SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Anastas, J. R., Stephen, D. G., & Dixon, J. A. (2011). The scaling behavior of hand motions reveals self-organization during an executive-function task. Physica A, 390, 15391545.
  • Bell, A. J. (1999). Levels and loops: The future of artificial intelligence and neuroscience. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B, 354, 20132020.
  • Bickhard, M. H. (2001). Why children don’t have to solve the frame problems: Cognitive representations are not encodings. Developmental Review, 21, 224262.
  • Bickhard, M. H. (2008). Issues in process metaphysics. Ecological Psychology, 20, 252256.
  • Bickle, J. (2003). Philosophy and neuroscience: A ruthlessly reductive approach. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Boogerd, F. C., Bruggeman, F. J., Richardson, R. C., Stephan, A., & Westerhoff, H. V. (2005). Emergence and its place in nature: A case study of biochemical networks. Synthese, 145, 131164.
  • Botnivick, M. (this volume). Commentary: Why I am not a dynamicist. Topics in Cognitive Science.
  • Bronzino, J. (Ed.). (2000). The biomedical engineering handbook. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Cariani, P. (1997). Emergence of new signal-primitives in neural systems. Intellectica, 2, 95143.
  • Chhabra, A. B., & Jensen, R. V. (1989). Direct determination of the f(α) singularity spectrum. Physics Review Letters, 62, 13271330.
  • Dale, R. A. (2008). Pluralism and the future of cognitive science. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 20, 153267.
  • Davia, C. J. (2005). Life, catalysis and excitable media: A dynamic systems approach to metabolism and cognition. In J. Tuszynski (Ed.), The physical basis for consciousness (pp. 229260). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
  • Dennett, D. (1984). Cognitive wheels: The frame problem in artificial intelligence. In C. Hookway (Ed.), Minds, machines and evolution (pp. 129151). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Eliasmith, C. (this volume). The complex systems approach: Rhetoric or revolution. Topics in Cognitive Science.
  • Fodor, J. A. (2000). The mind doesn’t work that way: The scope and limits of computational psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gibbs, R. W., & Van Orden, G. (in press). Pragmatic choice in production. Topics in Cognitive Science.
  • Gilden, D. L. (2001). Cognitive emissions of 1/f noise. Psychological Review, 108, 3356.
  • Gilden, D. L. (2009). Global model analysis of cognitive variability. Cognitive Science, 33, 127.
  • Harley, T. A. (2004). Promises, promises. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 5156.
  • Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D, 42, 335346.
  • Holden, J. G., Choi, I., Amazeen, P. G., & Van Orden, G. (2011). Fractal 1/f dynamics suggest entanglement of measurement and human performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 37, 935948.
  • Holden, J. G., Van Orden, G., & Turvey, M. T. (2009). Dispersion of response times reveals cognitive dynamics. Psychological Review, 116, 318342.
  • Hollis, G., Kloos, H., & Van Orden, G. (2009). Origins of order in cognitive activity. In S. Guastello, M. Koopmans, & D. Pincus (Eds.), Chaos and complexity in psychology: The theory of nonlinear dynamical systems (pp. 206241). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hooker, C. (Ed.). (2011). The philosophy of complex systems. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
  • Howes, A. (this volume). Useful theories make predictions. Topics in Cognitive Science.
  • Ihlen, E. A. F., & Vereijken, B. (2010). Interaction-dominant dynamics in human cognition: Beyond 1/fα fluctuation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 436463.
  • Järvilehto, T. (1998). The theory of the organism–environment system: I. Description of the theory. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 33, 321334.
  • Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Kelso, J. A. S. (2003). Cognitive coordination dynamics. In W. Tschacher & J.-P. Dauwalder (Eds.), The dynamical systems approach to cognition (pp. 4567). Edge, NJ: World Scientific.
  • Kloos, H., & Van Orden, G. (2010). Voluntary behavior in cognitive and motor tasks. Mind & Matter, 8, 1943.
  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Riley, M. A., Shockley, K., & Van Orden, G. (this volume). Learning from the body about the mind. Topics in Cognitive Science.
  • van Rooij, I. (in press). Self-organization takes time too. Topics in Cognitive Science.
  • Rosen, R. (1991). Life itself: A comprehensive inquiry into the nature, origin, and fabrication of life. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 417457.
