SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Andre, A. D., & Wickens, C. D. (1995). When users want what’s NOT best for them. Ergonomics in Design, 3, 1014.
  • Bennett, K. B., Nagy, A. L., & Flach, J. M. (1997). Visual displays. In G.Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (2nd ed.) (pp. 659696). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Berlyne, D. E. (1970). Novelty, complexity and hedonic value. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 279286.
  • Bertin, J. (1983) Semiology of graphics: Diagrams, networks, maps (translated by W. J.Berg). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Bowman, D. A., Kruijff, E., LaViola, J. J. Jr, & Poupyrev, I. (2005). 3D user interfaces: Theory and practice. Boston, Addison-Wesley.
  • Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (1987). Paradox of the active user. In J. M.Carroll (Ed.), Interfacing thought: Cognitive aspects of human-computer interaction (pp. 80111). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Carter, W. E., Shrestha, R. L., & Slatton, K. C. (2007). Geodetic laser scanning. Physics Today, 60, 4147.
  • Cavanagh, P. (2005). The artist as neuroscientist. Nature, 434, 301307.
  • Cruz, I. F. (1996). Tailorable information visualization. ACM Computing Survey, 28 (4es), December 1996.
  • Cutting, J. E., & Vishton, P. M. (1995). Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In W.Epstein & S.Rogers (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition, Vol. 5 (pp. 69117). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Daukantas, P. (2009). Photorealistic rendering: Making the virtual into reality. Optics & Photonics News, 20, 3439.
  • Dennehy, M. T., Nesbitt, D. W., & Sumey, R. A. (1994). Real-time three-dimensional graphics display for antiair warfare command and control. Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest, 15, 110119.
  • Eley, M. G. (1991). Selective encoding in the interpretation of topographic maps. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 403422.
  • Ferwerda, J. A. (2003). Three varieties of realism in computer graphics. In B. E.Rogowitz & T. N.Pappas (Eds.), Proceedings SPIE human vision and electronic imaging VIII, Vol. 5007 (pp. 290297). Santa Clara, CA: SPIE press.
  • Frisby, J. P. (1980). Seeing. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Glenberg, A. M., & Epstein, W. (1985). Calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 702718.
  • Hegarty, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of visual-spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 684689.
  • Hegarty, M., Smallman, H. S., Stull, A. T., & Canham, M. (2009). Naïve cartography: How intuitions about display configuration can hurt performance. Cartographica, 44, 171186.
  • Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2005). Individual differences in spatial abilities. In P.Shah & A.Miyake (Eds.), Handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 121169). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Imhof, E. (1982). Cartographic relief presentation. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Jacobsen, T., & Höfel, L. (2002). Aesthetic judgments of novel graphic patterns: Analysis of individual judgments. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95, 755766.
  • Jenks, G. F., & Brown, D. A. (1966). Three dimensional map construction. Science, 154, 857864.
  • Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). Effects of feedback intervention on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254284.
  • Kyllonen, P. C., Lohman, D. F., & Snow, R. E. (1984). Effects of aptitudes, strategy training, and task facets on spatial task performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 130145.
  • Loomis, J. M. (1992). Distal attribution and presence. Presence, 1, 113119.
  • Loomis, J. M., & Knapp, J. M. (2003). Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. In L. J.Hettinger & M. W.Hass (Eds.), Virtual and adaptive environments (pp. 2146). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Lowe, R. K. (1994). Selectivity in diagrams: Reading between the lines. Education Psychology, 14, 467491.
  • MacEachren, A. M. (1995). How maps works: Representation, visualization, and design. London: Guilford Press.
  • MacLeod, D. I. A., & Willen, J. D. (1995). Is there a visual space? In R. D.Luce, M. D.D’Zmura, D. D.Hoffman, G. J.Iverson, & A. K.Romney (Eds.), Geometric representations of perceptual phenomena: Papers in honor of Tarow Indow on his 70th (pp. 4760). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Maki, R. H., Foley, J. M., Kaher, W. K., Thompson, R. C., & Willert, M. G. (1990). Increased processing enhances calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 609616.
  • McKee, S. P., Levi, D. M., & Bowne, S. F. (1990). The imprecision of stereopsis. Vision Research, 30, 17631779.
