SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • carbamates;
  • hydrolases;
  • organochlorines;
  • organophosphates;
  • pyrethroids

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Organophosphate metabolizing enzymes
  5. Organochlorine metabolizing enzymes
  6. Insecticidal carbamate metabolizing enzymes
  7. Synthetic pyrethroid-metabolizing enzymes
  8. Conclusions
  9. Acknowledgements
  10. Literature cited

Here, we compare the evolutionary routes by which bacteria and insects have evolved enzymatic processes for the degradation of four classes of synthetic chemical insecticide. For insects, the selective advantage of such degradative activities is survival on exposure to the insecticide, whereas for the bacteria the advantage is simply a matter of access to additional sources of nutrients. Nevertheless, bacteria have evolved highly efficient enzymes from a wide variety of enzyme families, whereas insects have relied upon generalist esterase-, cytochrome P450- and glutathione-S-transferase-dependent detoxification systems. Moreover, the mutant insect enzymes are less efficient kinetically and less diverged in sequence from their putative ancestors than their bacterial counterparts. This presumably reflects several advantages that bacteria have over insects in the acquisition of new enzymatic functions, such as a broad biochemical repertoire from which new functions can be evolved, large population sizes, high effective mutation rates, very short generation times and access to genetic diversity through horizontal gene transfer. Both the insect and bacterial systems support recent theory proposing that new biochemical functions often evolve from ‘promiscuous’ activities in existing enzymes, with subsequent mutations then enhancing those activities. Study of the insect enzymes will help in resistance management, while the bacterial enzymes are potential bioremediants of insecticide residues in a range of contaminated environments.


Introduction

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Organophosphate metabolizing enzymes
  5. Organochlorine metabolizing enzymes
  6. Insecticidal carbamate metabolizing enzymes
  7. Synthetic pyrethroid-metabolizing enzymes
  8. Conclusions
  9. Acknowledgements
  10. Literature cited

Living organisms have been coping with xenobiotics since life began and, as life has evolved, the nature of the xenobiotic challenge has changed. For example, as photosynthesis evolved, the toxic xenobiotic oxygen was produced for the first time; organisms not only evolved strategies to cope with this new xenobiotic, but also learnt to use it to provide energy (Storz and Imlay 1999; Imlay 2003; Falkowski and Godfrey 2008). Since the industrial revolution, anthropogenic xenobiotics have entered the biosphere in copious quantity and variety. While it is true that many man-made chemicals have very close structural relatives in nature (Wackett 2009), specific classes of chemical compounds that were not there before are also now abundant in the environment. Indeed, like oxygen in earlier times, many of these anthropogenic compounds are toxic and, in the case of pesticides and herbicides, they are toxic by design.

Many evolutionary outcomes associated with the introduction of anthropogenic xenobiotics have been documented, although few have been as well documented as those associated with the introduction of modern insecticides. The consequences of synthetic insecticide use have been extremely well described in both the eukaryotic target organisms (insects) and in incidentally exposed prokaryotes (bacteria in particular), often to the molecular level. In both cases, the exposed organisms have evolved altered physiologies because of the presence of insecticides, although clearly in response to different selection pressures.

Bacteria incidentally exposed to these insecticides have evolved mechanisms to degrade them so that they can use them as sources of nutrients to increase their rates of reproduction and proliferation. Within a few decades, entirely new catabolic pathways dedicated to insecticide mineralization have emerged. For example, at least three distinct metabolic routes have developed specifically for the catabolism of the insecticidal carbamate carbofuran (e.g. Behki and Topp 1993; Chaudhry et al. 2002; Yan et al. 2007). Many bacterial enzymes and pathways have been extensively characterized at the molecular level (Ellis et al. 2001; Scott et al. 2008; Gao et al. 2010), although it is very likely that we are just beginning to understand the extent of this catabolic diversity.

Conversely, insects have not adapted to the introduction of insecticides for opportunistic reasons, as is the case with bacteria, but rather as a requirement for survival. They have exercised this by the development of resistances based on either mutant target sites that are no longer sensitive to the insecticides (e.g. Cassanelli et al. 2006; Liu et al. 2006, 2009; Ramphul et al. 2009) or by mutations in xenobiotic detoxification pathways to adapt them for the detoxification of the insecticides (detailed below). Several hundred cases of insecticide resistance have now been reported (Whalon et al. 2008), although molecular analyses suggest that many cases across a wide range of species involve quite precisely orthologous mechanisms (Claudianos et al. 2006; Hartley et al. 2006; Liu et al. 2006; Li et al. 2007).

Here, we review the metabolic adaptations of the insects targeted by insecticides and the bacteria that are exposed to these xenobiotics in the environment, with a focus on the enzymes that are altered to achieve these degradative functions. Our goal is to abstract insights into evolutionary processes and in particular the mechanisms by which organisms acquire new functions. We will consider four classes of insecticide chemistry: the organophosphates (OPs), organochlorines (OCs), carbamates and synthetic pyrethroids (SPs). The enzymes and metabolic pathways that have evolved in response to these four classes of insecticide are the best characterized, with at least some biochemical and molecular data available on the mechanisms of degradation in both bacteria and insects.

Organophosphate metabolizing enzymes

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Organophosphate metabolizing enzymes
  5. Organochlorine metabolizing enzymes
  6. Insecticidal carbamate metabolizing enzymes
  7. Synthetic pyrethroid-metabolizing enzymes
  8. Conclusions
  9. Acknowledgements
  10. Literature cited

Organophosphate triesters, such as parathion and diazinon, are potent acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors and have been widely used as insecticides around the world. Most OPs have three phosphoester linkages, two of which (R1 and R2 in Fig. 1) are generally short aliphatic groups (most commonly o-methyl or o-ethyl). The leaving group at the third position (R3) can be one of a large number of phosphoesters or phosphothioesters (O’Brien 1960; Tomlin 2006).

image

Figure 1.  Structures of insecticides considered in this work. The structures of type 1 and type 2 synthetic pyrethroids (SP), organophosphate insecticides (OP), organochlorides (OC), and insecticidal carbamates are shown. Isomeric centres are indicated with an asterisk, the numbers of common isomers are indicated, and the structures of the commercially available insecticidal isomers are shown. Arrows indicate the bonds cleaved during enzymatic detoxification.

Download figure to PowerPoint

The OPs are substrates for AChE, although they are hydrolysed far more slowly by AChE than is its natural substrate, acetylcholine. Acetylcholine is hydrolysed by AChE in a two-step reaction: nucleophic attack on the carboxylester by the AChE active-site serine, forming a planar acylated intermediate (acylation; Fig. 2), followed by regeneration of the active-site serine via an activated water molecule (deacylation). When the substrate is a phosphotriester, a phosphorylated serine intermediate is formed by the same mechanism. However, the phosphoryl group of the phosphorylated serine is tetrahedral, rather than planar (as is the acetylated serine), and it is sterically prevented from undergoing dephosphorylation via an activated water molecule as per the deacylation of the acylated intermediate. Indeed, solvent water is used to complete the reaction, which is far slower. Furthermore, a second process (aging) can also occur in which the dialkylphophoserine intermediate is dealkylated. The monoalkylphophoserine product of aging cannot then be regenerated to a serine.

image

Figure 2.  Reactions of insecticidal organophosphates (OPs) and carbamates with acetylcholine esterase (AChE). The physiological reaction of AChE with a carboxyl ester is shown (left), whereby the active-site serine is first acylated as a consequence of its nucleophilc attack of the substrates ester bond. Deacylation (regeneration) is catalysed by histidine-activated water. In the reaction with an insecticidal carbamate (middle), nucleophilc hydrolysis of the substrate results in a carbamylated serine intermediate, which is then regenerated by histidine-activated water. Phosphorylation of the active-site serine by OP (right) results in an intermediate that is sterically hindered from regeneration by a histidine-activated water. Instead, a solvent water acts as a nucleophile either regenerating the active-site serine or removing an alkyl side chain from the phosphorous moiety and resulting in a stable phosphodiester of serine (aging).

Download figure to PowerPoint

Phosphotriesters that contain a thiophosphate group, rather than a phosphate, are not turned over by AChE (or other carboxylesterases) and are therefore not toxic themselves but act as protoxins that are activated by cytochromes P450 via oxidation of the thiophosphate to a phosphate. As this is a much faster process in insects than mammals, the result is that thiophosphates have a greater selectivity for insects than do their phosphate counterparts. For this reason, commercially available OP insecticides are predominantly thiophosphates. The OP triester chemistry is new to nature and, by definition, enzymes that can degrade these compounds have recently evolved catalytic functions.

Bacterial enzymes

Three classes of bacterial enzymes are known to degrade phosphotriesters, namely phosphotriesterases (PTEs), methyl parathion hydrolases (MPHs) and organophosphorus acid anhydrolases (OPAA), and all operate via the hydrolysis of the R3 phosphoester bond (Fig. 1 and Table 1). Although all three of these enzymes are hydrolases (see below), there is some evidence for an as yet uncharacterized oxidative route to the degradation of some OPs as well (Munnecke and Hsieh 1976). The three classes of hydrolases liberate a phosphodiester and an alcohol as the first step in the mineralization of the OP compound. Further degradation then occurs; the phosphodiester provides a source of phosphorous for the organism, and the alcohol can provide carbon or energy. For example, the alcohol produced from parathion hydrolysis (p-nitrophenol) is further degraded by well-characterized catabolic pathways (Singh et al. 2002; Paul et al. 2004, 2008; Scott et al. 2008; Chauhan et al. 2010).

Table 1.   Bacterial enzymes with activity against man-made insecticidal xenobiotics.
Insecticide classBacterial enzymeEnzyme activityCommentsReference
Organophosphates (OPs)Phosphotriesterase (PTE) (amidohydrolase fold) from Flavobacterium sp., Pseudomonas diminuta, and Agrobacterium radiobacter P230For the Pseudomonas/Flavobacterium enzyme, using paraoxon as substrate: kcat = 4 × 103 s−1; Km = 1 × 10−4 m; kcat/Km > 4 × 107 s−1 m−1Diffusion-limited kinetics; rate enhancement of 2.8 × 1011 over the uncatalysed reaction. The Pseudomonas and Flavobacterium enzymes are identical, while the Agrobacterium enzyme shares 90% amino acid identity. Very broad substrate rangeBrown (1980), Dumas et al. (1989), Horne et al. (2002) and Horvat and Wolfenden (2005)
Methyl parathion hydrolases (MPH) (β-lactamase fold) from Plesiomonas sp. strain M6, Pseudomonas sp. WBC-3For methyl parathion as substrate: Km = 3.7 × 10−5 mkcat = 37 s−1Limited substrate range, with parathion the major substrate. Enzyme is most closely related to glyoxylase II. Bimetal centre is nearly identical to that found in PTECui et al. (2001) and Dong et al. (2005)
Organophosphorus acid anhydrolases (OPAA) (Pita bread-fold, prolidase/proline dipeptidase) from Alteromonas sp. strain JD6.5For paraoxon as substrate: Km = 1.4 × 10−2 mkcat = 2.3 × 102 s−1For diisopropyl fluorophosphate: kcat = 583 s−1OPAA appears to be a proline dipeptidase with a high level of promiscuous activity against OPs. Other prolidases (e.g. PepQ from Ecoli) also have OP hydrolase activity Mn2+-dependent; broad substrate rangeDefrank and Cheng (1991) and Park et al. (2004)
OrganochlorinesLinA (unique dehydrochlorinase) from various species, predominantly SphingomonadsFor the LinAγ1-7 enzyme at 1.7 μmγ-HCH (lindane), reaction rate is 197 s−1; for 1.7 μm α-HCH: 50 s−1; for 1.7 μm δ-HCH: 5 s−1Very modest kinetics for the preferred isomers; rate enhancement of >1010 over the uncatalysed reaction (knon ∼ 160 years)Cortes and Hites (2000), Lal et al. (2010) and Pandey et al. (unpublished manuscript)
LinB (hydrolytic dechlorinase) from various species, predominantly SphingomonadsFor the LinB SS04-5 enzyme at 1.7 μmβ-HCH, reaction rate is: 3 s−1; for 1.7 μm δ-HCH: 0.1 s−1A very broad substrate preference for halogenated compounds up to a chain length of eight carbon atomsLal et al. (2010) and Pandey et al. (unpublished manuscript)
CarbamatesMCD (β-lactamse fold) from Achromobacter WM111For carbaryl as substrate: kcat = 1.7 s−1; Km = 3.1 × 10−5 m; kcat/Km = 5.4 × 104 s−1 m−1Also has a high level of carboxylesterase activity against 1-naphthyl acetate, and low PTE activityWolfe et al. (1978), Derbyshire et al. (1987) and Naqvi et al. (2009)
CahA (amidase, Pnc1p fold) from Arthrobacter sp. RC100For carbaryl as substrate: kcat = 0.2 s−1; Km = 2.3 × 10−5 m; kcat/Km = 8.7 × 103 s−1 m−1Retains the lysine/serine catalytic dyad of other known amidases; active against a range of carbamatesHayatsu et al. (2001) and Hashimoto et al. (2006)
CehA (structure unknown) from Rhizobium sp AC100For carbaryl as substrate: Km = 6.2 × 10−5 mAssociated with transposable elements, unknown mechanism, no known relatives; active against a wide range of N-methyl carbamatesHashimoto et al. (2002)
Synthetic pyrethroidsPytH (α/β-hydrolase fold) from Sphingobium sp. strain JZ-1For permethrin (cis- and trans-) as substrate: Km = 6 × 10−8 m; kcat = 3 s−1 cypermethrin (cis- and trans-): Km = 1 × 10−7 m; kcat = 2.5 s−1 cyhalothrin: Km = 3 × 10−7 m; kcat = 1.3 s−1 bifenthirin: 1.59 × 10−6 m; kcat = 0.4 s−1 deltamethrin: Km = 0.79 × 10−7 m; kcat = 0.8 s−1 fenvalerate: Km = 5.9 × 10−7 m; kcat = 0.9 s−1No isomer specificityWang et al. (2009)
Permethrinase (structure unknown) from Bacillus cereus SM3Up to 70% degradation of trans-permethrin after 8 hDemonstrates isomer specificity on permethrin; activity towards a wide range of α-cyanopyrethroidsMaloney et al. (1993)
EspA (carboxylesterase) from Klebsiella ZD 112For permethrin (cis- and trans-) as substrate: Km = 1.6 × 10−7 m; kcat = 1 s−1 cypermethrin Km = 2.1 × 10−7 m; kcat = 0.29 s−1 fenvalerate Km = 9.1 × 10−7 m; kcat = 0.1 s−1 deltamethrin Km = 1.2 × 10−6 m; kcat = 1.6 × 10−2 s−1No isomer specificity, very broad substrate range; also active against the carboxylester bonds of the OP insecticide, malathionWu et al. (2006)

