Reproducibility of viscoelastic property and intraocular pressure measurements obtained with the Ocular Response Analyzer
Article first published online: 25 AUG 2010
© 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 Acta Ophthalmol
Volume 89, Issue 3, pages e225–e230, May 2011
How to Cite
Kopito, R., Gaujoux, T., Montard, R., Touzeau, O., Allouch, C., Borderie, V. and Laroche, L. (2011), Reproducibility of viscoelastic property and intraocular pressure measurements obtained with the Ocular Response Analyzer. Acta Ophthalmologica, 89: e225–e230. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.01957.x
- Issue published online: 18 APR 2011
- Article first published online: 25 AUG 2010
- Received on November 16th, 2009. Accepted April 20th, 2010.
- corneal resistance factor;
- intraocular pressure;
Purpose: To analyse the reproducibility of corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg) and corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) obtained with the ocular response analyzer (ORA).
Methods: This is a prospective study, nonmasked, of eight successive examinations with the ORA device in 60 normal eyes. Using 30 eyes (one eye per subject), the reproducibility was assessed by comparing the first series of four examinations to the second four and by calculating the within-subject coefficient of variation. The correlation and difference with the fellow eye were analysed, respectively.
Results: The mean values were 10.7 ± 1.8 mmHg, CRF; 10.6 ± 1.6 mmHg, CH; 15.9 ± 3.9 mmHg, IOPg and 16.2 ± 3.7 mmHg, IOPcc. The reproducibility was significantly different for CRF (5.2 ± 5.9%), CH (7.3 ± 8.6%), IOPg (7.7 ± 6.7%) and IOPcc (10.1 ± 8.0%); p < 0.001. Considering the reproducibility, CRF correlated with CH (rs = 0.55; p < 0.001) and showed to be independent of IOPg and IOPcc. The score spread was best for CRF (2.6 ± 1.5 mmHg; 24.0%) compared to IOPg (4.3 ± 1.5 mmHg; 28.1%) and CH (3.1 ± 1.7 mmHg; 29.9%) and worst for IOPcc (5.5 ± 2.5 mmHg; 34.4%). The lowest difference with the fellow eye was observed for CRF (5.0%; p = 0.09). The correlation with the fellow eye was high, especially for IOPcc and CRF (rs > 0.9; p < 0.001) followed by IOPg and CH (rs > 0.8; p < 0.001).
Conclusion: The ORA device provides reproducible information on viscoelastic properties of the cornea in normal eyes notably CRF and CH. IOPcc was less reproducible. Four measurements per eye were necessary to reach a 10% precision and six for 5%.