SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ahn, W. Y., Busemeyer, J. R., Wagenmakers, E. J., & Stout, J. C. (2008). Comparison of decision learning models using the generalization criterion method. Cognitive Science, 32, 13761402.
  • Altman, A., Bercovici-Boden, A., & Tennenholtz, M. (2006). Learning in one shot strategic form games. In J.Fürnkranz, T.Scheffer, & M.Spiliopoulou (Eds.), Machine learning: EMCL 2006 (pp. 617). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Ashton, M. C., & Vernon, P. A. (1995). Verbal and spatial abilities are uncorrelated when g is controlled. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 399401.
  • Birnbaum, M. H., & Bahra, J. P. (2007). Gain-loss separability and coalescing in risky decision making. Management Science, 53, 10161028.
  • Brachinger, H. W., & Weber, M. (1997). Risk as primitive: A survey of measures of perceived risk. OR Spectrum, 19, 235250.
  • Busemeyer, J. R., & Stout, J. C. (2002). A contribution of cognitive decision models to clinical assessment: Decomposing performance on the Bechara gambling task. Psychological Assessment, 14, 253262.
  • Deinzer, R., Steyer, R., Eid, M., Notz, P., Schwenkmezger, P., Ostendorf, F., & Neubauer, A. (1995). Situational effects in trait assessment: The FPI, NEOFFI, and EPI questionnaires. European Journal of Personality, 9, 123.
  • Erev, I., Ert, E., & Yechiam, E. (2008). Loss aversion, diminishing sensitivity, and the effect of experience on repeated decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 575597.
  • Ert, E., & Erev, I. (2008). The rejection of attractive gambles, loss aversion, and the lemon avoidance heuristic. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 715723.
  • Ert, E., & Erev, I. (2010). On the descriptive value of loss aversion in decisions under risk. Harvard Business School working paper 10-056.
  • Ert, E., & Yechiam, E. (2010). Consistent constructs in individuals’ risk taking in decisions from experience. Acta Psychologica, 134, 225232.
  • Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. New York: Plenum.
  • Figner, B., Mackinlay, R. J., Wilkening, F., & Weber, E. U. (2009). Hot and cold cognition in risky decision making: accounting for age and gender differences in risk taking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 709730.
  • Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 2634.
  • Goldstein, W. M., & Einhorn, H. (1987). A theory of preference reversals. Psychological Review, 94, 236254.
  • Hendricks, W. A., & Robey, K. W. (1936). The sampling distribution of the coefficient of variation. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 7, 129132.
  • Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E. U., & Erev, I. (2004). Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychological Science, 15, 534539.
    Direct Link:
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263291.
  • Kassin, S. (2003). Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  • Keller, R. L. (1985). An Empirical Investigation of relative risk aversion. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 15, 475482.
  • Kenrick, T., & Funder, D. C. (1988). Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 43, 2334.
  • Koritzky, G., & Yechiam, E. (2010). On the robustness of decision tasks to response distortion. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23, 8399.
  • Levin, I. P., Hart, S. S., Weller, J. A., & Harshman, L. A. (2007). Stability of choices in a risky decision making task: A 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20, 241252.
  • Markowitz, H. M. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7, 7791.
  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 8190.
  • Michalski, R., Carbonell, J., & Mitchell, T. (1986). Machine learning, Vol II. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kauffman.
  • Payne, J. W. (1973). Alternative approaches to decision making under risk: Moments vs. risk dimensions. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 493553.
  • Pratt, J. W. (1964). Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica, 32, 122136.
  • Preuschoff, K., Bossaerts, P., & Quartz, S. R. (2006). Neural differentiation of expected reward and risk in human subcortical structures. Neuron, 51, 381390.
  • Schneider, S. L., & Lopes, L. L. (1986). Reflection in preferences under risk: Who and when may suggest why. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 535548.
  • Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1990). Are risk-attitudes related across domains and response modes? Management Science, 36, 14511463.
  • Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Determinants of risk-taking: Behavioral and economic views. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 6, 4973.
  • Stevens, S. S. (1957). On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 64, 153181.
  • Tett, R. P., & Guterman, H. A. (2000). Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-situational consistency: Testing a principle of trait activation. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 397423.
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgments under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 11241131.
  • Tversky, A., Sattath, S., & Slovic, E. (1988). Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychological Review, 95, 371384.
  • Weber, E. U., Shafir, S., & Blais, A.-R. (2004). Predicting risk-sensitivity in humans and lower animals: Risk as variance or coefficient of variation. Psychological Review, 111, 430445.
  • Weller, J. A., Levin, I. P., Shiv, B., & Bechara, A. (2007). Neural correlates of adaptive decision making for risky gains and losses. Psychological Science, 18, 958964.
    Direct Link:
  • Worthy, D. A., Maddox, W. T., & Markman, A. B. (2007). Regulatory fit effects in a choice task. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 11251132.
  • Yechiam, E. (2010). Losses induce consistency in risk taking even without loss aversion. Technion working paper.