SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Gorey KM, Trevisan M. Secular trends in the United States black/white hypertension prevalence ratio: potential impact of diminishing response rates. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;147(2): 95102.
  • 2
    Steeh C, Kirgis N, Cannon B, DeWitt J. Are They as Bad as They seem? Nonresponse Rates at the End of the Twentieth Century. Journal of Official Statistics. 2001;17(2): 22747.
  • 3
    Olson SH. Reported participation in case-control studies: changes over time. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;154(6): 57481.
  • 4
    Hartge P. Participation in population studies. Epidemiology. 2006;17(3): 2524.
  • 5
    Morton LM, Cahill J, Hartge P. Reporting participation in epidemiologic studies: a survey of practice. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163(3): 197203.
  • 6
    Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Morgenstern H. Epidemiologic research: Principles and Quantitative Methods. New York ( NY ): Van Rostrand Reinhold; 1982.
  • 7
    Armstrong BK, Saracci R, White E. Principles of Exposure Measurement in Epidemiology. New York ( NY ): Oxford University Press; 1992.
  • 8
    Little RJA, Rubin DB. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. 2nd ed. Hoboken ( NJ ): Wiley; 2002.
  • 9
    Schafer JL. Analysis of incomplete Multivariate Data. London ( UK ): Chapman & Hall; 1997.
  • 10
    Smith W, Mitchell P, Attebo K, Leeder S. Selection bias from sampling frames: telephone directory and electoral roll compared with door-to-door population census: results from the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1997;21(2): 12733.
  • 11
    Australian Bureau of Statistics [homepage on the Internet]. Canberra (AUST): ABS; 2006 [cited 2006 Sept]. National Health Survey and National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Survey 2004/5: Data Reference Package, 2004-05. Catalogue No.: 4363.0.55.002. Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/
  • 12
    Australian Bureau of Statistics. National Health Survey. Users' Guide – Electronic Publication, 2004-05. Canberra ( AUST ): ABS; 2006.
  • 13
    Kubo A, Corley DA. Body mass index and adenocarcinomas of the esophagus or gastric cardia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(5): 8728.
  • 14
    Lindblad M, Rodriguez LAG, Lagergren J. Body mass, tobacco and alcohol and risk of esophageal, gastric cardia, and gastric non-cardia adenocarcinoma among men and women in a nested case-control study. Cancer Causes Control. 2005;16(3): 28594.
  • 15
    Lagergren J, Bergstrom R, Lindgren A, Nyren O. The role of tobacco, snuff and alcohol use in the aetiology of cancer of the oesophagus and gastric cardia. Int J Cancer. 2000;85(3): 3406.
  • 16
    Jordan SJ, Whiteman DC, Purdie DM, Green AC, Webb PM. Does smoking increase risk of ovarian cancer? A systematic review. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;103(3): 11229.
  • 17
    Olsen CM, Green AC, Whiteman DC, Sadeghi S, Kolahdooz F, Webb PM. Obesity and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43(4): 690709.
  • 18
    Mezei G, Kheifets L. Selection bias and its implications for case-control studies: a case study of magnetic field exposure and childhood leukaemia. Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35(2): 397406.
  • 19
    Nishimoto IN, Pintos J, Schlecht NF, Torloni H, Carvalho AL, Kowalski LP, et al. Assessment of control selection bias in a hospital-based case-control study of upper aero-digestive tract cancers. J Cancer Epidemiol Prev. 2002;7(3): 13141.
  • 20
    Olson SH, Voigt LF, Begg CB, Weiss NS. Reporting participation in case-control studies. Epidemiology. 2002;13(2): 1236.
  • 21
    Ramos E, Lopes C, Barros H. Investigating the effect of nonparticipation using a population-based case-control study on myocardial infarction. Ann Epidemiol. 2004;14(6): 43741.
  • 22
    Richiardi L, Boffetta P, Merletti F. Analysis of nonresponse bias in a population-based case-control study on lung cancer. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55(10): 103340.
  • 23
    Stang A, Jockel KH. Studies with low response proportions may be less biased than studies with high response proportions. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(2): 20410.
  • 24
    Voigt LF, Boudreau DM, Weiss NS, Malone KE, Li CI, Daling JR. Re: “Studies with low response proportions may be less biased than studies with high response proportions”. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161(4): 4012; author reply 2-3.
  • 25
    Greenland S. Basic methods for sensitivity analysis of biases. Int J Epidemiol. 1996;25(6): 110716.
  • 26
    Kreiger N, Nishri ED. The effect of nonresponse on estimation of relative risk in a case-control study. Ann Epidemiol. 1997;7(3): 1949.
  • 27
    Vrijheid M, Richardson L, Armstrong BK, Auvinen A, Berg G, Carroll M, et al. Quantifying the Impact of Selection Bias Caused by Nonparticipation in a Case-Control Study of Mobile Phone Use. Ann Epidemiol. 2009;19(1): 3341. e1.
  • 28
    Sheikh K. Late response vs. non-response to mail questionnaire. Ann Epidemiol. 1998;8(1): 756.
  • 29
    Purdie DM, Dunne MP, Boyle FM, Cook MD, Najman JM. Health and demographic characteristics of respondents in an Australian national sexuality survey: comparison with population norms. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56(10): 74853.
  • 30
    Schuz J. Non-response bias as a likely cause of the association between young maternal age at the time of delivery and the risk of cancer in the offspring. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2003;17(1): 10612.