SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Allman, J. M. (1999). Evolving brains. New York: Scientific American Library, distributed by W.H. Freeman.
  • Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
  • Bates, E. A. (2004). Explaining and interpreting deficits in language development across clinical groups: Where do we go from here? Brain and Language, 88 (2), 248253.
  • Bates, E., Elman, J., Johnson, M., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1998). Innateness and emergentism. In W.Bechtel, & G.Graham (Eds.), A companion to cognitive science (pp. xvii, 791). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Bellugi, U., Lichtenberger, L., Jones, W., Lai, Z., & St. George, M. (2000). I. The neurocognitive profile of Williams syndrome: A complex pattern of strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 (Suppl. 1), 729.
  • Bouchard Jr., T. J. (1994). Genes, environment, and personality. Science, 264 (5166), 17001701.
  • Brown, D. E. (1991). Human universals. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Carr, H. (1917). Maze studies with the white rat. Journal of Animal Behavior, 7 (4), 259275.
  • Carroll, S. B., Grenier, J. K., & Weatherbee, S. D. (2001). From DNA to diversity: Molecular genetics and the evolution of animal design. Oxford; Malden, MA: Blackwell Science.
  • Carruthers, P. (2006). The architecture of the mind: Massive modularity and the flexibility of thought. Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.
  • Chater, N., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Yuille, A. (2006). Probabilistic models of cognition: conceptual foundations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10 (7), 287291.
  • Cherniak, C. (1986). Minimal rationality. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Chomsky, N. A. (1959). Review of verbal behavior. Language, 35, 2658.
  • Colledge, E., Bishop, D. V., Koeppen-Schomerus, G., Price, T. S., Happe, F. G., Eley, T. C., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2002). The structure of language abilities at 4 years: A twin study. Developmental Psychology, 38 (5), 749757.
  • Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J.Barkow, J.Tooby, & L.Cosmides (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 163228). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1994). Origins of domain specificity: The evolution of functional organization. In L. A.Hirschfeld & S. A.Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 85116). Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24 (1), 87114; discussion 114185.
  • Crain, S. (1991). Language acquisition in the absence of experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 597650.
  • Damoiseaux, J. S., Rombouts, S. A., Barkhof, F., Scheltens, P., Stam, C. J., Smith, S. M., & Beckmann, C. F. (2006). Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103 (37), 1384813853.
  • Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species. London: Murray.
  • Dawkins, R. (1982). The extended phenotype: The gene as the unit of selection. Oxford; San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
  • Ehrlich, P. R. (2000). Human natures: Genes, cultures, and the human prospect. Washington, DC: Island Press/Shearwater Books.
  • Elman, J. L., Bates, E., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Ferreira, M. B., Garcia-Marques, L., Sherman, S. J., & Sherman, J. W. (2006). Automatic and controlled components of judgment and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91 (5), 797813.
  • Fisher, S. E., & Marcus, G. F. (2006). The eloquent ape: Genes, brains and the evolution of language. Nature Reviews. Genetics, 7 (1), 920.
  • Fodor, J. A. (1983). Modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition, 28, 371.
  • Frey, M. C., & Detterman, D. K. (2004). Scholastic assessment or g? The relationship between the Scholastic Assessment Test and general cognitive ability Psychological Science, 15 (6), 373378.
    Direct Link:
  • Gardner, H. (1985). The mind’s new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York: Basic Books.
  • Gerhart, J., & Kirschner, M. (1997). Cells, embryos, and evolution. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Science.
  • Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103 (4), 650669.
  • Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (2002). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox (1st MIT Press paperback ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Godden, D. R., & Baddeley, A. D. (1975). Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: On land and underwater. British Journal of Psychology, 66 (3), 325331.
  • Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). The resilience of language: What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language. New York: Psychology Press.
  • Goldin-Meadow, S., & Mylander, C. (1998). Spontaneous sign systems created by deaf children in two cultures. Nature, 391 (6664), 279281.
  • Gordon, P. (2004). Numerical cognition without words: Evidence from Amazonia. Science, 306 (5695), 496499.
  • Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2006). Optimal predictions in everyday cognition. Psychological Science, 17 (9), 767773.
    Direct Link:
  • Hasson, U., Nir, Y., Levy, I., Fuhrmann, G., & Malach, R. (2004). Intersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision. Science, 303 (5664), 16341640.
  • Hill, E. L. (2001). Non-specific nature of specific language impairment: A review of the literature with regard to concomitant motor impairments. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 36 (2), 149171.
  • Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science, 286 (5449), 25262528.
  • Jacob, F. (1977). Evolution and tinkering. Science, 196, 11611166.
  • Jacob, F., & Monod, J. (1961). On the regulation of gene activity. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology, 26, 193211.
  • Jarvella, R. J. (1971). Syntactic processing of connected speech. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 409416.
  • Johnson, S. C., & Carey, S. (1998). Knowledge enrichment and conceptual change in folkbiology: Evidence from Williams syndrome. Cognitive Psychology, 37 (2), 156200.
  • Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 6099.
  • Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58 (9), 697720.
  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kanwisher, N. (2000). Domain specificity in face perception. Nature Neuroscience, 3 (8), 759763.
  • Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2000). Why babies’ brains are not Swiss army knives. In H.Rose & S. P. R.Rose (Eds.), Alas, poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology (pp. 144156). London: Jonathan Cape.
  • Kim, J. J., Marcus, G. F., Pinker, S., Hollander, M., & Coppola, M. (1994). Sensitivity of children’s inflection to grammatical structure. Journal of Child Language, 21, 173209.
  • Kim, J. J., Pinker, S., Prince, A., & Prasada, S. (1991). Why no mere mortal has ever flown out to center field. Cognitive Science, 15, 173218.
  • Kording, K. P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2004). Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature, 427 (6971), 244247.
  • Kovas, Y., & Plomin, R. (2006). Generalist genes: Implications for the cognitive sciences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10 (5), 198203.
  • Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108 (3), 480498.
  • Lachter, J., & Bever, T. G. (1988). The relation between linguistic structure and associative theories of language learning: A constructive critique of some connectionist learning models. Cognition, 28, 195247.
  • Landau, B., & Hoffman, J. E. (2005). Parallels between spatial cognition and spatial language: Evidence from Williams syndrome. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 163185.
  • Van Der Lely, H. K. (2005). Domain-specific cognitive systems: Insight from Grammatical-SLI. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9 (2), 5359.
  • Van Der Lely, H. K., Rosen, S., & McClelland, A. (1998). Evidence for a grammar-specific deficit in children. Current Biology, 8 (23), 12531258.
  • Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.
  • Ling, C. X., & Marinov, M. (1993). Answering the connectionist challenge: A symbolic model of learning the past tense of English verbs. Cognition, 49, 235290.
  • Lombardi, L., & Potter, M. (1992). The regeneration of syntax in short term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 713733.
  • Luria, A. (1979). The making of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Maess, B., Koelsch, S., Gunter, T. C., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Musical syntax is processed in Broca’s area: an MEG study. Nature Neuroscience, 4 (5), 540545.
  • Marcus, G. F. (1998a). Can connectionism save constructivism? Cognition, 66, 153182.
  • Marcus, G. F. (1998b). Rethinking eliminative connectionism. Cognitive Psychology, 37 (3), 243282.
  • Marcus, G. F. (2001). The algebraic mind: Integrating connectionism and cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Marcus, G. F. (2004). The birth of the mind: How a tiny number of genes creates the complexities of human thought. New York: Basic Books.
  • Marcus, G. F. (2006). Cognitive architecture and descent with modification. Cognition, 101, 443465.
  • Marcus, G. (2008). Kluge: The haphazard construction of the human mind. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
  • Marcus, G. F., Brinkmann, U., Clahsen, H., Wiese, R., & Pinker, S. (1995). German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 186256.
  • Marcus, G. F., & Keil, F. C. (2008). Concepts, correlations, and some challenges for connectionist cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Forthcoming.
  • Marcus, G. F., Pinker, S., Ullman, M., Hollander, J. M., Rosen, T. J., & Xu, F. (1992). Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development., 57 (4, Serial No. 228).
  • Marcus, G. F. (2009). Tree structure and the representation of sentences: a reappraisal. In J.Bolhuis, & M.Everaert (Eds.), Birdsong, Speech & Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Marler, P. (1991). The instinct to learn. In S.Carey, & R.Gelman (Eds.), The epigenesis of mind: Essays on biology and cognition (pp. 3766). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E., & Hinton, G. E. (1986a). The appeal of parallel distributed processing. In J. L.McClelland, D. E.Rumelhart, & The PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Volume 1: Foundations (pp. 365422). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E., & The PDP Research Group (Eds.). (1986b). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Volume 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • McElree, B. (2001). Working memory and focal attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27 (3), 817835.
  • Menand, L. (2002). What comes naturally: Does evolution explain who we are? The New Yorker, 96101, November 25.
  • Mervis, C. B., Morris, C. A., Bertrand, J., & Robinson, B. F. (1999). Williams syndrome: Findings from an integrated program of research. In H.Tager-Flusberg (Ed.), Neurodevelopmental disorders (pp. 65110). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Merzenich, M. M., Nelson, R. J., Stryker, M. P., Cynader, M. S., Schoppmann, A., & Zook, J. M. (1984). Somatosensory cortical map changes following digit amputation in adult monkeys. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 224 (4), 591605.
  • Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63 (2), 8197.
  • Miller, G., & Chomsky, N. A. (1963). Finitary models of language users. In R. D.Luce, R. R.Bush, & E.Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology, Vol. II (pp. 419492). New York: Wiley.
  • Morris, C. A., & Mervis, C. B. (2000). Williams syndrome and related disorders. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 1, 461484.
  • Nadel, L. (1999). Down syndrome in cognitive neuroscience perspective. In H.Tager-Flusberg (Ed.), Neurodevelopmental disorders (pp. 197222). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Newell, A. (1980). Physical symbol systems. Cognitive Science, 4, 135183.
  • Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1975). Computer science as empirical inquiry: Symbols and search. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 19, 113136.
  • Newport, E. L. (1990). Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science, 14, 1128.
  • Pica, P., Lemer, C., Izard, V., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Exact and approximate arithmetic in an Amazonian indigene group. Science, 306 (5695), 499503.
  • Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language. Science, 253, 530535.
  • Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: Morrow.
  • Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: Norton.
  • Pinker, S. (2002). The Blank Slate. New York: Viking Penguin.
  • Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1988). On language and connectionism: analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition, 28, 73193.
  • Pitkow, L. J., Sharer, C. A., Ren, X., Insel, T. R., Terwilliger, E. F., & Young, L. J. (2001). Facilitation of affiliation and pair-bond formation by vasopressin receptor gene transfer into the ventral forebrain of a monogamous vole. Journal of Neuroscience, 21 (18), 73927396.
  • Plomin, R., & Kovas, Y. (2005). Generalist genes and learning disabilities. Psychological Bulletin, 131 (4), 592617.
  • Plunkett, K., & Marchman, V. (1991). U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perceptron: implications for child language acquisition. Cognition, 38 (1), 43102.
  • Plunkett, K., & Marchman, V. (1993). From rote learning to system building: acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets. Cognition, 48 (1), 2169.
  • Prasada, S., & Pinker, S. (1993). Similarity-based and rule-based generalizations in inflectional morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 156.
  • Pylyshyn, Z. W., & Storm, R. W. (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking system. Spatial Vision, 3, 179197.
  • Quartz, S. R., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1997). The neural basis of cognitive development: A constructivist manifesto. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 537556; discussion 556596.
  • Rogers, T. T., & McClelland, J. L. (2004). Semantic cognition: A parallel distributed processing approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986a). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In J. L.McClelland, D. E.Rumelhart, & The PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Volume 2: Psychological and biological models (pp. 216271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986b). PDP models and general issues in cognitive science. In D. E.Rumelhart, J. L.McClelland, & The PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Volume 1: Foundations (pp. 110146). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., & The PDP Research Group (Eds.). (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Volume 2: Psychological and biological models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Rumelhart, D. E., & Todd, P. M. (1993). Learning and connectionist representations. In D. E.Meyer, & S.Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and Performance XIV (pp. 330). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Schlaug, G. (2001). The brain of musicians. A model for functional and structural adaptation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 930, 281299.
  • Senghas, A., & Coppola, M. (2001). Children creating language: How Nicaraguan sign language acquired a spatial grammar. Psychological Science, 12 (4), 323328.
    Direct Link:
  • Shafir, E., & LeBoeuf, R. A. (2002). Rationality. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 491517.
  • Smith, S. M. (2006). Context and human memory. In H. L.Roediger, Y.Dudai, & S.Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Science of memory: Concepts (pp. 111114). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Smolensky, P. (1988). On the proper treatment of connectionism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 174.
  • Spencer, J. P., Blumberg, M. S., McMurray, R., Robinson, S. R., Samuelson, L. K., & Tomblin, J. B. (2009). Short arms and talking eggs: Why we should no longer abide the nativist-empiricist debate. Child Development Perspectives, forthcoming.
  • Strack, F., Martin, L. L., & Schwarz, N. (1988). Priming and communication: Social determinants of information use in judgments of life satisfaction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18 (5), 429442.
  • Taatgen, N. A., & Anderson, J. R. (2002). Why do children learn to say “Broke”? A model of learning the past tense without feedback. Cognition, 86 (2), 123155.
  • Tabor, W., Galantucci, B., & Richardson, D. (2004). Effects of merely local syntactic coherence on sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 50 (4), 355370.
  • Tarr, M. J., & Gauthier, I. (2000). FFA: A flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise. Nature Neuroscience, 3 (8), 764769.
  • The SLI Consortium (2002). A genomewide scan identifies two novel loci involved in specific language impairment. American Journal of Human Genetics, 70 (2), 384398.
  • Todorov, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Goren, A., & Hall, C. C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308 (5728), 16231626.
  • Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1995). Mapping the evolved functional organization of mind and brain. In M. S.Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 11851197). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12 (1), 97136.
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185 (4157), 11241131.
  • Walum, H., Westberg, L., Henningsson, S., Neiderhiser, J. M., Reiss, D., Igl, W., Ganiban, J. M., Spotts, E. L., Pedersen, N. L., Eriksson, E., & Lichtenstein, P. (2008). Genetic variation in the vasopressin receptor 1a gene (AVPR1A) associates with pair-bonding behavior in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105 (37), 1415314156.
  • Watson, J. B. (1925). Behaviorism [microform]. New York: W.W. Norton.
  • Wilson, T. D., & Brekke, N. (1994). Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 116 (1), 117142.
  • Wright, W. G. (1998). Evolution of nonassociative learning: Behavioral analysis of a phylogenetic lesion. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 69 (3), 326337.