SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Agrawal, A. (1995) Indigenous and scientific knowledge: some critical comments. http://www.nuffic.nl/ciran/ikdm/3--3/articles/agrawal.html
  • Ayyub, B.M. (2001) Elicitation of expert opinions for uncertainty and risks. CRC Press, Boca Raton .
  • Barley, S.R., Kunda G. (2006) Contracting: a new form of professional practice. Acad Manag Perspect 20, 4566.
  • Beck, U. (1992) Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage Publications, London .
  • Broks, P. (2006)Understanding popular science. Open University Press, Maidenhead and Philadelphia .
  • Burgman, M.A. (2005) Risks and decisions for conservation and environmental management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge .
  • Campbell, L.M. (2002) Science and sustainable use: views of marine turtle conservation experts. Ecol Appl 12, 12291246.
  • Carr, A.J.L. (2004) Why do we all need community science? Soc Nat Resour 17, 19.
  • Chaloner, K.M., Church T., Louis T.A., Matts J.P. (1993) Graphical elicitation of a prior distribution for a clinical trial. Statistician 42, 341353.
  • Chi, M.T.H. (2006) Two approaches to the study of experts’ characteristics. Pages 2130 in K.A.Ericsson, N.Charness, P.J.Feltovitch & R.R.Hoffman, editors. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge .
  • Christie, E. (1991) The role of law and science in the resolution of disputes over factual evidence. Environ Plan Law J 8, 200210.
  • Clemen, R., Winkler R. (1999) Combining probability distributions from experts in risk analysis. Risk Anal 19, 187203.
  • Collins, H.M., Evans R. (2007) Rethinking expertise. University of Chicago Press, Chicago .
  • Cooke, R.M. (1991) Experts in uncertainty: opinion and subjective probability in science. Oxford University Press, Oxford .
  • Cooke, R.M., Goossens L.H.J. (2000) Procedures guide for structured expert judgement in accident consequence modelling. Radiat Protect Dosim 90, 303309.
  • Cruess, S.R., Cruess R.L., Johnston S. (2004) Professionalism for medicine: opportunities and obligations. Iowa Orthop J 24, 915.
  • Dawes, R.M. (1994) House of cards: psychology and psychotherapy built on myth. Simon and Schuster, New York .
  • Dryzek, J.S. (2005) Politics of the earth. Oxford University Press, Oxford .
  • Evans, R. (2008) The sociology of expertise: the distribution of social fluency. Sociol Compass 2, 281298.
  • Evatts, J., Mieg H.A., Felt U. (2006) Professionalization, scientific expertise, and elitism: a sociological perspective. Pages 105123 in K.A.Ericsson, N.Charness, P.J.Feltovitch & R.R.Hoffman, editors. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge .
  • Failing, L., Gregory R., Harstone M. (2007) Integrating science and local knowledge in environmental risk management: a decision-focused approach. Ecol Econ 64, 4760.
  • Fischhoff, B., Slovic P., Lichtenstein S. (1982) Lay foibles and expert fables in judgements about risk. Am Stat 36, 240255.
  • Fisk, D. (1998) Environmental science and environmental law. J Environ Law 10, 38.
  • Franklin J. (2001) The science of conjecture. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore .
  • Franklin, J., Sisson S.A., Burgman M.A., Martin J.K. (2008) Evaluating extreme risks in invasion ecology: learning from banking compliance. Divers Distributions 14, 581591.
  • Freudenburg, W.R. (1999) Tools for understanding the socioeconomic and political settings for environmental decision making. Pages 94125 in V.H.Dale & M.R.English, editors. Tools to aid environmental decision making. Springer, New York .
  • Gans, J., Palmer A. (2004) Australian principles of evidence. Routledge Cavendish, Sydney .
  • Garthwaite, P.H., Kadane J.B., O’Hagan A. (2005) Statistical methods for eliciting probability distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 100, 680700.
  • Gregory, R. (2002) Incorporating value trade-offs into community-based environmental risk decisions. Environ Values 11, 461468.
  • Gregory, R., Failing L., Ohlson D., McDaniels T. (2006) Some pitfalls of an overemphasis on science in environmental risk management decisions. J Risk Res 9, 717735.
  • Gregory, J., Miller S. (1998) Science in public: communication, culture and credibility. Plenum Trade, London .
  • Gullet, W. (2000) The precautionary principle in Australia: policy, law and potential precautionary EIAs. Risk Health Saf Environ 11, 93124.
  • Hart, A. (1986) Knowledge acquisition for expert systems. McGraw-Hill, New York .
  • Hilgartner, S. (1990) The dominant view of popularization: conceptual problems, political uses. Soc Stud Sci 20, 519539.
  • Hoffrage, U., Gigerenzer G., Krauss S. & Martignon L. (2002) Representation facilitates reasoning: what natural frequencies are and what they are not. Cognition 84, 343352.
  • Hora S.C. (1992) Acquisition of expert judgment: examples from risk assessment. J Energy Eng 118, 13648.
  • Irwin, A. (2001) Constructing the scientific citizen: science and democracy in the biosciences. Public Underst Sci 10, 118.
  • James, A., Low Choy S., Mengersen K. (2010) Elicitator: an expert elicitation tool for regression in ecology. Environ Model Software 25, 129145.