The best characterized of the three families of hydrolases that degrade OPs are the PTEs, which were initially isolated from a Flavobacterium sp. and Pseudomonas diminuta in the 1980s (PTEPd; Brown 1980; Dumas et al. 1989). Subsequently, a PTE with 90% amino acid sequence identity to this enzyme was also isolated from Agrobacterium radiobacter (PTEAr; Horne et al. 2002). The crystal structures of both enzymes have been determined, and both possess a TIM(β/α)8-barrel fold, contain two metal atoms (Fe2+ and Zn2+) in the active site and belong to the amidohydrolase superfamily of proteins (Benning et al. 2001; Yang et al. 2003; Jackson et al. 2005). PTEs are highly efficient enzymes; they act specifically on phosphotriesters with diffusion-limited kinetics, resulting in a rate enhancement over the noncatalysed reaction (i.e. spontaneous decomposition) of ∼1011-fold (see Table 1). Hydrolysis of phosphotriesters is achieved via a nucleophilic substitution (SN2) using metal co-ordinated activated water (Holden and Raushel 2002; Jackson et al. 2005). The two different PTE enzymes vary somewhat in their substrate preferences: the Agrobacteriun PTE prefers dimethyl alkoxy groups in the R1 and R2 positions (see Fig. 1), whereas the Flavobacterium/Pseudomonas enzyme prefers diethyl groups at these positions (Brown 1980; Dumas et al. 1989; Horne et al. 2002). The substrate preference and catalytic rate for OPs are constrained by both the structure (Di Sioudi et al. 1999; Cho et al. 2004, 2006; Jackson et al. 2009a) and pKa (Hong and Raushel 1996; Jackson et al. 2009b) of the R3 group. Leaving groups with a pKa of ∼8 or less are hydrolysed extremely efficiently, while leaving groups with higher pKa values are generally turned over at a rate related to their pKa value, although other factors such as hydrophobicity and stereochemical interactions can also affect the rate (Jackson et al. 2005, 2009b).

No close homologues of the PTEs have been identified, so their evolutionary origins are unknown. The genes (oph) encoding PTE in the Flavobacterium sp. and Pdiminuta are identical in sequence and located on large, albeit different plasmids, within a highly conserved region of ∼5.1 kb (Mulbry et al. 1987), suggesting a recent genetic exchange between the plasmids. The opdA gene encoding PTEAr, while not plasmid-borne, is associated with a transposase gene (Horne et al. 2003), so it is likely that lateral gene transfer has also played a role in PTE evolution.

Recently, Afriat et al. (2006) discovered that PTEPd has considerable promiscuous lactonase activity (kcat/Km = 160 − 6.5 × 105 s−1 m−1 for different lactones and thiolactones). They therefore tested both the PTE and lactonase activities of three PTE-like lactonases (∼30% sequence identity to PTE) and found that they all proficiently hydrolyse lactones (kcat/Km = 6 × 104 − 1.7 × 106 s−1 m−1) and have measurable paraoxonase activity (102- to 106-fold lower than the lactonase activity, and 104- to 108-fold lower than the activity of PTE for paraoxon). The authors suggested that the physiological role for these PTE-like lactonases might be in processing quorum-sensing lactones, in which case they probably evolved many millions of years ago. They further suggested that PTEs may have evolved from an unknown PTE-like lactonase, using its low level of promiscuous paraoxonase activity as an essential starting point. The paraoxonase activity would previously have had no physiological relevance, so it could have been selectively neutral, remaining latent in these enzymes. Empirical structures have also now been determined for three additional lactonases with promiscuous PTE activity (Del Vecchio et al. 2009; Hawwa et al. 2009; Xiang et al. 2009). These lactonases share both the fold and active site architecture with PTE, supporting the speculation of Afriat and co-workers.

Phosphotriesters are also hydrolysed by members of the MPH and OPAA families, albeit with considerably lower catalytic rates (kcat) than those for the PTEs. The activity of MPH is effectively restricted to methyl parathion, with a kcat value of 37 s−1 and a Km of 37 μm (Table 1). OPAA has a kcat for paraoxon of 230 s−1, which is an order of magnitude slower than the PTEs. In contrast to MPH, OPAA has a relatively broad substrate range, including diisopropyl fluorophosphate (DFP), cyclohexyl methyl fluorophosphate, paraoxon and the G-series nerve gasses (sarin, soman and tabun), which are turned over more rapidly than the ‘model’ substrate methyl parathion (kcat of 583 s−1 for DFP; Defrank and Cheng 1991).

Methyl parathion hydrolase has a β-lactamase-like structure and contains a bimetallic catalytic centre that is analogous in structure and presumably in mechanism to that of the PTEs (Dong et al. 2005). Therefore, it appears that a virtually identical catalytic mechanism for OP hydrolysis has evolved independently from two structurally distinct, but mechanistically similar ancestors, suggesting that it was mechanistic rather than structural considerations that predisposed the ancestors of both the PTEs and MPH to evolve OP hydrolase activity.

Organophosphorus acid anhydrolases is phylogenetically distinct from both the MPH and PTEs and is an Mn2+-dependent hydrolase, rather than an Fe/Zn- or Zn/Zn-dependent enzyme like the PTEs and MPH. OPAA is therefore likely to be mechanistically dissimilar from the other PTE families, although its catalytic mechanism is yet to be elucidated. The evolutionary origin of the OPAA class of PTEs is much clearer than that for either the PTEs or MPH. OPAA has a high degree of amino acid identity (∼50%) to the prolidase family of dipeptidases (e.g. PepQ from Escherichia coli; Cheng et al. 1996). Indeed, OPAA from Alteromonas haloplanktis maintains high levels of proline dipeptidase activity (650 μmol min−1 mg−1 for the ALA-PRO dipeptide; Cheng et al. 1996). Moreover, prolidases from other organisms, including Ecoli aminopeptidase P, have levels of PTE activity that closely match that of OPAA (Jao et al. 2004). This suggests that the OP hydrolase activity of the OPAA family is simply a promiscuous activity, albeit a moderately efficient one, and that the major cellular role of these enzymes is as a prolidase.

Insect enzymes

More than 150 separate cases of OP resistance have been described in insects where at least something is known about the biochemical mechanism (for reviews, see Feyereisen 2005; Oakeshott et al. 2005a,b; Li et al. 2007; and Farnsworth et al. 2010). Known enzyme-dependent mechanisms involved in resistance fall into just four classes (Table 2), only one of which (certain carboxylesterases) involves mutations in the active site to produce a new enzyme function (OP hydrolysis, which reduces the toxicity of the OP by several orders of magnitude; Singh and Walker 2006). The others confer resistance via gene amplification and/or over-expression of general detoxifying systems [glutathione-S-transferases (GSTs), cytochromes P450 or other carboxylesterases], or by mutations in AChE that decrease its sensitivity to the insecticide (Table 2).

Table 2.   Insect enzymes with activity against man-made insecticidal xenobiotics.*
Insecticide classInsect enzymeEnzyme activityCommentsReference
  1. *Where possible kcat and Km values are given. In other cases, specific activities are given in pmol min−1 mg−1 for easy comparison and may have been converted from their originally published units of measure. If these values were not available, other measures of activity are shown.

