The importance of incorporating threat for efficient targeting and evaluation of conservation investments
Version of Record online: 7 SEP 2009
©2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Volume 2, Issue 5, pages 240–241, October 2009
How to Cite
Merenlender, A. M., Newburn, D., Reed, S. E. and Rissman, A. R. (2009), The importance of incorporating threat for efficient targeting and evaluation of conservation investments. Conservation Letters, 2: 240–241. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00073.x
- Issue online: 15 OCT 2009
- Version of Record online: 7 SEP 2009
- Received: 29 May 2009; accepted 24 July 2009.
Figure S1: Annual rate and rank order of conversion from natural to urban land cover in 50 California counties between 1990 and 2004. The rate of land cover change was calculated as a percentage of the total developable land in each county, excluding public lands and protected areas. Analysis is limited to urban conversion because there was greater agreement between the two data sources, which cover different geographic areas (FMMP 2002; C-CAP 2003).
Figure S2: Annual rate of urban conversion rate versus land costs, fitted with linear regression (R2 = 0.3). Land costs are taken from Table S1 in supplemental materials from Underwood et al. (2009). Annual rate of urban conversion between 1990 and 2004 is derived from FMMP (2002) and C-CAP (2003), as shown in Figure S1.
Please note: Wiley-Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
|CONL_73_sm_FigS1.pdf||90K||Supporting info item|
|CONL_73_sm_FigS2.pdf||44K||Supporting info item|
|CONL_73_sm_SuppMat.doc||21K||Supporting info item|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.