SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ahonen A (2004) The socio-economic effects of the use of forest chips from logging residues and small-sized trees in energy production, case-study. Research and Development Centre of Kajaani, Working Papers 47.
  • Alakangas E, Heikkinen A, Lensu T, Vesterinen P (2007) Biomass fuel trade in Europe. Summary Report VTTR0350807, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Jyväskylä, Finland.
  • Börjesson P, Gustavsson L (1996) Biomass transportation. Renewable Energy, 9, 10331036.
  • Bosch J, Johnson FX, Mertens R, Roubanis N, Loesoenen P, Gikas A, Görten J (2007) Panorama of energy. Energy statistics to support EU policies and solutions. In: Eurostat Statistical Books. (eds BoschJ, MertensR), pp. 1178. Eurostat, European Communities, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
  • Chum Hl, Overend RP (2001) Biomass and renewable fuels. Fuel Processing Technology, 71, 187195.
  • Cowie Al, David Gardner W (2007) Competition for the biomass resource: greenhouse impacts and implications for renewable energy incentive schemes. Biomass and Bioenergy, 31, 601607.
  • Davis LS, Johnson KN, Davis KP (1987) Forest Management. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • Dove WT, Boustead I (1998) The effect of sulphur on primary zinc eco profile calculations. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Ecobalance, pp. 413–416.
  • European Commission (1997) Energy for the future: Renewable sources of energy. White Paper for a Community Strategy and Action Plan. COM(97)599 final, Brussels.
  • European Commission (2005) Impact Assessment Guidelines. SEC (2005) 791, Brussels.
  • European Commission (2007) Renewable energy road map. Renewable energies in the 21st century: building a more sustainable future. COM (2006) 848 final, Brussels.
  • European Environment Agency (2007) Environmentally Compatible Bio-Energy Potential from European Forests. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
  • Eggers J, Tröltzsch K, Falcucci A et al. (2009) Is biofuel policy harming biodiversity in Europe? GCB Bioenergy, 1, 1834.
  • Egnell G, Valinger E (2003) Survival, growth, and growth allocation of planted Scots pine trees after different levels of biomass removal in clear-felling. Forest Ecology and Management, 177, 6574.
  • Ewert F, Van Ittersum MK, Bezlepkina I et al. (2009) A methodology for enhanced flexibility of integrated assessment in agriculture. Environmental science & policy, 12, 546561.
  • Faaij AP (2006) Bio-energy in Europe: changing technology choices. Energy Policy, 34, 322342.
  • Hakkila P (1989) Utilization of Residual Forest Biomass. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
  • Hakkila P (2003) Developing technology for large scale production of forest chips: Wood energy technology programme 1999–2003. Interim Report, Technology Programme Report 5/2003, Tekes.
  • Hakkila P (2006) Factors driving the development of forest energy in Finland. Biomass and Bioenergy, 30, 281288.
  • Hall DO, Scrase JI (1998) Will biomass be the environmentally friendly fuel of the future? Biomass and Bioenergy, 15, 357367.
  • Hall JP (2001) Criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 67, 109119.
  • Hawkings W (2009) Forest biomass and wood pellet price indications. Forest Energy Monitor, 1, 123.
  • Heikkilä J, Laitila J, Tanttu V, Lindblad J, Sirén M, Asikainen A (2006) Harvesting alternatives and cost factors of delimbed energy wood. Forestry Studies, 45, 4956.
  • Heikkilä J, Sirén M, Äijälä O (2007) Management alternatives of energy wood thinning stands. Biomass and Bioenergy, 31, 255266.
  • Heinimö J, Alakangas E (2006) Solid and Liquid Biofuels Markets in Finland – A Study on International Biofuels Trade. Lappeenranta University of Technology and VTT, Lappeenranta.
  • Howell CI, Wilson AD, Davey SM, Eddington MM (2008) Sustainable forest management reporting in Australia. Ecological Indicators, 8, 123130.
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2006) IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. IPCC Publications, Kanagawa, Japan.
  • Joelsson A, Gustavsson L (2008) District heating and energy efficiency in detached houses of differing size and construction. Applied Energy, 86, 126134.
  • Kangas J, Kangas A (2005) Multiple criteria decision support in forest management–the approach, methods applied, and experiences gained. Forest Ecology and Management, 207, 133143.
  • Karltun E, Saarsalmi A, Ingerslev M et al. (2008) Wood ash recycling possibilities and risks. In: Sustainable Use of Forest Biomass for Energy. A Synthesis with Focus on the Baltic and Nordic Region (eds RöserD, AsikainenA, Raulund-RasmussenK, StupakI), pp. 79108. Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Laitila J (2006) Cost and sensitive analysis tools for forest energy procurement chains. Forestry Studies, 45, 510.
  • Laitila J, Ranta T, Asikainen A (2008) Productivity of Stump Harvesting for Fuel. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 19, 3747.
  • Lindner M, Suominen T, Palosuo T, Garcia-Gonzales J, Verweij P, Zudin S, Päivinen R (in press) ToSIA – a tool for sustainability impact assessment of forest-wood-chains. Ecological Modelling, doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.08.006 (Accessed 5 October 2009).
