SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • American Bird Conservancy (ABC). (2008) Agency proposes listing two Hawaiian birds on brink of extinction under Endangered Species Act. http://www.abcbirdsorg/newsandreports/releases/080930html (visited Jan. 15, 2011).
  • Ando, A.W. (1999) Waiting to be protected under the Endangered Species Act: the political economy of regulatory delay. J Law Econ 42, 2960.
  • Arroyo, T.P.F., Olson M.E., García-Mendoza A., Solano E. (2009) A GIS-based comparison of the Mexican national and IUCN methods for determining extinction risk. Conserv Biol 23, 11561166.
  • BirdLife International (BLI). (2010) BirdLife International data zone. http://www.birdlife.org/datazone.html (visited Sep. 20, 2010).
  • Bottrill, M.C., Joseph L.N., Carwardine J. et al . (2008) Is conservation triage just smart decision making? Trends Ecol Evol 23, 649–654.
  • Chesser, R.T., Banks R.C., Barker F.K. et al . (2010) Fifty-first supplement to the American Ornithologists’ Union check-list of North American birds. Auk 127, 726744.
  • Davison, G.W.H., Ng P.K.L., Chew H.H. (2008) The Singapore Red Data Book: threatened plants and animals of Singapore. Nature Society (Singapore), Singapore .
  • D’Elia, J., McCarthy S. (2010) Time horizons and extinction risk in endangered species categorization systems. BioScience 60, 751758.
  • de Grammont, P., Cuarón A. (2006) An evaluation of the threatened species categorization systems used on the American continent. Conserv Biol 20, 1427.
  • Dunn, J.L., Alderfer J., editors. (2006) National geographic guide to the birds of North America, 5th edition. National Geographic Society, Washington , D.C .
  • Elphick, C.S., Roberts D.L., Reed J.M. (2010) Estimated dates of recent extinctions for North American and Hawaiian birds. Biol Conserv 143, 617624.
  • General Accounting Office (GAO). (1979) Endangered species: a controversial issue needing resolution. Report to the Congress of the United States, United States General Accounting Office, CED-79–65, Washington, D.C.
  • Greenwald, D.N. (2009) Effects on species’ conservation of reinterpreting the phrase “significant portion of its range” in the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Conserv Biol 23, 13741377.
  • Greenwald, D.N., Suckling K.F., Taylor M. (2006) The listing record. Pages 51–67 in D.D. Goble, J.M. Scott, F.W. Davis, editors. The Endangered Species Act at thirty: renewing the conservation promise. Island Press, Washington , D.C .
  • International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). (2001) IUCN Red List categories and criteria. Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland , Switzerland and Cambridge , UK . http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/categories-and-criteria/2001-categories-criteria (visited Nov. 8, 2008).
  • International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN). (2009) IUCN Red List of threatened species. Version 2009.2. World Conservation Union, Gland , Switzerland and Cambridge , UK . http://www.iucnredlist.org (visited Jul. 15, 2010).
  • Laband, D.N., Nieswiadomy M. (2006) Factors affecting species’ risk of extinction: an empirical analysis of ESA and NatureServe listings. Contemporary Econ Pol 24, 160171.
  • Lamoreux, J., Akçakaya H.R., Bennun L. et al . (2003) Value of the IUCN Red List. Trends Ecol Evol 18, 214215.
  • Mace, G.M., Collar N.J., Gaston K.J. et al . (2008) Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN's system for classifying threatened species. Conserv Biol 22, 14241442.
  • McMillan, M., Wilcove D.S. (1994) Gone but not forgotten: why have species protected by the Endangered Species Act become extinct? Endangered Species Update 11, 5–6.
  • Miller, J.K., Scott J.M., Miller C.R., Waits L.P. (2002) The Endangered Species Act: dollars and sense? BioScience 52, 163168.
  • Miller, R.M., Rodríguez J.P., Aniskowicz-Fowler T. et al . (2007) National threatened species listing based on IUCN criteria and regional guidelines: current status and future perspectives. Conserv Biol 21, 684696.
