SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abbs, J. H., & Connor, N. P. (1989). Motor coordination for functional human behavior: Perspectives from a speech motor data base. In S. Wallace (Ed.), Perspectives on the coordination of movement (pp. 157183). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  • Bak, P. (1996). How nature works: The science of self-organized criticality. New York: Copernicus.
  • Barr, D., & Keysar, B. (2002). Anchoring comprehension in linguistic precedents. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 391418.
  • Barr, D. J., & Keysar, B. (2005). Mindreading in an exotic case: The normal adult human. In B. F. Malle & S. D. Hodges (Eds.), Other minds: How humans bridge the divide between self and other (pp. 271283). New York: Guilford.
  • Clark, H. (1996). Using language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Francik, E., & Clark, H. (1985). How to make requests that overcome obstacles to compliance. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 360368.
  • Garrett, M. F. (2000). Remarks on the architecture of language processing systems. In Y., Grodzinsky, L., Shapiro & D., Swinney (Eds.), Language and the brain (pp. 31–69). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Gibbs, R. (1986). Why are some indirect speech acts are conventional? Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 182196.
  • Gibbs, R. (1999). Intentions in the experience of meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gibbs, R., & Bryant, G. (2008). Striving for optimal relevance in answering questions. Cognition, 106, 345369.
  • Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the ways of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Hollis, J., Kloos, H., & Van Orden, G. (2009). Origins of order in cognitive activity. In S. Guastello, M. Koopmans, & D. Pincus (Eds.), Chaos and complexity: Recent advances and future directions in the theory of nonlinear dynamical systems (pp. 206241). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kello, C. T., Anderson, G. G., Holden, J. G., & Van Orden, G. (2008). The pervasiveness of 1/f scaling in speech reflects the metastable basis of cognition. Cognitive Science, 32, 12171231.
  • Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Keysar, B., & Bly, B. (1995). Intuitions of the transparency of idioms: Can one keep a secret by spilling the beans? Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 89109.
  • Keysar, B., & Henly, A. (2002). Speakers’ overestimate of their effectiveness. Psychological Science, 13, 207212.
    Direct Link:
  • Kloos, H., & Van Orden, G. (2009). Soft-assembled mechanisms for the unified theory. In J. P. Spencer, M. Thomas, & J. McClelland (Eds.), Toward a unified theory of development: Connectionism and dynamic systems theory re-considered (pp. 253267). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Kloos, H., & Van Orden, G. (2010). Voluntary performance of cognitive and motor tasks. Mind & Matter, 8, 1944.
  • Lee, J. J., & Pinker, S. (2010). Rationales for indirect speech: The theory of the strategic speaker. Psychological Review, 117, 785807.
  • Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Morgan, J. (1975). Two types of convention in indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 4561). New York: Academic Press.
  • Perkins, M. (2008). Pragmatic impairment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Postma, A. (2000). Detection of errors during speech production: A review of speech monitoring models. Cognition, 77, 97131.
  • Riley, M. A., & Turvey, M. T. (2002). Variability and determinism in motor behavior. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 99125.
  • Searle, J. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 5982). New York: Academic Press.
  • Shockley, K., Richardson, D. C., & Dale, R. (2009). Conversation and coordinative structures. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 305319.
  • Sperber, D. (2005). Modularity and relevance: How can a massively modular mind be flexible and context-sensitive. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind: Structure and content (pp. 5368). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2002). Pragmatics, modularity and mindreading. Mind & Language, 17, 323.
  • Stephens, G. J., Silbert, L. J., & Hasson, U. (2010). Speaker–listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107, 1442514430.
  • Turvey, M. T. (2007). Action and perception at the level of synergies. Human Movement Science, 26, 657697.
  • Van Lieshout, P. H. H. M., Bose, A., Square, P. A., & Steele, C. M. (2007). Speech motor control in fluent and dysfluent speech production of an individual with apraxia of speech and Broca’s aphasia. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 21, 159188.
  • Van Orden, G. (2010). Voluntary performance. Medicina.
  • Van Orden, G., & Kloos, H. (2005). The question of phonology and reading. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 6178). Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Van Orden, G., Kloos, H., & Wallot, S. (in press). Living in the pink: Intentionality, wellbeing, and complexity. In C. A. Hooker (Ed.), Philosophy of complex systems. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Van Orden, G., Pennington, B. F., & Stone, G. O. (2001). What do double dissociations prove? Cognitive Science, 25, 111172.
  • Vigliocco, G., & Hartsuiker, R.J. (2002). The interplay of meaning, sound & syntax in language production. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 442472.
  • Wallot, S., & Van Orden, G. (in press). Grounding language performance in the anticipatory dynamics of the body. Ecological Psychology.
  • Zbilut, J. P. (2004). Unstable singularities and randomness: Their importance in the complexity of physical, biological and social sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.