  • Searle, J. R. (1990). Is the brain a digital computer? Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 64, 2137.
  • Simon, H. A. (1973). The organization of complex systems. In H. H. Pattee (Ed.), Hierarchy theory: The challenge of complex systems (pp. 127). New York: Braziller.
  • Solé, R. V., Manrubia, S. C., Benton, M., Kauffman, S., & Bak, P. (1999). Criticality and scaling in evolutionary ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14, 156160.
  • Stanley, H. E., Amaral, L. A. N., Gopikrishnan, P., Ivanov, P. Ch., Keitt, T. H., & Plerou, V. (2000). Scale invariance and universality: Organizing principles in complex systems. Physica A, 281, 6068.
  • Stanovich, K. E. (2004). The robot’s rebellion: Finding meaning in the age of Darwin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Stephen, D. G., Arzamarski, R., & Michaels, C. F. (2010). The role of fractality in perceptual learning: Exploration in dynamic touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 36, 11611173.
  • Stephen, D. G., Boncoddo, R. A., Magnuson, J. S., & Dixon, J. A. (2009). The dynamics of insight: Mathematical discovery as a phase transition. Memory & Cognition, 37, 11321149.
  • Stephen, D. G., & Dixon, J. A. (2011). Strong anticipation: Multifractal cascade dynamics modulate scaling in synchronization behaviors. Chaos, Solitons, & Fractals, 44, 160168.
  • Stephen, D. G., & Hajnal, A. (2011). Transfer of calibration between hand and foot: Functional equivalence and fractal fluctuations. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 13021328.
  • Stepp, N., Chemero, A., & Turvey, M. T. (2011). Philosophy for the rest of cognitive science. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 425437.
  • Stepp, N., & Turvey, M. T. (2009). On strong anticipation. Cognitive Systems Research, 11, 148164.
  • Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Thornton, T. L., & Gilden, D. L. (2005). Provenance of correlations in psychological data. Psychological Review, 12, 409441.
  • Turvey, M. T., & Moreno, M. A. (2006). Physical metaphors for the mental lexicon. Mental Lexicon, 1, 733.
  • Uttal, W. R. (1990). On some two-way barriers between models and mechanisms. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 188203.
  • Uttal, W. R. (2001). The new phrenology: The limits of localizing cognitive processes in the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Uttal, W. R. (2007). The immeasurable mind: The real science of psychology. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
  • Van Orden, G. (2008). Peirce’s abduction and cognition as we know it. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 20, 219229.
  • Van Orden, G. (2010). Voluntary performance. Medicina (Kaunas), 46, 581594.
  • Van Orden, G., & Holden, J. G. (2002). Intentional contents and self-control. Ecological Psychology, 14, 87109.
  • Van Orden, G., Kello, C. T., & Holden, J. G. (2010). Situated behavior and the place of measurement in psychological theory. Ecological Psychology, 22, 2443.
  • Van Orden, G., & Kloos, H. (2003). The module mistake. Cortex, 39, 164166.
  • Van Orden, G., Kloos, H., & Wallot, S. (2011). Living in the pink: Intentionality, wellness, and complexity. In C. Hooker (Ed.), Handbook of the philosophy of science, vol. 10: Philosophy of complex systems (pp. 639682). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
  • Wagenmakers, E.-J., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Farrell, S. (this volume). Abstract concepts require concrete models: Why cognitive scientists have not yet embraced nonlinearly coupled, dynamical, self-organized critical, synergistic, scale-free, exquisitely context-sensitive, interaction-dominant, multifractal, interdependent brain–body–niche systems. Topics in Cognitive Science.
  • Wallot, S., & Van Orden, G. (in press). Ultrafast cognition. Journal of Consciousness Studies.
  • Wallot, S., & Van Orden, G. (2011). Nonlinear analyses of self-paced reading. Mental Lexicon, 6, 245274.
  • Watkins, M. J. (1990). Mediationism and the obfuscation of memory. American Psychologist, 45, 328335.
  • Weldon, M. S. (1999). The memory chop shop: Issues in the search for memory systems. In J. K. Forster & M. Jelicic (Eds.), Memory: Systems, process, or function? (pp. 162204). New York: Oxford University Press.