SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ackerly, D.D., Loarie, S.R., Cornwell, W.K. et al . (2010) The geography of climate change: implications for conservation biogeography. Divers Distrib 16, 476487.
  • Beier, P., Majka, D.R., Spencer, W.D. (2008) Forks in the road: choices in procedures for designing wildland linkages. Conserv Biol 22(4), 836851.
  • Beier, P. W., Spencer, R.F. Baldwin  , McRae, B.H. (2011) Toward best practices for developing regional connectivity maps. Conser Biol 25(5), 879892.
  • Bennett, A.F. (2003). Linkages in the Landscape: The Role of Corridors and Connectivity in Wildlife Conservation. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge , UK. xiv + 254 pp.
  • Bierwagen, B., Theobald, D.M., Pyke, C.R. et al . (2010) National housing and impervious surface scenarios for integrated climate impact assessments. PNAS 107(49), 2088720892.
  • Borgatti, S.P. (2005) Centrality and network flow. Soc Netw 27, 5571.
  • Butchart, S.H.M. et al . (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328, 11641168.
  • Butts, C.T. (2009) Revisiting the foundations of network analysis. Science 325, 414416.
  • Carroll, C., McRae, B., Brookes, A. In press. Use of linkage mapping and centrality analysis across habitat gradients to conserve connectivity of gray wolf populations in western North America. Conserv Biol.
  • Chetkiewicz, C.L.B., Clair, C.C. St., Boyce, M.S. (2006) Corridors for conservation: integrating pattern and process. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 37, 317342.
  • Circuitscape (2011) Circuitscape FAQ: how large of a landscape can I analyze with Circuitscape? Available from: http://www.circuitscape.org/Circuitscape/FAQ.html Accessed 4 September, 2011.
  • Connectivity Analysis Toolkit (2011) Online documentation: system requirements. Available from: http://www.connectivitytools.org, Access 4 September 2011.
  • Copeland, H.E., Doherty, K.E., Naugle, D.E., Pocewicz, A., Kiesecker, J.M. (2009) Mapping oil and gas development potential in the US intermountain west and estimating impacts to species. PLoS ONE 4(1), e7400.
  • Crooks, K.R., Sanjayan, M.A., editors. (2006) Connectivity conservation, New York , Cambridge University Press
  • Cushman, S.A., McKelvey, K.S., Schwartz, M.K. (2008) Use of empirically derived source-destination models to map regional conservation corridors. Conserv Biol 23(2), 368376.
  • Dale, M.R.T., Fortin, M.J. (2010) From graphs to spatial graphs. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 41, 2138.
  • Elvidge, C.D., Baugh, K.E., Dietz, J.B., Bland, T., Sutton, P.C., Kroehl, H.W. (1999) Radiance calibration of DMSP-OLS low-light imaging data of human settlements. Remote Sens Environ 68, 7788.
  • Fahrig, L., Rytwinski, T. (2009). Effects of roads on animal abundance: an empirical review and synthesis. Ecol Soc 14(1), 21. [online] Available from: http//www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art21/
  • Fancy, S.G., Gross, J.E., Carter, S.L. (2008) Monitoring the condition of natural resources in US National Parks. Environ Monit Assess 151, 161174.
  • Foley, J.A., DeFries, R., Asner, G.P., et al . (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309, 570574. doi: 10.1126/science.1111772
  • Forman, R.T.T., Sperling, D., Bissonette, J.A. et al . (2003) Road ecology: science and solutions. Washington , DC : Island Press.
  • GlobCover (2010) GlobCover 2009 Product Description Manual. Available from:http://ionia1.esrin.esa.int/
  • Heller, N.E., Zavaleta, E.S. (2009) Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: A review of 22 years of recommendations. Biol Conserv 142(1), 1432.
  • Hilty, J.A., Lidicker, W.Z., Merenlender, A.M. (2006). Corridor ecology: The science and practice of linking landscapes for biodiversity conservation. Washington , DC : Island Press.
  • Jacquez, G.M., Fortin, M.J., Goovaerts, P. (2008) Preface to the special issue on spatial statistics for boundar and patch analysis. Environ Ecol Stat 15, 365267.
  • Jantz, P., Goetz, S. (2008) Using widely available geospatial datasets to assess the influence of roads and buffers on habitat core areas and connectivity. Nat Area J 28(3), 261274.
  • Kindlmann, P., Burel, F. (2008) Connectivity measures: a review. Landscape Ecol 23, 879890.
