SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

  • 1
    Anon. Education section – choosing the comparison. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine 2010; 3: 134135.
  • 2
    Anon. Education section – Choosing the right outcome measures. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine 2010; 3: 188189.
  • 3
    Anon. Education section – Choosing the right size for the study. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine 2010; 3: 232233.
  • 4
    Yusuf S, Held P, Teo KK, Toretsky ER. Selection of patients for randomized controlled trials: implications of wide or narrow eligibility criteria. Statistics in Medicine 1990; 9: 7386.
  • 5
    Peto R, Baigent C. Trials: the next 50 years. Large scale randomised evidence of moderate benefits. BMJ 1998; 317: 11701171.
  • 6
    International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005; 366(9488): 809817.
  • 7
    Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Birks J, Ramzi N, Yarnold J, Sneade M, Rischmiller J, ISAT Collaborators. Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death, or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): long-term follow-up. Lancet Neurology 2009; 8(5): 427433.
  • 8
    Van Der Schaaf I, Algra A, Wermer M, Molyneux A, Clarke M, van Gijn J, Rinkel G. Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD003085.