Organophosphates (OPs)LcαE7G137D (E3 carboxylesterase) from Lucilia cuprina and orthologs in Lucilia sericata, Musca domestica, Cochliomyia hominivoraxLcαE7G137D: using diethyl 7-hydroxycoumaryl phosphate (dECP) as a substrate, kcat = 8 × 10−4 s−1 for baculovirus expressed enzyme; dimethyl 4-methylumbelliferyl phosphate (dMUP): kcat = 9 × 10−4 s−1; chlorfenvinphos (CVP): specific activity = 143 ± 0.2 pmol min−1 mg−1 baculovirus cell extracts. MdαE7G137D (Mdomestica orthologue): CVP: specific activity = 146 ± 0.5 pmol min−1 mg−1Ecoli cell extractsResistance to OPs resulting from mutations in LcαE7, the gene encoding carboxylesterase E3, that enhance the enzyme’s ability to hydrolyse insecticides. The G137D mutation enhances hydrolysis of diethyl and dimethyl OPs by 55- and 33-fold, respectively, although general carboxylesterase activity is diminishedNewcomb et al. (1997a), Campbell et al. (1998), Claudianos et al. (1999), Devonshire et al. (2003), Heidari et al. (2004), Oakeshott et al. (2005a) and de Carvalho et al. (2006, 2009, 2010)
LcαE7W251L/S/G (E3 carboxylesterase) from Lcuprina and orthologs in Mdomestica, Lsericata, Anisopteromalus calandrae, C. hominivoraxLcαE7W251L: dECP: kcat = 1.5 × 10−4 s−1 for baculovirus expressed enzyme; dMUP: kcat = 1 × 10−3 s−1; malathion: kcat = 3.7 s−1The W251L mutation increases hydrolysis of diethyl and dimethyl OPs by 10- and 33-fold, respectively. Unlike the G137D mutation above, it retains the ability to hydrolyse carboxylesters in the leaving group of malathion, conferring strong resistance to this compoundCampbell et al. (1998), Claudianos et al. (1999), Zhu et al. (1999), Devonshire et al. (2003), Heidari et al. (2004), Oakeshott et al. (2005a) and de Carvalho et al. (2006, 2009, 2010)
E4 and FE4 (carboxylesterases from paralogous genes) from Myzus persicaeE4: Paraoxon: kcat = 9 × 10−5 s−1 (or 0.33 h−1)Resistance resulting from the over-production of E4 or FE4 via gene amplification; results in sequestration and enhanced degradation of a wide range of OPs, carbamates and synthetic pyrethroids (SPs); E4-amplified genes are methylated leading to their over-expressionDevonshire and Moores (1982), Field and Devonshire (1997, 1998), Field (2000) and Field and Blackman (2003)
Cytochromes P450 (mainly members of the CYP4 and CYP6 families) from various speciesCYP6A1 from the Rutgers strain of Mdomestica: diazinon: turnover = 32.2 pmol min−1 mg−1Ecoli expressed CYP6A1Cytochrome P450-mediated resistance is attributable to over-expression via up-regulation of CYP genes. In the Rutgers strain of Mdomestica, over-expression of CYP6A1 is at least in part because of loss-of-function mutations in trans- regulatory lociCarino et al. (1994), Feyereisen (2005) and Li et al. (2007)
Glutathione-S-transferases (GSTs) from various speciesPxGST3 from the MPA methyl parathion-resistant strain of Plutella xylostella: specific activity towards parathion, methyl parathion and paraoxon 13- to 40-fold higher than that of other GST (nonover-expressed) isozymes in the same strainGST-mediated resistance is attributable to gene amplification and/or over-expression of GSTs, e.g. amplified MdGSTD3 and MdGST-6A are responsible for OP resistance in the Cornell strain of Mdomestica, although several GSTs are amplified (but have no activity); over-expressed PxGSTE1 (encoding PxGST3) is responsible for OP resistance in P. xylostellaChiang and Sun (1993), Wei et al. (2001) and Li et al. (2007)
Acetylcholinesterases (AChEs) from various species Resistance is attributable to mutations in AChE (target site for OPs) that decrease sensitivity to the insecticideRussell et al. (2004) and Oakeshott et al. (2005b)
OrganochlorinesCytochromes P450 (mainly members of the CYP4 and CYP6 families) from various speciesActivity of Anopheles gambiae CYP6Z1 for DDT = 5.7 pmol min−1 mg−1 of baculovirus expressed protein; no activity was detected for expressed CYP6Z2Cytochrome P450-mediated resistance is generally attributable to over-expression via up-regulation of CYP genes. In the DDT- and malathion-resistant 91-R and MHIII-D23 strains of Drosophila melanogaster, over-expression of CYP6A2 and CYP6A8 is at least in part because of loss-of-function mutations in trans-regulatory loci. DDT resistance in Dmelanogaster is largely because of a series of multiple adaptive steps occurring in rapid succession at the CYP6G1 locus and involves three different transposable element insertions and a CYP6G1 gene duplication event. Both CYP6Z1 and CYP6Z2 are over-expressed in DDT-resistant A. gambiae, but only CYP6Z1 is capable of metabolizing DDTMaitra et al. (2000), Catania et al. (2004), Feyereisen (2005), Li et al. (2007), Chiu et al. (2008) and Schmidt et al. (2010)
CYP6A2 (cytochrome P450) of the RaleighDDT strain of Drosophila melanogasterDDT metabolism rates were up to 20 times higher than those of the wild-type enzymeThree point mutations in CYP6A2 in the RaleighDDT strain confer >1000-fold R to DDT; CYP6A2 is also over-expressed in this strain of DmelanogasterAmichot et al. 2004 and Feyereisen (2005)
GSTs from various speciesDDT dehydrochlorinase (DDTase) activity of: AgGSTE2: 0.023 pmol min−1 mg−1; DmGSTD1: >0.0072 pmol min−1 mg−1; AaGSTE2: 0.0345 pmol min−1 mg−1GST-mediated resistance is attributable to over-expression of GSTs (e.g. AgGSTE2 in DDT-resistant Anopheles gambiae, DmGSTD1 in DDT-resistant Dmelanogaster, and AaGSTD1 and AaGSTE2 in DDT/SP-resistant Aedes aegypti). Some insect GSTs detoxify DDT by dehydrochlorination, using reduced glutathione as a cofactorTang and Tu (1994), Ortelli et al. (2003), Lumjuan et al. (2005) and Li et al. (2007)
CarbamatesCarboxylesterase A1 from Heliothis virescens Thiodicarb and cypermethrin resistance linked to an over-expressed carboxylesterase A1 in Hvirescens that is related to the E4 esterase from MpersicaeGoh et al. (1995)
E4 and FE4 (carboxylesterases from paralogous genes) from MpersicaeE4: pirimicarb: kcat = 2.6 × 10−5 s−1 (or 0.096 h−1); propoxur: kcat = 2.6 × 10−5 s−1 (0.093 h−1)Resistance resulting from the over-production of E4 or FE4 via gene amplification (see above)Devonshire and Moores (1982)
Cytochromes P450 from a limited number of insect species Only a small number of reports in the literature of P450-mediated resistance to carbamate insecticides (i.e. over-expressed CYP6A1 in the Rutgers strain of Mdomestica, CYP6G1 in the WC2 strain of Dmelanogaster and CYP9A1 in the Macon Ridge strain of Hvirescens)Sabourault et al. (2001) and Feyereisen (2005)
Synthetic pyrethroidsCarboxylesterases from various species Higher intensities of specific zones of esterase isozymes associated with high levels of resistance to SPs in various species; resistance mechanisms have not yet been elucidated at the molecular levelOakeshott et al. (2010) andFarnsworth et al. (2010)
LcαE7 wild-type (carboxylesterase) from LcuprinaWild-type αE7 has relatively high SP hydrolytic activity (specificity constants of up to 90 000 m−1 s−1), although its efficiency is much reduced for the more insecticidal isomers of the more recent type 2 SPsStrong preferences for type 1 over type 2 SPs, dichloro- over dibromo-, and trans- over cis-isomers across the cyclopropane ring of the SP. Wild-type Lcuprina is presumably sensitive to OPsHeidari et al. (2005), Devonshire et al. (2007) and Oakeshott et al. (2010)
E4 and FE4 (carboxylesterases from paralogous genes) from MpersicaeE4 hydrolysed (1S)trans-permethrin rapidly (i.e. 2500 times faster than for paraoxon above), but hydrolysis of the other three isomers could not be detectedResistance resulting from the over-production of E4 or FE4 via gene amplification (see above)Devonshire and Moores (1982)
Cytochrome P450s (mainly members of the CYP4 and CYP6 families) from various speciesMdCYP6D1 from LPR strain of Mdomestica: rates of SP metabolism are extremely low e.g. deltamethrin – <0.88 pmol min−1 mg−1; cypermethrin – 8.3 pmol min−1 mg−1; AgCYP6P3 from permethrin-resistant Anopheles gambiae: trans-permethrin isomers – 0.59 ± 0.04 min−1; cis-permethrin isomers – 0.37 ± 0.02 min−1; deltamethrin – 0.86 ± 0.03 min−1Cytochrome P450-mediated SP resistance is generally attributable to over-expression via up-regulation of CYP genes e.g. CYP4G8 and CYP6B7 in SP-resistant H. virescens; CYP6X1 in SP-resistant Lygus lineolaris; CYP6D1 from LPR strain of M. domestica (also contains other resistance genes, such as pen and kdr). Several P450s (e.g. CYP6P3, CYP6M2 and CYP6AK1) are over-expressed in field-caught permethrin-resistant A. gambiae, but so far only CYP6P3 has been expressed in E. coli and shown to have activity for both type 1 and type 2 SPsWheelock and Scott (1992), Zhang and Scott (1996), Feyereisen (2005), Li et al. (2007) and Muller et al. (2008)
GSTs from various species GST-mediated SP resistance is attributable to gene amplification and/or over-expression of GSTs (e.g. amplification of NlGSTD1 in SP-resistant Nilaparvata lugens; over-expression of AaGSTD1 and AaGSTE2 in DDT/SP-resistant Aaegypti). GSTs are involved in sequestration of SPs and/or detoxification of lipid peroxidation products induced by SPs, rather than direct metabolism of SPsLi et al. (2007)

So far there have been nine cases characterized in detail at the molecular level in which amino acid substitutions have conferred OP hydrolase activity on insect carboxylesterases. All of these fall into the same, orthologous clade of esterases, the best characterized of which is the αE7 enzyme of the sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina. Carboxylesterases, like AChE, can carry out the first step of the two-step reaction required to hydrolyse OPs at physiologically relevant rates (Fig. 2). In the nine cases of mutant carboxylesterases conferring OP resistance, a mutation in the active site greatly enhances the second step (regeneration by dephosphorylation). Remarkably, these nine cases essentially involve just two independent amino acid substitutions (Table 2). The first involves substitution of a tryptophan in the acyl pocket of the active site with a smaller residue, generally a leucine but sometimes a serine or a glycine, while the second involves substitution of a glycine in the oxyanion hole of the active site with an aspartic acid residue (Newcomb et al. 1997a; Campbell et al. 1998; Claudianos et al. 1999; Zhu et al. 1999; Heidari et al. 2004; Oakeshott et al. 2005a; de Carvalho et al. 2006, 2009, 2010). The two mutations do not occur together, each conferring resistance and OP hydrolase activity. Because these two very specific changes in orthologous esterase enzymes are the only ways yet known for an insect to evolve an enzyme with OP hydrolase activity, it appears that the options for doing so are very limited. Even the more active of the two LcαE7 mutants (Gly137Asp) is many fold less active in its OP hydrolytic activity than any of the bacterial OP hydrolases (Tables 1 and 2). It is interesting to note that the activity of the wild-type LcαE7 enzyme for OPs with either of the most common alkoxy group substituents is not zero, so again the start point for the evolution of the ‘new’ function has been an enzyme that already has low promiscuous activity for that function.

The Gly to Asp mutation greatly reduces the native carboxylesterase activity and, in Lcuprina at least, this impairs development, producing asymmetric bristle and wing vein patterns and measurable loss of fitness (McKenzie 1994, 1997; Batterham et al. 1996; Newcomb et al. 1997a,b). The Trp to Leu mutation in LcαE7 reduces the stability of the enzyme in vitro (C. J. Jackson, J-W. Liu and J. G. Oakeshott, unpublished data), although its effects on fitness, if any, are unknown.

Hartley et al. (2006) traced the evolutionary history of the two LcαE7 mutants by sequencing pinned Australasian specimens collected before OPs were used commercially. The G137D mutation was not recovered from any of the 16 pre-1950 blowflies sampled for this allele; however, four of 21 flies sampled for the W241 allele carried a resistance mutation (either W251L or W251T), indicating that it was in the population prior to the introduction of OPs. On the other hand, the G137D allele now dominates post-OP Australasian Lcuprina populations, substantively replacing the susceptible wild-type and the poorer W251L-resistant mutant (Oakeshott et al. 2005a). This is in part because the fitness cost associated with the G137D mutation has been ameliorated in two ways. First, a modifier mutation arose at a second locus, which corrects the developmental instability problem (McKenzie 1994). Second, there has been a rise in the frequency of duplication events that put both a susceptible and a resistant alleles onto the one chromosome (Smyth et al. 2000; Newcomb et al. 2005), so that the fly can be simultaneously homozygous for both the original function and the new one. However, the selective sweep of the G137D mutation to high frequencies has greatly reduced the level of polymorphism at other positions in the LcαE7 gene, thereby diminishing significantly the genetic diversity on which to select for further improvements in OP hydrolytic activity (Hartley et al. 2006).

Organochlorine metabolizing enzymes

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Organophosphate metabolizing enzymes
  5. Organochlorine metabolizing enzymes
  6. Insecticidal carbamate metabolizing enzymes
  7. Synthetic pyrethroid-metabolizing enzymes
  8. Conclusions
  9. Acknowledgements
  10. Literature cited

Relatively few OC-based insecticides are now used, as a result of the concerns about their mammalian toxicity and bioaccumulation. The environmental fate and development of resistance to OC insecticides are best documented for DDT (1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-di(4-chlorophenyl)ethane) and lindane (the gamma isomer of hexachlorocyclohexane; HCH). Enzymes have been identified that degrade other OC insecticides, such as the bacterial monooxygenases that degrade endosulfan and endosulfate (Sutherland et al. 2002; Weir et al. 2006). However, we have not discussed such cases here as they lack the level of molecular detail available for the HCH- and DDT-degrading enzymes in either bacteria or insects.

DDT is a potent neurotoxin that binds the voltage-gated axonic sodium channels, causing uncontrolled and persistent excitation of the neurones. This mode of action is shared by the SPs, and mutations that cause target-site insensitivity for DDT often also reduce sensitivity for the SPs (Brengues et al. 2003).

Lindane acts by binding and blocking the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors of neuronal GABA-gated chloride channels. GABA is an antagonist of these channels, so lindane effectively blocks this antagonistic effect, resulting in continuous stimulation of the associated neurones (Joy 1982). Technical grade HCH comprises four major isomers that differ in the spatial orientation of the chlorines around the cyclohexane ring (Fig. 1), although only γ-HCH is insecticidal. The production of 1 tonne of lindane therefore generates 8–12 tonnes of an unwanted mixture of variously stable HCH isomers (predominantly α-, β- and δ-HCH), 4–6 million tonnes of which have been dumped worldwide (Lal et al. 2010).

Bacterial enzymes

Numerous bacteria have been discovered that can degrade DDT (Stenerse 1965; Nadeau et al. 1994; Bidlan and Manonmani 2002; Ahuja and Kumar 2003; Kamanavalli and Ninnekar 2004; Blasco et al. 2008; Wang et al. 2010). However, the enzymes responsible for the early steps in this degradation have yet to be identified.

There have been over 45 reports of HCH-degrading bacteria, mostly from a single family, the Sphingomonadaceae, with most of the others also from relatively closely related Gram-negative bacteria (for review, see Lal et al. 2010). All the strains tested at a biochemical/molecular level appear to have very similar pathways for HCH mineralization, comprising a 10-enzyme pathway (encoded by the linAlinJ genes; Lal et al. 2010). The ten-enzyme pathway accommodates the enormous isomeric complexity of HCH. The two key enzymes at the head of the pathway are LinA, which is a unique HCH dehydrochlorinase, and LinB, which is a haloalkane dehalogenase in the α/β hydrolase superfamily of enzymes (Ollis et al. 1992; Nagata et al. 1993, 1997; Kmunicek et al. 2005; Brittain et al. 2011; Lal et al. 2010; Okai et al. 2010). LinA degrades α-, δ- and γ-HCH, performing either one or two dehydrochlorination reactions before LinB enters the pathway with its hydrolytic dechlorination reaction (Fig. 3). LinB also degrades of β-and δ-HCH without these isomers first being dehydrochlorinated by LinA (Ito et al. 2007; Lal et al. 2010). Each chloride removal reduces the toxicity of HCH by about 10-fold, and the removal of 3–4 chlorides is necessary before LinC and subsequent enzymes mineralize the compound (Kumari et al. 2002; Suar et al. 2004).

image

Figure 3.  Simplified scheme of hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) degradation pathway by LinA and LinB. Four different HCH isomers, α, β, γ and δ are degraded by the actions of LinA and LinB. The LinA (dehydrochlorinase)-initiated pathway occurs for β-, γ- and δ-HCH, and the respective pentachlorocyclohexanes (PCCH) are formed, which are further degraded by LinA and LinB. The haloalkane dehalogenase-, LinB-initiated pathway occurs for β- and δ-HCH, which are degraded to 2,3,5,6-tetrachlorocyclohexanediol via 2,3,4,5,6-pentachlorocyclohexanol. For details, see Lal et al. (2010).

Download figure to PowerPoint

There is considerable evidence that the rapid assembly of the HCH catalabolic pathway has involved lateral gene transfer across species and insertion sequence-mediated transposition within species. For example, there is strong sequence similarity in the genes across both Gram-positive and Gram-negative species, and the gene organization amongst species is variable and bears no relationship to phylogeny (Singh et al. 2007; Manickam et al. 2008). Moreover, many lin genes within the various species are located on plasmids, and most are associated with the IS6100 transposable element (Lal et al. 2010). As the lin pathway is most commonly found in a single genus, the Sphingomonads, it is possible that much of the downstream pathway and also some of the progenitors existed in sphingomonads for other reasons. Interestingly, linA has a very different codon usage from all the other genes of the pathway, the others being typical for sphingomonads, suggesting that linA at least originated elsewhere (Nagata et al. 1999; Dogra et al. 2004; Lal et al. 2010). There is also a high level of amino acid sequence variation between LinA and LinB variants from different species; at least some of this variation affects the isomer and enantiomer preferences of the encoded enzymes (Lal et al. 2010). Indeed, LinA and LinB between them can apparently degrade all of the >20 still-toxic compounds generated during the first three or four chloride removals from the various HCH isomers, which is a remarkable feat.

