We thank Bill Christie (the Editor) and two other anonymous referees for their extremely helpful comments and suggestions. We also benefited from discussions with Hadiye Aslan, Ozgur Demirtas, Armen Hovakimian, Robert Whitelaw, and seminar participants at Baruch College, Graduate School, and University Center of the University of New York, and the 2007 Financial Management Association meetings. We also thank Kenneth French for making a large amount of historical data publicly available in his online data library.
The Conditional Beta and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns
Article first published online: 28 APR 2009
© 2009 Financial Management Association International.
Volume 38, Issue 1, pages 103–137, Spring 2009
How to Cite
Bali, T. G., Cakici, N. and Tang, Y. (2009), The Conditional Beta and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns. Financial Management, 38: 103–137. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-053X.2009.01030.x
- Issue published online: 28 APR 2009
- Article first published online: 28 APR 2009
We examine the cross-sectional relation between conditional betas and expected stock returns for a sample period of July 1963 to December 2004. Our portfolio-level analyses and the firm-level cross-sectional regressions indicate a positive, significant relation between conditional betas and the cross-section of expected returns. The average return difference between high- and low-beta portfolios ranges between 0.89% and 1.01% per month, depending on the time-varying specification of conditional beta. After controlling for size, book-to-market, liquidity, and momentum, the positive relation between market beta and expected returns remains economically and statistically significant.