SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Brumby, D. P., Howes, A., & Salvucci, D. D. (2007). A cognitive constraint model of dual-task trade-offs in a highly dynamic driving task. In B.Beqole, S.Payne, E.Churchill, R.St. Armant, D.Gilmore, & M. B.Rosson (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 233242). New York: ACM Press.
  • Brumby, D. P., Salvucci, D. D., & Howes, A. (2007). Dialing while driving? A bounded rational analysis of concurrent multi-task behavior. In R. L.Lewis, T. A.Polk, & J. E.Laird (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (pp. 121126). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
  • Brumby, D. P., Salvucci, D. D., & Howes, A. (2009). Focus on driving: How cognitive constraints shape the adaptation of strategy when dialing while driving. In S.Greenberg, S. E.Hudson, K.Hinkley, M. R.Morris, & D. R.OlsenJr (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 16291638). New York: ACM Press.
  • Erev, I., & Gopher, D. (1999). A cognitive game-theoretic analysis of attention strategies, ability, and incentives. In D.Gopher & A.Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 343371). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gopher, D. (1993). The skill of attention control: Acquisition and execution of attention strategies. In D. E.Meyer & S.Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 299322). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gray, W. D., Sims, C. R., Fu, W. T., & Schoelles, M. J. (2006). The soft constraints hypothesis: A rational analysis approach to resource allocation for interactive behavior. Psychological Review, 113, 461482.
  • Hornof, A. J., Zhang, Y., & Halverson, T. (2010). Knowing where and when to look in a time-critical multimodel dual task. In S. E.Hudson, G.Fitzpatrick, W. K.Edwards, T.Rodden, & E.Mynatt (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 21032112). New York: ACM Press.
  • Horrey, W. J., Wickens, C. D., & Consalus, K. P. (2006). Modeling drivers’ visual attention allocation while interacting with in-vehicle technologies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12, 6778.
  • Howes, A., Lewis, R. L., & Vera, A. (2009). Rational adaptation under task and processing constraints: Implications for testing theories of cognition and action. Psychological Review, 116, 717751.
  • Howes, A., Vera, A., Lewis, R. L., & McCurdy, M. (2004). Cognitive constraint modeling: A formal approach to supporting reasoning about behavior. In K.Forbus, D.Gentner, & T.Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 595600). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Janssen, C. P., & Brumby, D. P. (2010). Strategic adaptation to performance objectives in a dual-task setting. Cognitive Science, 34, 15481560.
  • Janssen, C. P., Brumby, D. P., Dowell, J., & Chater, N. (2010). A cognitively bounded rational analysis model of dual-task performance trade-offs. In D. D.Salvucci & G.Gunzelmann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (pp. 103108). Philadelphia, PA: Drexel University.
  • Janssen, C. P., Brumby, D. P., & Garnett, R. (2010). Natural break points: Utilizing motor cues when multitasking. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 482486). San Francisco, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
  • Kieras, D. E., & Meyer, D. E. (2000). The role of cognitive task analysis in the application of predictive models of human performance. In J. M.Schraagen, S. F.Chipman, & V. L.Shalin (Eds.), Cognitive task analysis (pp. 237260). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Kieras, D. E., Meyer, D. E., Ballas, J. A., & Lauber, E. J. (2000). Modern computational perspectives on executive mental processes and cognitive control: Where to from here? In S.Monsell & J.Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 681712). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Lallement, Y., & John, B. (1998). Cognitive architecture and modeling idiom: An examination of three models of the wickens task. In M. A.Gernsbacher & S. J.Derry (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 597602). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Levy, J., & Pashler, H. (2008). Task prioritisation in multitasking during driving: Opportunity to abort a concurrent task does not insulate braking responses from dual-task slowing. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 507525.
  • Lewis, R., Vera, A., & Howes, A. (2004). A constraint-based approach to understanding the composition of skill. In M.Lovett, C.Schunn, C.Lebiere, & P.Munro (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (pp. 148153). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the human-processing system. Psychological Review, 86, 214255.
  • Norman, D. A., & Bobrow, D. G. (1975). On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 4464.
  • Payne, S. J., Duggan, G. B., & Neth, H. (2007). Discretionary task interleaving: Heuristics for time allocation in cognitive foraging. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 370388.
  • Salvucci, D. D., & Taatgen, N. A. (2008). Threaded cognition: An integrated theory of concurrent multitasking. Psychological Review, 115, 101130.
  • Schumacher, E., Lauber, E., Glass, J., Zurbriggen, E., Gmeindl, L., Kieras, D. E., & Meyer, D. E (1999). Concurrent response-selection processes in dual-task performance: Evidence for adaptive executive control of task scheduling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 791814.
  • Smith, M. R., Lewis, R. L., Howes, A., Chu, A., & Green, C. (2008). More than 8,192 ways to skin a cat: Modeling behavior in multidimensional strategy spaces. In B. C.Love, K.McRae, & V. M.Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 14411446). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Swets, J. A., Tanner, W., & Birdsall, T. (1961). Decision processes in perception. Psychological Review, 68, 301340.
  • Vera, A., Howes, A., McCurdy, M., & Lewis, R. (2004). A constraint satisfaction approach to predicting skilled interactive cognition. In E.Dykstra-Erickson & M.Tscheligi (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 121128). New York: ACM Press.
  • Wang, D. D., Proctor, R. W., & Pick, D. F. (2007). Acquisition and transfer of attention allocation strategies in a multiple-task work environment. Human Factors, 49, 9951004.
  • Wobbrock, J., Cutrell, E., Harada, S., & MacKenzie, I. (2008). An error model for pointing based on fitts’ law. In M.Burnett, M. F.Costabile, T.Catarci, B.De Ruyter, D.Tan, M.Czerwinski, & A.Lund (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 16131622). New York: ACM Press.