Insect enzymes

Only two classes of enzymes, the cytochromes P450 and GSTs, have so far been implicated in metabolic resistance to DDT in insects (Table 2). Cytochromes P450 typically catalyse an oxidation or hydroxylation that renders these highly hydrophobic insecticides more susceptible to further modification by increasing their hydrophilicity and capacity to cross lipid membranes. GSTs are then involved in conjugating the activated OC metabolites with large hydrophilic compounds such as glutathione or glucuronic acid, which can then be excreted (Josephy and Mannervik 2006). Most cases of DDT resistance appear to result from over-expression of these enzymes via gene amplification and/or up-regulation, by mutations in either trans-acting regulatory loci, or cis-acting elements within the promoters of P450 and GST genes (Feyereisen 2005; Li et al. 2007). It is assumed that the over-expression allows for more effective sequestration (in the case of the GSTs) or an enhancement of otherwise slow rates of oxidation/hydroxylation (in the case of the P450s).

One case of cis-inherited changes in a P450 gene leading to DDT resistance has been elucidated at a molecular level. In this case, involving the CYP6G1 locus of Drosophila melanogaster, a series of adaptive steps was found to have occurred in rapid succession (Schmidt et al. 2010). A fragment of the Accord transposable element was originally inserted into the promoter region of the CYP6G1 gene, causing an increase in transcription, and this was followed by a CYP6G1 gene duplication and two additional transposable element insertions (a P and an HMS-Beagle), all of which increased DDT resistance.

Notwithstanding this instance of cis-inherited changes at an individual P450 locus, many studies have now reported the up-regulation of multiple P450 and GST genes in DDT-resistant insects (Feyereisen 2005; Oakeshott et al. 2005a). Whether or not all these genes are causally involved, the pattern suggests that the resistance mutation involves a master regulator gene with trans-acting effects on the expression of these general detoxifying genes. There is certainly the scope for many P450 and GST genes to be involved. Most insect genomes sequenced to date have more than 80 P450 and more than 20 cytosolyic GST genes, with notable exceptions in some specialized insects (honey bee, louse; Weinstock et al. 2006; Kirkness et al. 2010). Many of the P450 and GST genes are clustered within the genome (Oakeshott et al. 2010), and many are also known to be inducible by various chemical stresses (Plapp 1984; Maitra et al. 2000). Therefore, there is a huge repertoire of inducible P450 and GST genes within an insect species that could be associated with responses to chemical stresses such as insecticides (Feyereisen 2005).

However, the work of Chiu et al. (2008) on DDT resistance in the mosquito Anopheles gambiae shows that care should be taken in assuming that the increased expression of all the P450 and GST genes associated with resistance to these (and possibly other) insecticides reflects a causal connection. Previous microarray studies had identified five P450 loci (CYP4C27, CYP4H15, CYP6Z1, CYP6Z2 and CYP12F1) that showed significantly higher expression in a DDT-resistant strain (David et al. 2005). Chiu and co-workers expressed both CYP6Z1 and CYP6Z2 in a heterologous expression system (Sf9 cells) and found that only CYP6Z1 was capable of metabolizing DDT. Thus, not all P450s that are up-regulated in resistant strains actually contribute causally to the resistance. Presumably, the others are up-regulated because they are involved in the same trans-acting regulatory networks.

While most cases of P450- and GST-based metabolic resistance to DDT characterized at the molecular level show enhanced expression of various P450/GST genes, there has been one case identified in which three amino acid substitutions in CYP6A2 of a DDT-resistant strain of Dmelanogaster resulted in an enzyme with up to 20 times higher DDT metabolism rates than the wild-type enzyme (Amichot et al. 2004). None of these mutations was located in the active site or near the substrate binding site, so the mechanism by which they confer an increase in activity is unclear. Interestingly, CYP6A2 was also over-expressed in this strain of Dmelanogaster.

Insecticidal carbamate metabolizing enzymes

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Organophosphate metabolizing enzymes
  5. Organochlorine metabolizing enzymes
  6. Insecticidal carbamate metabolizing enzymes
  7. Synthetic pyrethroid-metabolizing enzymes
  8. Conclusions
  9. Acknowledgements
  10. Literature cited

Like the OPs, the insecticidal carbamates are potent AChE inhibitors. However, unlike the phosphotriester chemistry, which is not synthesized naturally, the insecticidal carbamates are derived from carbamic acid, a chemistry used in a wide range of common cellular metabolites (carbamoyl phosphate and urea, for example). Again, like the OPs, carbamates are usually applied as chemically modified protoxins that are more readily activated in insects than mammals, such as the N-sulfonyl carbamates (Kinoshita and Fukuto 1980; Fahmy and Fukuto 1981).

The nitrogen of the carbamate structures is generally either a secondary (N-methyl) or a tertiary (N-dimethyl) amine, whilst the esterified group tends to be a bulky aromatic or an oxime group (Fig. 1). The mode of action for the carbamates is assumed to be analogous to that of the OPs (Casida 1963; Sogorb and Vilanova 2002). A carbamylated form of the AChE active-site serine is formed upon hydrolysis of the carbamate carboxyl ester, forming a relatively stable intermediate that completely inhibits its reaction with acetylcholine. In fact, this intermediate more closely resembles the covalent intermediate formed during the physiologically relevant reaction with acetylcholine than does the phosphorylated form produced during OP intoxication (Fig. 2). Because the carbamylated intermediate is planar, like the acylated form, the active-site serine can be regenerated by the ‘normal’ mechanism (i.e. an AChE activated water), albeit much more slowly than is the case when acetylcholine is the substrate, and the ‘aging’ reaction is thought to not occur (Fig. 2).

Bacterial enzymes

Although a large number of bacterial strains degrading insecticidal carbamates have been described in the literature, only three of the enzymes responsible for the first step in the degradation pathways have been identified and characterized: MCD, CehA and CahA (Derbyshire et al. 1987; Hayatsu et al. 2001; Hashimoto et al. 2002; Cheesman et al. 2007). Once the carbamate is hydrolysed by these enzymes, the reaction products are then catabolized by other cellular pathways as carbon sources. Both MCD from Achromobacter WM111 (Derbyshire et al. 1987) and CehA from Rhizobium sp AC100 (Hashimoto et al. 2002) are esterases capable of hydrolysing the carboxylester bond of 1-naphthyl acetate. Indeed, MCD hydrolyses 1-naphthyl acetate 30 times faster than it does carbaryl, with a kcat value of 52 s−1 for 1-naphthyl actetate (Naqvi et al. 2009). MCD is a Mn2+-dependent enzyme, as demonstrated by chelator and reconstitution studies (Karns and Tomasek 1991; Naqvi et al. 2009). The catalytic machinery of CehA remains a mystery, as it is inhibited by neither serine hydrolase inhibitors nor chelators, and contains no recognizable catalytic motif (Bornscheuer 2002). CahA has no activity for 1-naphthyl actetate and is likely to be an amidase, based on the conservation of a catalytic serine/lysine dyad (Labahn et al. 2002) and the fact that it shares the same structural fold (the Pnc1p fold) as pyrazinamidase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Hu et al. 2007).

All three carbamate-degrading enzymes are able to degrade carbaryl, with kcat values of approximately 2 and 0.2 s−1 for MCD and CahA (kcat for CehA is not available), respectively, and Km values for MCD, CehA and CahA in the range of 2.3–6.2 μm. MCD, CehA and CahA have all been described as possessing broad (although not identical) substrate ranges (Table 1). Interestingly, MCD has been demonstrated to have low (promiscuous) levels of PTE activity, with a kcat/Km for dimethyl umbelliferyl phosphate of 3 × 10−3, 107 times lower than its kcat/Km for carbaryl (Naqvi et al. 2009). MCD shares the β-lactamase structural fold with the PTE MPH (see above), and it is possible that promiscuous PTE activity is common within this fold, because of the underlying catalytic mechanism.

Insect enzymes

Field resistance towards the carbamate chemistries were detected a mere 5 years after their introduction in the 1950s, whereas it often took a decade or more for many of the OPs (Brattsten 1990), suggesting that enzymes capable of degrading carbamates may have been present already, at least at low frequencies, in some insect populations. Despite the high levels of ‘natural’ and acquired carbamate resistance and insensitivity that are present in some insect populations, there are relatively few data concerning the molecular basis for resistance to carbamate insecticides in insects (Table 2). Nevertheless, there have been a few reports of over-expressed carboxylesterases and P450s contributing to carbamate resistance in various strains of Heliothis virescens, Musca domestica and Dmelanogaster (Goh et al. 1995; Feyereisen 2005; Farnsworth et al. 2010) and synergist studies have implicated the involvement of an esterase-based mechanism in some Culex species (Tanga and Wood 1986; Bisseta et al. 1990). The lack of molecular detail concerning the mechanisms of carbamate resistance mechanisms clearly affords fertile ground for future research effort.

Synthetic pyrethroid-metabolizing enzymes

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Organophosphate metabolizing enzymes
  5. Organochlorine metabolizing enzymes
  6. Insecticidal carbamate metabolizing enzymes
  7. Synthetic pyrethroid-metabolizing enzymes
  8. Conclusions
  9. Acknowledgements
  10. Literature cited

The SPs are neurotoxins that target the voltage-gated axonic sodium channels in a similar manner to DDT, causing uncontrolled and persistent excitation of the neurones (Soderlund and Bloomquist 1990). The chemistry for this class of insecticide has been inspired by naturally occurring insecticides, the pyrthrums, produced by the genus Chrysanthemum (Silcox and Roberts 1994). So, like the carbamates, this chemistry has been present in nature for a considerable period of time.

Bacterial enzymes

To date, three pyrethroid-degrading enzymes of bacterial origin have been characterized: PytH from Sphingobium sp. strain JZ-1 (Wang et al. 2009), permethrinase from Bacillus cereus SM3 (Maloney et al. 1993) and EspA from Klebsiella ZD 112 (Wu et al. 2006). These enzymes are the first steps in catabolic pathways, and the hydrolysis products of these enzymes are likely further catabolized, as each of these organisms mineralize the SPs. The identities of these pathways and the subsequent enzymes in them have not yet been elucidated.

PytH has greatest homology with members of the α/β-hydrolase fold superfamily of proteins and is likely to be a serine hydrolase in that it is inhibited by diethyl-pyrocarbonate (DEPC) and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) and contains a conserved serine/aspartate/histidine motif that forms the catalytic triad of other serine hydrolases. Although the sequence of the Bacillus permethrinase is not known, inhibitor studies have revealed that it is likely to be a serine hydrolase as well. On the other hand, EspA has no close homologues of known function in the sequence databases, and the lack of conserved serine hydrolase motifs in its primary sequence suggests that it may operate by a different mechanism from that of PytH and the Bacillus permethrinase.

EspA and PytH are kinetically similar, with extremely low Km values (in the range of 10 nm to 1 μm) for a wide range of pyrethroid substrates (Table 1). PytH has somewhat higher kcat values than EspA, 0.4–3 s−1 for PytH compared with 0.01–1 s−1 for EspA, albeit both these values are low compared with the kcat values for the OP-degrading enzymes. EspA has also been shown to be active against a broad range of ester-containing substrates (p-nitrophenyl esters with side chains of varying length), although with Km values for these substrates typically in the order of 1000- to 10 000-fold greater than for the SPs. This observation may suggest that EspA may have evolved specifically towards a pyrethroid hydrolase activity, consistent with the inferred presence of a pathway for mineralization of SPs (Wu et al. 2006). The apparent steady state kinetics for the Bacillus permethrinase is unavailable but, like EspA and PytH, its rates appear to be consistently low across a range of substrates. However, unlike EspA and PytH, which appear to have no isomer specificity, permethrinase has a strong preference for the trans-isomer of permethrin (Maloney et al. 1993).

Insect enzymes

Carboxylesterases, P450s and GSTs have all been implicated in metabolic resistance to SPs in insects (Table 2). While increased intensities of specific zones of esterase isozymes (intense bands of carboxylesterase activity in nondenaturing polyacrylaminde gels) have been associated with resistance in various insect species, there is still no case where the resistance mechanism has been elucidated at the molecular level (Farnsworth et al. 2010). It is interesting that the LcαE7 carboxylesterase from wild-type Lcuprina has relatively high SP hydrolytic activity (up to 90 000 m−1 s−1; see Table 2) for some SPs. However, the blowfly is presumably susceptible, probably because the efficiency of the enzyme is much reduced for the more insecticidal isomers of the more recent type 2 SPs (Heidari et al. 2005; Devonshire et al. 2007).

Over-expression of CYP6D1 (at least in part because of loss-of-function mutations in repressor loci on another chromosome) has been implicated in SP resistance in the LPR strain of Mdomestica, albeit other resistance genes are also present in this strain and their relative importance in the resistance phenotype is unknown (Wheelock and Scott 1992; Zhang and Scott 1996). There are point mutations in the LPR CYP6D1 gene, and their contributions to the rate of SP metabolism by the encoded enzyme are unknown (Feyereisen 2005).

