• Please log in or register to access this feature.

MINI-REVIEW

You have free access to this content

Redefining expertise and improving ecological judgment

  1. Mark Burgman1,
  2. Anna Carr2,
  3. Lee Godden3,
  4. Robin Gregory4,
  5. Marissa McBride1,
  6. Louisa Flander5,
  7. Lynn Maguire6

Article first published online: 11 MAR 2011

DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00165.x

Issue

Conservation Letters

Conservation Letters

Volume 4, Issue 2, pages 81–87, April/May 2011

Additional Information

How to Cite

Burgman, M., Carr, A., Godden, L., Gregory, R., McBride, M., Flander, L. and Maguire, L. (2011), Redefining expertise and improving ecological judgment. Conservation Letters, 4: 81–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00165.x

Author Information

  1. 1

    School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia

  2. 2

    CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering, Bellenden St, Crace, Canberra, Australia

  3. 3

    Faculty of Law, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia

  4. 4

    Decision Research, 1160 Devina Drive, Galiano, BC, V6B 2S8, Canada

  5. 5

    Melbourne School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia

  6. 6

    Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Duke, NC, 27708-0328, USA

*Correspondence Mark Burgman, School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia. Tel: +613-8344-7151; Fax: +613-9348-1620. E-mail: markab@unimelb.edu.au

  1. Editor Andrew Knight

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 8 APR 2011
  2. Article first published online: 11 MAR 2011
  3. Accepted manuscript online: 16 FEB 2011 04:35AM EST
  4. Received , 11 May 2010, Accepted, 3 February 2011

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (120K)

