SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Bean, M.J., Dwyer L.E. (2000). Mitigation banking as an endangered species conservation tool. Environ Law Reporter 7, 1053710556.
  • Bedford, B.L., Preston E.M. (1988) Developing the scientific basis for assessing cumulative effects of wetland loss and degradation on landscape functions: status, perspectives, and prospects. Environ Manage 12, 751771.
  • Brower, A.L. (2008) Who owns the high country? Craig Potton Publishing, Nelson , New Zealand .
  • Brower, A.L., Reedy C., Yelin-Kefer J. (2001) Consensus vs. conservation in the Upper Colorado River Recovery Implementation Program. Conserv Biol 15, 10011007.
  • Brown, S., Veneman L.M. (2001) Effectiveness of compensatory wetland mitigation in Massachusetts, USA. Wetlands 21, 508518.
  • Brownlie, S., Botha M., Helme N., Van Zyl H. (2007) Provincial guidelines on biodiversity offsets. Revised draft – March 2007 Edition 2. Republic of South Africa, Provincial Government of the Western Cape, Department of Environmental Affairs & Development Planning, Cape Town , South Africa .
  • Burgin, S. (2008) Biobanking: an environmental scientist's view of the role of biodiversity banking offsets in conservation. Biodivers Conserv 17, 807816.
  • Carroll, N., FoxJ., BayonR. (2008) (ed). Conservation and biodiversity banking: a guide to setting up and running biodiversity credit systems. Earthscan, London .
  • Chomitz, K.M. (2004) Transferable development rights and forest protection: an exploratory analysis. Int Reg Sci Rev 27, 34873.
  • Crooks, S., Ledoux, L. (2002) Mitigation banking as a tool for strategic coastal zone management: a UK perspective. Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment Working Paper GEC 99–02.
  • Edelman, M. (1960) Symbols and political quiescence. Am Pol Sci Rev 54, 695704.
  • Edelman, M. (1964) The symbolic uses of politics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana , IL .
  • Ellickson, R.C. (1991) Order without law: how neighbours settle disputes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge , MA .
  • Eskridge, W. (1988). Politics without romance: implications of public choice theory for statutory interpretation. Virginia Law Rev 74, 275338.
  • Floumoy, A.C. (2000) Restoration Rx: an evaluation and prescription. Arizona Law Rev 7, 187213.
  • Fox, J., Nino-Murcia, A. (2005) Status of species conservation banking in the United States. Conserv Biol 19, 9961007.
  • Freeman, J. (2000) The contracting state. Fl State Univ Law Rev 28, 155214.
  • Gardner, R.C. (1996) Banking on entrepreneurs. Iowa Law Rev 81, 527587.
  • Gaston, K.J. (2000). Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature 405, 220227.
  • Gibbons, P., Lindenmayer D.B. (2007) Offsets for land clearing: no net loss or the tail wagging the dog? Ecol Manage Restor 8, 2631.
  • Gustafsson, B. (1998) Scope and limits of the market mechanism in environmental management. Ecol Econ 24, 259274.
  • Hanski, I. (1998) Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396, 4149.
  • Hilderbrand, R.H., Watts A.C., Randle A.M. (2005) The myths of restoration ecology. Ecol Soc 10, 19 [online].
  • Justus, J., Sarkar S. (2002) The principle of complementarity in the design of reserve networks to conserve biodiversity: a preliminary history. J Biosci 27, 421435.
  • Kroeger, T., Casey F. (2007) An assessment of market-based approaches to providing ecosystem services on agricultural lands. Ecol Econ 64, 321332.
  • Levine, M.E. (1998) Regulatory capture. Pages 267269 in New Palgrave dictionary of economics and the law (3d ed. 1999). Macmillan Reference, London , UK .
  • Lueck, D., Michael J.A. (2003) Preemptive habitat destruction under the Endangered Species Act. J Law Econ 46, 2760.
  • Mack, J.J., Micacchion M. (2006) An ecological assessment of Ohio mitigation banks: vegetation, amphibians, hydrology, and soils. Ohio EPA Technical Report WET/2006–1. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Surface Water, Wetland Ecology Group, Columbus , OH .
  • Matthews, J.W., Endress A.G. (2008) Performance criteria, compliance success, and vegetation development in compensatory mitigation wetlands. Environ Manage 41, 130141.
  • McCarthy, M.A., Parris K.M., Van Der Ree R. et al . (2004) The habitat hectares approach to vegetation assessment: an evaluation and suggestions for improvement. Ecol Manage Restor 5, 2427.
  • McCubbins, M., Noll R., Weingast B. (1987) Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. J Law Econ Org 3, 243277.
  • Merton, R.K. (1957) Social theory and social structure. The Free Press, Glencoe , IL .
  • Mitsch, W.J. (1998) The value of wetlands: the importance of landscape setting and scale. Pages 1730 in T.Soderqvist, editor. Wetlands: Landscape and institutional perspectives, Proceedings of the 4th Workshop of the Global Wetlands Economics Network, Beijer Occasional Paper.
