• 1
    Statistics New Zealand. Demographic Trends 2006 – Chapter 7 Induced Abortion [report on the Internet]. Wellington ( NZ ) : Government of New Zealand; 2007 [cited 2007 Sep 18]. Available from:
  • 2
    Bartlett LA, Berg CJ, Shulman HB, Zane SB, Green CA, Whitehead S, et al. Risk factors for legal induced abortion-related mortality in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:72937.
  • 3
    Buehler JW, Schulz KF, Grimes DA, Hogue CJ. The risk of serious complications from induced abortions: do personal characteristics make a difference? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;153(1):1420.
  • 4
    Ferris LE, McMain-Klein M, Colodny N, Fellows GF, Lamont J. Factors associated with immediate abortion complications. CMAJ. 1996;154(11):167785.
  • 5
    Zhou W, Nielsen GL, Moller M, Olsen J. Short-term complications after surgically induced abortions: a register based study of 56117 abortions. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81:3316.
  • 6
    Silva M, McNeill R, Ashton T. Ladies in Waiting: The timeliness of first trimester pregnancy termination in New Zealand. Reproductive Health. 2010;7:19.
  • 7
    Alan Guttmacher Institute. Facts on Induced Abortion in the United States. New York ( NY ) : AGI; 2006.
  • 8
    Crown Department of Health. Statistical Bulletin, Abortion Statistics, England and Wales: 2006. Bulletin 2007/01 [bulletin on the Internet]. London ( UK ) : Government of United Kingdom; 2007 [cited 2007 Oct 1]. Available from:
  • 9
    WA Department of Health. Induced Abortion in Western Australia 1999–2004: Report of the WA Abortion Notification System. Perth ( AUST ) : Government of Western Australia; 2005.
  • 10
    Finer LB, Frohwirth LF, Dauphine LA, Singh S, Moore AM. Timing of steps and reasons for delay in obtaining abortions in the United States. Contraception. 2006;74:33444.
  • 11
    Strauss LT, Herndon J, Chang J, et al. Abortion surveillance—United States, 2002. MWR Surveill Summ. 2005;55(SS-7):131.
  • 12
    Finer LB, Frohwirth LF, Dauphinee LA, Singh S, Moore AM. Reasons US women have abortions: quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2005;37:11018.
  • 13
    Drey EA, Foster DG, Jackson RA, Lee SJ, Cardenas LH, Darney PD. Risk factors associated with presenting for abortion in the second trimester. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(1):12835.
  • 14
    Foster DG, Jackson RA, Cosby K, Weitz TA, Darney PD, Drey EA. Predictors of delay in each step leading to an abortion. Contraception. 2008;77:28993.
  • 15
    Ingham R, Lee E, Clements SJ, Stone N. Reasons for second trimester abortions in England and Wales. Reprod Health Matters. 2008;16(31S):1829.
  • 16
    Gallo MF, Nghia NC. Real life is different: A qualitative study of why women delay abortion until the second trimester. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64:181222.
  • 17
    Yee L, Eisenberg D, Feinglass J, Simon M. Delay in requests for abortion: Comparison of patients in first and second trimester. Contraception. 2008;78:188.
  • 18
    Kumar U, Baraitser P, Morton S, Massil H. Decision making and referral prior to abortion: a qualitative study of women's experiences. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2004;30(1):514.
  • 19
    Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion. London(UK) : RCOG Press; 2004.
  • 20
    Finnie S, Foy R, Mather J. The pathway to induced abortions: women's experiences and general practitioner attitudes. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2006;32(1):1518.
  • 21
    The Crimes Act 1961 No 43 Public Act. Wellington ( NZ ) : Parliamentary Counsel Office; 1961 [cited 2009 Dec 11]. Available from:
  • 22
    Contraception, Sterilisation, and Abortion Act 1977 No 112 Public Act. Wellington ( NZ ) : Parliamentary Counsel Office; 1977 [cited 2009 Dec 11]. Available from:
  • 23
    Standards Committee to the Abortion Supervisory Committee. Standards of Care for Women Requesting Induced Abortion in New Zealand [unpublished report]. Wellington ( NZ ) : New Zealand Ministry of Justice; 2009 October.