Microarray and RT-PCR studies found that several P450s were significantly over-expressed in field-caught, permethrin-resistant Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes (Muller et al. 2008). One of these enzymes, CYP6P3, was expressed in Ecoli and shown to have activity for both permethrin and deltamethrin, although turnover numbers were modest, at less than one per minute. Again, a kdr target-site resistance allele was also segregating in this mosquito population, and the mechanism of P450 up-regulation is unknown.

Glutathione-S-transferase-mediated SP resistance is attributable to over-expression of GSTs, either as a result of gene amplification or up-regulation of GST genes, resulting in either sequestration of SPs and/or detoxification of lipid peroxidation products induced by SPs (Li et al. 2007; Table 2). However, the molecular detail for this mechanism is not yet understood.

Conclusions

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Organophosphate metabolizing enzymes
  5. Organochlorine metabolizing enzymes
  6. Insecticidal carbamate metabolizing enzymes
  7. Synthetic pyrethroid-metabolizing enzymes
  8. Conclusions
  9. Acknowledgements
  10. Literature cited

Some learnings about evolutionary processes

Both target species of pest insects and incidentally exposed microorganisms have evolved enzymatic routes for the degradation of many insecticides. Both do so in response to selection, albeit very different forms of selection. For insects, it is a case of survival, and for bacteria it is a matter of utilizing a new source of nutrients. Nevertheless, the two forms both translate to a need to generate new, or enhance existing, xenobiotic detoxification mechanisms, so that they can degrade the insecticides efficiently at generally low but physiologically significant concentrations.

Comparisons across the four classes of chemistry we have reviewed show that the bacteria have evolved far better catabolic systems than the insects, even though the insects would seem to have more incentive to do so. Considerably higher catalytic rates have been found for the primary detoxification enzymes in the bacteria, with kcat values typically in the range of several to several thousand turnovers per second (Table 1), compared with one turnover per thousand seconds or slower for the insect enzymes (where kinetic data are available; Table 2). Additionally, the range of enzyme architectures and mechanisms employed by bacteria in degrading the four chemistries studied is much greater than those so far described for the insects, which essentially involve just three enzyme classes: cytochromes P450, GSTs and carboxyl/choline esterases. The bacterial insecticide-degrading enzymes also appear to have diverged much further from their nearest relatives than their insect counterparts, which generally only differ from their wild-type ancestors by a small number of mutational events. In many cases, these latter mutations simply act to increase expression of enzymes that are still relatively poor catalysts of the detoxification reaction required. The mutant carboxylesterases that have acquired OP hydrolase activity are a rare case where a substantively new enzymatic function has evolved to confer insecticide resistance in insects.

We suggest that the differences in the evolutionary outcomes for insects and bacteria stem from the differences in the biochemical and genetic systems under selection. Bacteria have a broader biochemical repertoire than insects from which new functions can develop, larger population sizes than insects, relatively high effective rates of mutation, very short generation times and, of course, greater access than insects to genetic diversity in other species via horizontal gene transfer.

The extensive biochemical repertoire of bacterial physiology is as varied as the environments in which they live; they can assimilate sulphur from a large variety of inorganic and organic sources, respire a wide variety of both inorganic (including sulphur and nitrogen compounds and metal oxides) and organic compounds (e.g. dimethyl sulfoxide, trimethylamine and organohalides), hydrolyse an enormous range of carbon/nitrogen, carbon/sulphur, carbon/halide and carbon/oxygen bonds, and produce a diverse array of secondary metabolites. By contrast, eukaryotes are conservative in regard to their primary metabolic pathways, using essentially the same pathways for energy transduction, anabolism and catabolism.

The size of insect populations can be enormous by eukaryotic standards, and their generation times are amongst the shortest for animals. It is unsurprising then that resistance mechanisms have emerged for most of the insecticide chemistries introduced over the last 50 years or so. However, as impressive as insect population sizes and generation times are in the context of other complex eukaryotes, they are considerably smaller and slower, respectively, than those of bacteria. Bacterial generation times can be in the order of 3 h−1, and a 1-mL solution of laboratory-grown bacteria will often contain more than 109 individuals.

The ‘normal’ rate of mutation is very similar between eukaryotes and prokaryotes; it is estimated that both Dmelanogaster and Ecoli have mutation rates of 3–5 × 10−10 per nucleotide per replication (Drake et al. 1998; Nishant et al. 2009). However, the effective rate of mutation for bacteria in the environment is likely to be considerably greater because of stress-induced adaptive evolution (induced modulation of the fidelity of DNA replication; Ponder et al. 2005; Foster 2007; Galhardo et al. 2007; Roth 2010) and the occurrence of mutator strains (strains with mutations that affect the fidelity of DNA replication; Tenaillon et al. 1999). There is no estimate for the prevalence of mutator genotypes in the environment; however, even at low frequency within a population, bacteria with these characteristics would contribute enormously to the generation of new functionality.

Bacterial species also have access to an immense ‘interspecies gene pool’ on which selection can act. Bacterial genomes are extremely plastic and are continually changed by gene duplication and loss and by lateral gene transfer (the acquisition of novel DNA segments from unrelated sources). Lateral gene transfer is common in bacteria and mediated by bacterial viruses (transduction), self-transmissible (mobilizable) plasmids or conjugative transposons (conjugation), and the direct uptake of DNA (transformation) (Achtman and Wagner 2008). Several of the bacterial enzymes described herein are located on plasmids or adjacent to transposable elements, and the data for the lin system strongly support a major and ongoing role for horizontal gene transfer in the assembly and dissemination of the pathway. In this respect, there are close parallels with the spread of antibiotic resistance since the 1960s; for example, Staphylococcus aureus has acquired 28- to 67-kb stretches of DNA encoding various antibiotic resistance genes on at least 20 separate occasions (Grundmann et al. 2006). Dagan and Martin (2007) studied >57 000 gene families distributed across 190 sequenced bacterial genomes and found that at least two-thirds (and probably all) have been affected by lateral gene transfer at least at some time in their evolutionary past. In fact, there is such extensive genomic diversity even amongst strains of a single species that the concept of the ‘bacterial species’ is being called into question (Buckley and Roberts 2006). In a sense, all of the genomes in the bacterial biosphere are available to each species, and this number is huge.

By contrast, not only is the gene pool available to insects limited by their inability to access other species’ genes via horizontal gene transfer, but their own gene pools are also significantly compromised by insecticide selection. The sheep blowfly example described previously shows how the selective sweeps accompanying the rapid rise in frequencies of resistance alleles can drastically reduce the amount of polymorphism in the chromosomal regions containing those resistance alleles. Furthermore, it is becoming apparent from a series of insect genome sequencing projects now that the P450, esterase and GST genes involved in xenobiotic resistance often co-occur in clusters of closely related, closely linked genes (Claudianos et al. 2006; Oakeshott et al. 2010). Thus, a selective sweep for a resistance allele in one gene involved in xenobiotic detoxification may well eliminate much of the polymorphism in other genes involved in xenobiotic detoxification as well. This in turn could mean that the insect is then less able to respond rapidly to selection for resistance for another insecticide class.

Much effort has been expended in understanding the mechanisms that underpin the evolution of new enzyme functions in both prokarya and eukarya. In the 1960s and 1970s, Ohno (1967) and Nei (1969) suggested that an early step in the process involved the duplication of an ‘old’ gene to generate a spare template on which to build the new function, leaving the other copy free to retain the original function. It is clear from the genomic data now available that gene duplication has indeed accompanied the evolution of proteins with new functions in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. However, Ohno and Nei’s model does not address the problem of how to assemble the multiple mutations still likely to be needed to produce an effective version of the new function/phenotype, nor the apparent lack of selective advantage associated with gene duplication per se. More recently, Tawfik and co-workers (Khersonsky et al. 2006; Amitai et al. 2007; Peisajovich and Tawfik 2007; Tokuriki and Tawfik 2009) have proposed that a rudimentary form of the new phenotype could be a pre-existing, previously neutral, ‘side’ activity of an enzyme with promiscuity of function. Enhancement of the rudimentary new phenotype would then occur because of the steady divergence of the new template as it acquires new mutations, suggesting that the process depends, at least for a while, on a pre-existing pool of previously neutral mutations. Because of the relatively recent prevalence of insecticides, the new metabolic pathways of bacteria and the few examples found thus far of truly new biochemical functionality associated with insecticide resistance in insects provide unique opportunities to characterize this evolutionary process as it unfolds in real time.

Some practical implications

Arguably, the two greatest problems in the management of chemical insecticides are the evolution of resistance in the target pests and the off-target toxicities caused by residues of the pesticides that have dispersed away from their point of application. Obviously, the evolutionary responses we have described in insects have implications for the resistance problem. Not so obvious is that the evolutionary responses we have summarized from bacteria have implications for residue management.

The relevance of the bacterial responses to the residue problem lies in the potential to exploit the microbes, or the enzymes that they have developed, for the bioremediation of the pesticides (Alcalde et al. 2006; Whiteley and Lee 2006; Scott et al. 2008). Successful field trials have been reported for the use of Sphingobium species expressing the lin genes in the microbial bioremediation of HCH-contaminated soil (Raina et al. 2008). The OpdA enzyme is already being used commercially for free-enzyme bioremediation of OP residues in various contaminated liquids like spent animal and horticultural dip liquors (Sutherland et al. 2004; Scott et al. 2008). There are even the prospects of using the free-enzyme approach in the clean up of surface localized residues on commodities (Sutherland et al. 2004) and treating OP insecticide poisoning in humans (Bird et al. 2008; Gresham et al. 2010; Jackson et al. 2010). Given the facility with which microbes develop effective detoxifying enzymes for a range of pesticides, it is likely that enzymes will evolve that target most, if not all, insecticide chemistries. In some cases, these enzymes may fall short of the requirements for bioremediation (Scott et al. 2008), but there is considerable potential to evolve and engineer the enzymes further in vitro to make them fit for purpose (Ang et al. 2005; Jackson et al. 2009b; Bottcher and Bornscheuer 2010). There would therefore seem to be considerable opportunities to expand the scope of these approaches considerably, both across different types of pesticides and across different types of contamination problem.

The potential benefits in understanding the genetics and biochemistry of the mutant detoxifying enzymes that have evolved in insecticide-resistant insects lie both in improved management of existing chemistries and in the possibility of designing new or modified chemistries to which it may be more difficult for pests to evolve resistance. The potential for improving insecticide management comes about because of the insights now possible through the use of ‘next gen’ genome sequencing technologies (Morozova and Marra 2008). With these technologies, it will very soon be possible to gain genome-wide scans of target species for the polymorphism available in all their e.g. cytochrome P450, esterase and GST genes that might potentially play a role in resistance to relevant chemistries. Such data will afford us with unprecedented predictive power in planning best use of available insecticide options. Functional genomics will also afford researchers the ability to seek new targets for insecticides with greater selectivity than ever (Ishaaya et al. 2007). There is also potential for designing new or modified chemistries through the use of the growing body of empirical and modelled structural data on the mutant enzymes (Bohm and Stahl 2000; Doucet-Personeni et al. 2001; Walter 2002; Baudry et al. 2003; Wang et al. 2008; Yan et al. 2009) recurrently associated with resistances to help in the design of new or modified chemistries most likely to be recalcitrant to resistance development by these mechanisms. More detailed consideration of biochemical, physiological and genomic factors relating to modern insecticide design is given in comprehensive reviews by Appelt et al. (1991), Walter (2002), Tietjen et al. (2005) and Ishaaya et al. (2007).

