SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alexander, R. D., & Noonan, K. M. (1979). Concealment of ovulation, parental care, and human social evolution. In N.Chagnon & W.Irons (Eds.), Evolutionary biology and human social behavior (pp. 436453). Scituate, ME: Duxbury Press.
  • Amato, P. R. (2000). The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 12691287.
  • Amato, P. R. (2004). Tension between institutional and individual views of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 959965.
  • Amato, P. R., Booth, A., Johnson, D. R., & Rogers, S. J. (2007). Alone together: How marriage in America is changing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Amato, P. R., Johnson, D. R., Booth, A., & Rogers, S. J. (2003). Continuity and change in marital quality between 1980 and 2000. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 123.
  • Berg, J. H. van den (1963). Metabletica of de leer der verandering [Metabletica or the study of change]. Netherlands: Nijkerk-Callenbach.
  • Berger, P. L., & Kellner, H. (1965). Arnold Gehlen and the theory of institutions. Social Research, 32, 110115.
  • Berger, P. L., & Kellner, H. (1972). Marriage and the construction of reality. In H. P.Dreitzel (Ed.), Recent sociology: No. 2 (pp. 5073). New York: MacMillan.
  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. New York: Anchor Books.
  • Broderick, C. (1993). Understanding family process. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Cherlin, A. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848861.
  • Climo, J. J., & Cattell, M. G. (Eds.). (2002). Social memory and history. New York: Altamira Press.
  • Connerton, P. (1989). How societies remember. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cott, N. F. (2000). Public vows. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Deacon, T. W. (1997). The symbolic species. The co-evolution of language and the brain. New York: W. W. Norton.
  • Demo, D. H., Allen, K. R., & Fine, M. A. (Eds). (2000). Handbook of family diversity. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Diamond, J. (1992). The third chimpanzee. New York: Harper Perennial.
  • Douglas, M. (1986). How institutions think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
  • Durkheim, E. (1950). The rules of sociological method. New York: The Free Press.
  • Durkheim, E. (1961). The elementary forms of the religious life. New York: Collier Books.
  • Ekeland, I. (1993). The broken dice and other mathematical tales of chance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Elias, N. (1982). Power and civility. New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Finch, J., & Mason, J. (1993). Negotiating family responsibilities. New York: Tavistock/Routledge.
  • Gillis, J. R. (1996). A world of their own making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Goldberg, C. (1991). Von der Ehe als Institution zur individuellen Partnerschaft? [From marriage as institution to individual partnership?] Zeitschrift fur Soziologie, 20, 323333.
  • Gough, K. (1971). The origin of the family. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 33, 760770.
  • Greimas, A. J. (1987). On meaning: Selected writings in semiotic theory. London: Francis Pinter.
  • Hacking, I. (2002). Historical ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Hawkins, A. J., Wardle, L. D., & Coolidge, D. O.(Eds.). (2002). Revitalizing the institution of marriage for the twenty-first century. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Hdry, S. B. (1999). Mother nature: A history of mothers, infants, and natural selection. New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Johnson, G. (1995). Fire in the mind: Science, faith, and the search for order. New York: Vintage Books.
  • Kellert, S. H. (1993). In the wake of chaos. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kenneally, C. (2007). The first word: The search for the origins of language. New York: Viking.
  • Luhmann, N. (1987). The evolutionary differentiation between society and interaction. In J. C.Alexander, B.Giesen, R.Munch, & B.Smelser (Eds.), The micro-macro link (pp. 112131). Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Luhmann, N. (2000). The reality of the mass media. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Malinowski, B. & Briffault, R. (1956). What is a family? In M. F. A.Montague (Ed.), Marriage: Past and present. A debate between Robert Briffault and Bronislaw Malinowski (pp. 4052). Boston: Porter Sargent.
  • Manning, W. D., Longmore, M. A., & Giordano, P. C. (2007). The changing institution of marriage: Adolescents’ expectations to cohabit and to marry. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 559575.
  • Mason, M. A., Skolnick, A., & Sugarman, S. D.(Eds.).(1998). All our families. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • McWhorter, J. (2003). The power of Babel. A natural history of language. New York: Perennial.
  • Milardo, R. M. (2000). The decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 873875.
  • Milardo, R. M., & Duck, S.(Eds.). (2000). Families as relationships. London: Wiley.
  • Patterson, C. J. (2000). Family relationships of lesbians and gay men. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 10521067.
  • Peirce, C. S. (1898). The first rule of Logic. In K. L.Ketner (Ed.), Reasoning and the logic of things: The Cambridge Conferences Lectures of 1898 (p. 177). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. London: Alan Lane.
  • Popenoe, D. (2002). A marriage-research agenda for the twenty-first century: Ten critical questions. In A. J.Hawkins, L. D.Wardle, & D. O.Coolidge (Eds.), Revitalizing the institution of marriage for the twenty-first century (pp. 195205). Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Reynolds, V. (1968). Kinship and the family in monkeys, apes and man. Man, 3, 209223.
  • Riverside Publishing Company. (1984). Webster's II new Riverside university dictionary. Boston: Riverside.
  • Schelling, T. C. (1978). Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York: Norton.
  • Schneider, D. M. (1968). American kinship: A cultural account. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Sclater, D. S. (2000). Families. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
  • Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Skolnick, A. (1991). Embattled paradise. New York: Basic Books.
  • Sprey, J. (2000). Theorizing in family studies: Discovering process. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1832.
  • Stacey, J. (2000). The handbook's tail: Toward revels or a requiem for family diversity? In D. H.Demo, K. R.Allen, & M. A.Fine (Eds.), Handbook of family diversity (pp. 424439). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Stewart, I. (1989). Does God play dice? The mathematics of chaos. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
  • Strauss, A. (1934). The social psychology of George Herbert Mead. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Tilly, C. (2000). How do relations store histories? Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 721723.
  • Tolstoy, L. N. (1978). Anna Karenina. New York: Penguin Books. (Orginal work published 1874).
  • Van Horn, R. C., Engh, A. L., Scribner, K. T., Funk, S. M., and Holekamp, K. E. (2004). Behavioural structuring of relatedness in the spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta) suggests direct fitness benefits of clan-level cooperation. Molecular Ecology, 13, 449458.
  • Widmer, E., Le Goff, J. M., & Levy, R. (2006). Embedded parenting? The influence of conjugal networks on parent-child relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 387406.
  • Zucker, L. G. (1991). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. In W. W.Powell & P. J.DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 83107). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.