2005. The SOL Genomics Network. A comparative resource for Solanaceae biology and beyond. Plant Physiology 138:13101317.
  • Muir, C. D., and L. C. Moyle. 2009. Antagonistic epistasis for ecophysiological trait differences between Solanum species. New Phytologist 183:789802.
  • Nakazato, T., M. Bogonovich, and L. C. Moyle. 2008. Environmental factors predict adaptive phenotypic differentiation within and between two wild andean tomatoes. Evolution 62:774792.
  • Nakazato, T., D. L. Warren, and L. C. Moyle. 2010. Ecological and geographic modes of species divergence in wild tomatoes. American Journal of Botany 97:680693.
  • Nambara, E., and A. Marion-Poll. 2005. Abscisic acid biosynthesis and catabolism. Annual Review of Plant Biology 56:165185.
  • Nesbitt, T. C., and S. D. Tanksley. 2002. Comparative sequencing in the genus Lycopersicon: implications for the evolution of fruit size in the domestication of cultivated tomatoes. Genetics 162:365379.
  • Nevo, E., and G. X Chen. 2010. Drought and salt tolerances in wild relatives for wheat and barley improvement. Plant Cell and Environment. 33:670685.
  • Nielsen, R. 2005. Molecular signatures of natural selection. Annual Review of Genetics 39:197218.
  • Oakley, T. H. 2007. Today’s multiple choice exam: (a) gene duplication; (b) structural mutation; (c) co-option; (d) regulatory mutation; (e) all of the above. Evolution & Development 9:523524.
  • Olsen, K. M., A. L. Caicedo, N. Polato, A. McClung, S. McCouch, and M. D. Purugganan. 2006. Selection under domestication: evidence for a sweep in the rice Waxy genomic region. Genetics 173:975983.
  • Orr, H. A. 2005. The genetic theory of adaptation: a brief history. Nature Reviews Genetics 6:119127.
  • Passioura, J. B. 1996. Drought and drought tolerance. Plant Growth Regulation 20:7983.
  • Patterson, B. D., R. Paull, and R. M. Smillie. 1978. Chilling resistance in Lycopersicon hirsutum Humb. and Bonpl. a wild tomato with a wide altitudinal distribution. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 5:609617.
  • Peralta, I. E., and D. M. Spooner. 2001. Granule-bound starch synthase (GBSSI) gene phylogeny of wild tomatoes (Solanum L. section Lycopersicon [Mill.] Wettst. subsection Lycopersicon). American Journal of Botany 88:18881902.
  • Peralta, I. E., D. M. Spooner, and S. Knapp. 2008. Taxonomy of wild tomatoes and their relatives (Solanum sect Lycopersicoides, sect. Juglandifolia, sect. Lycopersicon; Solanaceae). Systematic Botany Monographs 84:1186.
  • Phillips, P. C. 2008. Epistasis – the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems. Nature Reviews Genetics 9:855867.
  • Purugganan, M. D., and D. Q. Fuller. 2009. The nature of selection during plant domestication. Nature 457:843848.
  • Quiros, C. F. 1991. Lycopersicon cytogenetics. In P. K.Gupta, and T.Tsuchiya, eds. Chromosome Engineering in Plants: Genetics, Breeding, Evolution, pp. 119137. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  • Ramsay, H., L. H. Rieseberg, and K. Ritland. 2009. The correlation of evolutionary rate with pathway position in plant terpenoid biosynthesis. Molecular Biology and Evolution 26:10451053.
  • Rausher, M. D. 2008. Evolutionary transitions in floral color. International Journal of Plant Sciences 169:721.
  • Reid, J. B., and A. R. Renquist. 1997. Enhanced root production as a feed-forward response to soil water deficit in field-grown tomatoes. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 24:685692.
  • Renquist, A. R., and J. B. Reid. 2001. Processing tomato fruit quality: influence of soil water deficits at flowering and ripening. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52:793799.
  • Richards, R. A. 1996. Defining selection criteria to improve yield under drought. Plant Growth Regulation 20:157166.
  • Rick, C. M. 1973. Potential genetic resources in tomato species: clues from observations in native habitats. In A. M.Srb, ed. Genes, Enzymes, and Populations, pp. 255269. Plenum Press, New York, NY.
  • Rick, C. M. 1976. Natural variability in wild species of Lycopersicon and its bearing on tomato breeding. Agraria 30:249259.
  • Rick, C. M. 1978. Tomato Germplasm Resources. The 1st International Symposium on Tropical Tomato. 214224. Shanhua, Taiwan.
  • Rick, C. M. 1979. Biosystematic studies in Lycopersicon and closely related species of Solanum. In J. G.Hawkes, R. N.Lester, and A. D.Skelding, eds. The Biology and Taxonomy of the Solanaceae, vol. 7, pp. 667679. Academic Press, London.
  • Romero-Aranda, R., T. Soria, and J. Cuartero. 2001. Tomato plant-water uptake and plant-water relationships under saline growth conditions. Plant Science 160:265272.
