SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Sutton AJ, Song F, Gilbody SM, Abrams KR. Modelling publication bias in meta-analyses: a review. Stat Methods Med Res 2000; 9: 42145.
  • 2
    Burrett JA. Identification of randomized trials for inclusion in meta-analyses of treatments for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, and investigation of factors leading to publication bias. PhD thesis.Open University, Department of Statistics; 2003.
  • 3
    Burrett JA, Clarke MJ. A descriptive study of randomized trials of treatments for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol 2002; 118: 98690.
  • 4
    Clarke MJ, Stewart LA. Obtaining data from randomized controlled trials: how much do we need to perform reliable and informative meta-analyses? BMJ 1994; 309: 100710.
  • 5
    Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group: Treatment of Early Breast Cancer. Volume 1. Worldwide Evidence 1985–1990. Oxford : Oxford University Press; 1990.
  • 6
    Childhood ALL Collaborative Group: International Register of Current Randomized Trials in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia. Oxford : Clinical Trial Service Unit; 2001.
  • 7
    Childhood ALL Collaborative Group: Duration and intensity of maintenance chemotherapy in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: overview of 42 trials involving 12 000 randomized children. Lancet 1996; 347: 17838.
  • 8
    Djulbegovic B, Clarke M. Scientific and ethical issues in equivalence trials. JAMA 2001; 285(9): 12068.
  • 9
    Institute for Scientific Information: Journal Citation Reports 1995 Science Edition [http://wos.mimas.ac.uk/jcrweb/] (2000–05-11)
  • 10
    Liebeskind DS, Kidwell CS, Saver JL. Empiric evidence of publication bias affecting acute stroke clinical trials. Stroke 1999; 30(1): 92.
  • 11
    Misakian AL, Bero LA. Publication Bias and Research on Passive Smoking. Comparison of Published and Unpublished Studies. JAMA 1998; 280(3): 2503.
  • 12
    Cheng K, Preston C, Ashby D, O’Hea U, Smyth RL. Time to publication as full reports of abstracts of randomized controlled trials in cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol 1998; 26(2): 1015.
  • 13
    Stern JM, Simes RJ. Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects. BMJ 1997; 315: 6405.
  • 14
    Handysides S. CDR Review's editorial process: a survey of papers published in 1995. Commun Dis Rep CDR Review 1996; 6(12): R1768.
  • 15
    Dickersin K, Min YI. NIH clinical trials and publication bias. Online J Curr Clin Trials 1993; Doc No 50.
  • 16
    Chew FS. Fate of manuscripts rejected for publication in the AJR. Am J Roentgenol 1991; 156(3): 627632.
  • 17
    Ioannidis JPA. Effect of the Statistical Significance of Results on the Time to Completion and Publication of Randomized Efficacy Trials. JAMA 1998; 279(4): 2816.
  • 18
    Hopewell S, Clarke M, Stewart L, Tierney J. Time to publication for results of clinical trials. The Cochrane Database of Methodology Reviews 2001, Issue 3: Art. No.: MR000011. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000011.
  • 19
    Scherer RW, Langenberg P, von Elm E. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. The Cochrane Database of Methodology Reviews 2005, Issue 2. Art. No.: MR000005. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000005.pub2.