SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Bröder, A. (in press). The quest for Take the Best: Insights and outlooks from experimental research. In P. Todd, G. Gigerenzer, & the ABC Research Group (Eds.), Ecological rationality: Intelligence in the world. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bröder, A., & Eichler, A. (2006). The use of recognition information and additional cues in inferences from memory. Acta Psychologica, 121, 275284.
  • Bröder, A., & Newell, B. R. (2008). Challenging some common beliefs: Empirical work within the adaptive toolbox metaphor. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 205214.
  • Bröder, A., & Schiffer, S. (2003). Bayesian strategy assessment in multi-attribute decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 193213.
  • Erdfelder, E., Auer, T.-S., Hilbig, B. E., Aßfalg, A., Moshagen, M., & Nadarevic, L. (2009). Multinomial processing tree models: A review of the literature. Zeitschrift für Psychologie – Journal of Psychology, 217, 108124.
  • Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (2005). Power analysis for categorical methods. In B. S.Everitt & D. C.Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science (Vol. 3, pp. 15651570). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • Gigerenzer, G., & Brighton, H. (2009). Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 107143.
  • Glöckner, A. (2009). Investigating intuitive and deliberate processes statistically: The multiple-measure maximum likelihood strategy classification method. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 186199.
  • Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008a). Modeling option and strategy choices with connectionist networks: Towards an integrative model of automatic and deliberate decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 215228.
  • Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008b). Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 10551075.
  • Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2010). Accounting for critical evidence while being precise and avoiding the strategy selection problem in a parallel constraint satisfaction approach – a reply to Marewski. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23, 468472.
  • Glöckner, A., & Witteman, C. (2010). Beyond dual-process models: A categorization of processes underlying intuitive judgment and decision making. Thinking & Reasoning, 16, 125.
  • Goldstein, D. G., & Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psychological Review, 109, 7590.
  • Hilbig, B. E. (2008a). Individual differences in fast-and-frugal decision making: Neuroticism and the recognition heuristic. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 16411645.
  • Hilbig, B. E. (2008b). One-reason decision making in risky choice? A closer look at the priority heuristic. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 457462.
  • Hilbig, B. E. (2010). Precise models deserve precise measures: A methodological dissection. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 272284.
  • Hilbig, B. E. (in press). Reconsidering ‘evidence’ for fast and frugal heuristics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
  • Hilbig, B. E., Erdfelder, E., & Pohl, R. F. (2010). One-reason decision-making unveiled: A measurement model of the recognition heuristic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 36, 123134.
  • Hilbig, B. E., & Pohl, R. F. (2008). Recognizing users of the recognition heuristic. Experimental Psychology, 55, 394401.
  • Hilbig, B. E., & Pohl, R. F. (2009). Ignorance- versus evidence-based decision making: A decision time analysis of the recognition heuristic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 12961305.
  • Hilbig, B. E., Pohl, R. F., & Bröder, A. (2009). Criterion knowledge: A moderator of using the recognition heuristic? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22, 510522.
  • Hu, X., & Batchelder, W. H. (1994). The statistical analysis of engineering processing tree models with the EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 59, 2147.
  • Moshagen, M. (2010). multiTree: A computer program for the analysis of multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 4254.
  • Myung, I. J. (2000). The importance of complexity in model selection. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 190204.
  • Newell, B. R., & Fernandez, D. (2006). On the binary quality of recognition and the inconsequentially of further knowledge: Two critical tests of the recognition heuristic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 333346.
  • Newell, B. R., & Lee, M. D. (in press). The right tool for the job? Comparing an evidence accumulation and a naive atrategy selection model of decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making.
  • Pohl, R. F. (2006). Empirical tests of the recognition heuristic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 251271.
  • Richter, T., & Späth, P. (2006). Recognition is used as one cue among others in judgment and decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 150162.
  • Rieskamp, J. (2008). The probabilistic nature of preferential choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 14461465.
  • Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 779804.