SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ackerman, P. L. (1987). Individual differences in skill learning: An integration of psychometric and information processing perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 102(1), 327.
  • Beck, K. (2000). Extreme Programming eXplained: Embrace change. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Boukhelifa, N., & Duke, D. J. (2009). Uncertainty visualization: Why might it fail? Proceedings of SIGCHI 2009, April 4–9, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Brooks, G., & Brooks, R. (1979). The improbable progenitor. Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada, 73(1), 923.
  • Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J., & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Readings in information visualization: Using vision to think. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
  • Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Colombo, J., Mitchell, D. W., Coldren, J. T., & Freeseman, L. J. (1991). Individual differences in infant visual attention: Are short lookers faster processors or feature processors? Child Development, 62(6), 12471257.
  • Correa, E. D., Chan, Y. H., & Ma, K. L. (2009). A framework for uncertainty aware visual analytics. Proceedings of IEEE Visual Analytics Science and Technology, October 11–13, Atlantic City, NJ.
  • Duric, Z., Gray, W. D., Heishman, R., Li, F., Rosenfeld, A., Schoelles, M. J., Schunn, C., & Wechsler, H. (2002). Integrating perceptual and cognitive modeling for adaptive and intelligent human–computer interaction. Proceedings, IEEE 2002 90(7) 12721289.
  • Fisher, B., Fels, S., MacLean, K., Munzner, T., & Rensink, R. (2004) Seeing, hearing, and touching: Putting it all together. SIGGRAPH ‘04: SIGGRAPH 2004 Course Notes. ACM Digital Library.
  • Galison, P. (1997). Image & logic: A material culture of microphysics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Gallis, H. (2007). Evaluating pair programming with respect to system complexity and programmer expertise. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 33(2), 6586.
  • Gallis, H., Arisholm, E., & Dyba, T. (2003). An initial framework for research on pair programming. Proceedings of the 2003 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE’03), Rome, Italy.
  • Gorg, C., Liu, Z., Parekh, N., Singhal, K., & Stasko, J. (2007). Jigsaw meets Blue Iguanadon The VAST 2007 contest. Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology 2007, Sacramento, CA.
  • Green, T. M., & Fisher, B. (2010). Towards the personal equation of interaction: The impact of personality factors on visual analytics interface interaction. Proceedings of IEEE Visual Analytics Science and Technology, October 24–28, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Green, T. M., Jeong, D. H., & Fisher, B. (2010). Using personality factors to predict interface learning performance. Proceedings of Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 43, January 5–8, Koloa, Kauai, HI, USA.
  • Green, T. M., Ribarsky, W., & Fisher, B. (2008). Visual analytics for complex concepts using a human cognition model. Proceedings of IEEE Visual Analytics Science and Technology, Columbus, OH, October 19–24, 2008, 9198.
  • Heuer, R. J. (1999). The psychology of intelligence analysis. Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Intelligence, CIA.
  • Kadivar, N., Chen, V., Dunsmuir, D., Lee, E., Qian, C., Dill, J., Shaw, C., & Woodbury, R. (2009). Proceedings of IEEE Visual Analytics Science & Technology 2009, IEEE, Atlantic City, NJ, October 11–16, 2009, 131–138.
  • Larva, B. L. (1998). Lakatos: An introduction. London; New York: Routledge.
  • Lee, B., Robertson, G. G., Czerwinski, M., & Parr, C. S. (2007). CandidTree: Visualizing structural uncertainty in similar hierarchies. Information Visualization, 6, 233246.
  • Liu, G., Austen, E. L., Booth, K. S., Fisher, B., Argue, R., Rempel, M. I., & Enns, J. (2005). Multiple-object tracking is based on scene, not retinal coordinates. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31(2), 235247.
  • Lundstrom, C., Ljung, P., Persson, A., & Ynnerman, A. (2007). Uncertainty visualization in medical volume rendering using probabilistic animation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13(6), 16481655.
  • Marincola, F. (2003). Translational Medicine: A two-way road. Journal of Translational Medicine, 1(1), 1.
  • Norman, D. (1994). Visual representations. In: D. Norman (Ed.), Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine (pp. 4376). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • O’Keefe, B. J. (1988). The logic of message design: Individual differences in reasoning about communication. Communication Monographs, 55(1), 80103.
  • Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2006). Building the gist of a scene: The role of global image features in recognition. Progress in Brain Research, 155, 527532.
  • Patterson, E. S., Roth, E. M., & Woods, D. D. (2001). Predicting vulnerabilities in computer-supported inferential analysis under data overload. Cognition, Technology & Work, 3, 224237.
  • Pike, W. A., Baddeley, B., Best, D., Franklin, L., May, R., Rice, D. M., Rienische, R., & Younking, K. (2008). The scalable reasoning system: Lightweight visualization for distributed analytics. Proceedings of IEEE Visual Analytics Science and Technology, Columbus, OH, 131138.
  • Pike, W., May, R., & Turner, A. (2007). Supporting Knowledge Transfer through Decomposable Reasoning Artifacts. 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, Big Island, HI.
  • Pirolli, P., & Card, S. (2005). The sensemaking process and leverage points for analyst technology as identified through cognitive task analysis. Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Intelligence Analysis, May 2005, pp. 24.
  • Po, B., Fisher, B., & Booth, K. S. (2003). Pointing and visual feedback for spatial interaction in large-screen display environments. Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Smart Graphics, 2733, 2238.
  • Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1989). The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model. Cognition, 32, 6597.
  • Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2001). Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision. Cognition, 80(1–2), 127158.
  • Rensink, R. (2000). The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, 1742.
  • Ribarsky, W., Fisher, B., & Pottenger, W. M. (2009). Science of analytical reasoning. Information Visualization, 8(4), 254262.
  • Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155169.
  • Simon, A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645726.
  • Stasko, J., Gorg, C., & Liu, Z. (2008a). Sensemaking across text documents: Human-centered, visual exploration ith Jigsaw. Proceedings of Sensemaking Worship at ACM CHI 2008, April 2008, Florence, Italy.
  • Stasko, J., Gorg, C., & Liu, Z. (2008b). Jigsaw: Supporting investigative analysis through interactive visualization. Information Visualization, 7, 118132.
  • Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Thomas, J. J., & Cook, K. A. (Eds.) (2005). Illuminating the path: The research and development agenda for visual analytics. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
  • Trafton, J. G., Kirschenbaum, S. S., Tsui, T. L., Miyamoto, R. T., Ballas, J. A., & Raymond, P. D. (2000). Turning pictures into numbers: Extracting and generating Information from complex visualizations. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 53(5), 827850.
  • Trickett, S. B., & Trafton, J. G. (2007). “What if...”: The use of conceptual simulations in scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 31(5), 843875.
  • Triesman, A., & Gormican, S. (1998). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95(1), 1598.