  • Kupfer, J.A., Malanson, G.P., Franklin, S.B. (2006) Not seeing the ocean for the islands: the mediating influence of matrix-based processes on forest fragmentation effects. Global Ecol Biogeogr 15, 820.
  • Leinwand, IIF, Theobald, D.M., Mitchell, J., Knight, R.L. (2010) Landscape dynamics at the public-private interface: A case study in Colorado. Landscape and Urban Plan 97(3), 182193.
  • McGarigal, K., Tagil, S., Cushman, S.A.. (2009) Surface metrics: an alternative to patch metrics for the quantification of landscape structure. Landscape Ecol 24, 433450.
  • McRae, B.H. (2006) Isolation by resistance. Evolution 60(8), 15511561.
  • Pinto, N., Keitt, T.H. (2009) Beyond the least-cost path: evaluating corridor redundancy using a graph-theoretic approach. Landscape Ecol 24(2), 253266.
  • Pullinger, M.G., Johnson, C.J. (2010) Maintaining or restoring connectivity of modified landscapes: evaluating the least-cost path model with multiple sources of ecological information. Landscape Ecol 25(10), 15471560.
  • Rayfield, B., Fortin, M-J., Fall, A. (2011) Connectivity for conservation: a framework to classify network measures. Ecology 92(4), 847858.
  • Rouget, M., Cowling, R.M., Lombard, A.T., Knight, A.T., Kerley, G.H. (2006) Designing large-scale conservation corridors for pattern and process. Conserv Biol 20, 549561.
  • Sapoval, B., Rosso, M. (1995) Gradient percolation and fractal frontiers in image processing. Fractals 3(1), 2331.
  • Saura, S, Estreguil, C., Mouton, C., Rodriguez-Freire, M (2011) Network analysis to assess landscape connectivity trends: Application to European forests (1990–2000). Ecol Indicators 11, 407416.
  • Singleton, P.H., Gaines, W.L., Lehmkuhl, J.F. (2002) Landscape permeability for large carnivores in Washington: a geographic information system weighted-distance and least-cost corridor assessment. Research Paper N-549. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland , Oregon .
  • Soulé, M.E., Terborgh, J. (1999) Conserving nature at regional and continental scales: a scientific program for North America. BioScience 49(10), 809817.
  • Spencer, W.D., Beier, P., Penrod, K. et al . (2010) California essential habitat connectivity project: a strategy for conserving a connected California. Prepared for California Department of Transportation, California Department of Fish and Game, and Federal Highways Administration.
  • Taylor, P. D., Fahrig, L., Henein, K., Merriam, G. (1993) Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 68, 571573.
  • Theobald, D.M. (2005) Landscape patterns of exurban growth in the USA from 1980 to 2020. Ecol Soc 10(1), 32. [online] Available from:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art32/.
  • Theobald, D.M. (2010) Estimating changes in natural landscapes from 1992 to 2030 for the conterminous United States. Landscape Ecol 25(7), 9991011.
  • Theobald, D.M. (2006) Exploring the functional connectivity of landscapes using landscape networks. Pages 416443 in Crooks, K.R. and M.A. Sanjayan, editors. Connectivity conservation: maintaining connections for nature. Cambridge University Press.
  • Theobald, D.M., Crooks K.R., Norman J.B. (2011) Assessing effects of land use on landscape connectivity: loss and fragmentation of western U.S. forests. Ecol Appl 21(7), 24452458.
  • Urban, D.L., Keitt, T.H. (2001) Landscape connectedness: a graph theoretic perspective. Ecology 82, 12051218.
  • Urban, D.L., Minor, E.S., Treml, E.A., Schick, R.S. (2009) Graph models of habitat mosaics. Ecol Lett 12, 260273.
  • US Department of Transportation (USDOT). (2009) National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD) 2009 CD. Research and Innovative Technology Administration/Bureau of Transportation Statistics. January 2007.
  • US Geological Survey (USGS) Gap Analysis Program. (2010) National land cover, version 1.
  • Walker, R., Craighead, L. (1997). Analysis of wildlife movement corridors in Montana using GIS. Proceedings of the 1997 ESRI Users conference, San Diego , CA .
  • Washington Wildlife Habitat Connectivity Working Group (WHCWG). (2010) Washington Connected Landscapes Project: Statewide Analysis. Olympia , WA : Washington Departments of Fish and Wildlife, and Transportation.
  • Worboys, G.L., Francis, W.L., Lockwood, M. (2010) Connectviity conservation management: a global guide. Earthscan , Canberra , Australia , 480 pp.