Editor Ashwini Chhatre
The changing landscape of conservation science funding in the United States
Article first published online: 21 MAY 2010
©2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Volume 3, Issue 6, pages 435–444, December 2010
How to Cite
Bakker, V. J., Baum, J. K., Brodie, J. F., Salomon, A. K., Dickson, B. G., Gibbs, H. K., Jensen, O. P. and McIntyre, P. B. (2010), The changing landscape of conservation science funding in the United States. Conservation Letters, 3: 435–444. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00125.x
- Issue published online: 3 DEC 2010
- Article first published online: 21 MAY 2010
- Received 16 December 2009Accepted4 May 2010
- 2003) Who should pay for tropical conservation, and how could the costs be met? Oryx 37, 238–250. , (
- CBO. (2009) The budget and economic outlook: an update. The Congress of the United States. Congressional Budget Office, Washington , DC .
- 2006a) The questionable effectiveness of science spending by international conservation organizations in the tropics. Conserv Biol 20, 733–738. (
- 2006b) Who needs to spend money on conservation science anyway? Conserv Biol 20, 1567–1568. (
- 1997) Political and economic determinants of individuals’ support for environmental spending. J Environ Manage 51, 15–27. , , (
- Foundation Center. (2000) Top 50 U.S. Foundations Awarding Grants for Environment, circa 1998. Foundation Center Statistical Services. Available from: http://foundationcenter.org/findfunders/statistics/pdf/04_fund_sub/1998/50_found_sub/sub_c_8.pdf. Accessed 1 April 2010.
- Foundation Center. (2009) Foundation yearbook: facts and figures on private and community foundations. July 2009 edition, New York , NY .
- 2004) Who gets acknowledged: measuring scientific contributions through automatic acknowledgment indexing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101, 17599–17604. , (
- 2008) The effect of government contracting on academic research: does the source of funding affect scientific output? Res Policy 37, 41–58. (
- 2006) Who needs to spend money on conservation science anyway? Conserv Biol 20, 1566–1567. , , et al . (
- 2007) Saving the vaquita: immediate action, not more data. Conserv Biol 21, 1653–1655. , , et al . (
- 2009) Relation of study quality, concordance, take home message, funding, and impact in studies of influenza vaccines: systematic review. Br Med J 338, b354. , , , , (
- 2002) Slow-moving journals hinder conservation efforts. Nature 420, 15–15. , , , (
- 2006) Do financial factors such as author page charges and industry funding impact on the nature of published research in infectious diseases? Health Info Libr J 23, 214–222. , (
- NGA, NASBO. (2009) The fiscal survey of states. National Governors Association and the National Association of State Budget Officers, Washington , DC .
- 2010) Hindrance of conservation biology by delays in the submission of manuscripts. Conserv Biol 24, 615–620. , , (
- 2004) Linkage of conservation activity to trends in the US economy. Conserv Biol 18, 1617–1623. , , , (
- 2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Econ 52, 273–288. , , (
- 2006) Conservation biology and real-world conservation. Conserv Biol 20, 658–669. (
- 2008) Relations between national research investment and publication output: application to an American paradox. Scientometrics 74, 191–205. (
- 2007) Temporal pattern of government funding for nonindigenous species research in the Great Lakes. J Great Lakes Res 33, 136–142. , , , (
- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2009) Consumer Price Index inflation calculator. Available from: http://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm. Accessed 23 October 2009.
- U.S. Office of Management and Budget. (2009) A new era of responsibility: renewing America's promise. Available from: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/assets/fy2010_new_era/a_new_era_of_responsibility2.pdf. Accessed 30 March 2010.
- 2006) What is changing in academic research? Trends and futures scenarios. Eur J Educ 41, 169–202. (
- 2009) Conflict of interest in research on anthropogenic noise and marine mammals: does funding bias conclusions? Mar Policy 34, 320–327. , , (
- 2008) Enhancing the engagement of the U.S. private foundations with conservation science. Conserv Biol 22, 1477–1484. , , et al . (
- 1997) More authors, more institutions, and more funding sources: hot papers in biology from 1991 to 1993. J Am Soc Inf Sci 48, 662–666. (