  • Jasanoff, S. (2006) Transparency in public science: purposes, reasons, limits. Law Contemp Probl 69, 21.
  • Kadane, J.B., Dickeey J., Winkler R.L., Smith W., Peters S. (1980) Interactive elicitation of opinion for a normal linear model. J Am Stat Assoc 75, 815885.
  • Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1982) On the study of statistical intuitions. Pages 493508 in, D.Kahneman, P.Slovic, A.Tversky, editors. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge .
  • Krinitzsky, E.L. (1993) Earthquake probability in engineering—part 1: the use and misuse of expert opinion. Eng Geol 33, 257288.
  • Lawson, J.D. (1900) The law of expert and opinion evidence, 2nd edition. T.H.Flood, Chicago .
  • Leadbeater, C. (2003) Amateurs: a 21st-century remake. RSA J. Issue 5507, 2225.
  • MacMillan, D.C., Marshall K. (2006) The Delphi process—an expert-based approach to ecological modelling in data-poor environments. Anim Conserv 9, 1119.
  • Martin, T.G., Kuhnert P.M., Mengersen K., Possingham H.P. (2005) The power of expert opinion in ecological models using Bayesian methods: impact of grazing on birds. Ecol Appl 15, 266280.
  • Morgan, M.G., Henrion M. (1990) Uncertainty: a guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge .
  • Murphy, A.H., Winkler R.L. (1977) Can weather forecasters formulate reliable probability forecasts of precipitation and temperature? Natl Weather Dig 2, 29.
  • Murphy, A.H. (1993) What is a good forecast? An essay on the nature of goodness in weather forecasting. Am Meterol Soc 8, 281293.
  • O’Brien, M. (2000) Making better environmental decisions: an alternative to risk assessment. MIT Press, Cambridge , MA .
  • O’Hagan, A., Oakley J.E. (2004) Probability is perfect, but we can't elicit it perfectly. Reliability Eng Syst Saf Altern Representations Epistemic Uncertainty 85, 23948.
  • Patterson, J., Meek M.E., Strawson J.E., Liteplo R.G. (2007) Engaging expert peers in the development of risk assessments. Risk Anal 27, 16091621.
  • Peel, J. (2005) The precautionary principle in practice: environmental decision-making and scientific uncertainty. Federation Press, Annandale , N.S.W .
  • Preston, B. (2006) The role of public interest environmental litigation. Environ Plann Law J 23, 337350.
  • Pidgeon, N., Harthorn B., Bryant K., Rogers-Hayden R. (2008) Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the US and UK. Nat Nanotechnol (doi: 10.1038/NNANO.2008.362.)
  • Regan, H.M., Colyvan M., Burgman M.A. (2002) A taxonomy and treatment of uncertainty for ecology and conservation biology. Ecol Appl 12, 618628.
  • Schum, D., Morris J. (2007) Assessing the competence and credibility of human sources of intelligence evidence: contributions from law and probability. Law Probability Risk 6, 247274.
  • Shanteau, J. (1992) How much information does an expert use? Is it relevant? Acta Psychol 81, 7586.
  • Shrader-Frechette, K. (1996) Value judgments in verifying and validating risk assessment models. Pages 291309 in C.R.Cothern, editor. Handbook for environmental risk decision making: values, perceptions and ethics. CRC Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton .
  • Slovic, P. (1999) Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Anal 19, 689701.
  • Speirs-Bridge, A., Fidler F., McBride M., Flander L., Cumming G., Burgman M. (2010) Reducing over-confidence in the interval judgements of experts. Risk Anal 30, 512523.
  • Stern, P.C., Fineberg H.V., editors (1996) Understanding risk: informing decisions in a demographic society. Committee on Risk Characterisation, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington , DC .
  • Sternberg, R.J., Wagner R.K., Okagaki, L. (1993) Practical intelligence: the nature and role of tacit knowledge in work and at school. Pages 205227 in J.M.Puckett & H.W.Reese, editor. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale , New Jersey .
  • Verran, H. (2002) Transferring strategies of land management: indigenous land owners and environmental scientists. Research in science and technology studies, knowledge and society. Pages 155181 Vol. 13, Elsevier & JAI Press, Oxford .
  • Wallsten, T.S., Budescu D.V. (1983) Encoding subjective probabilities—a psychological and psychometric review. Manag Sci 29, 151173.
  • Wallsten, T., Budescu D., Erev I., Diederich A. (1997) Evaluating and combining subjective probability estimates. J Behav Decis Mak 10, 243268.
  • Walton, D. (1997) Appeal to expert opinion: arguments from authority. Pennsylvania State University Press, Pennsylvania .
  • Walshe, T.V., Burgman M.A. (2010) A framework for assessing and managing risks posed by emerging diseases. Risk Anal 30, 236249.
  • Wintle, B., Burgman M., Fidler F. (2007) How fast should nanotechnology advance? Nat Nanotechnol 2, 327.
  • Wynne, B. (1996) May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. Pages 4483 in S.Lash, B.Szerszynski & B.Wynne, editors. Risk, environment and modernity: towards a new ecology. Sage Publications, London .
  • Yearley, S. (2000) Making systematic sense of public discontents with expert knowledge: two analytical approaches and a case study. Public Underst Sci 9, 105122.