Diagnostic test of rifampicin resistance in mycobacterium tuberculosis: a meta-analysis
Version of Record online: 1 MAR 2011
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd and Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University
Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
Volume 4, Issue 1, pages 15–21, February 2011
How to Cite
MA, B., Qi, G.-q., Li, H.-m., ZHU, B.-d. and YANG, K.-h. (2011), Diagnostic test of rifampicin resistance in mycobacterium tuberculosis: a meta-analysis. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 4: 15–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-5391.2011.01117.x
- Issue online: 1 MAR 2011
- Version of Record online: 1 MAR 2011
- Accepted manuscript online: 10 FEB 2011 04:08AM EST
- Received 8 December 2010; accepted for publication 21 January 2011.
- Mycobacterium tuberculosis;
- Systematic review;
- Non-radioactive mycobacterium culture system
Objective To evaluate available evidence on the diagnostic value of radioactivity-free cultivation and detection technologies for rapid detection of rifampicin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Methods A fully recursive literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Biosis, Web of Science (all 1990–2010), CBMWeb (1978–2010), and Google Scholar. QUADAS items were used to evaluate the quality of included studies. Sensitivity, specificity, Summary receiver-operating curve SEN, SPE, SROC, and related techniques were used to assess the diagnostic value of radioactivity-free Mycobacterium tuberculosis cultivation and detection technologies.
Results Six studies were included in the final analysis. The MB/BacT, BACTEC MGIT 960, and Manual MGIT systems were highly sensitive and specific for detecting rifampicin-resistant TB. The summary SEN and summary SPE of the MB/BacT and BACTEC MGIT 960 systems were 100%, 99%, 100%, and 96%, respectively. The SROC of the BACTEC MGIT 960 system was 0.9943.
Conclusion We recommended that the BACTEC 460 system be replaced by MB/BacT or BACTEC MGIT 960 as the final diagnostic test for rifampicin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. More studies are needed on the diagnostic value of other radioactivity-free cultivation and detection technologies to reliably determine their sensitivity and specificity for this bacterium.