• Anderson, J. R.(1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Anderson, J. R. (2005). Human symbol manipulation within an integrated cognitive architecture. Cognitive Science, 29(3), 313341.
  • Anderson, J. R. (2007). How can the human mind occur in the physical universe? New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Anderson, A. H., Bader, M., Bard, E. G., Boyle, E., Doherty, G., Garrod, S., Isard, S., Kowtko, J., McAllister, J., Miller, J., Sotillo, C., Thompson, H. S., & Weinert, R. (1991). The HCRC Map Task Corpus. Language and Speech, 34(4), 351366.
  • Anderson, J. R., & Schooler, L. J. (1991). Reflections of the environment in memory. Psychological Science, 2(6), 396408.
    Direct Link:
  • Arnold, J. E., & Griffin, Z. M. (2007). The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: Everyone counts. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(4), 521536.
  • Bard, E. G., Anderson, A. H., Sotillo, C., Aylett, M. P., Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Newlands, A. (2000). Controlling the intelligibility of referring expressions in dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(1), 122.
  • Brennan, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(6), 14821493.
  • Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22(1), 139.
  • Dale, R., & Reiter, E. (1995). Computational interpretations of the Gricean maxims in the generation of referring expressions. Cognitive Science, 19(2), 233263.
  • Garrod, S., & Anderson, A. (1987). Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination. Cognition, 21(2), 181218.
  • Garrod, S., & Doherty, G. (1994). Conversation, co-ordination and convention: An empirical investigation of how groups establish linguistic conventions. Cognition, 53, 181215.
  • Gonzalez, C., Lerch, F. J., & Lebiere, C. (2003). Instance-based learning in real-time dynamic decision making. Cognitive Science, 27(4), 591635.
  • Goudbeek, M., Krahmer, E., & Swerts, M. (2009). Alignment of (dis)preferred properties during the production of referring expressions. In Proceedings of PRE-CogSci 2009: Production of referring expressions: Bridging the gap between computational and empirical approaches to reference. July 29, Amsterdam.
  • Guhe, M. (2007a). Incremental conceptualization for language production. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Guhe, M. (2007b). Marking theme and rheme in preverbal messages. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Computational Semantics IWCS-7, January 10–12 (pp. 330333). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University.
  • Guhe, M., & Bard, E. G. (2008a). Adapting referring expressions to the task environment. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 24042409). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Guhe, M., & Bard, E. G. (2008b). Adapting the use of attributes to the task environment in joint action: Results and a model. In Proceedings of Londial – The 11th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (pp. 9198).
  • Jordan, P. W., & Walker, M. A. (2005). Learning content selection rules for generating object descriptions in dialogue. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 24, 157194.
  • Kelleher, J. D. (2007). DIT – Frequency based incremental attribute selection for GRE. In Proceedings of the MT Summit XI Workshop Using Corpora for Natural Language Generation: Language Generation and Machine Translation (UCNLG + MT pp. 9091). Available at
  • Newell, A. (1973). You can’t play 20 questions with nature and win: Projective comments on the papers of this symposium. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 283308). New York: Academic Press.
  • Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition: The William James lectures, 1987. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1963). GPS: A program that simulates human thought. In E. Feigenbaum & J. Feldmann (Eds.), Computers and thought (pp. 279293). New York: McGraw–Hill.
  • Paraboni, I., van Deemter, K., & Masthoff, J. (2007). Generating referring expressions: Making referents easy to identify. Computational Linguistics, 33(2), 229254.
  • Pechmann, T. (1989). Incremental speech production and referential overspecification. Linguistics, 27, 98110.
  • Pickering, M., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(2), 169226.
  • Reitter, D., Moore, J. D., & Keller, F. (2006). Priming of syntactic rules in task-oriented dialogue and spontaneous conversation. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 685690). Vancouver, BC.
  • Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations and the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning: II. Current research and theory (pp. 6499). New York: Appleton–Century–Crofts.
  • Steedman, M. (1995). Computational aspects of the theory of grammar. In L. R. Gleitman & M. Liberman (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science: Language (2nd ed., vol. 1, pp. 247281). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Steedman, M. (2000). The syntactic process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998). Reinforcement learning: An introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Taatgen, N. A., & Wallach, D. (2002). Whether skill acquisition is rule or instance based is determined by the structure of the task. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 2(2), 163204.
  • Thórisson, K. R. (1994). Situated perceptual groupings: An application to human–computer interaction. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 876881).
  • Widrow, B., & Hoff, M. E. (1960). Adaptive switching circuits. In 1960 IRE WESCON convention report (pp. 96104). New York: Institute of Radio Engineers.