  • Marland G, Schlamadinger B (1995) Biomass fuels and forest-management strategies: how do we calculate the greenhouse-gas emissions benefits? Energy, 20, 11311140.
  • Nas TF (1996) Cost–Benefit Analysis: Theory and Application. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.
  • Nurmi J (1999) The storage of logging residue for fuel. Biomass and Bioenergy, 17, 4147.
  • Päivinen R, Lindner M, Rosén K, Lexer MJ (in press) A concept for assessing sustainability impacts of forestry-wood chains. European Journal of Forest Research.
  • Palander T, Vesa L, Tokola T, Pihlaja P, Ovaskainen H (2009) Modelling the stump biomass of stands for energy production using a harvester data management system. Biosystems Engineering, 102, 6974.
  • Palosuo T, Peltoniemi M, Mikhailov A, Komarov A, Faubert P, Thuerig E, Lindner M (2008) Projecting effects of intensified biomass extraction with alternative modelling approaches. Forest Ecology and Management, 255, 14231433.
  • Palosuo T, Suominen T, Werhahn-Mees W, Lindner M (in press) Assigning results of the tool for sustainability impact assessment (ToSIA) to products of a forest-wood-chain. Ecological Modelling, doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.03.020 (Accessed 21 April 2010).
  • Powers RF, Scott DA, Sanchez FG, Voldseth RA, Page-Dumroese D, Elioff JD, Stone DM (2005) The North American long-term soil productivity experiment: findings from the first decade of research. Forest Ecology and Management, 220, 3150.
  • Rametsteiner E, Berg S, Laurijssen J et al. (2008) EFORWOOD Project Deliverable 1.1.6: Revised FWC-Sustainability Indicator Set Document. BOKU, Vienna.
  • Raulund-Rasmussen K, Stupak I, Clarke N, Callesen I, Helmisaari H-S, Karltun E, Varnagiryte-Kabasinskiene I (2008) Effects of very intensive forest biomass harvesting on short and long term site productivity. In: Sustainable Use of Forest Biomass for Energy. A synthesis with Focus on the Baltic and Nordic Region (eds RöserD, AsikainenA, Raulund-RasmussenK, StupakI), pp. 2978. Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Richardson J (2006) Sustainable production systems for bioenergy: impacts on forest resources and utilization of wood for energy. Biomass and Bioenergy, 30, 279280.
  • Rogner H-H, Zhou D, Bradley R et al. (2007) Introduction. In: Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds MetzB, DavidsonOr, BoschPr, DaveR, MeyerLa), pp. 95116. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Röser D, Pasanen K, Asikainen A (2006) Decision-support program “EnerTree” for analyzing forest residue recovery options. Biomass and Bioenergy, 30, 326333.
  • Samuelsson H (2002) Recommendations for the extractions of forest fuel and compensation fertilising. National Board of Forestry (Skogsstyrelsen), Meddelande, 3-2002, 129.
  • Sathre R, Gustavsson L (2006) Energy and carbon balances of wood cascade chains. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 47, 332355.
  • Sheehan JJ (2009) Biofuels and the conundrum of sustainability. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 20, 318324.
  • Stupak I, Asikainen A, Jonsell M et al. (2007) Sustainable utilisation of forest biomass for energy – possibilities and problems: policy, legislation, certification, and recommendations and guidelines in the Nordic, Baltic, and other European countries. Biomass and Bioenergy, 31, 666684.
  • Sverdrup H, Rosen K (1998) Long-term base cation mass balances for Swedish forests and the concept of sustainability. Forest Ecology and Management, 110, 221236.
  • Thek G, Obernberg I (2004) Wood pellet production costs under Austrian and in comparison to Swedish framework conditions. Biomass and Bioenergy, 27, 671693.
  • Tilman D, Socolow R, Foley JA et al. (2009) Beneficial Biofuels – The Food, Energy, and Environment Trilemma. Science, 325, 270271.
  • Trømborg E, Bolkesjø TF, Solberg B (2008) Biomass market and trade in Norway: status and future prospects. Biomass and Bioenergy, 32, 660671.
  • Tscherning K, König B, Schößer B, Helming K, Sieber S (2008) Ex-ante impact assessments (IA) in the European commission – an overview. In: Sustainability Impact Assessment of Land Use Changes (eds HelmingK, Pérez-SobaM, TabbushP), pp. 1733. Springer, Berlin.
  • Verkerk PJ, Lindner M, Zanchi G, Zudin S (2009) Assessing impacts of intensified biomass removal on deadwood in European forests. Ecological Indicators, doi:DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.04.004 (Accessed 4 June 2009).
  • Wihersaari M (2005a) Evaluation of greenhouse gas emission risks from storage of wood residue. Biomass and Bioenergy, 28, 444453.
  • Wihersaari M (2005b) Greenhouse gas emissions from final harvest fuel chip production in Finland. Biomass and Bioenergy, 28, 435443.