  • Rose, L. E., R. W. Michelmore, and C. H. Langley. 2007. Natural variation in the Pto disease resistance gene within species of wild tomato (Lycopersicon). II. Population genetics of Pto. Genetics 175:13071319.
  • Ross-Ibarra, J., P. L. Morrell, and B. S. Gaut. 2007. Plant domestication, a unique opportunity to identify the genetic basis of adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104:86418648.
  • Rudich, J., D. Kalmar, C. Geizenberg, and S. Harel. 1977. Low water tensions in defined growth stages of processing tomato plants and their effects on yield and quality. Journal of Horticultural Science 52:391399.
  • Stebbins, G. L. 1952. Aridity as a stimulus to plant evolution. American Naturalist 86:3344.
  • Stern, D. L., and V. Orgogozo. 2008. The loci of evolution: How predictable is genetic evolution? Evolution 62:21552177.
  • Stevens, M. A., and J. Rudich. 1978. Genetic potential for overcoming physiological limitations on adaptability, yield, and quality in the tomato. Hortscience 13:673678.
  • Storz, J. F. 2005. Using genome scans of DNA polymorphism to infer adaptive population divergence. Molecular Ecology 14:671688.
  • Sultan, S. E. 2007. Development in context: the timely emergence of eco-devo. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22:575582.
  • Tan, C. S. 1993. Tomato yield-evapotranspiration relationships, seasonal canopy temperature and stomatal conductance as affected by irrigation. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 73:257264.
  • Thakur, P. S. 1990. Different physiological-responses of tomato (Lycopersicon-Esculentum Mill) cultivars to drought. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 12:175182.
  • Thompson, A. J., A. C. Jackson, R. A. Parker, D. R. Morpeth, A. Burbidge, and I. B. Taylor. 2000. Abscisic acid biosynthesis in tomato: regulation of zeaxanthin epoxidase and 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase mRNAs by light/dark cycles, water stress and abscisic acid. Plant Molecular Biology 42:833845.
  • Thompson, A. J., E. T. Thorne, A. Burbidge, A. C. Jackson, R. E. Sharp, and I. B. Taylor. 2004. Complementation of notabilis, an abscisic acid-deficient mutant of tomato: importance of sequence context and utility of partial complementation. Plant, Cell and Environment 27:459471.
  • Thompson, A. J., B. J. Mulholland, A. C. Jackson, J. M. T. McKee, H. W. Hilton, R. C. Symonds, T. Sonneveld et al. 2007a. Regulation and manipulation of ABA biosynthesis in roots. Plant, Cell and Environment 30:6778.
  • Thompson, A. J., J. Andrews, B. J. Mulholland, J. M. T. McKee, H. W. Hilton, C. R. Black, and I. B. Taylor. 2007b. Overproduction of abscisic acid in tomato increases transpiration efficiency and root hydraulic conductivity and influences leaf expansion. Plant Physiology 143:19051917.
  • Ticha, I. 1982. Photosynthetic characteristics during ontogenesis of leaves.7. Stomata density and sizes. Photosynthetica 16:375471.
  • Torrecillas, A., C. Guillaume, J. J. Alarcon, and M. C. Ruizsanchez. 1995. Water relations of 2 tomato species under water-stress and recovery. Plant Science 105:169176.
  • Vallejos, C. E. 1979. Genetic diversity of plants for response to low temperatures and its potential use in crop plants. In J. M.Lyons, D.Graham, and J. K.Raison, eds. Low Temperature Stress in Crop Plants: The Role of the Membrane, pp. 565. Academic Press, New York, NY.
  • Van Deynze, A., K. Stoffel, C. R. Buell, A. Kozik, J. Liu, E. Van Der Knaap, and D. Francis. 2007. Diversity in conserved genes in tomato. BMC Genomics 8:465.
  • Vasemägi, A., and C. R. Primmer. 2005. Challenges for identifying functionally important genetic variation: the promise of combining complementary research strategies. Molecular Ecology 14:36233642.
  • Weinig, C., and J. Schmitt. 2004. Environmental effects on the expression of quantitative trait loci and implications for phenotypic evolution. BioScience 54:627635.
  • Westerbergh, A., and J. Doebley. 2002. Morphological traits defining species differences in wild relatives of maize are controlled by multiple quantitative trait loci. Evolution 56:273283.
  • Wudiri, B. B., and D. W. Henderson. 1985. Effects of water-stress on flowering and fruit-set in processing tomatoes. Scientia Horticulturae 27:189198.
  • Xu, X., B. Martin, J. P. Comstock, T. J. Vision, C. G. Tauer, B. Zhao, R. C. Pausch et al. 2008. Fine mapping a QTL for carbon isotope composition in tomato. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 117:221233.
  • Yoo, C. Y., H. E. Pence, P. M. Hasegawa, and M. V. Mickelbart. 2009. Regulation of transpiration to improve crop water use. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 28:410431.
  • Young, K. R., C. U. Ulloa, J. L. Luteyn, and S. Knapp. 2002. Plant evolution and endemism in Andean South America: an introduction. Botanical Review 68:421.
  • Zamir, D. 2001. Improving plant breeding with exotic genetic libraries. Nature Reviews Genetics 2:983989.