Qualitative methods to ensure acceptability of behavioral and social interventions to the target population
Article first published online: 18 MAR 2011
© 2011 American Association of Public Health Dentistry
Journal of Public Health Dentistry
Special Issue: Behavioral and Social Intervention Research Essentials
Volume 71, Issue Supplement s1, pages S69–S79, Winter 2011
How to Cite
Ayala, G. X. and Elder, J. P. (2011), Qualitative methods to ensure acceptability of behavioral and social interventions to the target population. Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 71: S69–S79. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00241.x
- Issue published online: 18 MAR 2011
- Article first published online: 18 MAR 2011
Objectives: This paper introduces qualitative methods for assessing the acceptability of an intervention.
Methods: Acceptability refers to determining how well an intervention will be received by the target population and the extent to which the new intervention or its components might meet the needs of the target population and organizational setting. In this paper, we focus on two common qualitative methods for conducting acceptability research and their advantages and disadvantages: focus groups and interviews.
Results: We provide examples from our own research and other studies to demonstrate the use of these methods for conducting acceptability research and how one might adapt this approach for oral health research.
Discussion: We present emerging methods for conducting acceptability research, including the use of community-based participatory research, as well as the utility of conducting acceptability research for assessing the appropriateness of measures in intervention research.