SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abadie, A., & Gay, S. (2006). The impact of presumed consent legislation on cadaveric organ donation: A cross-country study. Journal of Health Economics, 25, 599620.
  • Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D., & Sanford, N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Ali, A. H. (2002). The caged virgin: A Muslim woman’s cry for reason. London: Simon & Schuster.
  • Amodio, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2006). Meeting of minds: The medial prefrontal cortex and social cognition. Nature Review Neuroscience, 7, 268277.
  • Arrow, K. J. (2004). Is bounded rationality unboundedly rational? Some ruminations. In M.Augier & J. G.March (Eds.), Models of a man: Essays in memory of Herbert A. Simon (pp. 4755). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements. Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 396403.
    Direct Link:
  • Becker, G. S. (1995). The essence of Becker. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
  • Bennis, W. M., Medin, D. L., & Bartels, D. M. (2010). The costs and benefits of calculation and moral rules. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 187202.
  • Binmore, K. (2009). Rational decisions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Blass, T. (1991). Understanding behavior in the Milgram obedience experiment: The role of personality, situations, and their interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 398413.
  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2005). The origin and evolution of cultures. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Brase, G. L., & Richmond, J. (2004). The white-coat effect: Physician attire and perceived authority, friendliness, and attractiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 24692481.
  • Braybrooke, D. (2004). Utilitarianism: Restorations; repairs; renovations. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
  • Brighton, H. (2006). Robust inference with simple cognitive models. In C.Lebiere & R.Wray (Eds.), AAAI spring symposium: Cognitive science principles meet AI-hard problems (pp. 1722). Menlo Park, CA: American Association for Artificial Intelligence.
  • Bröder, A. (2003). Decision making with the “adaptive toolbox”: Influence of environmental structure, intelligence, and working memory load. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 611625.
  • Bundesärztekammer. (2008). EU Bulletin, Nr. 9, April 21, 2008.
  • Burger, J. M. (2009). Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today? American Psychologist, 64, 111.
  • Byron, M. (Ed.) (2004). Satisficing and maximizing: Moral theorists on practical reason. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cokely, E. T., & Feltz, A. (2009). Adaptive variation in judgment and philosophical intuition. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 355357.
  • Commission of the European Communities. (2007, May 30). Organ donation and transplantation: Policy actions at EU level. Impact assessment. (Press Release No. IP/07/718). Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/07/718&format=HTML&aged=1&language=EN&guiLanguage=en
  • Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2008). Can a general deontic logic capture the facts of humans’ moral reasoning? How the mind interprets social exchange rules and detects cheaters. In W.Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology: Vol 1. The evolution of morality: Adaptations and innateness (pp. 53119). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Czerlinski, J., Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1999). How good are simple heuristics? In G.Gigerenzer, P. M.Todd, & the ABC Research Group (Eds.), Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 97118). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Darwin, C. (1981). The descent of man. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1871).
  • Daston, L. J. (1988). Classical probability in the Enlightenment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Dawkins, R. (2006). The God delusion. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  • DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L., & Uppal, R. (2009). Optimal versus naive diversification: How inefficient is the 1/N portfolio strategy? Review of Financial Studies, 22, 19151953.
  • Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137149.
  • Dhami, M. K. (2003). Psychological models of professional decision-making. Psychological Science, 14, 175180.
    Direct Link:
  • Dieckmann, A., & Rieskamp, J. (2007). The influence of information redundancy on probabilistic inference. Memory & Cognition, 35, 18011813.
  • Doris, J. M. (2002). Lack of character. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Feltz, A., & Cokely, E. T. (2009). Do judgments about freedom and responsibility depend on who you are? Personality differences in intuitions about compatibilism and incompatibilism. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 342350.
  • Fiske, A. P. (1992). Four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of sociality. Psychological Review, 99, 689723.
  • Funder, D. (2001). Personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 197221.
