Direct Link:
1753-6405/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=ecd736ee9d7c8f8d824f0cf57e258fa7a3c4a5d0)
1753-6405/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=fef0d8b215d7d678c35113c30f5b17d3a03045ff)
You have free access to this content
Research methods – most common reason for rejection
Article first published online: 9 FEB 2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00465.x
© 2010 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2010 Public Health Association of Australia
Issue
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Volume 34, Issue 1, pages 3–4, February 2010
Additional Information
How to Cite
The Editors (2010), Research methods – most common reason for rejection. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 34: 3–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00465.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 9 FEB 2010
- Article first published online: 9 FEB 2010
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Cited in:
- CrossRef
This article has been cited by:
- 1, Diligence, commitment and innovation, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2013, 37, 2
- 2, Responsibility and ethics in publishing for editors and authors, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2012, 36, 1Direct Link:
- 3, Clear as mud: results and the use of mixed methods, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2010, 34, 4Direct Link: