SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alac, M., & Hutchins, E. (2004). I see what you are saying: Action as cognition in fMRI brain mapping practice. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 4(3–4), 629662.
  • Barsalou, L. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 615645.
  • Becvar, A., Hollan, J., & Hutchins, E. (2008). Representing gestures as cognitive artifacts. In M. S.Ackerman, C.Halverson, T.Erickson & W. A.Kellog (Eds.), Resources, co-evolution,and artifacts: Theory in CSCW (pp. 117143). NewYork: Springer.
  • Christensen, B. T., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). The role and impact of mental simulation in design. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 118.
  • Craik, K. (1943). The nature of explanation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. J.Sternberg & J. E.Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 365395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Dunbar, K., & Blanchette, I. (2001). The in vivo/in vitro approach to cognition: The case of analogy. TRENDS in Cognitive Science, 5, 334339.
  • Eisner, E. (2003). On the art and science of qualitative research in psychology. In P.Camic, J.Rhodes, & L.Yardly (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Elgin, C. Z. (1996). Considered judgment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Gentner, D., & Stevens, A. L. (1983). Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Giere, R. N. (1988). Explaining science: A cognitive approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Piscataway, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
  • Goodman, N. (1968). Languages of art. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
  • Goodwin, C. (1995). Seeing in depth. Social Studies of Science, 25, 237274.
  • Gorman, M. (1997). Mind in the world: Cognition and practice in the invention of the telephone. Social Studies of Science, 27, 583624.
  • Gorman, M. E., & Carlson, W. B. (1990). Interpreting invention as a cognitive process: The case of Alexander Graham Bell, Thomas Edison, and the telephone. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 15, 131164.
  • Greeno, J. G. (1989). Situations, mental models, and generative knowledge. In D.Klahr & K.Kotovsky (Eds.), Complex information processing (pp. 285318). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hall, R., Stevens, R., & Torralba, T. (2002). Disrupting representational infrastructure in conversation across disciplines. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9, 179210.
  • Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsch, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(2), 174196.
  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Kurz-Milcke, E., Nersessian, N. J., & Newstetter, W. (2004). What has history to do with cognition? Interactive methods for studying research laboratories Journal of Cognition and Culture, 4, 663700.
  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • MorganM. S., & MorrisonM. (Eds.) (1999). Models as mediators. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nersessian, N. J. (1992a). How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. In R.Giere (Ed.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 345). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Nersessian, N. J. (1992b). In the theoretician’s laboratory: Thought experimenting as mental modeling. In D.Hull, M.Forbes, & K.Okruhlik (Eds.), PSA 1992, Vol. 2 (pp. 291301). Lansing, MI: PSA.
  • Nersessian, N. J. (1995). Opening the black box: Cognitive science and the history of science. Osiris, 10, 194211.
  • Nersessian, N. J. (2002). The cognitive basis of model-based reasoning in science. In P.Carruthers, S.Stich, & M.Siegal (Eds.), The cognitive basis of science (pp. 133153). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nersessian, N. J. (2005). Interpreting scientific and engineering practices: Integrating the cognitive, social, and cultural dimensions. In M.Gorman, R. D.Tweney, D.Gooding, & A.Kincannon (Eds.), Scientific and technological thinking (pp. 1756). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Nersessian, N. J. (2006). The cognitive—cultural systems of the research laboratory. Organization Studies, 27, 125145.
  • Nersessian, N. J. (2008a). Creating scientific concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Nersessian, N. J. (2008b). Mental modeling in conceptual change. In S.Vosniadou (Ed.), Interntional handbook of conceptual change (pp. 391416). New York: Routledge.
  • Nersessian, N. J., & Chandrasekharan, S. (2009). Hybrid analogies in conceptual innovation in science. Cognitive Systems Research, 10, 178188.
  • Nersessian, N. J., Kurz-Milcke, E., Newstetter, W., & Davies, J. (2003). Research laboratories as evolving distributed cognitive systems. In D.Alterman & D.Kirsch (Eds.), Proceedings of the cognitive science society 25 (pp. 857862). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Osbeck, L., & Nersessian, N. J. (2006). The distribution of representation. The Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 36, 141160.
  • Perrig, W., & Kintsch, W. (1985). Propositional and situational representations of text. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 503518.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Trafton, J. G., Trickett, S. B., & Mintz, F. E. (2005). Connecting internal and external representations: Spatial transformations of scientific visualizations. Foundations of Science, 10, 89106.
  • Trickett, S. B., Fu, W. T., Schunn, C. D., & Trafton, J. G. (2000). From dipsy-doodles to streaming motions: Changes in representation in the analysis of visual scientific data. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society 22.
  • Trickett, S. B., & Trafton, J. G. (2007). “What if....”: The use of conceptual simulations in scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 31, 843876.
  • Tweney, R. D. (1989). A framework for the cognitive psychology of science. In B.Gholson, W. R.ShadishJr, R. A.Neimeyer, & A. C.Houts (Eds.), Psychology of science: Contributions to metascience (pp. 342366). New York: Cambridge University Press.