  • Gambetta, D. (1996). The Sicilian Mafia. The business of private protection. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Garcia-Retamero, R., & Dhami, M. K. (2009). Take-the-best in expert–novice decision strategies for residential burglary. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 163169.
  • Geman, S., Bienenstock, E., & Doursat, R. (1992). Neural networks and the bias/variance dilemma. Neural Computation, 4, 158.
  • Gerson, R., & Damon, W. (1978). Moral understanding and children’s conduct. In W.Damon (Ed.), New directions for child development (pp. 4159). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Blass.
  • Gigerenzer, G. (1991). From tools to theories: A heuristic of discovery in cognitive psychology. Psychological Review, 98, 254267.
  • Gigerenzer, G. (2006). Heuristics. In G.Gigerenzer & C.Engel (Eds.), Heuristics and the law (pp. 1744). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Gut feelings: The intelligence of the unconscious. New York: Viking. (UK version: London: Allen Lane/Penguin).
  • Gigerenzer, G. (2008a). Rationality for mortals. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Gigerenzer, G. (2008b). Moral intuition = Fast and frugal heuristics? In W.Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology: Vol 2. The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity (pp. 126). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gigerenzer, G., & Brighton, H. (2009). Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 107143.
  • Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (Eds.) (2001a). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (2001b). Rethinking rationality. In G.Gigerenzer & R.Selten (Eds.), Bounded rationality. The adaptive toolbox (pp. 112). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Greene, J., & Haidt, J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 517523.
  • Gruber, H. E., & Vonèche, J. J. (1977). The essential Piaget. New York: Basic Books.
  • Hacking, I. (1975). The emergence of probability. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814834.
  • Haidt, J., & Bjorklund, F. (2008). Social intuitionists answer six questions about moral psychology. In W.Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral Psychology, Vol. 2: The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity (pp. 181217). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Hammerstein, P. (2003). Why is reciprocity so rare in social animals? A protestant appeal. In P.Hammerstein (Ed.), Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation (pp. 8393). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Hauser, M. (2006). Moral minds: How nature designed our universal sense of right and wrong. New York: Ecco.
  • Hertwig, R., Davis, J. N., & Sulloway, F. (2002). Parental investment: How an equity motive can produce inequality. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 728745.
  • Hutchinson, J. M. C., & Gigerenzer, G. (2005). Simple heuristics and rules of thumb: Where psychologists and behavioural biologists might meet. Behavioural Processes, 69, 97124.
  • Johnson, E. J., & Goldstein, D. G. (2003). Do defaults save lives? Science, 302, 13381339.
  • Johnson, E. J., Hershey, J., Meszaros, J., & Kunreuther, H. (1993). Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 7, 3551.
  • Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgement and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697720.
  • Kelling, G. L., & Coles, C. M. (1996). Fixing broken windows: Restoring order and reducing crime in our communities. New York: The Free Press.
  • Knobe, J., & Nichols, S. (2008). An experimental philosophy manifesto. In J.Knobe & S.Nichols (Eds.), Experimental philosophy (pp. 314). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Kohlberg, L. (1968). The child as a moral philosopher. Psychology Today, 2, 2530.
  • Lipsey, R. G. (1956). The general theory of the second best. Review of Economic Studies, 24, 1132.
  • Makridakis, S., & Hibon, M. (2000). The M3-competition: Results, conclusions, and implications. International Journal of Forecasting, 16, 451476.
  • Mata, R., Schooler, L. J., & Rieskamp, J. (2007). The aging decision maker: Cognitive aging and the adaptive selection of decision strategies. Psychology and Aging, 22, 796810.
  • Matheson, D. (2006). Bounded rationality, epistemic externalism and the Enlightenment picture of cognitive virtue. In R.Stainton (Ed.), Contemporary debates in cognitive science (pp. 134144). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  • Messick, D. M. (1993). Equality as a decision heuristic. In B. A.Mellers & J.Baron (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on justice (pp. 1131). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.