  • NatureServe. (2005) NatureServe central databases. NatureServe, Arlington , VA .
  • O’Grady, J.J., Burgman M.A., Keith D.A. et al . (2004) Correlations among extinction risks assessed by different systems of threatened species categorization. Conserv Biol 18, 16241635.
  • Possingham, H.P., Andelman S.J., Burgman M.A., Medellín R.A., Master L.L., Keith D.A. (2002) Limits to the use of threatened species lists. Trends Ecol Evol 17, 503507.
  • Pratt, H.D. (2005) The Hawaiian honeycreepers: Drepanidinae. Oxford University Press, Oxford , UK .
  • Pyle, R.L. (2002) Checklist of the birds of Hawaii. Elepaio 62, 137148.
  • Regan, T.J., Burgman M.A., McCarthy M.A. et al . (2005) The consistency of extinction risk classification protocols. Conserv Biol 19, 19691977.
  • Rodrigues, A.S.L., Pilgrim J.D., Lamoreux J.F., Hoffmann M., Brooks T.M. (2006) The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 21, 7176.
  • Rodríguez, J.P. (2008) National Red Lists: the largest global market for IUCN Red List categories and criteria. Endangered Species Res 6, 193198.
  • Schipper, J., Chanson J.S., Chiozza F. et al . (2008) The status of the world's land and marine mammals: diversity, threat, and knowledge. Science 322, 225230.
  • Schwartz, M.W. (2008) The performance of the Endangered Species Act. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 39, 279299.
  • Scott, J.M., Goble D.D., Svancara L.K., Pidgorna A. (2006) By the numbers. Pages 1635 in D.D. Goble, J.M. Scott, F.W. David, editors. The Endangered Species Act at thirty: renewing the conservation promise. Island Press , Washington , D.C .
  • Stokstad, E. (2005) What's wrong with the Endangered Species Act? Science 309, 21502152.
  • Stokstad, E. (2007) Endangered Species Act: appointee ‘reshaped’ science, says report. Science 316, 37.
  • Suckling, K.F., Slack R., Nowicki B. (2004) Extinction and the Endangered Species Act. Unpublished report, Center for Biological Diversity, San Francisco , CA .
  • Taylor, M.F.J., Suckling K.F., Rachlinski J.J. (2005) The effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act: a quantitative analysis. BioScience 55, 360367.
  • Traill, L.W., Brook B.W., Frankham R.R., Bradshaw C.J.A. (2010) Pragmatic population viability targets in a rapidly changing world. Biol Conserv 143, 2834.
  • US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). (2006) 12-month finding on a petition to list the cerulean warbler (Dendroica cerulea) as threatened with critical habitat. Federal Register 71, 7071770733.
  • US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). (2009a) Listing a species as threatened or endangered. USFWS Endangered Species Program, Washington D.C . http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/listing.pdf (visited Jul. 15, 2010).
  • US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). (2009b) Species information. USFWS Endangered Species Program, Washington , D.C . http://www.fws.gov/Endangered/wildlife.html (visited Dec. 2009).
  • US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). (2011) Budget justifications and performance information, fiscal year 2012. U.S. Department of Interior, Washington , D.C .
  • Western Governors Association (WGA). (2011) Sagegrouse and sagebrush conservation. Policy resolution 11–9. http://www.westgov.org/component/joomdoc/doc_download/1443--11-9 (visited Oct. 1, 2011).
  • Wilcove, D.S., Master L.L. (2005) How many endangered species are there in the United States? Front Ecol Environ 3, 414420.
  • Wilcove, D.S., McMillan M., Winston K.C. (1993) What exactly is an endangered species? An analysis of the U.S. Endangered Species List: 1985–1991. Conserv Biol 7, 8793.
  • Zamin, T.J., Baillie J.E.M., Miller R.M., Rodríguez J.P., Ardid A., Collen B. (2010) National red listing beyond the 2010 target. Conserv Biol 24, 10121020.