References

  • Agrawal, A. (1995) Indigenous and scientific knowledge: some critical comments. http://www.nuffic.nl/ciran/ikdm/3--3/articles/agrawal.html
  • Ayyub, B.M. (2001) Elicitation of expert opinions for uncertainty and risks. CRC Press, Boca Raton .
  • Barley, S.R., Kunda G. (2006) Contracting: a new form of professional practice. Acad Manag Perspect 20, 45–66.
  • Beck, U. (1992) Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage Publications, London .
  • Broks, P. (2006)Understanding popular science. Open University Press, Maidenhead and Philadelphia .
  • Burgman, M.A. (2005) Risks and decisions for conservation and environmental management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge .
  • Campbell, L.M. (2002) Science and sustainable use: views of marine turtle conservation experts. Ecol Appl 12, 1229–1246.
  • Carr, A.J.L. (2004) Why do we all need community science? Soc Nat Resour 17, 1–9.
  • Chaloner, K.M., Church T., Louis T.A., Matts J.P. (1993) Graphical elicitation of a prior distribution for a clinical trial. Statistician 42, 341–353.
  • Chi, M.T.H. (2006) Two approaches to the study of experts’ characteristics. Pages 21–30 in K.A.Ericsson, N.Charness, P.J.Feltovitch & R.R.Hoffman, editors. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge .
  • Christie, E. (1991) The role of law and science in the resolution of disputes over factual evidence. Environ Plan Law J 8, 200–210.
  • Clemen, R., Winkler R. (1999) Combining probability distributions from experts in risk analysis. Risk Anal 19, 187–203.
    Direct Link:
  • Collins, H.M., Evans R. (2007) Rethinking expertise. University of Chicago Press, Chicago .
  • Cooke, R.M. (1991) Experts in uncertainty: opinion and subjective probability in science. Oxford University Press, Oxford .
  • Cooke, R.M., Goossens L.H.J. (2000) Procedures guide for structured expert judgement in accident consequence modelling. Radiat Protect Dosim 90, 303–309.
  • Cruess, S.R., Cruess R.L., Johnston S. (2004) Professionalism for medicine: opportunities and obligations. Iowa Orthop J 24, 9–15.
  • Dawes, R.M. (1994) House of cards: psychology and psychotherapy built on myth. Simon and Schuster, New York .
  • Dryzek, J.S. (2005) Politics of the earth. Oxford University Press, Oxford .
  • Evans, R. (2008) The sociology of expertise: the distribution of social fluency. Sociol Compass 2, 281–298.
    Direct Link:
  • Evatts, J., Mieg H.A., Felt U. (2006) Professionalization, scientific expertise, and elitism: a sociological perspective. Pages 105–123 in K.A.Ericsson, N.Charness, P.J.Feltovitch & R.R.Hoffman, editors. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge .
  • Failing, L., Gregory R., Harstone M. (2007) Integrating science and local knowledge in environmental risk management: a decision-focused approach. Ecol Econ 64, 47–60.
  • Fischhoff, B., Slovic P., Lichtenstein S. (1982) Lay foibles and expert fables in judgements about risk. Am Stat 36, 240–255.
  • Fisk, D. (1998) Environmental science and environmental law. J Environ Law 10, 3–8.
  • Franklin J. (2001) The science of conjecture. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore .
  • Franklin, J., Sisson S.A., Burgman M.A., Martin J.K. (2008) Evaluating extreme risks in invasion ecology: learning from banking compliance. Divers Distributions 14, 581–591.
    Direct Link:
  • Freudenburg, W.R. (1999) Tools for understanding the socioeconomic and political settings for environmental decision making. Pages 94–125 in V.H.Dale & M.R.English, editors. Tools to aid environmental decision making. Springer, New York .
  • Gans, J., Palmer A. (2004) Australian principles of evidence. Routledge Cavendish, Sydney .
  • Garthwaite, P.H., Kadane J.B., O’Hagan A. (2005) Statistical methods for eliciting probability distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 100, 680–700.
  • Gregory, R. (2002) Incorporating value trade-offs into community-based environmental risk decisions. Environ Values 11, 461–468.
  • Gregory, R., Failing L., Ohlson D., McDaniels T. (2006) Some pitfalls of an overemphasis on science in environmental risk management decisions. J Risk Res 9, 717–735.
  • Gregory, J., Miller S. (1998) Science in public: communication, culture and credibility. Plenum Trade, London .
  • Gullet, W. (2000) The precautionary principle in Australia: policy, law and potential precautionary EIAs. Risk Health Saf Environ 11, 93–124.
  • Hart, A. (1986) Knowledge acquisition for expert systems. McGraw-Hill, New York .
  • Hilgartner, S. (1990) The dominant view of popularization: conceptual problems, political uses. Soc Stud Sci 20, 519–539.
  • Hoffrage, U., Gigerenzer G., Krauss S. & Martignon L. (2002) Representation facilitates reasoning: what natural frequencies are and what they are not. Cognition 84, 343–352.
  • Hora S.C. (1992) Acquisition of expert judgment: examples from risk assessment. J Energy Eng 118, 136–48.
  • Irwin, A. (2001) Constructing the scientific citizen: science and democracy in the biosciences. Public Underst Sci 10, 1–18.
  • James, A., Low Choy S., Mengersen K. (2010) Elicitator: an expert elicitation tool for regression in ecology. Environ Model Software 25, 129–145.
  • Jasanoff, S. (2006) Transparency in public science: purposes, reasons, limits. Law Contemp Probl 69, 21.