  • Nagel, T. (1993). Moral luck. In D.Statman (Ed.), Moral luck (pp. 5771). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Narvaez, D., & Lapsley, D. (2005). The psychological foundations of everyday morality and moral expertise. In D.Lapsley & C.Power (Eds.), Character psychology and character education (pp. 140165). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
  • Narveson, J. (2004). Maximizing life on a budget; or, if you would maximize, then satisfice! In M.Byron (Ed.), Satisficing and maximizing: Moral theorists on practical reason (pp. 5970). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Neiman, S. (2008). Moral clarity: A guide for grownup idealists. New York: Harcourt.
  • Pascal, B. (1962). Pensées. Paris: Editions du Seuil. (Original work published 1669).
  • Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Persijn, G. (1997). Public education and organ donation. Transplantation Proceedings, 29, 16141617.
  • Pichert, D., & Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2008). Green defaults: Information presentation and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 6373.
  • Pippin, R. B. (2009). Natural & normative. Daedalus, Summer 2009, 3543.
  • Richardson, H. S. (2004). Satisficing: Not good enough. In M.Byron (Ed.), Satisficing and maximizing: Moral theorists on practical reason (pp. 106130). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rieskamp, J., & Otto, P. E. (2006). SSL: A theory of how people learn to select strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 207236.
  • Rosenbaum, J. (2009). Patient teenagers? A comparison of the sexual behavior of virginity pledgers and matched nonpledgers. Pediatrics, 123, 110120. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-0407.
  • Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley.
  • Saxe, R. (2006). Uniquely human social cognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16, 235239.
  • Schmidtz, D. (2004). Satisficing as a humanly rational strategy. In M.Byron (Ed.), Satisficing and maximizing: Moral theorists on practical reason (pp. 3058). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schwartz, B., Ward, A., Monterosso, J., Lyubomirsky, S., White, K., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 11781197.
  • Shaffer, D. M., Krauchunas, S. M., Eddy, M., & McBeath, M. K. (2004). How dogs navigate to catch Frisbees. Psychological Science, 15, 437441.
    Direct Link:
  • Shanteau, J. (1992). How much information does an expert use? Is it relevant? Acta Psychologica, 81, 7586.
  • Shweder, R. A., Much, N. C., Mahaptra, M., & Park, L. (1997). The “big three” of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity), and the “big three” explanations of suffering, as well. In A.Brandt & P.Rozin (Eds.), Morality and health (pp. 119169). New York: Routledge.
  • Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99118.
  • Simon, H. A. (1990). Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 119.
  • Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Originally published 1969).
  • Slote, M. (2004). Two views of satisficing. In M.Byron (Ed.), Satisficing and maximizing: Moral theorists on practical reason (pp. 1429). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Smith, A. (1761). The theory of moral sentiments. London: Millar.
  • Statman, D. (1993). Moral luck. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Stevens, J. R., & Hauser, M. D. (2004). Why be nice? Psychological constraints on the evolution of cooperation TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 6065.
  • Sunstein, C. R. (2005). Moral heuristics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 531542.
  • Swanton, C. (2004). Satisficing and perfectionism in virtue ethics. In M.Byron (Ed.), Satisficing and maximizing: Moral theorists on practical reason (pp. 176189). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Todd, P. M., & Gigerenzer, G. (2001). Shepard’s mirrors or Simon’s scissors? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 704705.
  • Tomasello, M. (2000). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Weininger, O. (1903). Geschlecht und Charakter [Sex and character]. Vienna: Wilhelm Braumüller.
  • Williams, B. (1981). Moral luck. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wilson, D. S. (2002). Darwin’s cathedral: Evolution, religion, and the nature of society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Wübben, M., & Wangenheim, F. v. (2008). Instant customer base analysis: Managerial heuristics often “get it right.” Journal of Marketing, 72, 8293.
  • Zimbardo, P. (2007). The Lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn to evil. New York: Random House.