  • McLeary, G. F., Jenks, G. F., & Ellis, S. R. (1991). Cartography and map displays. In S. R.Ellis, M.Kaiser, & A. J.Grunwald (Eds.), Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments (pp. 7696). London: Taylor & Francis.
  • Milgram, P., & Kishono, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality virtual displays. IECE Transactions on Information Systems, E77-D(12), 13211329.
  • Neth, H., Sims, C., & Gray, W. (2006). Melioration dominates maximization: Stable suboptimal performance despite global feedback. In R.Sun & N.Miyake (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 627632). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Pick, H. L., Heinrichs, M. R., Montello, D. R., Smith, K., Sullivan, C. N., & Thompson, W. B. (1995). Topographic map reading. In P. A.Hancock, J. M.Flach, J.Caird, & K. J.Vicente (Eds.), Local applications of the ecological approach to human-machine systems, Vol. 2 (pp. 255284). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2003). Seeing and visualizing: It’s not what you think. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press Bradford Books.
  • Sanders, M. S., & McCormick, E. J. (1993). Human factors in engineering and design (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
  • Scholl, M. J., & Egeth, H. E. (1982). Cognitive correlates of map reading ability. Intelligence, 6, 215230.
  • Sedgwick, H. A. (1986). Space perception. In K. R.Boff, L.Kaufman, & J. P.Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of Perception and human performance, Vol. 1 (pp. 21012157). New York: Wiley.
  • diSessa, A. A. (2004). Metarepresentation: Native competence and targets for instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 293331.
  • Simons, D. J., & Rensink, R. A. (2005). Change blindness: Past, present and future. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 1620.
  • Smallman, H. S., & Hegarty, M. (2007). Expertise, spatial ability and intuition in the use of complex visual displays. In Proceedings of the 51st annual meeting of the human factors and ergonomics society (pp. 20002004). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
  • Smallman, H. S., & St. John, M. (2005). Naïve Realism: Misplaced faith in the utility of realistic displays. Ergonomics in Design, 13, 613.
  • Smallman, H. S., St. John, M., & Cowen, M. B. (2002). Use and misuse of linear perspective in the perceptual reconstruction of 3-D perspective view displays. In Proceedings of the 46th annual meeting of the human factors and ergonomics society (pp. 15601564). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
  • Smallman, H. S., St. John, M., Oonk, H. M., & Cowen, M. B. (2000). When beauty is only skin deep: 3-D realistic icons are harder to identify than conventional 2-D military symbols. In Proceedings of the 44th annual meeting of the human factors and ergonomics society (pp. 480483). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
  • Smallman, H. S., St. John, M., Oonk, H. M., & Cowen, M. B. (2001). ‘SYMBICONS’: A hybrid symbology that combines the best elements of SYMBols and ICONS. In Proceedings of the 45th annual meeting of the human factors and ergonomics society (pp. 110114). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
  • St. John, M., Cowen, M. B., Smallman, H. S., & Oonk, H. M. (2001). The use of 2D and 3D displays for shape understanding vs. relative position tasks. Human Factors, 43, 7998.
  • Steiner, B. A., & Dotson, D. A. (1990). The use of 3-D stereo display of tactical information. In Proceedings of the 34th annual meeting of the human factors society (pp. 3640). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
  • Sutherland, I. F. (1965). The ultimate display. In Proceedings of the international federation of information processing (IFIP) congress (pp. 506508). New York: IFIP.
  • Tractinsky, N., Katz, A. S., & Ikar, D. (2000). What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers, 13, 127145.
  • Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
  • Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 247262.
  • Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 599604.
  • Varakin, D. A., Levin, D. T., & Fidler, R. (2004). Unseen and unaware: Implications of recent research on failures of visual awareness for human-computer interface design. Human-Computer Interaction, 19, 389422.
  • Winer, G. A., & Cottrell, J. E. (2004). The odd belief that rays exit the eye during vision. In D. T.Levin (Ed.), Thinking and seeing: Visual metacognition in adults and children (pp. 97119). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Woods, D. D., & Roth, E. M. (1988). Cognitive systems engineering. In M.Helander (Ed.) Handbook of human-computer interaction (pp. 141). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. (North-Holland).