SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer in Australia: An Overview, 2006. Canberra (AUST): AIHW; 2007. Report No.: AIHW Catalogue No.: CAN 32.
  • 2
    Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Breast Screen Australia Monitoring Report 2003–2004. Canberra ( AUST ) : AIHW; 2007. Report No.: AIHW Catalogue No.: CAN 31.
  • 3
    Wikipedia the free encyclopedia. Computed Radiography [article on the Internet]. San Francisco ( CA ) : Wikimedia Foundation; 2008 June 16[cited 2008 Sept 9]. Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computed_radiography.
  • 4
    Wikipedia the free encyclopaedia. Digital Radiography [article on the Internet]. San Francisco ( CA ) : Wikimedia Foundation; 2008 June 16[cited 2008 Sept 9]. Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_radiography.
  • 5
    Merlin T, Hedyati H, Wang S, Sullivan T, Newton S, Buckley E, et al. Digital Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening, Surveillance and Diagnosis. MSAC Reference 37 Assessment Report. Canberra (AUST): Commonwealth of Australia; 2008.
  • 6
    Medical Services Advisory Committee. Funding for New Medical Technologies and Procedures: Application and Assessment Guidelines September 2005 [report on the Internet]. Canberra ( AUST ) : Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing; 2005 [cited 2009 Sept 9]. Available from: http://www.msac.gov.au/.
  • 7
    Ciatto S, Brancato B, Baglioni R, Turci M. A methodology to evaluate differential costs of full field digital as compared to conventional screen film mammography in a clinical setting. Eur J Radiol. 2006;57(1):6975.
  • 8
    Legood R, Alastair G. A Cost Comparison of full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) with Film-screen Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening. Oxford ( UK ) : Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford; 2004.
  • 9
    Tosteson AN, Stout NK, Fryback DG, Acharyya S, Herman BA, Hannah LG, et al. Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(1):110.
  • 10
    Drummond M, Sculpher M, Torrance G, O’Brien B, Stoddart G. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 3rd ed. New York ( NY ) : Oxford University Press; 2005.
  • 11
    Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum JK, Acharyya S, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(17):177383.
  • 12
    Bradley G, Mozjerin C. Occupancy Chargeback: An Overview of Different Models and a Glimpse of “One” Future. Proceedings of the ATEM-AAPPA Conference [paper on the Internet]; 2000 [cited 2007 July 5] September 25; Melbourne, Australia Available from: http://mams.rmit.edu.au/n6kmum2aewlb.doc.
  • 13
    Australian Bureau of Statistics [homepage on the Internet]. Canberra (AUST): ABS; 2009 July 21 [cited 2007 Dec 5]. 6401.0 - Consumer Price Index, Australia, September 2007. Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/6401.0/.
  • 14
    Griebsch I, Brown J, Boggis C, Dixon M, Easton D, Eeles R, et al. Cost-effectiveness of screening with contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging vs. X-ray mammography of women at a high familial risk of breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006;95:80110.
  • 15
    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [national accounts page on the Internet]. Paris [FRA]: OECD; 2009; [cited 2009 May 20]. Dataset: 4. PPPs and Exchange Rates. Available from: http://stats.oecd.org/wbos/Index.aspx?datasetcode=SNA_TABLE4.
  • 16
    Valentin J. Guest editorial, preface, main points, glossary and chapter 1. Ann ICRP. 2004;34(1):1.
  • 17
    Medical Services Advisory Committee [completed assessments page on the Internet]. Canberra (AUST): Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing; 2008 [cited 2008 Sept 9]. References 1–40. Available from: http://www.msac.gov.au/internet/msac/publishing.nsf/Content/completed-assessments.
  • 18
    Berns EA, Hendrick RE, Solari M, Barke L, Reddy D, Wolfman J, et al. Digital and screen-film mammography: comparison of image acquisition and interpretation times. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187(1):3841.