Literature cited

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Organophosphate metabolizing enzymes
  5. Organochlorine metabolizing enzymes
  6. Insecticidal carbamate metabolizing enzymes
  7. Synthetic pyrethroid-metabolizing enzymes
  8. Conclusions
  9. Acknowledgements
  10. Literature cited
  • Achtman, M., and M. Wagner. 2008. Microbial diversity and the genetic nature of microbial species. Nature Reviews Microbiology 6:431440.
  • Afriat, L., C. Roodveldt, G. Manco, and D. S. Tawfik. 2006. The latent promiscuity of newly identified microbial lactonases is linked to a recently diverged phosphotriesterase. Biochemistry 45:1367713686.
  • Ahuja, R., and A. Kumar. 2003. Metabolism of DDT [1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl)ethane] by Alcaligenes denitrificans ITRC-4 under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Current Microbiology 46:6569.
  • Alcalde, M., M. Ferrer, F. J. Plou, and A. Ballesteros. 2006. Environmental biocatalysis: from remediation with enzymes to novel green processes. Trends in Biotechnology 24:281287.
  • Amichot, M., S. Tares, A. Brun-Barale, L. Arthaud, J. M. Bride, and J. B. Berge. 2004. Point mutations associated with insecticide resistance in the Drosophila cytochrome P450 CYP6A2 enable DDT metabolism. European Journal of Biochemistry 271:12501257.
  • Amitai, G., R. D. Gupta, and D. S. Tawfik. 2007. Latent evolutionary potentials under the neutral mutational drift of an enzyme. HFSP Journal 1:6778.
  • Ang, E. L., H. M. Zhao, and J. P. Obbard. 2005. Recent advances in the bioremediation of persistent organic pollutants via biomolecular engineering. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 37:487496.
  • Appelt, K., R. J. Bacquet, C. A. Bartlett, C. L. J. Booth, S. T. Freer, M. A. M. Fuhry, M. R. Gehring et al. 1991. Design of enzyme-inhibitors using iterative protein crystallographic analysis. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 34:19251934.
  • Batterham, P., A. G. Davies, A. Y. Game, and J. A. McKenzie. 1996. Asymmetry – where evolutionary and developmental genetics meet. Bioessays 18:841845.
  • Baudry, J., W. M., Li, L. P. Pan, M. R. Berenbaum, and M. A. Schuler. 2003. Molecular docking of substrates and inhibitors in the catalytic site of CYP6B1, an insect cytochrome P450 monooxygenase. Protein Engineering 8:577587.
  • Behki, R., and E. Topp. 1993. Metabolism of Carbofuran by Rhodococcus TEI. Abstract 113. 93rd General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology.
  • Benning, M. M., H. Shim, F. M. Raushel, and H. M. Holden. 2001. High resolution X-ray structures of different metal-substituted forms of phosphotriesterase from Pseudomonas diminuta. Biochemistry 40:27122722.
  • Bidlan, R., and H. K. Manonmani. 2002. Aerobic degradation of dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) by Serratia marcescens DT-1P. Process Biochemistry 38:4956.
  • Bird, S. B., T. D. Sutherland, C. Gresham, J. G. Oakeshott, and M. Eddleston. 2008. OpdA, a bacterial organophosphorus hydrolase, prevents lethality in rats after poisoning with highly toxic organophosphorus pesticides. Toxicology 247:8892.
  • Bisseta, J. A., M. M. Rodrigueza, C. Diaza, E. Ortiza, M. C. Marquettia, and J. Hemingway. 1990. The mechanisms of organophosphate and carbamate resistance in Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) from Cuba. Bulletin of Entomological Research 80:245250.
  • Blasco, R., J. L. Ramos, and R. M. Wittich. 2008. Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain RW41 mineralizes 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate, the major polar by-product from DDT manufacturing. Environmental Microbiology 10:15911600.
  • Bohm, H. J., and M. Stahl. 2000. Structure-based library design: molecular modelling merges with combinatorial chemistry. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 4:283286.
  • Bornscheuer, U. T. 2002. Microbial carboxyl esterases: classification, properties and application in biocatalysis. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 26:7381.
  • Bottcher, D., and U. T. Bornscheuer. 2010. Protein engineering of microbial enzymes. Current Opinion in Microbiology 13:274282.
  • Brattsten, L. B. 1990. Resistance to carbamate and organophosphate insecticides. In M. B.Green, H. M.LeBaron, and W. K.Moberg, eds. Managing Resistance to Agrichemicals. ACS Symposium Series, pp. 4260. Vol. 421, Washington, DC.
  • Brengues, C., N. J. Hawkes, F. Chandre, L. McCarroll, S. Duchon, P. Guillet, S. Manguin et al. 2003. Pyrethroid and DDT cross-resistance in Aedes aegypti is correlated with novel mutations in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 17:8794.
  • Brittain, D. R. B., K. Kumari, P. Sharma, R. Pandey, G. Pandey, R. Lal, M. L. Coote et al. 2011. Competing SN2 and E2 reaction pathways for hexachlorocyclohexane degradation in gas phase, solution and enzymes. Chemical Communications (doi: 10.1039/C0CC02925D).
  • Brown, K. A. 1980. Phosphotriesterases of Flavobacterium sp. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 12:105112.
  • Buckley, M., and R. J. Roberts. 2006. Reconciling microbial systematics and genomics. A report based on a colloquium, sponsored by the American Academy of Microbiology, convened September 2728, 2006, Washington, DC.
  • Campbell, P. M., R. D. Newcomb, R. J. Russell, and J. G. Oakeshott. 1998. Two different amino acid substitutions in the ali-esterase, E3, confer alternative types of organophosphorus insecticide resistance in the sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 28:139150.
  • Carino, F. A., J. F. Koener, F. W. Plapp, and R. Feyereisen. 1994. Constitutive overexpression of the cytochrome-P450 gene CYP6A1 in a house-fly strain with metabolic resistance to insecticides. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 24:411418.
  • de Carvalho, R. A., T. T. Torres, and A. M. L. de Azeredo-Espin. 2006. A survey of mutations in the Cochliomyia hominivorax (Diptera: Calliphoridae) esterase E3 gene associated with organophosphate resistance and the molecular identification of mutant alleles. Veterinary Parasitology 140:344351.
  • de Carvalho, R. A., T. T. Torres, M. G. Paniago, and A. M. L. de Azeredo-Espin. 2009. Molecular characterization of the esterase E3 gene associated with organophosphorous insecticide resistance in the New World screwworm fly, Cochliomyia hominovorax. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 23:8691.
  • de Carvalho, R. A., C. E. G. Limia, C. Bass, and A. M. L. de Azeredo-Espin. 2010. Changes in the frequency of the G137D and W251S mutations in the carboxylesterase E3 gene of Cochliomyia hominovorax (Diptera: Calliphoridae) populations from Uruguay. Veterinary Parasitology 170:297301.
  • Casida, J. E. 1963. Mode of action of carbamates. Annual Review of Entomology 8:3958.
  • Cassanelli, S., M. Reyes, M. Rault, G. C. Manicardi, and B. Sauphanor. 2006. Acetyleholinesterase mutation in an insecticide-resistant population of the codling moth Cydia pomonella (L.). Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 36:642653.
  • Catania, F., M. O. Kauer, P. J. Daborn, J. L. Yen, R. H. Ffrench-Constant, and C. Schlotterer. 2004. World-wide survey of an Accord insertion and its association with DDT resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. Molecular Ecology 13:24912504.
  • Chaudhry, G. R., A. Mateen, B. Kaskar, M. Bloda, and S. Riazuddin. 2002. Purification and biochemical characterization of the carbamate hydrolase from Pseudomonas sp. 50432. Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry 36:6370.
  • Chauhan, A., G. Pandey, N. K. Sharma, D. Paul, J. Pandey, and R. K. Jain. 2010. p-Nitrophenol degradation via 4-Nitrocatechol in Burkholderia sp SJ98 and cloning of some of the lower pathway genes. Environmental Science & Technology 44:34353441.
  • Cheesman, M. J., I. Horne, K. Weir, G. Pandey, M. Williams, C. Scott, R. J. Russell et al. 2007. Carbamate pesticides and their biological degradation: prospects for enzymatic bioremediation. In I. R.Kennedy, K. R.Solomon, S. J.Gee, A. N.Crossan, S.Wang, and F.Sanchez-Bayo, eds. Rational Environmental Management of Agrochemicals; Risk Assessment, Monitoring and Remedial Action, pp. 288305. American Chemical Society, Washington.
  • Cheng, T. C., S. P. Harvey, and G. L. Chen. 1996. Cloning and expression of a gene encoding a bacterial enzyme for decontamination of organophosphorus nerve agents and nucleotide sequence of the enzyme. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 62:16361641.
  • Chiang, F. M., and C. N. Sun. 1993. Glutathione transferase isozymes of diamondback moth larvae and their role in the degradation of some organophosphorus insecticides. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 45:714.
  • Chiu, T. L., Z. M. Wen, S. G. Rupasinghe, and M. A. Schuler. 2008. Comparative molecular modeling of Anopheles gambiae CYP6Z1, a mosquito P450 capable of metabolizing DDT. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105:88558860.
  • Cho, C. M. H., A. Mulchandani, and W. Chen. 2004. Altering the substrate specificity of organophosphorus hydrolase for enhanced hydrolysis of chlorpyrifos. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 70:46814685.
  • Cho, C. M. H., A. Mulchandani, and W. Chen. 2006. Functional analysis of organophosphorus hydrolase variants with high degradation activity towards organophosphate pesticides. Protein Engineering Design and Selection 19:99105.
  • Claudianos, C., R. J. Russell, and J. G. Oakeshott. 1999. The same amino acid substitution in orthologous esterases confers organophosphate resistance on the house fly and a blowfly. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 29:675686.
  • Claudianos, C., H. Ranson, R. M. Johnson, S. Biswas, M. A. Schuler, M. R. Berenbaum, R. Feyereisen et al. 2006. A deficit of detoxification enzymes: pesticide sensitivity and environmental response in the honeybee. Insect Molecular Biology 15:615636.
  • Cortes, D. R., and R. A. Hites. 2000. Detection of statistically significant trends in atmospheric concentrations of semivolatile compounds. Environmental Science & Technology 34:28262829.
  • Cui, Z. L., S. P. Li, and G. P. Fu. 2001. Isolation of methyl parathion-degrading strain M6 and cloning of the methyl parathion hydrolase gene. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 67:49224925.
  • Dagan, T., and W. Martin. 2007. Ancestral genome sizes specify the minimum rate of lateral gene transfer during prokaryote evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104:870875.
  • David, J. P., C. Strode, J. Vontas, D. Nikou, A. Vaughan, P. M. Pignatelli, C. Louis et al. 2005. The Anopheles gambiae detoxification chip: a highly specific microarray to study metabolic-based insecticide resistance in malaria vectors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102:40804084.
  • Defrank, J. J., and T. C. Cheng. 1991. Purification and properties of an organophosphorus acid anhydrase from a halophilic bacterial isolate. Journal of Bacteriology 173:19381943.
  • Del Vecchio, P., M. Elias, L. Merone, G. Graziano, J. Dupuy, L. Mandrich, P. Carullo et al. 2009. Structural determinants of the high thermal stability of SsoPox from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. Extremophiles 13:461470.
  • Derbyshire, M. K., J. S. Karns, P. C. Kearney, and J. O. Nelson. 1987. Purification and characterization of an N-methylcarbamate pesticide hydrolyzing enzyme. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 35:871877.
  • Devonshire, A. L., and G. D. Moores. 1982. A carboxylesterase with broad substrate-specificity causes organo-phosphorus, carbamate and pyrethroid resistance in peach-potato aphids (Myzus persicae). Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 18:235246.
  • Devonshire, A. L., R. Heidari, K. L. Bell, P. M. Campbell, B. E. Campbell, W. A. Odgers, J. G. Oakeshott et al. 2003. Kinetic efficiency of mutant carboxylesterases implicated in organophosphate insecticide resistance. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 76:113.
  • Devonshire, A. L., R. Heidari, H. Z. Huang, B. D. Hammock, R. J. Russell, and J. G. Oakeshott. 2007. Hydrolysis of individual isomers of fluorogenic pyrethroid analogs by mutant carboxylesterases from Lucilia cuprina. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 37:891902.
  • Di Sioudi, B. D., C. E. Miller, K. H. Lai, J. K. Grimsley, and J. R. Wild. 1999. Rational design of organophosphorus hydrolase for altered substrate specificities. Chemico-Biological Interactions 120:211223.
  • Dogra, C., V. Raina, R. Pal, M. Suar, S. Lal, K. H. Gartemann, C. Holliger et al. 2004. Organization of lin genes and IS6100 among different strains of hexachlorocyclohexane-degrading Sphingomonas paucimobilis: evidence for horizontal gene transfer. Journal of Bacteriology 186:22252235.
  • Dong, Y. J., M. Bartlam, L. Sun, Y. F. Zhou, Z. P. Zhang, C. G. Zhang, Z. H. Rao et al. 2005. Crystal structure of methyl parathion hydrolase from Pseudomonas sp WBC-3. Journal of Molecular Biology 353:655663.
  • Doucet-Personeni, C., P. D. Bentley, R. J. Fletcher, A. Kinkaid, G. Kryger, B. Pirard, A. Taylor et al. 2001. A structure-based design approach to the development of novel, reversible AChE inhibitors. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 44:32033215.
  • Drake, J. W., B. Charlesworth, D. Charlesworth, and J. F. Crow. 1998. Rates of spontaneous mutation. Genetics 148:16671686.
  • Dumas, D. P., S. R. Caldwell, J. R. Wild, and F. M. Raushel. 1989. Purification and properties of the phosphotriesterase from Pseudomonas diminuta. Journal of Biological Chemistry 264:1965919665.
  • Ellis, L. B. M., C. D. Hershberger, E. M. Bryan, and L. P. Wackett. 2001. The University of Minnesota Biocatalysis/Biodegradation Database: emphasizing enzymes. Nucleic Acids Research 29:340343.
