SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Armstrong, R. D. (1981). An area model for solving probability problems. In A. P.Shulte (Ed.), Teaching statistics and probability (pp. 135142). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Austin, J. D. (1974). An experimental study of the effects of three instructional methods in basic probability and statistics. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 5(3), 146154.
  • Ball, A., & Buckwell, G. (1986). Work out statistics “A” level. Basingstoke, Hampshire, England: Macmillan Education.
  • Belsom, C., Dolan, S., & Glickman, L. (1991). Probability. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Booth, D. (1993). Foundation mathematics (2nd ed.). Wokingham, England: Addison-Wesley.
  • Card, S., MacKinlay, J., & Shneiderman, B. (Eds.) (1999). Readings in information visualization: Using vision to think. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Cheng, P. C.-H. (1999). Unlocking conceptual learning in mathematics and science with effective representational systems. Computers in Education, 33(2–3), 109130.
  • Cheng, P. C.-H. (2002). Electrifying diagrams for learning: Principles for effective representational systems. Cognitive Science, 26(6), 685736.
  • Cheng, P. C.-H. (2003). Diagrammatic re-codification of probability theory: A representational epistemological study. In R.Alterman & D.Kirsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 234239). Boston: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Cheng, P. C.-H., & Barone, R. (2004). Representing rosters: Conceptual integration counteracts visual complexity. In A.Blackwell, K.Marriot, & A.Shimojima (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and inference: Third international conference, diagrams 2004 (pp. 385387). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Cheng, P. C.-H., & Barone, R. (2007). Representing complex problems: A representational epistemic approach. In D. H.Jonassen (Ed.), Learning to solve complex scientific problems (pp. 97130). Mahmah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Cheng, P. C.-H., Barone, R., Cowling, P. I., & Ahmadi, S. (2002). Opening the information bottleneck in complex scheduling problems with a novel representation: STARK diagrams. In M.Hegarty, B.Meyer, & N. H.Narayanan (Eds.), Diagrammatic representations and inference: Second international conference, diagrams 2002 (pp. 264278). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Cheng, P. C.-H., & Pitt, N. G. (2003). Diagrams for difficult problems in probability. Mathematical Gazette, 87(508), 8697.
  • Cheng, P. C.-H., & Shipstone, D. M. (2003). Supporting learning and promoting conceptual change with box and AVOW diagrams. Part 2: Their impact on student learning at A-level. International Journal of Science Education, 25(3), 291305.
  • Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1996). Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgement under uncertainty. Cognition, 58, 173.
  • Dahlke, R., & Fakler, R. (1981). Geometric probability. In A. P.Shulte (Ed.), Teaching statistics and probability (pp. 143153). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Endsley, M. R., Bolté, B., & Jones, D. G. (2003). Designing for situation awareness: An approach to user-centered design. London: Taylor & Francis.
  • Engelhardt, J. (2002). The language of graphics. Amsterdam: ILLC, Unversity of Amsterdam.
  • Falk, R. (1992). A closer look at the probabilities of the notorious three prisoners. Cognition, 43, 197223.
  • Fischbein, E., & Schnarch, D. (1997). The evolution with age of probabilistic, intuitively based misconceptions. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 96105.
  • Garfield, J., & Ahlgren, A. (1988). Difficulties in learning basic concepts in probability and statistics: Implications for research. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 19(1), 44.
  • Gigerenzer, G., & Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102(4), 684704.
  • Greer, A. (1992). A complete GCSE mathematics higher course (3rd ed.). Cheltenham, England: Stanley Thornes.
  • Ichikawa, S. (1989). The role of isomorphic schematic representation in the comprehension of counterintuitive Bayesian problems. Journal of Mathematic Behaviour, 8, 269281.
  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgement under uncertainty. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kent, D., Pledger, K., Medlow, C., Woodward, R., & Killick, A. (1996). Essential mathematics for GCSE. Oxford, England: Heinemann Education.
  • McColl, J. H. (1995). Probability. London: Edward Arnold.
  • Poskitt, K. (2001). Do you feel lucky? The secrets of probability (murderous maths). London: Scholastics.
  • Shafir, E. (1994). Uncertainty and the difficulty of thinking through disjunctions. Cognition, 50, 403430.
  • Shaughnessy, M. J. (1992). Research in probability and statistics: Reflections and directions. In D. A.Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 465494). New York: MacMillan.
  • Shimojo, S., & Ichikawa, S. (1989). Intuitive reasoning about probability: Theoretical and experimental analyses of the “problem of three prisoners. Cognition, 32, 112.
  • Vincente, K. J. (1996). Improving dynamic decision making in complex systems through ecological interface design: A research overview. Systems Dynamics Review, 12(4), 251279.
  • Zhang, J. (1996). A representational analysis of relational information displays. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 45, 5974.