We thank Hans Degryse, Geert Dhaene, Ulrich Kaiser, Francine Lafontaine, Martin Pesendorfer, Patrick Rey, Howard Smith, Patrick Van Cayseele, three anonymous referees, and the editor and participants at several seminars and conferences for helpful comments. We are particularly grateful to Jan Bouckaert for help in obtaining the data set and for useful discussions at an early stage of this project.
Vertical control of a distribution network—an empirical analysis of magazines
Version of Record online: 28 MAR 2012
© 2012, RAND.
The RAND Journal of Economics
Volume 43, Issue 1, pages 26–50, Spring 2012
How to Cite
Ferrari, S. and Verboven, F. (2012), Vertical control of a distribution network—an empirical analysis of magazines. The RAND Journal of Economics, 43: 26–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2011.00156.x
- Issue online: 28 MAR 2012
- Version of Record online: 28 MAR 2012
How does an upstream firm determine the size of its distribution network, and what is the role of vertical restraints? To address these questions, we develop two empirical entry models. In the benchmark coordinated entry model, the upstream firm sets market-specific wholesale prices and implements the first best. In the more realistic restricted/free entry model, the upstream firm only sets a uniform wholesale price. As a second-best solution, it restricts entry in markets where business stealing (encroachment) is high, and allows free entry elsewhere. We apply the model to magazine distribution, and assess the profitability of alternative vertical restraints. Banning restricted licensing reduces profits only slightly, so the business rationale for restricted licensing should not be sought in the prevention of encroachment. Furthermore, market-specific wholesale prices implement the first best, but the profit increase would be small, providing a rationale for the commonly observed uniform wholesale prices. Finally, uniform franchise fees are much less effective than a uniform wholesale price to cope with local market differences.