SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Atran, S., & Medin, D. (2008). The native mind and the cultural construction of nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Baker, C., Fillmore, C., & Lowe, J. (1998). The Berkeley FrameNet project. Proceedings of the COLING-ACL. Montreal, Canada.
  • Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577660.
  • Barsalou, L. W. (2010). Grounded cognition: Past, present and future. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(3), 322327.
  • Bender, A., Hutchins, E., & Medin, D. (2010). Anthropology in Cognitive Science. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(3), 374385.
  • Berlin, B., Breedlove, D., & Raven, P. (1973). General principles of classification and nomenclature in folk biology. American Anthropologist, 75(1), 214242.
  • Bransford, J. D. (1979). The role of prior knowledge. In J. D.Bransford (Ed.), Human cognition: Learning, understanding, and remembering (pp. 129165). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 3242.
  • Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Chatterjee, A. (2010). Disembodying cognition. Language and Cognition, 2, 79116.
  • Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145182.
  • Chipman, S. E. F. (2010). Applications in education and training: A force behind the development of Cognitive Science. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(3), 386397.
  • Collins, A. (1977). Why cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 1, 12.
  • D’Andrade, R. G. (1984). Cultural meaning systems. In R. A.Shweder & R.LeVine (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion (pp. 88119). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Emery, N., & Clayton, N. (2004). The mentality of crows: Convergent evolution of intelligence in corvids and apes. Science, 306, 19031907.
  • Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K. D., & Gentner, D. (1989). The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and examples. Artificial Intelligence, 41, 163.
  • Fischer, M. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 825850.
  • Forbus, K. D. (2010). AI and Cognitive Science: The Past and Next 30 Years. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(3), 345356.
  • Forbus, K. D., Gentner, D., & Law, K. (1995). MAC/FAC: A model of similarity-based retrieval. Cognitive Science, 19, 141205.
  • Gardner, H. (1987). The mind’s new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York: Basic Books.
  • Gentner, D. (2002). Cognitive science. Encyclopedia Americana. Danbury, CT: Grolier.
  • Gentner, D., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (Eds.) (2003). Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1993). Analogy-Watershed or Waterloo? Structural alignment and the development of connectionist models of cognition. In S. J.Hanson, J. D.Cowan, & C. L.Giles (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 5 (pp. 855862). San Mateo, CA: Kaufmann.
  • Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1995). Analogy-based reasoning in connectionism. In M.Arbib (Ed.), The handbook of brain theory and neural networks (pp. 9193). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gentner, D., & Medina, J. (1998). Similarity and the development of rules. Cognition, 65, 263297.
  • Gibson, J. J. (1970). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
  • Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 138.
  • Goldstone, R. L., & Son, J. Y. (2005). The transfer of scientific principles using concrete and idealized simulations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(1), 69110.
  • Hall, D., Jurafsky, D., & Manning, C. D. (2008). Studying the history of ideas using topic models. In M.Lapata & H. T.Ng (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2008 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (pp. 363371). Honolulu, HI: SIGDAT.
  • Hayes, P. J. (1985). Naive Physics I: Ontology for liquids. In J. R.Hobbs & R. C.Moore (Eds.), Formal theories of the commonsense world (pp. 71107). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Hinton, G. E. (1989). Connectionist learning procedures. Artificial Intelligence, 40, 185234.
  • Holyoak, K. J., & Hummel, J. E. (2000). The proper treatment of symbols in a connectionist architecture. In E.Dietrich & A.Markman (Eds.), Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual change in humans and machines (pp. 229263). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A therapy of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review, 104, 427466.
  • Hutchins, E. (1996). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
  • Hutchins, E. (2010). Cognitive ecology. Topics in Cognitive Science.
  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lenat, B. (1995). Cyc: A large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure. Communications of the ACM, 38(11), 3338.
  • Levinson, S. C. (1996). Language and space. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25, 353382.
  • Li, P., & Gleitman, L. (2002). Turning the tables: Language and spatial reasoning. Cognition, 83, 265294.
  • Loewenstein, J., Thompson, L., & Gentner, D. (2003). Analogical learning in negotiation teams: Comparing cases promotes learning and transfer. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2, 119127.
  • Markman, A. B. (1999). Knowledge representation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational approach. San Francisco: Freeman & Co.
  • McClelland, J. L., and the PDP Research Group Rumelhart, D. E. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, Vol. 2: Psychological and biological models (pp. 757). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Medin, D. L., & Ross, B. H. (1989). The specific character of abstract thought: Categorization, problem-solving, and induction. In R. J.Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, Vol. 5 (pp. 189223). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Miller, G. (1979). A very personal history. Talk to Cognitive Science Workshop, MIT, Cambridge, MA, June 1, 1979. Cited in: Gardner, H. (1985). The mind’s new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York: Basic Books.
  • Miller, G. (1995). WordNet: a lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM, 38(11), 3941.
  • Miller, G. (2003). The cognitive revolution: A historical perspective. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7(3), 141144.
  • Minsky, M. L., & Papert, S. A. (1969). Perceptrons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently…and why. New York: The Free Press.
  • Palmer, S. E. (1978). Fundamental aspects of cognitive representation. In E.Rosch & B. B.Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 259303). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Pepperberg, I. M. (1999). The Alex studies: Cognitive and communicative abilities of grey parrots. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Reeves, L. M., & Weisberg, R. W. (1994). The role of content and abstract information in analogical transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 115(3), 381400.
  • Romney, A. K., & D’Andrade, R. G. (1964). Cognitive aspects of English kin terms. American Anthropologist, 66, 3.
  • Rosenblatt, F. (1958). The Perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory. Psychological Review, 65(6), 386408.
  • Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., & the PDP Research Group. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol. 1. Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Seed, A., & Tomasello, M. (2010). Primate cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science.
  • Tomasello, M., & Call, J. (1997). Primate cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.