  • Fahmy, M. A. H., and T. R. Fukuto. 1981. N-Sulfinylated derivatives of methylcarbamate esters. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 29:567572.
  • Falkowski, P. G., and L. V. Godfrey. 2008. Electrons, life and the evolution of Earth’s oxygen cycle. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 363:27052716.
  • Farnsworth, C. A., M. G. Teese, G. Yuan, Y. Li, C. Scott, X. Zhang, Y. Wu et al. 2010. Esterase-based metabolic resistance to insecticides in heliothine and spodopteran pests. Journal of Pesticide Science 35:275289.
  • Feyereisen, R. 2005. Insect cytochrome P450. In L. I.Gilbert, K.Iatrou, and S. S.Gill, eds. Comprehensive Molecular Insect Science, pp. 177. Elsevier BV, Oxford, UK.
  • Field, L. M. 2000. Methylation and expression of amplified esterase genes in the aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer). Biochemical Journal 349:863868.
  • Field, L. M., and R. L. Blackman. 2003. Insecticide resistance in the aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer): chromosome location and epigenetic effects on esterase gene expression in clonal lineages. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 79:107113.
  • Field, L. M., and A. L. Devonshire. 1997. Structure and organization of amplicons containing the E4 esterase genes responsible for insecticide resistance in the aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer). Biochemical Journal 322:867871.
  • Field, L. M., and A. L. Devonshire. 1998. Evidence that the E4 and FE4 esterase genes responsible for insecticide resistance in the aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer) are part of a gene family. Biochemical Journal 330:169173.
  • Foster, P. L. 2007. Stress-induced mutagenesis in bacteria. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 42:373397.
  • Galhardo, R. S., P. J. Hastings, and S. M. Rosenberg. 2007. Mutation as a stress response and the regulation of evolvability. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 42:399435.
  • Gao, J. F., L. B. M. Ellis, and L. P. Wackett. 2010. The University of Minnesota Biocatalysis/Biodegradation Database: improving public access. Nucleic Acids Research 38:D488D491.
  • Goh, D. K. S., D. D. Anspaugh, N. Motoyama, G. C. Rock, and R. M. Roe. 1995. Isolation and characterization of an insecticide-resistance-associated esterase in the tobacco budworm Heliothis virescens (f). Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 51:192204.
  • Gresham, C., C. Rosenbaum, R. J. Gaspari, C. J. Jackson, and S. B. Bird. 2010. Kinetics and efficacy of an organophosphorus hydrolase in a rodent model of methyl-parathion poisoning. Academic Emergency Medicine 17:736740.
  • Grundmann, H., M. Aires-De-Sousa, J. Boyce, and E. Tiemersma. 2006. Emergence and resurgence of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as a public-health threat. Lancet 368:874885.
  • Hartley, C. J., R. D. Newcomb, R. J. Russell, C. G. Yong, J. R. Stevens, D. K. Yeates, J. La Salle et al. 2006. Amplification of DNA from preserved specimens shows blowflies were pre-adapted for the rapid evolution of insecticide resistance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103:87578762.
  • Hashimoto, M., M. Fukui, K. Hayano, and M. Hayatsu. 2002. Nucleotide sequence and genetic structure of a novel carbaryl hydrolase gene (cehA) from Rhizobium sp strain AC100. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 68:12201227.
  • Hashimoto, M., A. Mizutani, K. Tago, M. Ohnishi-Kameyama, T. Shimojo, and M. Hayatsu. 2006. Cloning and nucleotide sequence of carbaryl hydrolase gene (cahA) from Arthrobacter sp RC100. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 101:410414.
  • Hawwa, R., J. Aikens, R. J. Turner, B. D. Santarsiero, and A. D. Mesecar. 2009. Structural basis for thermostability revealed through the identification and characterization of a highly thermostable phosphotriesterase-like lactonase from Geobacillus stearothermophilus. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 488:109120.
  • Hayatsu, M., A. Mizutani, M. Hashimoto, K. Sato, and K. Hayano. 2001. Purification and characterization of carbaryl hydrolase from Arthrobacter sp RC100. FEMS Microbiology Letters 201:99103.
  • Heidari, R., A. L. Devonshire, B. E. Campbell, K. L. Bell, S. J. Dorrian, J. G. Oakeshott, and R. J. Russell. 2004. Hydrolysis of organophosphorus insecticides by in vitro modified carboxylesterase E3 from Lucilia cuprina. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 34:353363.
  • Heidari, R., A. L. Devonshire, B. E. Campbell, S. J. Dorrian, J. G. Oakeshott, and R. J. Russell. 2005. Hydrolysis of pyrethroids by carboxylesterases from Lucilia cuprina and Drosophila melanogaster with active sites modified by in vitro mutagenesis. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 35:597609.
  • Holden, H. M., and F. M. Raushel. 2002. Structural and functional analyses of phosphotriesterase from Pseudomonas diminuta. Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society 223: C49. Part 2.
  • Hong, S. B., and F. M. Raushel. 1996. Metal-substrate interactions facilitate the catalytic activity of the bacterial phosphotriesterase. Biochemistry 35:1090410912.
  • Horne, I., T. D. Sutherland, R. L. Harcourt, R. J. Russell, and J. G. Oakeshott. 2002. Identification of an opd (organophosphate degradation) gene in an Agrobacterium isolate. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 68:33713376.
  • Horne, I., X. H. Qiu, R. J. Russell, and J. G. Oakeshott. 2003. The phosphotriesterase gene opdA in Agrobacterium radiobacter P230 is transposable. FEMS Microbiology Letters 222:18.
  • Horvat, C. M., and R. V. Wolfenden. 2005. A persistent pesticide residue and the unusual catalytic proficiency of a dehalogenating enzyme. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102:1619916202.
  • Hu, G., A. B. Taylor, L. McAlister-Henn, and P. J. Hart. 2007. Crystal structure of the yeast nicotinamidase Pnc1p. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 461:6675.
  • Imlay, J. A. 2003. Pathways of oxidative damage. Annual Review of Microbiology 57:395418.
  • Ishaaya, I., R. Nauen, and A. R. Horowitz (eds). 2007. Insecticides Design Using Advanced Technologies. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  • Ito, M., Z. Prokop, M. Klvana, Y. Otsubo, M. Tsuda, J. Damborsky, and Y. Nagata. 2007. Degradation of beta-hexachlorocyclohexane by haloalkane dehalogenase LinB from gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane-utilizing bacterium Sphingobium sp MI1205. Archives of Microbiology 188:313325.
  • Jackson, C., H. K. Kim, P. D. Carr, J. W. Liu, and D. L. Ollis. 2005. The structure of an enzyme-product complex reveals the critical role of a terminal hydroxide nucleophile in the bacterial phosphotriesterase mechanism. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta-Proteins and Proteomics 1752:5664.
  • Jackson, C. J., J. L. Foo, N. Tokuriki, L. Afriat, P. D. Carr, H. K. Kim, G. Schenk et al. 2009a. Conformational sampling, catalysis, and evolution of the bacterial phosphotriesterase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106:2163121636.
  • Jackson, C. J., K. Weir, A. Herlt, J. Khurana, T. D. Sutherland, I. Horne, C. Easton et al. 2009b. Structure-based rational design of a phosphotriesterase. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75:51535156.
  • Jackson, C. J., C. Scott, A. Carville, K. Mansfield, D. L. Ollis, and S. B. Bird. 2010. Pharmacokinetics of OpdA, an organophosphorus hydrolase, in the African green monkey. Biochemical Pharmacology 80:10791086.
  • Jao, S. C., L. F. Huang, Y. S. Tao, and W. S. Li. 2004. Hydrolysis of organophosphate triesters by Escherichia coli aminopeptidase P. Journal of Molecular Catalysis B-Enzymatic 27:712.
  • Josephy, P. D., and B. Mannervik. 2006. Molecular Toxicology. New York, Oxford University Press, Inc.
  • Joy, R. M. 1982. Mode of action of lindane, dieldrin and related insecticides in the central nervous-system. Neurobehavioral Toxicology and Teratology 4:813823.
  • Kamanavalli, C. M., and H. Z. Ninnekar. 2004. Biodegradation of DDT by a Pseudomonas species. Current Microbiology 48:1013.
  • Karns, J. S., and P. H. Tomasek. 1991. Carbofuran hydrolase – purification and properties. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 39:10041008.
  • Khersonsky, O., C. Roodveldt, and D. S. Tawfik. 2006. Enzyme promiscuity: evolutionary and mechanistic aspects. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 10:498508.
  • Kinoshita, Y., and T. R. Fukuto. 1980. Insecticidal properties of N-sulfonyl derivatives of propoxur and carbofuran. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 28:13251327.
  • Kirkness, E. F., B. J. Haas, W. Sun, H. R. Braig, M. A. Perotti, J. M. Clark, S. H. Lee et al. 2010. Genome sequences of the human body louse and its primary endosymbiont provide insights into the permanent parasitic lifestyle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107:1216812173.
  • Kmunicek, J., K. Hynkova, T. Jedlicka, Y. Nagata, A. Negri, F. Gago, R. C. Wade et al. 2005. Quantitative analysis of substrate specificity of haloalkane dehalogenase LinB from Sphingomonas paucimobilis UT26. Biochemistry 44:33903401.
  • Kumari, R., S. Subudhi, M. Suar, G. Dhingra, V. Raina, C. Dogra, S. Lal et al. 2002. Cloning and characterization of lin genes responsible for the degradation of hexachlorocyclohexane isomers by Sphingomonas paucimobilis strain B90. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 68:60216028.
  • Labahn, J., S. Neumann, G. Buldt, M. R. Kula, and J. Granzin. 2002. An alternative mechanism for amidase signature enzymes. Journal of Molecular Biology 322:10531064.
  • Lal, R., G. Pandey, P. Sharma, K. Kumari, S. Malhotra, R. Pandey, V. Raina et al. 2010. Biochemistry of microbial degradation of hexachlorocyclohexane and prospects for bioremediation. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 74:5869.
  • Li, X. C., M. A. Schuler, and M. R. Berenbaum. 2007. Molecular mechanisms of metabolic resistance to synthetic and natural xenobiotics. Annual Review of Entomology 52:231253.
  • Liu, Z. W., M. S. Williamson, S. J. Lansdell, Z. J. Han, I. Denholm, and N. S. Millar. 2006. A nicotinic acetylcholine receptor mutation (Y151S) causes reduced agonist potency to a range of neonicotinoid insecticides. Journal of Neurochemistry 99:12731281.
  • Liu, N. N., Q. Xu, T. Li, L. He, and L. Zhang. 2009. Permethrin resistance and target site insensitivity in the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus in Alabama. Journal of Medical Entomology 46:14241429.
  • Lumjuan, N., L. McCarroll, L. A. Prapanthadara, J. Hemingway, and H. Ranson. 2005. Elevated activity of an Epsilon class glutathione transferase confers DDT resistance in the dengue vector, Aedes aegypti. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 35:861871.
  • Maitra, S., S. M. Dombrowski, M. Basu, O. Raustol, L. C. Waters, and R. Ganguly. 2000. Factors on the third chromosome affect the level of CYP6A2 and CYP6A8 expression in Drosophila melanogaster. Gene 248:147156.
  • Maloney, S. E., A. Maule, and A. R. W. Smith. 1993. Purification and preliminary characterization of permethrinase from a pyrethroid-transforming strain of Bacillus cereus. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 59:20072013.
  • Manickam, N., M. K. Reddy, H. S. Saini, and R. Shanker. 2008. Isolation of hexachlorocyclohexane-degrading Sphingomonas sp by dehalogenase assay and characterization of genes involved in gamma-HCH degradation. Journal of Applied Microbiology 104:952960.
  • McKenzie, J. A. 1994. Selection at the diazinon resistance locus in overwintering populations of Lucilia cuprina (the Australian sheep blowfly). Heredity 73:5764.
  • McKenzie, J. A. 1997. Stress and asymmetry during arrested development of the Australian sheep blowfly. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 264:17491756.
  • Morozova, O., and M. A. Marra. 2008. Applications of next-generation sequencing technologies in functional genomics. Genomics 92:255264.
  • Mulbry, W. W., P. C. Kearney, J. O. Nelson, and J. S. Karns. 1987. Physical comparison of parathion hydrolase plasmids from Pseudomonas diminuta and Flavobacterium sp. Plasmid 18:173177.
  • Muller, P., E. Warr, B. J. Stevenson, P. M. Pignatelli, J. C. Morgan, A. Steven, A. E. Yawson et al. 2008. Field-caught permethrin-resistant Anopheles gambiae overexpress CYP6P3, a P450 that metabolises pyrethroids. Plos Genetics 4:e1000286.
  • Munnecke, D. M., and D. P. Hsieh. 1976. Pathways of microbial metabolism of parathion. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 31:6369.
  • Nadeau, L. J., F. M. Menn, A. Breen, and G. S. Sayler. 1994. Aerobic degradation of 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl)ethane (DDT) by Alcaligenes eutrophus A5. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 60:5155.
  • Nagata, Y., T. Nariya, R. Ohtomo, M. Fukuda, K. Yano, and M. Takagi. 1993. Cloning and sequencing of a dehalogenase gene encoding an enzyme with hydrolase activity involved in the degradation of gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane in Pseudomonas paucimobilis. Journal of Bacteriology 175:64036410.
  • Nagata, Y., K. Miyauchi, J. Damborsky, K. Manova, A. Ansorgova, and M. Takagi. 1997. Purification and characterization of a haloalkane dehalogenase of a new substrate class from a gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane-degrading bacterium, Sphingomonas paucimobilis UT26. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 63:37073710.
  • Nagata, Y., A. Futamura, K. Miyauchi, and M. Takagi. 1999. Two different types of dehalogenases, LinA and LinB, involved in gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane degradation in Sphingomonas paucimobilis UT26 are localized in the periplasmic space without molecular processing. Journal of Bacteriology 181:54095413.
