SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Anderson, J. (2005). Cognitive psychology and its implications (6th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.
  • Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity. New York: The Free Press of Macmillan Co.
  • Carley, K. (1990). Group stability: A socio-cognitive approach. In E.Lawler, B.Markovsky, C.Ridgeway, & H.Walker (Eds.), Advances in group processes: Theory & research, Vol. VII. (pp. 144). Greenwhich, CN: JAI Press.
  • Carley, K. M. (1991). A theory of group stability. American Sociology Review, 56(3), 331354.
  • Carley, K. M. (1995). Communication technologies and their effect on cultural homogeneity, consensus, and the diffusion of new ideas. Sociological Perspectives, 38(4), 547571.
  • Carley, K. M. (1999). On the evolution of social and organizational networks. In S. B.Andrews, & DavidKnotee (Eds.), Research on the sociology of organizations, vol. 16 (pp. 130). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Carley, K. M. (2002). Smart agents and organizations of the future. In L.Lievrouw & S.Livingstone (Eds.), The handbook of new media (pp. 206220). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Carley, K. M., & Hill, V. (2001). Structural change and learning within organizations. In A.Lomi & E. R.Larsen (Eds.), Dynamics of organizations: Computational modeling and organization theories (pp. 6392). Menlo Park, CA: MIT Press/AAAI.
  • Carley, K. M., & Krackhardt, D. (1996). Cognitive inconsistencies and non-symmetric friendship. Social Networks, 18, 127.
  • Carley, K. M., Lee, J., & Krackhardt, D. (2001). Destabilizing networks. Connections, 24(3), 3134.
  • Carley, K. M., & Newell, A. (1994). The nature of the social agent. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 19(4), 221262.
  • Case, D. 2002. Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior (2nd ed.). London: Academic Press.
  • Catlett, C., Allcock, W. E., Andrews, P., Aydt, R., Bair, R., Balac, N., et al. (2007). TeraGrid: analysis of organization, system architecture, and middleware enabling new types of applications. HPC and Grids in Action, Ed. Lucio Grandinetti, IOS Press “Advances in Parallel Computing” series, Amsterdam.
  • Dunbar, R. I. M. (1993). Co-evolution of neocortex size, group size, and language in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 681735.
  • Erdos, P., & Renyi, A. (1959). On random graphs i. Publicationes Mathematicae Debrecen, 6, 290297.
  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117140.
  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
  • Frantz, T., & Carley, K. M. (2005). A formal characterization of cellular networks. Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Institute for Software Research International, Technical Report CMU-ISRI-05-109.
  • Friedkin, N. (1998). A structural theory of social influence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Hill, V., & Carley, K. M. (2008). Win friends and influence people: Relationships as conduits of organizational culture in temporary placement agencies. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17(4), 369379.
  • Hirshman, B. R., Carley, K. M., & Kowalchuck, M. J. (2007a). Specifying agents in construct. Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Institute for Software Research, Technical Report, CMU-ISRI-07-107.
  • Hirshman, B. R., Carley, K. M., & Kowalchuck, M. J. (2007b). Loading networks in construct. Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Institute for Software Research, Technical Report, CMU-ISRI-07-116.
  • Hirshman, B. R., Martin, M. K., Bigrigg, M., & Carley, K. M. (2008b). The impact of educational media by socio-demographic attribute. Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Institute for Software Research, Technical Report, CMU-ISR-08-118.
  • Hirshman, B. R., Martin, M. K., Birukou, A., Bigrigg, M., & Carley, K. M. (2008c). The impact of educational media on real and stylized cities. Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Institute for Software Research, Technical Report, CMU-ISR-08-114.
  • Hirshman, B. R., Martin, M. K., & Carley, K. M. (2008a). Modeling information access in construct. Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Institute for Software Research, Technical Report, CMU-ISR-08-115.
  • Kaufer, D. S., & Carley, K. M. (1993). Communication at a distance: The effect of print on socio-cultural organization and change. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Kaufer, D. S., & Carley, K. M. (1994). Some concepts and axioms about communication: Proximate and at a distance. Written Communication, 11(1), 842.
  • Kirsch, I., Jungebut, A., Jenkins, L., & Kolsted, A. (2002). Adult literacy in America: A first look at the findings of the National Adult Literacy Survey (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
  • Kramer, R. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569598.
  • Kuhlthau, C. (1999). Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user’s perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42, 361371.
  • Lau, D., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23, 325340.
  • Lazarsfeld, P., & Merton, R. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In M.Berger, T.Abel, & C.Page (Eds.), Freedom and control in modern society (pp. 1866). New York: Octagon.
  • Livingston, G. (2007). Latinos online (pp. 123). Washington, DC: Pew Internet American Life Project.
  • Manis, J. G., & Meltzer, B. N. (1978). Symbolic interaction: A reader in social psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Marchionni, G. (1995). Information seeking in electronic environments. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • McAllister, D. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 2459.
  • McPherson, J. M., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1987). Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. American Sociological Review, 52, 370379.
  • Moore, R. (1985). A formal theory of knowledge and action. In J.Hobbs & R.Moore (Eds.), Formal theories of the commonsense world, vol. 1 (p. 400). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
  • Moorthy, S., Ratchford, B., & Talukdar, D. (1997). Information search revisited: Theory and empirical analysis. The Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 263277.
  • Newman, M. (2000). Models of the small world. Journal of Statistical Physics, 101(3/4), 819841.
  • Pew Internet (2007). Pew Internet and American life project. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org. Accessed on December 12, 2007.
  • Salancik, G., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224253.
  • Schreiber, C. (2006). Human and organizational risk modeling, critical personnel and leadership in network organizations, Ph.D Thesis. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Institute for Software Research, Computation, Organizations and Society.
  • Schreiber, C., & Carley, K. M. (2004a). Construct – a multi-agent network model for the co-evolution of agents and socio-cultural environments. Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Institute for Software Research International, Technical Report CMU-ISRI-04-109.
  • Schreiber, C., & Carley, K. M. (2004b). Going beyond the data: Empirical validation leading to grounded theory. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 10, 155164.
  • Schreiber, C., & Carley, K. M. (2008). Dynamic network leadership: Leading for learning adaptability. In M.Uhl-Bien, & R.Marion (Eds.), Complexity leadership part I: Conceptual foundations (pp. 291332). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
  • Simon, H. (1982). Models of bounded rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Smith-Lovin, L., McPherson, M., & Cook, J. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415444.
  • Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin Cummings.
  • The Newspaper Association of America (2008). The daily and Sunday newspaper audience report 2007 (pp. 131). Arlington, VA: Interactive Market Systems, Inc.
  • Valente, T. H., Poppe, P. R., & Merritt, A. P. (1996). Mass-media-generated interpersonal communication as sources of information about family planning. Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives, 1(3), 247266.
  • Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature, 393(6684), 409410.
  • Wegner, D. M. (1986). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B.Mullen, & G. R.Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185205). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • White, H. C. (1992). Identity and control: A structural theory of social action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • White, H. C. (2008). Identity and control: How social formations emerge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Wilkins, J. S. (1998). What’s in a meme? Journal of Memetics-Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission, 2(1), 233.
  • Wooldridge, M., & Jennings, N. (1995). Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. Knowledge Engineering Review, 10, 115152.