  • Kadane, J.B., Dickeey J., Winkler R.L., Smith W., Peters S. (1980) Interactive elicitation of opinion for a normal linear model. J Am Stat Assoc 75, 815–885.
  • Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1982) On the study of statistical intuitions. Pages 493–508 in, D.Kahneman, P.Slovic, A.Tversky, editors. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge .
  • Krinitzsky, E.L. (1993) Earthquake probability in engineering—part 1: the use and misuse of expert opinion. Eng Geol 33, 257–288.
  • Lawson, J.D. (1900) The law of expert and opinion evidence, 2nd edition. T.H.Flood, Chicago .
  • Leadbeater, C. (2003) Amateurs: a 21st-century remake. RSA J. Issue 5507, 22–25.
  • MacMillan, D.C., Marshall K. (2006) The Delphi process—an expert-based approach to ecological modelling in data-poor environments. Anim Conserv 9, 11–19.
    Direct Link:
  • Martin, T.G., Kuhnert P.M., Mengersen K., Possingham H.P. (2005) The power of expert opinion in ecological models using Bayesian methods: impact of grazing on birds. Ecol Appl 15, 266–280.
  • Morgan, M.G., Henrion M. (1990) Uncertainty: a guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge .
  • Murphy, A.H., Winkler R.L. (1977) Can weather forecasters formulate reliable probability forecasts of precipitation and temperature? Natl Weather Dig 2, 2–9.
  • Murphy, A.H. (1993) What is a good forecast? An essay on the nature of goodness in weather forecasting. Am Meterol Soc 8, 281–293.
  • O’Brien, M. (2000) Making better environmental decisions: an alternative to risk assessment. MIT Press, Cambridge , MA .
  • O’Hagan, A., Oakley J.E. (2004) Probability is perfect, but we can't elicit it perfectly. Reliability Eng Syst Saf Altern Representations Epistemic Uncertainty 85, 239–48.
  • Patterson, J., Meek M.E., Strawson J.E., Liteplo R.G. (2007) Engaging expert peers in the development of risk assessments. Risk Anal 27, 1609–1621.
    Direct Link:
  • Peel, J. (2005) The precautionary principle in practice: environmental decision-making and scientific uncertainty. Federation Press, Annandale , N.S.W .
  • Preston, B. (2006) The role of public interest environmental litigation. Environ Plann Law J 23, 337–350.
  • Pidgeon, N., Harthorn B., Bryant K., Rogers-Hayden R. (2008) Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the US and UK. Nat Nanotechnol (doi: 10.1038/NNANO.2008.362.)
  • Regan, H.M., Colyvan M., Burgman M.A. (2002) A taxonomy and treatment of uncertainty for ecology and conservation biology. Ecol Appl 12, 618–628.
  • Schum, D., Morris J. (2007) Assessing the competence and credibility of human sources of intelligence evidence: contributions from law and probability. Law Probability Risk 6, 247–274.
  • Shanteau, J. (1992) How much information does an expert use? Is it relevant? Acta Psychol 81, 75–86.
  • Shrader-Frechette, K. (1996) Value judgments in verifying and validating risk assessment models. Pages 291–309 in C.R.Cothern, editor. Handbook for environmental risk decision making: values, perceptions and ethics. CRC Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton .
  • Slovic, P. (1999) Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Anal 19, 689–701.
    Direct Link:
  • Speirs-Bridge, A., Fidler F., McBride M., Flander L., Cumming G., Burgman M. (2010) Reducing over-confidence in the interval judgements of experts. Risk Anal 30, 512–523.
    Direct Link:
  • Stern, P.C., Fineberg H.V., editors (1996) Understanding risk: informing decisions in a demographic society. Committee on Risk Characterisation, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington , DC .
  • Sternberg, R.J., Wagner R.K., Okagaki, L. (1993) Practical intelligence: the nature and role of tacit knowledge in work and at school. Pages 205–227 in J.M.Puckett & H.W.Reese, editor. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale , New Jersey .
  • Verran, H. (2002) Transferring strategies of land management: indigenous land owners and environmental scientists. Research in science and technology studies, knowledge and society. Pages 155–181 Vol. 13, Elsevier & JAI Press, Oxford .
  • Wallsten, T.S., Budescu D.V. (1983) Encoding subjective probabilities—a psychological and psychometric review. Manag Sci 29, 151–173.
  • Wallsten, T., Budescu D., Erev I., Diederich A. (1997) Evaluating and combining subjective probability estimates. J Behav Decis Mak 10, 243–268.
    Direct Link:
  • Walton, D. (1997) Appeal to expert opinion: arguments from authority. Pennsylvania State University Press, Pennsylvania .
  • Walshe, T.V., Burgman M.A. (2010) A framework for assessing and managing risks posed by emerging diseases. Risk Anal 30, 236–249.
    Direct Link:
  • Wintle, B., Burgman M., Fidler F. (2007) How fast should nanotechnology advance? Nat Nanotechnol 2, 327.
  • Wynne, B. (1996) May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. Pages 44–83 in S.Lash, B.Szerszynski & B.Wynne, editors. Risk, environment and modernity: towards a new ecology. Sage Publications, London .
  • Yearley, S. (2000) Making systematic sense of public discontents with expert knowledge: two analytical approaches and a case study. Public Underst Sci 9, 105–122.
View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (120K)