  • Naqvi, T., M. J. Cheesman, M. R. Williams, P. M. Campbell, S. Ahmed, R. J. Russell, C. Scott et al. 2009. Heterologous expression of the methyl carbamate-degrading hydrolase MCD. Journal of Biotechnology 144:8995.
  • Nei, M. 1969. Gene duplication and nucleotide substitution in evolution. Nature 221:4042.
  • Newcomb, R. D., P. M. Campbell, D. L. Ollis, E. Cheah, R. J. Russell, and J. G. Oakeshott. 1997a. A single amino acid substitution converts a carboxylesterase to an organophosphorus hydrolase and confers insecticide resistance on a blowfly. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94:74647468.
  • Newcomb, R. D., P. M. Campbell, R. J. Russell, and J. G. Oakeshott. 1997b. cDNA cloning, baculovirus-expression and kinetic properties of the esterase, E3, involved in organophosphorus resistance in Lucilia cuprina. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 27:1525.
  • Newcomb, R. D., D. M. Gleeson, C. G. Yong, R. J. Russell, and J. G. Oakeshott. 2005. Multiple mutations and gene duplications conferring organophosphorus insecticide resistance have been selected at the Rop-1 locus of the sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina. Journal of Molecular Evolution 60:207220.
  • Nishant, K. T., N. D. Singh, and E. Alani. 2009. Genomic mutation rates: what high-throughput methods can tell us. Bioessays 31:912920.
  • Oakeshott, J. G., C. Claudianos, P. M. Campbell, R. D. Newcomb, and R. J. Russell. 2005a. Biochemical genetics and genomics of insect esterases. In L. I.Gilbert, K.Iatrou, and S. S.Gill, eds. Comprehensive Molecular Insect Science, pp. 309381.Vol. 5 – Pharmacology. Elsevier BV, Oxford, UK.
  • Oakeshott, J. G., A. L. Devonshire, C. Claudianos, T. D. Sutherland, I. Horne, P. M. Campbell, D. L. Ollis et al. 2005b. Comparing the organophosphorus and carbamate insecticide resistance mutations in cholin- and carboxyl-esterases. Chemico-Biological Interactions 157:269275.
  • Oakeshott, J. G., R. M. Johnson, M. R. Berenbaum, H. Ranson, A. S. Cristino, and C. Claudianos. 2010. Metabolic enzymes associated with xenobiotic and chemosensory responses in Nasonia vitripennis. Insect Molecular Biology 19:147163.
  • Oakeshott, J. G., C. Claudianos, and R. J. Russell. 2010. New genomic perspectives on insect esterases and insecticide resistance. In L. I.Gilbert, K.Iatrou, and S. S.Gill, eds. Insect Pharmacology: Channels, Receptors, Toxins and Enzymes, pp. 302306. Elsevier BV, Oxford, UK.
  • O’Brien, R. 1960. Toxic Phosphorus Esters. New York, Academic Press.
  • Ohno, S. 1967. Evolution by Gene Duplication. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • Okai, M., K. Kubota, M. Fukuda, Y. Nagata, K. Nagata, and M. Tanokura. 2010. Crystal structure of g-hexachlorocyclohexane dehydrochlorinase LinA from Sphingobium japonicum UT26. Journal of Molecular Biology 403:260269.
  • Ollis, D. L., E. Cheah, M. Cygler, B. Dijkstra, F. Frolow, S. M. Franken, M. Harel et al. 1992. The alpha/beta-hydrolase fold. Protein Engineering 5:197211.
  • Ortelli, F., L. C. Rossiter, J. Vontas, H. Ranson, and J. Hemingway. 2003. Heterologous expression of four glutathione transferase genes genetically linked to a major insecticide-resistance locus from the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. Biochemical Journal 373:957963.
  • Park, M. S., C. M. Hill, Y. C. Li, R. K. Hardy, H. Khanna, Y. H. Khang, and F. M. Raushel. 2004. Catalytic properties of the PepQ prolidase from Escherichia coli. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 429:224230.
  • Paul, D., A. Chauhan, G. Pandey, and R. K. Jain. 2004. Degradation of p-hydroxybenzoate via protocatechuate in Arthrobacter protophormiae RKJ100 and Burkholderia cepacia RKJ200. Current Science 87:12631268.
  • Paul, D., N. Rastogi, U. Krauss, M. Schlomann, G. Pandey, J. Pandey, A. Ghosh et al. 2008. Diversity of ‘benzenetriol dioxygenase’ involved in p-nitrophenol degradation in soil bacteria. Indian Journal of Microbiology 48:279286.
  • Peisajovich, S. G., and D. S. Tawfik. 2007. Protein engineers turned evolutionists. Nature Methods 4:991994.
  • Plapp, F. W. 1984. The genetic basis of insecticide residence in the house fly: evidence that a single genetic locus plays a role in metabolic resistance to insecticides. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 22:194201.
  • Ponder, R. G., N. C. Fonville, and S. M. Rosenberg. 2005. A switch from high-fidelity to error-prone DNA double-strand break repair underlies stress-induced mutation. Molecular Cell 19:791804.
  • Raina, V., M. Suar, A. Singh, O. Prakash, M. Dadhwal, S. K. Gupta, C. Dogra et al. 2008. Enhanced biodegradation of hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) in contaminated soils via inoculation with Sphingobium indicum B90A. Biodegradation 19:2740.
  • Ramphul, U., T. Boase, C. Bass, L. M. Okedi, M. J. Donnelly, and P. Muller. 2009. Insecticide resistance and its association with target-site mutations in natural populations of Anopheles gambiae from eastern Uganda. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 103:11211126.
  • Roth, J. R. 2010. Genetic adaptation: a new piece for a very old puzzle. Current Biology 20:R15R17.
  • Russell, R. J., C. Claudianos, P. M. Campbell, I. Horne, T. D. Sutherland, and J. G. Oakeshott. 2004. Two major classes of target site insensitivity mutations confer resistance to organophosphate and carbamate insecticides. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 79:8493.
  • Sabourault, C., V. M. Guzov, J. F. Koener, C. Claudianos, F. W. Plapp, and R. Feyereisen. 2001. Overproduction of a P450 that metabolizes diazinon is linked to a loss-of-function in the chromosome 2 ali-esterase (Md alpha E7) gene in resistant houseflies. Insect Molecular Biology 10:609618.
  • Schmidt, J. M., R. T. Good, B. Appleton, J. Sherrard, G. C. Raymant, M. R. Bogwitz, J. Martin et al. 2010. Copy number variation and transposable elements feature in recent, ongoing adaptation at the CYP6G1 locus. PLoS Genetics 6:e1000998.
  • Scott, C., G. Pandey, C. J. Hartley, C. J. Jackson, M. J. Cheesman, M. C. Taylor, R. Pandey et al. 2008. The enzymatic basis for pesticide bioremediation. Indian Journal of Microbiology 48:6579.
  • Silcox, C., and E. S. Roberts. 1994. Pyrethrum for pest control. In J. E.Casida, and G. B.Quistad, eds. Pyrethrum Flowers: Production, Chemistry, Toxicology and Uses. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  • Singh, B. K., and A. Walker. 2006. Microbial degradation of organophosphorus compounds. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 30:428471.
  • Singh, O. V., G. Pandey, and R. K. Jain 2002, Bioremediation of p-nitrophenol using soil microcosms: remediation and beneficial reuse of contaminated sediments. Remediation and beneficial reuse of contaminated sediments. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Remediation of Contaminated Sediments, Venice, Italy.
  • Singh, A. K., P. Chanhary, A. S. Macwan, U. N. Diwedi, and A. Kumar. 2007. Selective loss of lin genes from hexachlorocyclohexane-degrading Pseudomonas aeruginosa ITRC-5 under different growth conditions. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 76:895901.
  • Smyth, K.-A., T. M. Boyce, R. J. Russell, and J. G. Oakeshott. 2000. MCE activities and malathion resistances in field populations of the Australian sheep blowfly (Lucilia cuprina). Heredity 84:6372.
  • Soderlund, D. M., and J. R. Bloomquist. 1990. Molecular mechanisms of insecticide resistance. In R. T.Roush, and B. E.Tabashnik, eds. Pesticide Resistance in Arthropods, pp. 5896. Chapman and Hall, London.
  • Sogorb, M. A., and E. Vilanova. 2002. Enzymes involved in the detoxification of organophosphorus, carbamate and pyrethroid insecticides through hydrolysis. Toxicology Letters 128:215228.
  • Stenerse, J. H. 1965. DDT-metabolism in resistant and susceptible stable-flies and in bacteria. Nature 207:660.
  • Storz, G., and J. A. Imlay. 1999. Oxidative stress. Current Opinion in Microbiology 2:188194.
  • Suar, M., J. R. van der Meer, M. Lawlor, C. Holliger, and R. Lal. 2004. Dynamics of multiple lin gene expression in Sphingomonas paucimobilis B90A in response to different hexachlorocyclohexane isomers. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 70:66506656.
  • Sutherland, T. D., I. Horne, K. M. Weir, C. W. Coppin, M. R. Williams, M. Selleck, R. J. Russell et al. 2004. Enzymatic bioremediation: from enzyme discovery to applications. Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology 31:817821.
  • Tang, A. H., and C. P. D. Tu. 1994. Biochemical-characterization of Drosophila glutathione S-transferases D1 and D21. Journal of Biological Chemistry 269:2787627884.
  • Tanga, Z. H., and R. J. Wood. 1986. Comparative study of resistance to organophosphate and carbamate insecticides in four strains of the Culex pipiens L. complex (Diptera: Culicidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 76:505511.
  • Tenaillon, O., B. Toupance, H. Le Nagard, F. Taddei, and B. Godelle. 1999. Mutators, population size, adaptive landscape and the adaptation of asexual populations of bacteria. Genetics 152:485493.
  • Tietjen, K., M. Drewes, and K. Stenzel. 2005. High throughput screening in agrochemical research. Combinatorial Chemistry and High Throughput Screening 8:589594.
  • Tokuriki, N., and D. S. Tawfik. 2009. Protein dynamism and evolvability. Science 324:203207.
  • Tomlin, C. D. S. (ed.) 2006. The Pesticide Manual, 14th edn. British Crop Protection Council, Hampshire, UK.
  • Wackett, L. P. 2009. Questioning our perceptions about evolution of biodegradative enzymes. Current Opinion in Microbiology 12:244251.
  • Walter, M. W. 2002. Structure-based design of agrochemicals. Natural Product Reports 19:278291.
  • Wang, Y. J., L. Qiu, H. Ranson, N. Lumjuan, J. Hemingway, W. N. Setzer, E. J. Meehan et al. 2008. Structure of an insect epsilon class glutathione S-transferase from the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae provides an explanation for the high DDT-detoxifying activity. Journal of Structural Biology 164:228235.
  • Wang, B. Z., P. Guo, B. J. Hang, L. Li, J. He, and S. P. Li. 2009. Cloning of a novel pyrethroid-hydrolyzing carboxylesterase gene from Sphingobium sp. Strain JZ-1 and characterization of the gene product. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75:54965500.
  • Wang, G. L., J. Zhang, L. Wang, B. Liang, K. Chen, S. P. Li, and J. D. Jiang. 2010. Co-metabolism of DDT by the newly isolated bacterium, Pseudoxanthomonas sp wax. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 41:431438.
  • Wei, S. H., A. G. Clark, and M. Syvanen. 2001. Identification and cloning of a key insecticide-metabolizing glutathione S-transferase (MdGST-6A) from a hyper insecticide-resistant strain of the housefly Musca domestica. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 31:11451153.
  • Weinstock, G. M., G. E. Robinson, R. A. Gibbs, K. C. Worley, J. D. Evans, R. Maleszka, H. M. Robertson et al. 2006. Insights into social insects from the genome of the honeybee Apis mellifera. Nature 443:931949.
  • Weir, K. M., T. D. Sutherland, I. Horne, R. J. Russell, and J. G. Oakeshott. 2006. A single monooxygenase, ese, is involved in the metabolism of the organochlorides endosulfan and endosulfate in an Arthrobacter sp. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 72:35243530.
  • Whalon, M. E., D.Monte-Sanchez, and R. M.Hollingworth (eds). 2008. Global pesticide resistance in arthropods. CAB International, London.
  • Wheelock, G. D., and J. G. Scott. 1992. The role of cytochrome-P450IPR in deltamethrin metabolism by pyrethroid-resistant and susceptible strains of house-flies. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 43:6777.
  • Whiteley, C. G., and D. J. Lee. 2006. Enzyme technology and biological remediation. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 38:291316.
  • Wolfe, N. L., R. G. Zepp, and D. F. Paris. 1978. Use of structure-reactivity relationships to estimate hydrolytic persistence of carbamate pesticides. Water Research 12:561563.
  • Wu, P. C., Y. H. Liu, Z. Y. Wang, X. Y. Zhang, H. Li, W. Q. Liang, N. Luo et al. 2006. Molecular cloning, purification, and biochemical characterization of a novel pyrethroid-hydrolyzing esterase from Klebsiella sp strain ZD112. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 54:836842.
  • Xiang, D. F., P. Kolb, A. A. Fedorov, M. M. Meier, L. V. Fedorov, T. T. Nguyen, R. Sterner et al. 2009. Functional annotation and three-dimensional structure of Dr0930 from Deinococcus radiodurans, a close relative of phosphotriesterase in the amidohydrolase superfamily. Biochemistry 48:22372247.
  • Yan, Q-X., Q. Hong, P. Han, X-J. Dong, Y-J. Shen, and S-P. Li. 2007. Isolation and characterization of a carbofuran-degrading strain Novosphingobium sp. FND-3. FEMS Microbiology Letters 271:207213.
  • Yan, S. G., F. Cui, and C. L. Qiao. 2009. Structure, function and applications of carboxylesterases from insects for insecticide resistance. Protein and Peptide Letters 16:11811188.
  • Yang, H., P. D. Carr, S. Y. McLoughlin, J. W. Liu, I. Horne, X. Qiu, C. M. J. Jeffries et al. 2003. Evolution of an organophosphate-degrading enzyme: a comparison of natural and directed evolution. Protein Engineering 16:135145.
  • Zhang, M. L., and J. G. Scott. 1996. Cytochrome b(5) is essential for cytochrome P450 6D1-mediated cypermethrin resistance in LPR house flies. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 55:150156.
  • Zhu, Y. C., A. K. Dowdy, and J. E. Baker. 1999. Detection of single-base substitution in an esterase gene and its linkage to malathion resistance in the parasitoid Anisopteromalus calandrae (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Pesticide Science 55:398404.