  • Moilanen, A., Van Teeffelen A., Ben-Haim Y., Ferrier S. (2008) How much compensation is enough? Explicit incorporation of uncertainty and time discounting when calculating offset ratios for impacted habitat. Restor Ecol 16, in press. (http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/120124288/PDFSTART)
  • Morris, R.K.A., Alonso I., Jefferson R.G., Kirby, K.J. (2006) The creation of compensatory habitat-can it secure sustainable development? J Nature Conserv 14, 10616.
  • Niskanen, W.A. Jr. 1971. Bureaucracy and representative government. Aldine-Atherton, Chicago .
  • Norton, D.A. (2008) Biodiversity offsets: two New Zealand case studies and an assessment framework. Environ Manage 43, 698706.
  • NRC (National Research Council) (2001) Compensating for wetland losses under the Clean Water Act. National Academy Press, Washington , D.C .
  • Olson, M. (1965) The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press, Cambridge , MA .
  • O’Toole, R. (1988) Reforming the forest service. Island Press, Washington , D.C .
  • Ovaskainen, O., Hanski I. (2004) From individual behavior to metapopulation dynamics: unifying the patchy population and classic metapopulation models. Am Nat 164, 364377.
  • Parkes, D., Newell G., Cheal D. (2004) The development and raison d’être of ‘habitat hectares’: a response to McCarthy et al. (2004). Ecol Manage Restor 5, 2829.
  • Pedersen, W.F. Jr. (1994) The limits of market-based approaches to environmental protection. Environ Law Reporter 10, 173174.
  • Pralle, S.B. (2006) Branching out, digging in: environmental advocacy and agenda setting. Georgetown University Press, Washington , D.C .
  • Quigley, J.T., Harper D.J. (2005a) Effectiveness of fish habitat compensation in Canada in achieving no net loss. Environ Manage 37, 351366.
  • Quigley, J.T., Harper D.J. (2005b) Compliance with Canada's Fisheries Act: a field audit of habitat compensation projects. Environ Manage 37, 336350.
  • Race, M.S. (1985) Critique of present wetland mitigation policies in the United States based on analysis of past restoration projects in San Francisco Bay. Environ Manage 9, 7182.
  • Race, M.S., Fonseca M.S. (1996) Fixing compensatory mitigation – what will it take? Ecol Appl 6, 94101.
  • Robertson, M.M. (2000). No net loss: wetland restoration and the incomplete capitalisation of nature. Antipode 32, 463493.
  • Ruhl, J.B. (1999). How to kill endangered species, legally: the nuts and bolts of Endangered Species Act “HCP” permits for real estate development. Environ Lawyer 5, 345405.
  • Salzman, J., Ruhl J. B. (2000) Currencies and the commodification of Environmental Law. Stanford Law Rev 53, 607694.
  • Schattschneider, E.E. (1960) The semisovereign people: a realist's view of democracy in America. Dryden Press, Hinsdale , IL .
  • Stein, E.D., Tabatabai F., Ambrose R.F. (2000) Wetland mitigation banking: a framework for crediting and debiting. Environ Manage 26, 233250.
  • Ten Kate, K., Bishop J., Bayon R. (2004) Biodiversity offsets, views, experience and the business case. IUCN, Gland. Switzerland and Cambridge, UK and Insight Investment, London , UK .
  • VDNRE (Victoria Department of Natural Resources and Environment) (2002) Victoria's native vegetation management – a framework for action. Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Melbourne , Victoria , Australia .
  • Veltman, V.C. (1995) Banking on the future of wetlands using federal law. Northwestern Univ Law Rev 89, 654689.
  • Vesk, P.A., Nolan R., Thomson J.R., Dorrough J.W., Mac Nally R. (2008) Time lags in provision of habitat resources through revegetation. Biol Conserv 141, 174186.
  • Walker, S., Brower, A.L., Clarkson, B.D. et al . (2008) Halting indigenous biodiversity decline: ambiguity, equity, and outcomes in RMA assessment of significance. NZ J Ecol 32, 225237.
  • WA EPA (Government of Western Australia Environmental Protection Agency) (2006) Environmental offsets: Position statement No. 9 .
  • WHOEP (White House Office on Environmental Policy) (1993) Protecting America's wetlands: a fair, flexible, and effective approach. Available from: http://www.wetlands.com/fed/aug93wet.htm. Accessed 2 June 2009.
  • Wilson, J.Q. (1989) Bureaucracy: what government agencies do and why they do it. Basic Books, New York .
  • Winter, G. (1985) Bartering rationality in regulation. Law Soc Rev 19, 219250.
  • Zedler, J.B., Callaway J.C. (1999) Tracking wetland restoration: do mitigation sites follow desired trajectories? Restor Ecol 7, 6973.