SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Bogacz, S., & Trafton, J. G. (2005). Using dynamic and static displays: Using images to reason dynamically. Cognitive Systems Research, 6(4), 312319.
  • Christensen, B. T., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The role and impact of mental simulation in design. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(3), 327344.
  • Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. J.Sternberg & J. E.Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 365395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. In T. B.Ward & S. M.Smith (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 461493). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Forbus, K. (1997). Qualitative reasoning. In A. B.Tucker (Ed.), The computer science and engineering handbook. (pp. 715733) Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Online.
  • Hayes, J. R. 1985. Three problems in teaching general skills. In S.Chipman, J. W.Segal & R.Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills, Vol . 2 (pp. 391406). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
  • Hegarty, M. (1992). Mental animation: Inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18(5), 10841102.
  • Hegarty, M. (2004). Mechanical reasoning by mental simulation. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8(6), 280285.
  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2006). How we reason. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Kosslyn, S. M., Sukel, K. E., & Bly, B. M. (1999). Squinting with the mind’s eye: Effects of stimulus resolution on imaginal and perceptual comparisons. Memory and Cognition, 27(2), 276287.
  • Kuhn, T. S (1970). The structure of scientific resolutions (2nd ed). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kulkarni, D., & Simon, H. A. (1988). The process of scientific discovery: The Strategy of experimentation. Cognitive Science, 12, 139176.
  • Shepard, R., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701703.
  • Sims, V. K., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Domain specificity of spatial expertise: The case of video game players. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16(1), 97115.
  • St. John, M., Cowen, M. B., Smallman, H. S., & Oonk, H. M. (2001). The use of 2D and 3D displays for shape understanding vs. relative position tasks. Human Factors, 43(1), 7998.
  • Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Trafton, J. G., Trickett, S. B., & Mintz, F. E. (2005). Connecting internal and external representations: Spatial transformations of scientific visualizations. Foundations of Science, 10, 89106.
  • Trafton, J. G., Trickett, S. B., Stitzlein, C. A., Saner, L., Schunn, C. D., & Kirschenbaum, S. S. (2006). The relationship between spatial transformations and iconic gestures. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 6(1), 129.
  • Trickett, S. B., & Trafton, J. G. (2007). “What if...” The use of conceptual simulations in scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 31(5), 843875.
  • Trickett, S. B., Trafton, J. G., Saner, L., & Schunn, C. D. (2007). “I don’t know what’s going on there”: The use of spatial transformations to deal with and resolve uncertainty in complex visualizations. In M. C.Lovett & P.Shah (Eds.), Thinking with data (pp. 6585). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.