Editor David Lindenmayer
Does Indonesia's REDD+ moratorium on new concessions spare imminently threatened forests?
Version of Record online: 10 APR 2012
©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Volume 5, Issue 3, pages 222–231, June 2012
How to Cite
Sloan, S., Edwards, D. P. and Laurance, W. F. (2012), Does Indonesia's REDD+ moratorium on new concessions spare imminently threatened forests?. Conservation Letters, 5: 222–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00233.x
- Issue online: 15 JUN 2012
- Version of Record online: 10 APR 2012
- Accepted manuscript online: 19 MAR 2012 07:03AM EST
- Received , 9 December 2011, Accepted, 7 March 2012
- forest carbon;
In May 2010, Indonesia signed a $1-billion partnership with Norway to reduce deforestation and prepare for a global REDD+ scheme (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation). A pillar of the pact is a moratorium on new agricultural and logging licenses in ∼535,294 km2 of species-rich dryland forest and ∼153,984 km2 of carbon-rich peatlands. A critical question is whether these moratorium areas constitute "additional" conservation. We test whether dryland forests and peatlands within moratorium areas differ from unprotected forest and recently cleared forest on a range of biophysical, economic, and agricultural attributes indicative of forest threat. Compared to other forests, dryland moratorium forests are significantly more marginal economically, less physically accessible, more removed from forest disruption, and more sheltered from encroachment, such that their "conservation" achieves little additional prevention of forest loss and carbon emissions. Peatland moratorium areas are, however, a conservation success insofar as they are indistinguishable from unprotected peatland and encompass the majority of remaining peatland area, much of which is vulnerable to future conversion.